But Diaz is coming off of a loss and a suspension, and I'm sorry, lost convincingly to Condit, a guy who GSP dominated for 24 of the 25 minutes they fought.
Lost convincingly to you, but there's a good portion of the MMA community (and I'd say 50% if not more) who think Diaz won that fight. You can make the argument Diaz lost, but you can not say he CONVINCINGLY lost. That fight is perhaps the most debated decision in the history of MMA.
Usually, guys who fight for titles come off of wins.
It's not unusual in Boxing.
At the end of the day, Diaz is 12-1 in his last 13 fights, with that one loss being a controversial decision. Doesn't sound to me like him getting a title shot is really that big of an injustice.
I don't think GSP/Hendricks would be a snoozefest at all. GSP has to be perfect for 25 minutes as we all know he wouldn't finish Hendricks. All Hendricks has to do is plant a punch on GSP's chin. That actually sounds pretty exciting to me.
That's all Koscheck, Dan Hardy, Condit, and Thiago Alves had to do, too. But they weren't very successful, were they? GSP will never let what happened to him in the Serra fight ever happen to him again.
And if GSP/Hendricks is really a fight you want to see, then it's up to Hendricks to make it happen. All he has to do is win one more fight.
You could sell GSP vs. a broom and at least 500,000 Canadians would still buy the card. The build to the Condit fight wasn't great and it still did 700,000 to 800,000 buys.
But Diaz is still the bigger draw, and it's the fight GSP wants. Don't you think GSP deserves to pick who he wants to fight out of these two names? It's not like he's saying he'll never fight Hendricks... he just wants to fight Diaz first. Now, if GSP beats Diaz and Hendricks wins his next fight and then GSP wants to fight another Welterweight, I'll be right on the same side as you arguing that horse shit. But Hendricks having to wait a few extra months and winning one more time for a title shot is no big deal. Like I said earlier, if he's championship material, then he should have no problem fighting once more.
Nick Diaz mumbling his way through press conferences isn't inspiring either.
Diaz is a top 3 best interview in the sport, bar none. He's so unintentionally hilarious that you have something golden every time someone puts a microphone in his face.
What? Diaz robbed himself out of that shot. What was the other one?
Missing a press conference months before the fight itself is not a legitimate reason to take a title shot away from someone (not that he would have gotten it anyway since GSP got injured before the event), and then when Diaz vs. GSP was set-up again, GSP got injured. That's twice Diaz didn't get his fight with GSP. "Robbed" might not be the best way to describe it, but he's owed a fight against GSP, and GSP is owed a fight against Diaz.
Fitch is not a glass jaw and he's proven in fights over the years that he can take a punch.
I disagree, but whatever. Even if Fitch's chin is iron, that was still a lucky punch that he wouldn't be able to get in another fight against him.
Kampmann never actually got dropped though. He gets rocked every fight and he has low fight IQ but he's also a finisher and had impressive wins over top guys at 170 lbs. Going into the Hendricks fight he was a top 3 guy. He derailed Jake Ellenberger, and he brings it in every fight.
Kampmann's win over Thiago was the luckiest win in MMA history due to Alves' stupidity, and Ellenberger is overrated as shit. Kampmann is a journeyman in this sport and always will be. He'll never truly be a contender.
You're in the minority. Quick KOs impress the masses and that makes the fact that Hendricks is getting passed over even more mind boggling. A win is a win and Hendricks has three in a row over top 5 fighters. He's earned his shot.
Let's say you're right... he earned the shot, why not earn it again with just one more win? "He shouldn't have to" is not a legitimate excuse.
Because he shouldn't have to.
Most people who succeed in their profession end up having to do something that they shouldn't have to in order to get what they want. It's life. One fight isn't a big deal.
Nick routinely fought guys like Male Cyborg, KJ Noons, Paul Daley, and Scott "Brains of Shit" Smith in Strikeforce. And guys like Sakurai and Zaromskis in DREAM. None of them are top guys, and when he fought BJ, BJ was in complete "don't give a shit" mode.
All of those guys have one thing in common, they're not wrestlers.
He's still 12-1 in his last 13 fights and the most exciting fighter in the division. GSP vs. Diaz is simply the best fight available to make right now and it's the fight the champion, the fans, and the office wants. At the end of the day... that's all that matters.
Like I've said from the beginning, if I was the one in charge, Diaz and Hendricks would be fighting each other in February, but if GSP wants to fight sooner rather than later (the date I'm hearing is 4/20... which is just too perfect), then you set up the fight that will most benefit everyone, and GSP vs. Diaz with Hendrick co-headlining against a contender is the best way to go.
Also, for the record, if Hendricks vs. GSP was happening and Diaz got stuck fighting Koscheck or Rory or Condit again... I would completely understand it and I wouldn't bitch for a second. So I do see the side of the fence you're coming from, but Diaz vs. GSP is the fight I and 90% of the MMA fans out there want to see. I know Hendricks is "deserving," but I absolutely do think Diaz has done enough to still warrant a title shot when it's something almost everyone wants to see.