Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I think when you watch the Vikings play, it's obvious the Vikings problems are much deeper than who the QB is.
I don't expect Brad Childress to be coaching the Vikings next week.
Redskins win a game no one ultimately seemed to care about. The Titans Defense just fell apart with frustration it seemed.
Any videos of that Seymour hit on Big Ben get uploaded yet? That was awesome.
This is true on both counts but shouldn't they at least have Jackson in there to get some experience with the offense and just see what he can do? What's the worst that can happen, they lose even worse than 28 points?
This is true on both counts but shouldn't they at least have Jackson in there to get some experience with the offense and just see what he can do? What's the worst that can happen, they lose even worse than 28 points?
[YOUTUBE]pFGLmKrOeQ0[/YOUTUBE]
In unrelated news, Jimmie Johnson won his 5th straight NASCAR championship.
The QB is undoubtedly the most important position on the field, but no QB, whether it's Favre, Jackson or Rosenfeld, can overcome an entire team hating the coach, the loss of your three receivers, and a mediocre defense.
In unrelated news, Jimmie Johnson won his 5th straight NASCAR championship.
You mean the 3-7 Cleveland Browns? Good point.The Cleveland Browns would argue that opinion.
I think Dallas is showing to be a good example of what the coach means in the NFL. I'm sure the Vikings are thinking if Childress is gone, and they get a new coach, Favre can still lead them to the promised land. You also have to remember the Vikings have basically been without their three receivers all year long, and the Vikings defense hasn't been half of what it was last year.
The QB is undoubtedly the most important position on the field, but no QB, whether it's Favre, Jackson or Rosenfeld, can overcome an entire team hating the coach, the loss of your three receivers, and a mediocre defense.
You mean the 3-7 Cleveland Browns? Good point.
Missing your two best linebackers doesn't help either.
Who says he won't be out there next year though? That's what the point. With a new coach, perhaps the team changes directions, and Favre comes back for another year.As a Cowboys fan, amen.
As for the Vikings, if they're that bad with Favre out there and with the season having been lost for weeks now, why have Favre out there if he's not going to be the starter next year other than keeping the streak alive?
Because the entire team wants him to be. Because the entire team thinks he still gives the Vikes the best chance to win.Jackson hasn't really played in what, a year and a half now? Let him get some rhythm with the offense and experience with the season lost. That's the part I don't understand: why, other than the streak, is Favre still playing?
Because the vikings are on a series of one year basis. They're going for broke now, and maybe next year. After that, they're going to have to completely gut their roster, and start again.This is true. In that case, why have Favre out there when you can give Jackson 6 games of experience for next year?
And they've lost their last two, and I haven't heard any commotion about the coach. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, they LIKE their coach.Point being, Colt McCoy has won them 2 of those 3.. in other words, the QB change seems to have at least partly helped them win the majority of the games they've won. He's managed the games better than either Delhomme or Wallace.
And have lost two straight, and won those game by playing for a coach they like, I do believe.Of course their Defense is the bigger reason, however the argument you were making is that a QB change doesn't turn a team around - McCoy was inserted, and they won 2 more games with him than either of the other two guys they had starting.
The Colts defense is rarely better than "above average".Brady is shredding my Colts defense....not that shocking though since our defense is barely above average.