TNA Victory Road: In Your House

[X]

As I said, the text of UFC's most recent lawsuit effectively disproves this. The urban myth that watching is perfectly legal will probably never die on the internet, if only because bringing a prosecution against somebody for viewing an illegal stream is near impossible.

It's not a myth. It's the truth. UFC's latest lawsuit does nothing to disprove this as they are not going to be able or permitted to prosecute thousands of stream-watchers for watching a stream. Their lawsuit is only going to affect the people streaming the shows and the site hosting that streaming. Their lawsuit does absolutely nothing to any stream watchers.

Go find me, right now, the law in which it says that watching a stream of copyrighted material is illegal. I'll wait. You're not going to find it.

 

[ABMorales787]

Fayetteville!

 

[Nate DaMac]

Nothing is working for Anderson. He is failing.

 

[Hyorinmaru]

So what is this?, your best Stormy impression

Sure why not.

 

[klunderbunker]

They're grasping at whatever straws grasp at to make this have a backstory people will care about.

 

[Unsold Bacon]

Rvd parkour?

 

[ABMorales787]

Something happened to the Dixietron.

 

[Serious Mozzarella]

Wow, RVD really needs to not take his sweet ass time coming out to the ramp when his music hits and be as uncharismatic as he can possibly be.

Do these fucking people realize that this is a PAY PER VIEW?

 

[Hyorinmaru]

It may be the RVD mark in me or the fact I find Anderson annoying as shit but I hope RVD wins this match.



Knowing TNA it'll probably end up with both of them getting the title shot though.

 

[justinsayne]

They're grasping at whatever straws grasp at to make this have a backstory people will care about.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand failing...again

 

[Alastor]

i tune in just in time to see Anderson calling himself an asshole. Not the same as calling yourself a tough sob.

 

[justinsayne]

an arena full of TNA fans screaming "We are assholes"

 

[Serious Mozzarella]

Hm. I wonder if TNA is actually trying to make a statement about the "assholes" thing, or if they just want to get the crowd to chant "WE ARE ASSHOLES" to everyone else's amusement.

 

[Hyorinmaru]

Taz & Teney are killing me tonight.

 

[X]

By the way, took this from an article on the UFC lawsuit Gelgarin:

UFC is claiming that users of the Justin.TV and UStream services have streamed UFC pay-per-view events to thousands of viewers, costing the fighting league revenue. The lawsuit is seeking the IP addresses of those users who made the protected content available to others. So they’re going after the distributors, not the viewers, which makes sense.

So I have no clue what the fuck you're talking about by bringing up this lawsuit, when it only backs up what I'm saying about only the streamers being targeted.

Hopefully this is good. RVD and Anderson don't really have much chemistry if I remember though.

 

[Nate DaMac]

Why does the crowd insist on telling RVD that they are assholes?

 

[Pepe Silvia]

And why the f is that crap taking up PPV time?????????????????????????

Why the f were all of those question marks necessary for you to epress that you're being inquisitive?

 

[X]

Hm. I wonder if TNA is actually trying to make a statement about the "assholes" thing, or if they just want to get the crowd to chant "WE ARE ASSHOLES" to everyone else's amusement.

That chant cracks me the fuck up every single time. I almost died laughing when I first heard it. Only in TNA would that chant exist, really.

 

[UltimateHitman]

Why the f were all of those question marks necessary for you to epress that you're being inquisitive?

Just one of many forms of emphasis, my dear lad.

Now pour me a bowl of that cereal like a good boy.

 

[Serious Mozzarella]

Eh, RVD doesn't need to jump that high. He's high enough as it is. Anderson's cool with taking his dick and balls right to the face.

 

[ABMorales787]

RVD's been great so far.

 

[Gelgarin]

I already did. The text of UFC's lawsuit clearly states that people are "illegally" watching these streams. This will constitute a legal precedent. I'm not going to look through the text of international copywrite legislation, nor am I going to read through ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC vs Film On or the dozens of similer lawsuits that have made similar provisions. They exist.

Want more, when you watch a film or ppv online it's not like looking through a person's window; the data still makes a home on your computer. As such file sharing legislation could easily be applied.

 

[Pepe Silvia]

Just one of many forms of emphasis, my dear lad.

Now pour me a bowl of that cereal like a good boy.

So you couldn't have placed the same amount of emphasis on your inquisitive nature with between two and five?

Every time someone does that shit, Mike V thinks it's okay to POST LIKE THIS IN THE LDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

 

[Hyorinmaru]

I already did. The text of UFC's lawsuit clearly states that people are "illegally" watching these streams. This will constitute a legal precedent. I'm not going to look through the text of international copywrite legislation, nor am I going to read through ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC vs Film On or the dozens of similer lawsuits that have made similar provisions. They exist.

Want more, when you watch a film or ppv online it's not like looking through a person's window; the data still makes a home on your computer. As such file sharing legislation could easily be applied.

I tried to be nice but for the love of GOD wil you please shut the fuck up already?

That goes for anyone bring up the legality of streaming as well.

 

[Serious Mozzarella]

I already did. The text of UFC's lawsuit clearly states that people are "illegally" watching these streams. This will constitute a legal precedent.

A legal precedent that's not going to legally allow companies to do anything about it? How strange.