The Holy One
What's really good?
I truly wonder if Daniels can have a decent feud without it involving AJ.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Foley recently with TNA.
Hart in WCW. Who cares if it was a disaster? He still shit talked his own company.
If they were drawing like they were? No. That's the thing though: what has Hardy drawn?
If they were drawing like they were? No. That's the thing though: what has Hardy drawn?
Wasn't he gone for most of that though?
And WCW kept Hart and Hall under contract and went under. What are you trying to prove?
I suggest you do some research on your boy then, because HBK was the biggest scumbag in the locker room during the late 90's with WWE.
All I'm saying regarding Hardy and those like him is that superstars are worth more headaches than non-draws or non-superstars. Yes, there is a breaking point, and that breaking point is different for every star depending on the severity of it, the fallout, the event it occurs in, the exposure, etc. etc. but no way in hell do I simply fire guys who do something wrong simply because they did something wrong.
Should Samoa Joe have been fired for his shoot at No Surrender 2006?
Its one thing to be "the biggest scumbag in the locker room", I wouldn't find fault with this statement. But I think I would take this over a guy who has an extended drug history, likely including trafficking (sure, yet to be proven), and a guy who shows up for the main event of a PPV too stoned to compete.
Enough for TNA (you know, the people who actually know the answer to that question) to want to bring him back after victory road.
Matt Hardy proves that TNA don't have a problem cutting people if they are judged to be risk over reward, they have made to opposite conclusion with Jeff. Other than being holier than thou, what is the logic behind you questioning their conclusion?
You are right Habs, Jeff Hardy was never an egomaniac asshole.
That Jeff's incident was much more public and publicly damaging than Matt's. Jeff's happened in front of the cameras, which isn't something that happens with most of these. That makes it different.
That your "no tolerance" rule to guys who screw up being fired would result in your company with a very thin roster.
...how many more exposed and big situations have their been than Jeff's issue? I can't think of any.
Was that a shoot or a work? Legit question. Also wasn't that against Hall more than the company? (I legit don't remember it that well so I could be way off).
How?
If anyone here is honestly arguing that drawing power should make a difference, see Sheen, Charlie. HUGE draw on his show but his ass was canned when he started embarrassing the network and his show with his behavior. That's EXACTLY what Jeff Hardy did. He embarrassed the company by showing up and trying to compete in the condition he was in on a show that people paid good money to see. If there are people that honestly can't see that as grounds for termination, I can't help you.
While it's true that others have had problems that are generally accepted as true, how many truly made them public? Jeff should NEVER have been brought back, unless MAYBE he got proactive and the day after his debacle he checked himself into rehab. He didn't do that though (not to my knowledge anyway and I feel like if he did, it would have been reported), so he's being brought back with a court case still pending and no guarantee that his life is any better. Risk absolutely outweighs reward but with "new" guys in big spots on BFG, TNA didn't want to take chances by having all "non draws" so they brought back Hardy for the show. I personally find it appalling.