There are so many things wrong with this post, I'm not even going to bother telling you how stupid it is.
But I will, and I'll do it in a NUMBERED LIST!
Who's this "Coco" loser? Never heard of them, but if his/her post got deleted, it was because he/she violated the rules. Who's to say the vote wasn't counted? And if it was, 1 vote means fuck all when the matchup was decided by much more then 1 vote.
I was only going to bold your mistakes, but this paragraph was just one giant fuck up.
1) Don't be glib, you know exactly who Coco is. I know you do on the account that you have stated your hatred towards him on numerous occasions.
2) You switch from the plural in them to singular in his/her and he/she.
3) Who's to say the vote wasn't counted? How about Lee? Not to mention the fact that the vote wasn't counted.
4) It's been proven that had Coco's vote not been deleted other members would have been more willing to vote. However, because of Lee's tyrannical way of running the tournament, they withheld from voting.
making the finals count only with a non-spam post was smart, because it eliminated the idea of people campaigning for votes, or anything like that. If you like a game better, give a valid reason why you liked it better without being a fucking dick and your vote is good. If you don't give a valid reason (such as this GAME is better because of the boxart) and/or you act like a dick your vote isn't counted. Nor should it be, because it violates the rules clearly posted in the OP.
1) How does it eliminate the idea of campaigning votes? People can still PM other people asking them to go vote for the game of their choice. I think what eliminated the threat of people campaigning for votes was the fact that it's a fucking video game tournament.
2) Who are you to say what a valid reason is or not? Are you the king of video game analysis? No? You're just some douchebag with an internet connection? Well then, don't you look silly?
3) Coco wasn't acting like a dick, which you'd know if you read the post. He simply stated that Mario Kart's cover art was more tantalizing than the plain cover art of Zelda, and therefore he was more likely to pick up and enjoy the game. You come off as much more of a dick in this post than Coco did in his video game tournament post.
4) Let's review the rules... shall we?
1) There will be no poll, votes will only be accepted with a non spam post. In order to have your vote counted it MUST have Vote: *Game title* in bold. You can only vote once and must follow that pattern. Just putting the game name in bold won't do.
2) If a post is classed as spam your vote will not be counted as will troll posts.
3) If you get banned or imprisoned your vote will not count.
4) Flaming will also result in your vote being unaccounted for.
5) The deadline is Wednesday 20th July at 10pm British Summer Time which is 5pm EST.
6) In the event of a draw the organisers of the tournament will pick the winner.
The only rule that Coco even arguably broke was rule two, but once again, that's bullshit. Lee said it was a troll vote not because he thought it was a trolling attempt but because he was mad that Coco voted for the game he didn't want to win in a way that he didn't approve of. Oversensitivity and unfounded vote tampering made this the absolute worst tournament in the history of WrestleZone forums.
On a totally unrelated note, I'd like to point out that Lee closed and archived the entire tournament immediately after the voting was closed, probably to prevent people from discussing how the entire thing was one giant lie.
