Agreed. I just think the point needs to be made that the sweeping generalizations that can be taken from your post need to be debunked. The WWE is bad rather often (normally on Mondays...), but not even close to all the time. I think you give them too little credit.
On the othe hand, some people give them too much.
So I'm setting myself up for a never ending argument with everyone who doesn't see the middle ground that I do. At least it'll help boost my post count.
Granted, and I'll do what I can to refine my broader generalizations in the future so as to avoid this kind of banter.
As for not giving the company enough credit... I actually give them a lot of credit, for
Smackdown, which I watch regularly. NXT, however, I gave up on mid-way through (a barrel/keg carrying contest
really?) and RAW is a weekly shit show for the most part. RAW is still the flagship show, which is probably why my posts seem so vehement to the company as a whole, and not necessarily toward said particular brand.
1) Gabriel's never dealt with rejection like he did last Tuesday. Who are we to assume how it would wear on him? We know nothing about him.
2) Gabriel showed a moment of what could be considered contemplation when he was on the top rope last night. An intelligent writer might make use of it to establish Gabriel's character and motivations, and maybe even make him one of the early defectors from the faction.
See, this is what I mean when I talk about you lacking vision and creativity. It's not the huge jump that you're pretending it is. Do I think it'll work out this way? Probably not. WWE lack the storytelling ability these days. But at this point, it's a storyline stock full of potential.
But it still doesn't make much sense seeing as he didn't even show so much as a snippet of dejection or anger when being voted off. A small case of disappointment, perhaps, but since when is a single act of disappointment that's followed by an exit-interview done ultra babyface style grounds for a guy to turn in the course of a week? When has this ever been done (successfully) before?
That moment of what could be considered contemplation read to me more as a moment of pride for him. He looked down on Cena and stood slowly to let the world know what was coming and that there wasn't going to be any mercy or so much as a second thought to it. Were that Danielson, I might be inclined to believe it. Hell, if that were Matt Hardy, I'd have been OK with it since there'd actually be a logical story as to why he hit the 450 splash on his pro, but Gabriel of all people hitting it on Cena IMO made as much sense as a shit-flavored lollipop.
But I do. I give every product the credit it deserves based on what it puts out, not my pre-conceived bias. I do the same with posters. I don't seek to shit on anyone. But when they objectively earn it, why shouldn't I?
But this is another issue entirely. Perhaps it's best left for a different thread.
And we'll leave it as such. I have no beef with you personally, so I'd rather not degrade the discussion with ad hominem insults and non sequiturs.
Daniel Bryan has been a babyface maintaining his grace at times while shitting on the WWE establishment at others. Why is it so hard to believe other faces could do the same?
Because Bryan had a build albeit a marginal one. His frustrations were visible to all for weeks prior to joining this group. He attacked Cole, he did shoot-style interviews talking about the WWE Machine, etc. Bryan was playing a tweener the entire time since he was eliminated. He wasn't a babyface in the same vein as Gabriel IMO, so when Gabriel all of a sudden joined forces, the idea of a renegade NXT faction lost a bit of credibility with me. Like I noted earlier, had this been a group of all the heels from NXT, I'd have no issue with it at all, but to turn a guy like Gabriel heel in literally seven days is insulting to my intelligence as an intelligent fan something RAW is notorious for doing to me on a weekly basis.