Like all champions he lost the belt but then was drafted to Raw. From this point on he went straight downhill. His first night he wanted to "make an impression" when really he just showed people he wasn't willing to wrestle Randy Orton. What's wrong with bringing a former champion in and giving him a decent, but short (being it was a gauntlet match), match with Orton to put Swagger over a little bit? Nope, they made him look like a total punk.
They got him heat but showing his refusal to make an enemy out of the top heel on the brand. Heck, another heel was involved in that match. Mark Henry. Him going after Orton caused him to get major face heat. They didn't want that for Swagger, so they went another route. There was nothing wrong with that decision. But I digress.
After all this horrible jobbing there's no question he was a lock to LOSE MITB. But he won, which wasn't a bad thing because it was unpredictable and set up a nice possible run for him. But having him win the WHC so quickly, how can we expect him to win more than even 1 title defense, even if he tries to cheat? It doesn't make sense.
I don't think anyone should doubt him. People said he wouldn't win MITB, and then that he'd be the first man to lose when cashing in. In a week, he went from doing nothing to being the top midcarder in the company to winning the top title. Don't make too much of his past losses. As far as the WWE's concerned, his mega-push this week has made up for it.
If he wins, he makes Jericho or Edge look like crap and the IWC would have a legitimate gripe about what the hell the WWE is trying to do.
No. They wouldn't. The IWC often makes too much of wins and losses. Not to mention that Jericho is a glorified JTTS and lost clean to JTG a few months about. These men can lose without it causing their heat to falter. Using that to get Swagger over is exactly what should be happening.
Besides, the IWC is hardly a majority as it is. The gripes of the IWC generally mean nothing in the big picture.
If he loses, why the hell did they give him the belt in the first place?
Want me to name some other wrestlers with first title reigns that are considered awful bby many?
Bret Hart. Triple H. The Rock. Chris Jericho. Edge. CM Punk.
How much do you hear about those short-comings these days?
If Swagger has "it," he'll rise to the top no matter how this first reign goes down. Don't sweat somebody not having a great run with a glorified prop.
Wouldn't it have been a better idea to give him that briefcase and let him rebuild his credibility?
Probably. But that's not what happened, so such arm-chair quarter-backing isn't of much use. We are where we are. And it's not quite as bad of a situation as you make it out to be.
He could start out destroying jobbers. Then move up to beating mid-carders until he finally steals the belt in the way he just did.
In an ideal world, sure. However, the slow-build has been a dead art form for a long time. I don't know why you're choosing now to be upset. Most rational people are over this.
Along the way though they'd also have to up his moveset so when he faces the main eventers there's an excuse for him to win now like he couldn't before.
Because his shoulder tackles, press slams, Vader Bomb, and finisher isn't a decent enough moveset to build a match around? It's no weaker than the moveset of some other guys floating around the top of the card and he had no problem putting on proper looking lengthy (by today's standards) bouts with Christain and Matt Hardy last year.
This is just too fast for any title defense to seem AT ALL realistic. I don't think he has a chance. Either he loses it very quickly, or he and the WWE look stupid for making this unbelievable turnaround.
Thoughts?
You're wrong. WWE has been in full-on swerve-the-internet mode for at least the last two years. This is right down their alley. Given the rules they've established surrounding major pushes in recent years, there's nothing un believable about this.