Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Morpheus, I am REALLY to believe EVERY wrestler was gone from the arena at that time? Any of us who have been to a live event knows most all of the roster that was present last night was still there until the whole show was done & over with. The whole idea that NOBODY comes out when a massive beatdown occurs has gotten extremely old over the years...I'm sure the camera guys were the last of the unbeaten employees left running the show too, right?
BillAlfonso said:Also, you guys think that they may be the reason that the Undertaker's all fucked up?
Let's not get carried away. It may feel like years to you, but it hasn't been years. Taker-Michaels, Michaels-Jericho, Cena-Batista, and so-on haven't exactly insulted anyone's intelligence from where I sit.
Seven guys who were going to be tossed out on their ear because of this NXT experiment while yesterday's developmental prospects got unconditional call-ups to the main shows aren't going to be angry enough to do something about it?
Yeah, okay.
What you think is believable seems to hold very little weight as you simply lack the imagination to make anything work.
Trust me: If they went with something as bold as tonight's ending, they can surely piece together a decent motive.
And now I wait eagerly to be proven wrong next week when we go back to business as usual (as you pointed out, tonight's show overall didn't exactly inspire confidence).
And in that same time, Hornswoggle/Khali, Hornswoggle/McMahon, Hornswoggle/Chavo, Hornswoggle/Finlay, Hornswoggle/DX.
I'm not just referring to story lines, man look at the show last night from an objective POV. Look at the "choices" that were given to the fans in the first ever "Viewers Choice" RAW. Yeah... that wasn't scripted at all. No one on earth could have predicted that Santino/Kozlov would have a dance-off, or that the crowd would vote in the "mystery opponent" who's shadow performed Matt Hardy's taunt, or that the fans would vote Kane in to face Sheamus after they had an altercation minutes before back-stage, or that John Morrison would be voted in as R-Truth's partner considering they were just a tag-team not a few months ago, etc. etc. That's the shit that insults my intelligence.
Outside of the NXT invasion, the only entertaining quality of RAW last night IMO was the promo the Miz cut about how stupid the "WWE Universe" is, because it bordered heavily on reality.
Of which a number were booked and bred as mega baby-faces a la Justin Gabriel? Yeah makes no more sense to have Gabriel or whatever that Guitar Hero Rockstar guy's name is turn heel on the stop of a dime then it did to have Anderson do the same in TNA. The fans praising this illogical bullshit are the same who condemned the Anderson turn in TNA that spells hypocrisy.
I lack the imagination to make anything work? How dare you insinuate that I have no claims to creativity or the ability to suspend my disbelief. I wonder exactly what basis are you working on that you can make such a bold statement about someone you know so very little about or is this just your way of sneaking a jab into an otherwise porous argument to as to do your best to legitimize it by getting one over on me?
That's not the point, man. The point is that it was done on the drop of a dime, and logically made very little sense.
All of a sudden John Cena doesn't have a friend in the world and no one from the back would dare come out to help him?
All of a sudden the ultra baby-face "rookies" Justin Gabriel, Skip Sheffield, etc. all angered with being eliminated from a competition turn on the company that offered them the potential for a job because they want revenge? Where was the foundation for this in Gabriel's exit interview? Did I miss it? What I heard was more along the likes of a baby face exit when he spoke about how he'd just keep trying to win a job certainly no prelude to "I'm going to snap in the coming weeks and join a renegade group who will take over" by any means.
Look, shitbird: I'm just playing by the inane rules established in the post of your's I originally quoted. You said it was the first time in years that they gave you something that didn't insult your intelligence. Did I claim the product was perfect? Not once. In another thread, I squated and took a nice, healthy shit all over the majority of last night's show because it was just as awful as you make it out to be. But to generalize to the point where nothing in the last few years hasn't insulted your intelligence is just the usual blind anti-WWE sentiment that I've come to expect from you. It weakens your arguments as a whole when you take things to such obviously untrue extremes. Try a little bit of fucking objectivity one of these times. It goes a long way.And in that same time, Hornswoggle/Khali, Hornswoggle/McMahon, Hornswoggle/Chavo, Hornswoggle/Finlay, Hornswoggle/DX.
I'm not just referring to story lines, man look at the show last night from an objective POV. Look at the "choices" that were given to the fans in the first ever "Viewers Choice" RAW. Yeah... that wasn't scripted at all. No one on earth could have predicted that Santino/Kozlov would have a dance-off, or that the crowd would vote in the "mystery opponent" who's shadow performed Matt Hardy's taunt, or that the fans would vote Kane in to face Sheamus after they had an altercation minutes before back-stage, or that John Morrison would be voted in as R-Truth's partner considering they were just a tag-team not a few months ago, etc. etc. That's the shit that insults my intelligence.
Anderson's turn came out of nowhere. Meanwhile, you have guys who expected to be given a contract being voted off of nXt, a system that can be easily viewed as flawed. Their turns have a tangible catalyst. No hypocrisy about it.Of which a number were booked and bred as mega baby-faces a la Justin Gabriel? Yeah makes no more sense to have Gabriel or whatever that Guitar Hero Rockstar guy's name is turn heel on the stop of a dime then it did to have Anderson do the same in TNA. The fans praising this illogical bullshit are the same who condemned the Anderson turn in TNA that spells hypocrisy.
I'm basing it on the fact that you lack the imagination to make one of the most straightfoward, unfuckwithable angles in recent memory work. What more proof do I need to make such a claim?I lack the imagination to make anything work? How dare you insinuate that I have no claims to creativity or the ability to suspend my disbelief. I wonder exactly what basis are you working on that you can make such a bold statement about someone you know so very little about or is this just your way of sneaking a jab into an otherwise porous argument to as to do your best to legitimize it by getting one over on me?
You're mistaking something surprising for something that doesn't make any sense. Give it time to pan out and let them have a chance to fill in the blanks before you make such broad statements.That's not the point, man. The point is that it was done on the drop of a dime, and logically made very little sense.
While I defend the move being made to secure the employment of some of the eight men who they've spent weeks and months establishing (a bold move needed given how much nXt has altered the farm system), the segment certainly wasn't perfect. Explaining this away is an issue, but that doesn't bleed over to the fact that the rookies can have very logical motivations for what they did.All of a sudden John Cena doesn't have a friend in the world and no one from the back would dare come out to help him?
Last night's storyline broke the usual formula we've come to expect on Raw, so why are you assuming it follows the usual pro-wrestling rule of "everything has to occur on-screen or it doesn't matter"?All of a sudden the ultra baby-face "rookies" Justin Gabriel, Skip Sheffield, etc. all angered with being eliminated from a competition turn on the company that offered them the potential for a job because they want revenge? Where was the foundation for this in Gabriel's exit interview? Did I miss it? What I heard was more along the likes of a baby face exit when he spoke about how he'd just keep trying to win a job certainly no prelude to "I'm going to snap in the coming weeks and join a renegade group who will take over" by any means.
I'm surprised a two-decade fan feels the need to stamp this as a "nonsense-filled" storyline so quickly when this is the same company that just gave us Ted DiBiase and IRS kidnapping a member of the A-Team and last year did a pig-pen match with Vickie Guerrero and Santino and followed it up with the gratuitous verbal lashing of Vickie by Edge.A company who wants loyal followers did a "good job" by being so ignorant with their nonsense-filled storyline, that it drove this almost 2-decade fan away? Man, I'm glad you're not my business partner! Strength in numbers is good against one man? I think it shows a true measure of a man (wrestler in this case) when you have to rely on 7 other guys to help you make a physical statement...it shows you're absolutely WEAK on your own!
So a two-decade fan who sat through Bossman crashing Show's father's funeral, Steve Austin and Triple H beating up Lita, and Triple H fucking a corpse is suddenly too soft for last night's segment?If WWE wants to put disturbing television on and drive people like myself away (who have spent thousands of dollars on their product over the years), then I guess they've accomplished getting their reaction. I'm 28, and though I'm ending my support of their product, I can be sure that when my fiance and I have children in the next few years, as they get older, WWE will NOT be an option to watch on TV until their teenage years. Looks like it will be more than just their loss of 1 fan, but a loss of a potential family spending $$ on their product. I mean, that is the driving force behind McMahon, isn't it? Money?
They have every right to be bitter considering call-ups used to go straight to the main roster while they have to jump through hoops on nXt while seven perfectly qualified prospects and thrown out on their ass. An invasion to the joke that is the current Monday Night Raw upsets the waters and gives immediate credibility to some new blood. Not to mention that, judging by activity on message boards, it has people talking.What was "brilliant" about having losing competetors tear apart the symbolic stage that real wrestlers (who WRESTLE) perform on? I don't see how 8 guys on 1 and a dismantling of the set helps them to "up" their game. Did the complete opposite for me.
Nobody running out to save someone from a mutli-man beatdown hasn't been an issue for you over the last two-decades. Exactly what was different about last night?Morpheus, I am REALLY to believe EVERY wrestler was gone from the arena at that time? Any of us who have been to a live event knows most all of the roster that was present last night was still there until the whole show was done & over with. The whole idea that NOBODY comes out when a massive beatdown occurs has gotten extremely old over the years...I'm sure the camera guys were the last of the unbeaten employees left running the show too, right?
Do I need to post actual Attitude Era segments for you to realize how stupid this statement is?Kimbfun, "disturbed" is a perfect word to describe this Attitude-era wannabe segment.
On the same night as Edge's sensless attack on Orton while Orton's arm was in a sling?It might've been the worst wrestling you've watched because it had absolutely NOTHING to do with the sport/art of wrestling.
Considering you're a two-decade long fan, I'd expect you not to be worked so easily. That look more like an actual wrestling angle than the majority of last night's show.Disappointing to expect "wrestling" & end up getting a non-racial Rodney King-like beatdown from a company who's second word in its name is "Wrestling".
It was a non-wrestling segment between one non-wrestler (the owner) and another (his son).You want a damn good ending? I remember WCW being bought-out by Vince, and EVERYONE (including myself) marked-out at Shane McMahon appearing on Nitro to claim he actually bought WCW. The SON of the owner of WWE buying out the competition right from under his dad...holy shit. Will Nitro live-on? What will happen to the wresters? THAT was a moment that any true fan can appreciate,
What talent's validity was sacrificed? The rookies got instant heat and Cena, Punk, and Gallows didn't lose any credibility.because it delivered shock without sacrificing the validity of any of the talent,
Yeah, last night's segment is definitely a sign of stale television to come..and still had the possibility of consequences we haven't seen before.
You're not smart.I'm to believe THAT is on the same level as 8 second-rate wrestlers beating down company employees and tearing apart the ring? Get real.
Look, shitbird: I'm just playing by the inane rules established in the post of your's I originally quoted. You said it was the first time in years that they gave you something that didn't insult your intelligence. Did I claim the product was perfect? Not once. In another thread, I squated and took a nice, healthy shit all over the majority of last night's show because it was just as awful as you make it out to be. But to generalize to the point where nothing in the last few years hasn't insulted your intelligence is just the usual blind anti-WWE sentiment that I've come to expect from you. It weakens your arguments as a whole when you take things to such obviously untrue extremes. Try a little bit of fucking objectivity one of these times. It goes a long way.
K'thanks.
Anderson's turn came out of nowhere. Meanwhile, you have guys who expected to be given a contract being voted off of nXt, a system that can be easily viewed as flawed. Their turns have a tangible catalyst. No hypocrisy about it.
I'm basing it on the fact that you lack the imagination to make one of the most straightfoward, unfuckwithable angles in recent memory work. What more proof do I need to make such a claim?
It's not about getting one over on you. It's just about pointing out how wrong you are.
You're mistaking something surprising for something that doesn't make any sense. Give it time to pan out and let them have a chance to fill in the blanks before you make such broad statements.
If it doesn't make sense, I'll be the first to say so. But as of now, they haven't delivered a motive that doesn't make sense. So therefore, I'm willing to assume they have one that does.
If it's anything like the motivation behind Edge's turn a few weeks ago, I'll be the first to shit on it. But to jump on the storyline for not making sense at this point is jumping the gun.
While I defend the move being made to secure the employment of some of the eight men who they've spent weeks and months establishing (a bold move needed given how much nXt has altered the farm system), the segment certainly wasn't perfect. Explaining this away is an issue, but that doesn't bleed over to the fact that the rookies can have very logical motivations for what they did.
Last night's storyline broke the usual formula we've come to expect on Raw, so why are you assuming it follows the usual pro-wrestling rule of "everything has to occur on-screen or it doesn't matter"?
Agreed. I just think the point needs to be made that the sweeping generalizations that can be taken from your post need to be debunked. The WWE is bad rather often (normally on Mondays...), but not even close to all the time. I think you give them too little credit.Wrong. I said and I quote "Glad to see the WWE's finally given fans something that doesn't insult their intelligence for WHAT FEELS LIKE the first time in the last two or three years. Verbatim.
To generalize to the point where nothing in the last few years hasn't insulted my intelligence was never the intention but the emphasis was important because 90% of the show last night was childish garbage designed to entertain the mildly ******ed an intelligent fan watching that show for creative genius is the equivalent to an English major reading Green Eggs and Ham for an exercise in vocabulary.
1) Gabriel's never dealt with rejection like he did last Tuesday. Who are we to assume how it would wear on him? We know nothing about him.Anderson's turn came over the course of a month. It was fast, but made a little sense if you are willing to accept that they rushed it. Meanwhile, I have guys who expected to win a competition as a means to earn a contract being voted off of NXT turning heel because they lost yes on one hand it works, but at the very same time it makes little sense when you have guys like Gabriel cut babyface promos on their way out. At least allude to it by having them seem somewhat dejected and frustrated, no.
See above. If it's so straight forward, why was there no prelude? If it's so 'unfuckwithable', why does the logic of having a guy like Gabriel cut a babyface promo before being voted off make no sense when he comes back a week later as a heel being booed for performing a finisher that for weeks prior had the crowd cheering for him?
But I do. I give every product the credit it deserves based on what it puts out, not my pre-conceived bias. I do the same with posters. I don't seek to shit on anyone. But when they objectively earn it, why shouldn't I?It obviously is about getting one over on me since this is now the third time in this response you've insulted me directly as opposed to simply discussing this objectively you know, that thing you begged me to do up there, but don't do yourself. Defined: hypocrisy.
Daniel Bryan has been a babyface maintaining his grace at times while shitting on the WWE establishment at others. Why is it so hard to believe other faces could do the same?I just gave you a number of reasons why it makes no sense. To have the heels in the group do so would make sense to me, but a guy like Gabriel who cut a face promo on his way out joining the group out of the blue makes no sense. If this were Tarver, Otunga, etc. all upset over being cast out and all heels, I could see the logic, but to have a babyface get this upset that he turns heel on the drop of a dime is a logical farce.