I'm torn on the subject personally. Yes I remember when Cena could never lose no matter what happened but if you think about it, in 2011 Cena didn't win THAT much either. He lost to Punk, Miz and okay maybe it isn't like his current losing steak, there were moments. The problem I'm torn on is not so much Cena but Lesnar. I know I'm the very little minority but Lesnar was never anything great and from what I remember back in 2002-2004 was him mostly being shoved down our throats because he has that look. He leaves to do other stuff and then comes back and everyone goes ape shit because it's Brock Lesnar. Yes I'm sure Cena will lose to further the storyline which is entertaining but there will be a day when Cena wins again. As far as Lesnar's comment about Cena only being a star because Lesnar left is complete BS. I fully believe Cena would have done just fine regardless of Lesnar leaving. Now one can argue if Cena would have had his super Cena gimmick but there are plenty of other superstars at that time that were on the rise too, whose to say Lesnar wouldn't have gotten lost in the shuffle due to guys like Batista, Orton, HHH, Beniot, Eddie, Edge and JBL.