Are you really having this argument with me D-Man? God damn right we should let people put drugs into their OWN body if they want to, I'm of the opinion that no body or government or authority should be able to tell you what you can or can't put into or do with your OWN body. Your body is the only fucking thing in this world that is 100% truly and always your property.
LOL... I already thought of that when I stated it. That's why I mentioned heroin and didn't just say "drugs"... because then I'd be guilty, too.
However, it doesn't mean that your theory on our "bodies being our temple" gives no one else the right to help protect our physical well-being. Welcome to the world we live in. Whether you disagree with it or not, others actually give a shit if you poison yourself.
Drugs are as addictive to you as pain is to pro-wrestlers. But just because it's self-inflicted doesn't make it ok to do.
You guys are VASTLY overrating the effects of chairshots.
Not if they are unprotected chair shots. I've taken them before. They fucking hurt. BAD. How these guys took so many of them over the years behind the power of the men that swung the chairs is beyond me. It causes trauma to the brain, neck, back and spine, all in one shot.
Again, if you know how to properly deliver and sell a chairshot, these problems don't exist. Stop hiring sloppy wrestlers. How many damn chairshots have Triple H, Shawn Michaels, and the Undertaker taken in their career? What about Ric Flair? Hulk Hogan? Yet all of these guys are still alive and kicking, several in great shape and still on top of the business. Because they know how to deliver the damn spot. If you don't know how to deliver the spot without hurting yourself, don't do it, simple as that.
I couldn't agree more. But that doesn't mean these guys are going to listen to reason.
Who would Mick Foley be if he didn't take stiff chair shots, have his ear ripped off, fall through and off cages, and bleed on a constant basis in his matches? He'd be a fucking nothing. That's why someone OUTSIDE of the wrestlers' personal judgement should be making this call for them. They feel they NEED to take a
stiff chair shot to the head because they lack Triple H's, HBK's, and Undertaker's skills. That's both a bad career decision and a bad physical one. No one should allow them to make this call because none of them would give a shit and they would all continue to wrestle with a style that's detrimental towards their physcial health.
And that negates the great matches that have, how exactly? Excuse me if I want some variety in wrestling.
Did I say it "negates" them? Hell no. I still think hardcore massacre matches of the past have been awesome. But I do not feel they're ever "required" to have what you stated as being a "great" match.
As for variety, you're so bored with everything else that blood, excessive violence and gore quenches your personal thirst? To each his own, I guess.
Call me crazy, but I feel pro-wrestling has PLENTY of other ways to add "variety" to their matches besides those things.
Bullshit, that match was centered entirely around the finish with the chair shots, those chair shots managed to convey the new page that Austin had turned and set the stage for his character and the entire WWF main event scene for the rest of the damn year. Again, excuse me for wanting variety.
No, bullshit to you. The match was centered around two of (arguably) the most popular stars in pro-wrestling history colliding in a match that culminated on the greatest stage of them all. That match could've ended 90 other ways, and we would've been entertained by them all.
But I respect your opinion. I'm just waiting for the time that you actually give a fuck to respect mine.
I'm an adult, this "I watch for the STORIES!" bullshit hasn't been relevant to me since I was twelve years old D-Man. I love a good angle and story as much as the next guy, but at the end of the day I do not watch wrestling for the stories, I watch it for the WRESTLING. The in-ring product, which so happens to sometimes include dangerous spots like chair shots.
Agreed. Sometimes, when a man is thrown into the ring steps, I'm extra excited because violence is required in a pugilistic sport. But what's the difference if they take out chair shots TO THE HEAD? It's not like they're eliminating chair shots completely, or taking away the use of all other foreign objects. Jesus Christ, you act as if wrestling is going to change forever because of this one thing. Dude, chill out.
Variety D-Man. VARIETY. You can't have the same fucking match forever and ever and ever. You need hardcore things like chairshots and steel cages and gimmick matches to blow off feuds.
No, you need to become a good enough wrestler where you can entertain a crowd WITHOUT the use of chairshots to the head. There are PLENTY of other weapons that the WWE allows their wrestlers to use. Christ, let them use them!
Absolutely incorrect. Brain damage is caused by BOTCHED chair shots. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. Again, start teaching these wrestlers to properly deliver a chair shot and this problem goes away. Why is this such a hard concept to grasp?
Brain damage is caused by trauma to the head. You can lead a horse to water, but the mother fucker won't always drink. Then what? Fire them?
If you're seriously going to sit here and try to tell me that brain damage causes people to murder their family, I'm not sure what else I can say. Brain damage obviously had to do with Benoit's mental state, but you cannot connect those two things with anything other than the most circumstantial of evidence, which is what this is.
No, but I'll trust doctors and scientists that obviously know a ton more about this than you do. They ruled his murders as a result of brain damage caused by head trauma. He's taken a few stiff chair shots to the head in the past. Stiff chair shots to the head causes head trauma.
2 + 2 = 4