klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Or, I don't know, if you don't enjoy it so much you could just, ya know, not watch. It's not as if you're forced to.
This should be TNA Fans' battle cry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Or, I don't know, if you don't enjoy it so much you could just, ya know, not watch. It's not as if you're forced to.
Yeah, well... I don't know. At least there's something to discuss. Goddamn Bischoff for taking the week off. And goddamn him for giving Russo his responsibilities.Hey man, its what happens. TNA is so shit you can just keep talking about it for days
I thought I saw Mahoney too.
Then quit running angles on Impact that are from Xplosion and expect us to know about them. They talk about not seeing Magnus forever, yet he's still feuding with Terry? TELL US THAT.
This should be TNA Fans' battle cry.
Or, I don't know, if you don't enjoy it so much you could just, ya know, not watch. It's not as if you're forced to.
Simply had to log in to respond to the inane bitchfest this LD was. You guys are some of the most negative ***** I've ever seen in my life, every one of you would be giggling like school girls if the WWE decided to have a RAW with several gimmick matches, but here it's a problem? Why? Every one of them served a purpose. Sarita and Wilde had a street fight because they've been fighting backstage for weeks and feuding, Williams and Kendrick had an I Quit match to follow up their series of gimmick matches they've been having revolving around submissions and high flying, and the ladder match was for the right for the winning team to pick the next match's stipulation. All served a purpose.
The ladder match had no flow or psychology? Don't know what fuckin' ladder match you were watching KB, the one I was watching made perfect sense from start to finish and was one of the better ladder matches from either promotions in months, on par with this year's MITB match atleast, which surprise surprise, you and a bunch of other people really liked despite the MITB matches being the literal definition of a spotfest with no flow whatsoever. But hey, TNA did it, so obviously it sucks because TNA is incapable of doing anything right in some of your eyes.
Now on to Becker: Shut the fuck up. You know absolutely nothing about professional wrestling, nor have you ever. You wouldn't recognize a good wrestler if he gave you a fucking Burning Hammer, every time you post in a wrestling thread you immediately lower the IQ of that thread with your inane bullshit with absolutely no basis in fact.
Tiger: I'm with you man, fun little ladder match. It had plenty of flow, would love to hear someone explain how it didn't other than the shitty explanation of "Uhhh well I thought it didn't look like it had flow...", like, what? How do you figure? Was it when they built up each spot to be more painful than the previous? Was that the part with no flow? Was it the perfectly booked ending to the match, giving Beer Money a win and a reason for us to see them wrestle MCMG again while still not making MCMG look like crap? Was that the part that had no flow?
Thank you guys, THIS is why I don't ever come on for TNA LDs anymore, because I don't feel like hearing a bunch of *******s with too much sand in their vagina whining for two hours nonstop about every fucking thing they see on their television set. Maybe I'll return to one of these when some of you get some brains, or atleast a vagina that isn't stuffed to the brim with sand as it appears most of yours are.
Phew, that feels better. Fucking atrocious LD.
I cant even belive the TNA zealots. this fuckign show has holes in it as big as the day is long. I dont understand HOW in the fuck you could possibly defend it
You guys are some of the most negative ***** I've ever seen in my life, every one of you would be giggling like school girls if the WWE decided to have a RAW with several gimmick matches, but here it's a problem? Why? Every one of them served a purpose.
I cant even belive the TNA zealots. this fuckign show has holes in it as big as the day is long. I dont understand HOW in the fuck you could possibly defend it
Also, as I have posted on my Facebook page, really want to thank Vince Russo, Matt Conway and the team at TNA for picking up my slack and allowing me to spend some time with family and friends over an extended 4th of July break.
I think Meltzer reported that the past couple of PPVs only did like 10,000 buys. People don't have a reason to buy PPVs if they give PPV matches that they don't even promote away for free on television.
And whenever the WWE does a Raw full of gimmick matches (Raw Roulette, for example), they promote the shit out of it and rarely give away something you'd pay for. They still put on good matches.
No one is saying the show's perfect. But some of you fuckers bitch and whine about literally EVERY SINGLE MATCH, ANGLE, PROMO, and fucking SECOND of television. TNA has some holes, sure, they've got some stupid fucking angles, they're burying some talent they shouldn't be and some talentless fucks are getting pushes they don't deserve, but the way some of you are making this show out to sound you'd think I was watching WCW Thunder in 2000. TNA is not even half as bad as KB and others on here make it out to be. That MCMG-Beer Money tag match from Victory Road was far and away better than ANY tag match I have seen in the WWE in atleast two years, at LEAST. And you guys sit here shitting all over them for continuing the feud...do you have a problem with watching great wrestling or something?
Sometimes I feel like some of you aren't even wrestling fans so much as just critics.
And also to the jackass I saw in this LD bitching about the ECW invasion angle being a rip-off of the Nexus, you are a fucking moron, TNA has been planning and trying to get the ball rolling on this angle since fucking April, long before the Nexus was ever even contemplated about.
Please elaborate on these holes.
Yeah I'm sure WWE just threw that angle together at the very last second. They didn't plan that at all.
LOL, I know a lot about professional wrestling.[/qjuote]
You clearly do not, as every one of your wrestling posts proves time after time after time.
I know Angle's a hack.
Not even a paragraph into your post and you've already proven my point about you being a fucking moron when it comes to wrestling. What a shocker. Yeah, Angle sure is a hack, what with his great mic skills, amazing in-ring skills, and his ability to draw as either a face or a heel. Yeah, what a hack!
Wolfe sucks in TNA.
I'd venture to guess you've never seen a single Nigel match or promo before he arrived in TNA. His first few months were great he had several FANTASTIC matches with Kurt Angle. He's been treated like a jobber since, but that's not his fault. How has he sucked in TNA? Is it the entertaining promos he cuts? The fact that he makes the best out of a REALLY shitty situation each week?
Styles is rather good. Cena's the best in the world. Brian Kendrick sucks and likes his marijuana. I know Ravens old as shit and has been shit for years. I know no one cares about Stevie Richards unless your name is Lee. I know D-Lo Brown sucks.... O and Tommy Dreamer was never good. That results in one big fail of an angle when your biggest stae is someone who was never more than a mid carder. Success baby.
Kendrick sucks? Someone's never seen Kendrick cut a promo on his own. As for the ECW invasion angle, tell me Becker, who the fuck else would they have leading the faction other than some of their big names from the past that are employed by TNA? Sorry, would you like Stone Cold, Chris Jericho, Eddie Guerrero, and Chris Benoit to be in the faction as well?
The angle is CLEARLY focused on RVD as the main focus. Not sure how much more obvious that could be. You know, that guy that's more over than anyone in TNA and who can still put on a great match.
Where did I say WWE was innocent? That's right: I didn't. But hey, who cares about what was said or not said when you can bash a TNA critic?