It's kinda ridiculous that the staff is considering WWE.com articles as "spoilers" for the show.
That's like saying WWE spoiled Raw when they mentioned there will be a Big Show/Orton match on WWE.com. It's an advertisement, not a spoiler. Same goes with *******'s win. The purpose of the WWE.com article is to advertise *******'s appearance in the Chamber. And if we on the forum want to talk about the Chamber, we should be allowed to base our posts on WWE's advertisements. If ******* appearing in the SD Chamber is a spoiler, then WWE has been spoiling us for weeks with the advertisements that The Big Show, The Great Khali, Wade Barrett and Cody Rhodes are all going to be in the Chamber.
This is not a question, thus it will be deleted and Infracted for Spam. Please have a question, and not one about something which has already been answered.