The Triple H Thread | Page 15 | WrestleZone Forums

The Triple H Thread

What is your opinion of Triple H.?

  • I Hate Him!

  • I'm not a fan of his

  • Neutral: Don't like or hate him

  • He's okay, not the greatest

  • He's The King of Kings!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Pro H'ers claim that H put over Shelton Benjamin and say this makes him a good guy. Well just like you said above, those were fluke wins where Shelton had to roll him up. Shelton beat Jericho straight up previously for the IC Title if I'm remembering right. If he can beat Chris Jericho cleanly with a pinfall, then God knows he can beat H. I mean Jericho was the first Undisputed Champion and as much as that probably bothers Hunter, he can't take that away from Jericho. Plus we all know that Hunter NEVER beat Stone Cold and The Rock on the same night. We also hear about Hunter caring about the legacy he leaves behind. Dave Batista as World Heavyweight Champion. Hmmm, some legacy. I will however give him credit for getting Orton over as Orton is a favorite of mine. It was also said that he tried to veto Edge's move over to Smackdown last year and tried to prevent him from winning the World Heavyweight Championship. Hell he even politicked Edge into losing to Shawn Michaels even though he was the Champion his last night as a member of the Raw roster. I just hope that H realizes that the only reason he has the power he does is because Dewayne Johnson left the company. If he was still around , H would be upper midcard at best.
 
I just wanted to add to that last statement. If Austin had also stayed, maybe we would not see HHH allover the place and would be contained. Give him a title run, but let's not have another long reign like the last time or like Cena's.
 
HHH probably just demanded a 15-2 match so that he could put over 15 guys at once. I'm sure he wanted to be the one to take the pinfall too, but Kennedy probably jumped in and said "no, your character was damaged enough at Wrestlemania when you lost, let me take the pin."
hahaha... good one... sure it happened like that

but the guy just uses his political power a bit much. I'm mean, HBK has the same privilege...
He doesn't... He is not married to the bosses' daughter... he might has a lot of backstage power... never the same...

Yeah, he lost to Hardy, but who even remembers that? It came across as one of those fluke wins with some kind of rollup. Lame. Then Hardy loses clean to Orton at Rumble. Whoopy.
According to this logic, we have to remember who lost to who, and based on that, cheer more a certain wrestler...

Michaels has been a big star longer than Triple H, and he has political power too, but he puts people over, and not just in a subtle way. He lost to Jeff Hardy too, and the difference was Hardy looked good in that match, winning decisively. Shawn Michaels put over Mr. Kennedy cleanly, can you imagine Triple H doing that?
Michaels is an EMPLOYEE... he has power yeah, he has been there for years... more than H... he is bigger now and maybe will always be a bigger star than H... he is friends with H and for sure with Vince too... regardless of all this, HBK has to do what he is asked to... H doesn't... because he is not an employee like Michaels... HBK had to job to Hogan 3 years ago... and he oversold during the whole match because he wanted 1 win for each one and a longer feud... and he didn't get it...
Also... Kennedy got clean wins, but in the end he didn't get anything of that feud... it was rather boring and dissapointing... he just got a new finisher...

He's owns big stars in handicap matches, and most recently, he destroys the entire ECW roster in one shot. Some people might argue that he let them save face a bit by doing it with a chair, but who really notices the chair? People will just remember that Triple H whooped their asses. So what if he lost, Kennedy had to do the job...and to Chavo Guerrero, no less!
Cena and Orton did something simmilar just some weeks ago, to the raw midcard which is suposed to be better than ECW, champions included... and I haven't read a 'Randy Orton is an asshole' thread... well maybe I've read a couple... but different circumstances... Also, nobody notices if HHH destroys an entire roster besides IWC... I'm sure little kids who where at the arena last monday didn't tell their parents "mmm... you see dad?? H is not capable of putting 15 guys over... he is bigger than ECW and just saved that useless kennedy's ass, whom by the way got the pin from the more insignificant chavo"
Also, as someone said... who will remember in a few weeks that H got a chair and beat ECW's entire roster???
BTW... Good analogy that of the green power ranger...

I just hope that H realizes that the only reason he has the power he does is because Dewayne Johnson left the company. If he was still around , H would be upper midcard at best.
Sure... and The Rock would be married to Stephanie so this can work right?
And if Shelton Benjamin were in TNA, he would be 4 time world champ by now...

I just wanted to add to that last statement. If Austin had also stayed, maybe we would not see HHH allover the place and would be contained.
We might have seen a Backlash victory of H over the Rock, Cena and Austin... but we never now as they (Rock and Austin) are not wrestling anymore!!! The fact that H uses his backstage power to be champion doesn't change according to the roster... Rock and Austin are bigger stars than H... but, as I said about michaels... they are employees to WWE...

I think H will never be that big, no matter how many titles he gets... he can't compare with the heights of Flair, Hogan, Austin, Rock... but he has won his place in history... people cheer or boo him, that means people care about him... which makes a huge difference from all those incredibly talented, overrated, underused and wasted wrestlers...
 
To me HHH is or was a number one guy even with Rock and Austin around. They needed HHH. Sure he was not the number one good guy, but he sure as heck was the best heel. Or at least one of the top heels. I am not a fan of HHH, but you have to admit that he has made a name for himself in the history of the WWE.
 
Wow, this thread... People say HHH sucks, while others defend him... While I havn't read any of what else was posted, I will add this. Everytime HHH wins a match, you haters always say "It's because he's fucking the bosses daughter." Yet when he loses a match (and it only ever happens to up and comers) you claim "He only gave them the rub so he can beat em later." In your eyes, wether he wins or loses, you have a reason to jump down his throat. What do you want the guy to do? Divorce? Will that make you think of him as better? When is the last time he did somthing good in your opinion? Because now, no matter what he does, even when it equals the complete opposite as the week before, it's because he bangs the bosses daughter.

Give me a break.
 
Wow, this thread... People say HHH sucks, while others defend him... While I havn't read any of what else was posted, I will add this. Everytime HHH wins a match, you haters always say "It's because he's fucking the bosses daughter." Yet when he loses a match (and it only ever happens to up and comers) you claim "He only gave them the rub so he can beat em later." In your eyes, wether he wins or loses, you have a reason to jump down his throat. What do you want the guy to do? Divorce? Will that make you think of him as better? When is the last time he did somthing good in your opinion? Because now, no matter what he does, even when it equals the complete opposite as the week before, it's because he bangs the bosses daughter.

Give me a break.

Exactly Derf, no matter what Triple H does, there will always be haters. Next Monday on RAW he can let someone beat him clean with their finisher, but the haters will still say things like "Triple H didn't put over that superstar, he did two punches which made his opponent look weak, Triple H is not allowed to do anything against his opponent, that is how you put someone over!". Also, I am sick of the Shelton Benjamin marks and Randy Orton marks bashing Triple H, yes, Shelton may have gotten a couple of fluke victories over Trips, but that was enough to get him over with the fans and resulted in him having multiple IC title reigns. I remember exactly when Shelton lost his momentum, it was right after Shawn Michaels buried him, that's right, HBK himself, after that Shelton brought his "Mama" into the WWE and eventually went to ECW where he hasn't won any titles since. Then there is precious Randy Orton, the guy who wouldn't of had a World/WWE title run if it wasn't for Triple H and a little stable called EVOLUTION! And Orton marks cannot say that Randy made himself in the business because the only thing that he ever did was screw up time and time again. If it wasn't for him being "Evolution's Diamond in the Rough", he would have been fired long ago.

I just noticed that this thread has changed it's name to the "Triple H Sucks" thread, which I find funny because nearly half of the people who voted in the poll loves the guy and must find something great about him.
 
H only puts over the big time main eventers. He never loses to an upper midcarder decisively. Such as getting nailed with so and so's finisher and taking the 1, 2, 3. Benjamin beat him via roll up. Jeff Hardy the same thing. Hell, I can't even recall Jericho beating H. H should be willing to build young stars instead of being paranoid of losing his spot and burying guys. Hunter losing to the Swanton Bomb wouldn't have hurt him. H is comparable to Hogan in the sense of how he loses his matches. H got Batista over, so he lost to him. Cena was Vince's pet so he lost cleanly and decisively to him. Every other match he loses manages somehow to still make his opponent look bad. Now I will say that Triple H is a GREAT wrestler. He's in my top 10 for sure, but come on. Put some guys over decisively and build some stars to help WWE thrive once again.
 
Wow, this thread... People say HHH sucks, while others defend him... While I havn't read any of what else was posted, I will add this. Everytime HHH wins a match, you haters always say "It's because he's fucking the bosses daughter." Yet when he loses a match (and it only ever happens to up and comers) you claim "He only gave them the rub so he can beat em later." In your eyes, wether he wins or loses, you have a reason to jump down his throat. What do you want the guy to do? Divorce? Will that make you think of him as better? When is the last time he did somthing good in your opinion? Because now, no matter what he does, even when it equals the complete opposite as the week before, it's because he bangs the bosses daughter.

Give me a break.

If I had to be put into one catergory it would be the haters, but right now i don't mind him. Hey I will admit that he can wrestle, and he has one because he is who he is. HHH will always be looked differently and you know what he deserves it with all the power plays he has done since he has been nailing the bosses daughter. Yes that is bad to say but do you think be bothers to think of the other wrestlers when he steps on they're fingers? NO. And now that he has done that he has to deal with the side effects of getting so big in the WWE.
 
To me, Triple H is kind of like Tommy from the original Power Rangers. Tommy comes in as the green ranger, nothing too special, but eventually becomes important because he's banging Kimberly. Then he leaves for a while and everybody makes a fuss over him when he comes back as the white ranger. Upon returning as the white ranger, he uses his stroke to get Zordon to name him the new leader of the power rangers, effectively screwing Jason and making him look like a putz. Except in WWE, Tommy is Triple H, Kimberly is Stephanie McMahon, Zordon is Vince McMahon, the white ranger outfit is the king of kings crown, and Jason is every other superstar on the WWE roster.

:lmao: I swear, that is the greatest analogy I've ever read! Props, man, HUGE props.

Anyway, I went into much detail on how I reel about Trips in another thread not too long ago. I think his confidence is the biggest problem. I strongly believe that he does everything he does because he truly feels it's best for business. I don't think he does it just for power or to be a champion, but because in his mind, he's always 100% correct about his opinions. He probably has nothing personal against anyone in the business; he just doesn't think a lot of wrestlers we all want to see get pushed are half as good as he is. I could be wrong, but Trips seems like an alright guy away from the ring and I don't think he’s malicious in anything he does. He's just arrogant, and a lot of times just wrong on what he thinks is right.

When it comes to HHH being a wrestler, he’s one hell of an in-ring performer, but his promos usually bored the living daylights out of me, which is why I ultimately feel he’s not World Championship material by himself. He is if Steph or the Evolution guys are with him, but not when he’s alone, in my opinion.
 
Wow, this thread... People say HHH sucks, while others defend him... While I havn't read any of what else was posted, I will add this. Everytime HHH wins a match, you haters always say "It's because he's fucking the bosses daughter." Yet when he loses a match (and it only ever happens to up and comers) you claim "He only gave them the rub so he can beat em later." In your eyes, wether he wins or loses, you have a reason to jump down his throat. What do you want the guy to do? Divorce? Will that make you think of him as better? When is the last time he did somthing good in your opinion? Because now, no matter what he does, even when it equals the complete opposite as the week before, it's because he bangs the bosses daughter.

Give me a break.

It depends how you interpret his actions. The guy appears to be intelligent so he must be aware of what people think of him. So while he might want to put people over, he might be doing it because he doesn't like all the negativity he recieves. He wants to be considered the greatest, but he never will be.

Exactly Derf, no matter what Triple H does, there will always be haters. Next Monday on RAW he can let someone beat him clean with their finisher, but the haters will still say things like "Triple H didn't put over that superstar, he did two punches which made his opponent look weak, Triple H is not allowed to do anything against his opponent, that is how you put someone over!". Also, I am sick of the Shelton Benjamin marks and Randy Orton marks bashing Triple H, yes, Shelton may have gotten a couple of fluke victories over Trips, but that was enough to get him over with the fans and resulted in him having multiple IC title reigns. I remember exactly when Shelton lost his momentum, it was right after Shawn Michaels buried him, that's right, HBK himself, after that Shelton brought his "Mama" into the WWE and eventually went to ECW where he hasn't won any titles since. Then there is precious Randy Orton, the guy who wouldn't of had a World/WWE title run if it wasn't for Triple H and a little stable called EVOLUTION! And Orton marks cannot say that Randy made himself in the business because the only thing that he ever did was screw up time and time again. If it wasn't for him being "Evolution's Diamond in the Rough", he would have been fired long ago.

I'm still unsure how exactly HHH put over Benjamin. He lost the same way he did to Jeff Hardy. It was a fluke. Triple H acted like he couldn't believe he'd lost to this wrestler who was so far behind him in the pecking order. That's not putting somebody over. Putting somebody over is what he did to Batista. Losing to him, trying to make him look great in the process, losing on PPV to him (Which is way more important than TV), a lengthy feud and so on. He lost to Shelton but he wasn't feuding with him. Shelton then had a mini feud with Flair. And everyone lost to Flair.

He also didn't put over Orton. He made Orton look like shit. Yeah he gave him the rub in Evolution. I can't argue there. But as soon as Orton won the title, HHH squashed any momentum he had. It then took a lengthy feud with Undertaker for Orton to get his credability back.
 
HHH is one of the hardest working athletes on the WWE right now. He has the build of a true Bodybuilder and uses his athleticism to his advantage. He screws the boss's daughter but that doesn't mean it has any impact on the success or failure of his career. He wins because he is good and thats it.
 
HHH is one of the hardest working athletes on the WWE right now. .

I think every wrestler bar Carlito & Jeff Hardy work hard. That's his job though isn't it?

He has the build of a true Bodybuilder .

It's weird. i heard this rumour that WWE had drug testing. I'm kind of confused how Triple H's physique has got more ripped as of late. He wasn't like that when he returned at Summer Slam 07, he's now a similar size to what he was when he returned in 2002. Weird that.

and uses his athleticism to his advantage. .

I wouldn't say he's terribly athletic. The only time his feet leave the ground is for The Pedigree.

He wins because he is good and thats it.

Or because wrestlers, in general, are booked to win or lose.
 
i think Triple H is the man that represents the wwe because he is well known in america.But after 10 years of DX , The Game and The king of kings i think it's time he stepped down.I think it's a bit odd that in the raw brand and the Pay-Per-Views Triple H is always in one the most important matches.Im really getting tired of watching HHH vs cena 1000 or HHH vs Orton 500.I think it's time the wwe needs to get a new representative.
 
Breaking News & Question:

The Triple H DVD is out on Monday in the UK. I'll be buying it and watching it throughout the day. So expect a scathing review of the set. I'll give praise if it's deserved, but it won't be.

So my question. Why are the matches so gimmick heavy? If he's so good he shouldn't have to hide behind weapons and blood, right?
 
Breaking News & Question:

The Triple H DVD is out on Monday in the UK. I'll be buying it and watching it throughout the day. So expect a scathing review of the set. I'll give praise if it's deserved, but it won't be.

So my question. Why are the matches so gimmick heavy? If he's so good he shouldn't have to hide behind weapons and blood, right?

Wasn't it weapons and blood that made Triple H. as good as he is today? I may be wrong in that, but I'm pretty sure his above average, but below great wrestling skills aren't what made him stand out from the pack.

The DVD (to me) was a great compilation of some of his greatest matches. However the story is where it truly lacks, and for a DVD thats suppose to focus on his career, you'd think they'd have him speak a bit longer of it. Perhaps even Triple H. doesn't feel hes that damn good.

One of the few things I will point out. I admire Triple H. for mocking John Cena in the DVD and trying to (once again) put himself over, by claiming that Cena came to Triple H. for teaching, and Triple H. claims he flat-out told Cena "you suck." I have to sit back and laugh at something like that, because Cena's been in the business for a far less amount of time than Triple H.. yet hes already accomplished more value to his career than The King of Kings.
 
A couple of questions regarding the Triple H DVD:


Why does The King Of Kings Get A Special Case?

All other two disc sets are in normal boxes. But this morning when I bought HHH's I noticed it was in a unique package. Why is that? The only other two disc set that has a special case like that is the McMahon DVD. Coincidence? Me thinks not.

Why Does J.R. Do Commentary On One Of The Bonus Matches?

It's HHH's first match. So there's a special commentary on it with J.R. & The Game. Why? Usually the wrestler gets Cole, Coach or Grisham.

Stay tuned for more. I have a review of the DVD, which will be up in a couple of horus. Adios.

EDIT: Here Is my revie of The King Of Kings DVD. I think I've been pretty positive about it. Especially considering I don't like HHH.​

Triple H: The King Of Kings

Subtitled There Is Only One. Evidently HHH killed that final Highlander.

Straight up I have to say my favorite part of this set is the Easter Egg. It's Trips doing the old Make-A-Wish deal. He's visiting a girl with Cerebral Palsy, his ''Hey, I'm cerebral too'' line is classic.

Overall this is an ok set. It's just full of filler. You'd think that a guy as good as Triple H would have a bigger, more impressive set. Certain matches deserve to be there. His first match in WWE, his fist IC & WWE title wins. But they're not particularly great. Also for a guy that doesn't rate Mick Foley, he sure does feature him a lot on this set. 3 matches.

I love how Triple H claims that he was glad to have the workhorse title. A bit of a high opinion of himself there. He was terrible for most of the time he was a blueblood. He really only started to improve in late 1996.

I'm not sure why the Owen Hart Mania match is included. It's an ok match. But it's not a classic.

I'm also unsure why the second dic focus' on his post 2001 injury matches. That's when he was at his worst. The 2002-2008 years have not been kind to Triple H.

They bill this set as having the 2002 Rumble as well. Not true. They have 20 minutes of it. Not even a good 20 minutes at that. Triple H has the longest Rumble entrance of all time, wrestles with Austin for a big, oh look it's Mr. Perfect, finish. I'm sure they could have used another match.

The final disc was a total waste of my time. The HBK match is ok, not the best they've had, the Batista match is good considering how limited he is. The Flair match is too long, but ok for a Flair match. And the triple threat, while good, isn't really a memorable match.

Overall I think the release of other DVD sets crippled this one a bit. There are matches that I'm guessing could have been added, but are already on Rocks, Austins, Foleys & The Ladder Match. But that's no excuse for the lack of Angle matches. It's not like TNA is a threat to WWE, just add them. This set could have been a hell of a lot better.
 
Ok, ok I know you want more. While I'm here I have another question.

Why Is Benoit On This Disc?

He hasn't appeared on any WWE DVD's in the past year, yet he makes an appearence in this one. They cut him out of the Austin one, yet here Benoit is on this set. Austin is by far a more important wrestler than Triple H. Yet they edit him out of the HHH/Austin match on that set. Benoit is a pretty imoprtant part of that match. but the screen goes blank for a second, then they lead to the finish. Benoit is in the Triple H DVD for all of two seconds. It's wehn Hunter is talking about the injury that put him out of action for 9 months in 2001. He says he was in a match with Austin against Benoit & Jerich. An image of the two then appears on screen. But there's no need for it. He could have said he was in a match, he could ahve mentioned Benoit. But no, on The King Of Kings DVD he has to show him. What's the bet that the first DVD to feature Benoit matches again will be a Triple H one?
 
Ok, ok I know you want more. While I'm here I have another question.

Why Is Benoit On This Disc?

He hasn't appeared on any WWE DVD's in the past year, yet he makes an appearence in this one. They cut him out of the Austin one, yet here Benoit is on this set. Austin is by far a more important wrestler than Triple H. Yet they edit him out of the HHH/Austin match on that set. Benoit is a pretty imoprtant part of that match. but the screen goes blank for a second, then they lead to the finish. Benoit is in the Triple H DVD for all of two seconds. It's wehn Hunter is talking about the injury that put him out of action for 9 months in 2001. He says he was in a match with Austin against Benoit & Jerich. An image of the two then appears on screen. But there's no need for it. He could have said he was in a match, he could ahve mentioned Benoit. But no, on The King Of Kings DVD he has to show him. What's the bet that the first DVD to feature Benoit matches again will be a Triple H one?


It was an important event in Triple H's career, and Benoit was only mentioned for the fact that he was in the match. They barely showed him. There is no way to avoid that mention of Benoit. He wasnt a main focal point in the way Triple H was talkin about him. He just said he was in the match. When they mentioned that night on the first Triple H DVD The Game, they talked about Benoit alot more on that night and showed alot more of him. Its not that big of a deal that he wasnt in the SCSA DVD. Its just that it needed to be mentioned. The WWE can't erase all of its history.
 
It was an important event in Triple H's career, and Benoit was only mentioned for the fact that he was in the match. They barely showed him. There is no way to avoid that mention of Benoit. He wasnt a main focal point in the way Triple H was talkin about him. He just said he was in the match. When they mentioned that night on the first Triple H DVD The Game, they talked about Benoit alot more on that night and showed alot more of him. Its not that big of a deal that he wasnt in the SCSA DVD. Its just that it needed to be mentioned. The WWE can't erase all of its history.

There was no need to mention him. He was mentioned for the sake of it. They showed Triple H injuring himself, an Benoit isn't on screen at that time. They could have just showed that. But instead they mention him, which is fair enough. But they then show an image of him. No need. Everyone who buys the DVD knows who he is, it was only put in because Triple H wanted it in.
 
He mentioned his name once or twice. It wasnt like they kept him the focal point of the match, just said he was in a tag match with Jericho and Benoit. There wasnt much on him. And some new videos on 24/7 on WWE.com are starting to have a little more Benoit in the vids as long as he isnt in a match or a focus in a promo. So the Triple H DVD isnt the first thing to do that. I think in the comming years WWE is gonna put more Benoit in their DVDs just not have him be a main part of it. But its a shame that all those matches he had are basically unwatchable unless you have any of the DVDs yourself.
 
With HHH's move to Smackdown I feel it's a good time for a bit more bashing. Notice how he's on Smackdown for one episode. And he and Batista get the better of the WHC, Umaga and his stable. This is a sign of things to come. Edge wanted to leave Raw because he didn't want to get squashed by HHH. Well tough shit. It's going to happen. Just a year later than originally thought.

Anyone else think that The Game will make the hottest heel in WWE look like shit before he gets his title?
 
I know it was expecting too much yet I had hoped they could somehow unobtrusively transition HHH onto Smackdown rather than have him dominate the show. But just like Raw, Friday night was all about The Game. His ring entrance and promo took up a good ten minutes to start the show. Reading between the lines of what he said, I got the feeling we should all be grateful he gave up being Raw’s top dog to become a lowly SD! member for the first time in six years.

He implied that from the looks of him Edge wasn’t much of a world champion and his ego was much too big for anyone but him to be the show’s champion. He showed Edge, the World Heavyweight Champion, no respect before feeding him to Tista. Also just like Raw, HHH found himself involved in the main event, disposing of Edge and La Familia in record time to close the show.

In only two hours time, they managed to make Edge (and by extension La Familia) look weak and insignificant after months of building him as the uber heel and dominant force on SD!:disappointed: HHH might be off Raw but it was more of the same in his first SD! appearance. Friday night was just the beginning of the end for Edge. I'll be optimistic and give it five months before HHH goes over the entire SD! roster like he's done to Raw and ECW.
 
I couldn't agree more Amy (are you hot?). In the space of two hours HHH turned the far superior Smackdown into another version of Raw. It was a boring show. Just like Raw. Instead of getting the usually short/great La Familia promo. We got a 10 minute HHH one, with a bit of Edge. In the space of 20 minutes Edge went from being the hottest heel in the company, if not wrestling, to being a glorified mid carder. All because of The Game putting him down. When he's a face he's trying to be the coolest face, when he's the heel he trys to be the coolest heel. Triple H doesn't know that faces & heels should be two different things.
 
How did Edge get made into a mid carder?? By running away?? Like ya know, Edge always does? Every last time?? Oh, but since it was with Triple H, then it was burying him. Pullleeeaasse. If anything, Edge is further elevated with the two of them being in the ring, facing off as equals.
 
How did Edge get made into a mid carder??

I was either exaggerating or having a premonition. Edge purposley requested the move to Smackdown originally because HHH was eyeing him up for his return feud. Y'know, the one that eventually went to King Booker. Remember the feud which wasn't a fued. Just HHH burying Booker. That was almost Edge.

Example Here:

[youtube]Tm2XnmgQTKE&feature=related[/youtube]



By running away?? Like ya know, Edge always does? Every last time??

How come he didn't run away from Undertaker. Ok he did when he was face to face. But that didn't happen often. It was his stable that ran away, and got beaten. The Edge/Undertaker encounters were resrved for the actual PPVs. Edge is the sneaky heel. That's why he usually attcaks from behind, but he didn't when with HHH.

Oh, but since it was with Triple H, then it was burying him.

Not yet. But it's coming soon.

Pullleeeaasse. If anything, Edge is further elevated with the two of them being in the ring, facing off as equals.

Only one wrestler has been presented at The Games equal. That was Batista. The 40 year old with no personality. HHH doesn't have a good track record when it comes to wrestlers who are an actual threat to him.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top