The Triple H Thread | Page 9 | WrestleZone Forums

The Triple H Thread

What is your opinion of Triple H.?

  • I Hate Him!

  • I'm not a fan of his

  • Neutral: Don't like or hate him

  • He's okay, not the greatest

  • He's The King of Kings!


Results are only viewable after voting.
ok jback 1st of all he burried umaga cuz umaga was on that steroids list and suspended him for 30 days..2nd he burried carlito cause carlito gave notice to managenment that he wanted to leave so they burried him (he ended up staying anyways) and well obviously they burried booker t cause he was gunna leave regardless..so technically that isent burrying now back to this definite thumbs up for trips we bin bashing him for politics backstage and hes married to stephanie he "burries" people blah blah he put jeff over and thats good it kind ov shook up raw a little now the question is who is trips gunna feud with next?
 
1st of all he burried umaga cuz umaga was on that steroids list and suspended him for 30 days
ok CELTICPRIDE101 SO he basicaly made Umaga(who has really improved and proved that he is a good big man)job to him again and again because of the steriods??If they wanted to punish Umaga y not let someone else who could benefit from beating Umaga burry him. Also Edge was on the steroid list and it doesnt seem that he was punished? Im not trying to complain about HHH cuz he is a top face in the company and deserves to win I'm just saying dont throw a freaking party for the guy just because he chose to put over 1 wrestler. He doesnt deserve a metal...and anyways its reported that the only reason he put over Jeff Hardy is because he doesnt like or get along with Jericho and wants to make Jeff a bigger star. In all HHH burried Umaga now hes nothing but a jobber to the stars and thats ashame because he's talented.
 
i understand dude we shouldent celebrate becuase he put hardy over..but hey give him props where props are due... o yea dont forget he put over cena at wrestlemania 22 and batisita at wrestlemania 21 i think someone sed that already...and yes i love umaga to he really has improved but its not trips fault umaga is just like thrown into matches now i dont understand he needs a decent push
 
I give him no props......no props at all. I dont mind HHH(im not a hater) but he doesnt deserve props, for doing something he should do. He's not gonna ba around forever so he should put over some young stars. Dont get me wrong i dont mind him winning, and i dont think he should put over every wrestler than beating him would be pointless, but its in the best interest for the wwe that he starts to build up the future. That is all......i guess??? HHH=good. Putting over Hardy=shouldnt get a HUGE celebration for doing something he should do. And yet its all just my opinion...meh?
 
And Yet it continues. Mindless Triple H bashing. If Triple H puts over everyone he becomes what Ric Flair has become A Joke. So if you beat the guy it means nothing but if you lose your a joke. Triple H is the top dog in terms of wins meaning that if you do manage to beat him it shows you to be a top contender. Everyone got so High on Shelton Benjamin after beating Triple H three times, Triple H put Shelton over well by losing 3 times. Undertaker barely loses and has been on the same level for longer you do not see complaining about him burying talent or not putting talent over.

So what have we learnt here today class?

If the guy that barely ever loses, loses cleanly to someone, he is putting the other guy over beyond what someone with a middle of the road win loss record ever could.

shadow mancer go have a cry. you don't need to get upset because everyone is bagging triple. you don't see me crying when people bag jeff hardy. orton or m.v.p.

first of all triple h will never be a joke for god sakes he is a 11 time world champ, he is the owner of one of the greatest stables ever (evolution and dx). second the only reason people don't bag undertaker is because he hasn't been heel since the start of his career and every one is use to him being face. and when was the last time undertaker has conpeted in 10 matchs in 10 weeks. triple h neally has a match every week so he gets boring after a while.

don't get me wrong i love trips but his time is up.
 
I must admit I was surprised HHH put Hardy over. I think it was a great decision as it makes both Hardy and HHH look strong.

But just because HHH put Hardy over once, doesnt mean that ppl will stop the HHH bashing. The guy is still selfish IMO. Rumours have it that he is gonna be in the main event @ WM24 and possibly for the title. He is already 11 time world champion. Seriously how many title reigns does the guy need. He shouldnt win the world title to at least 2009 IMO.

Thumbs up for HHH for putting Jeff over, however it still doesnt change my opinion on the buryier of all buryiers.
 
I must admit I was surprised HHH put Hardy over. I think it was a great decision as it makes both Hardy and HHH look strong.

But just because HHH put Hardy over once, doesnt mean that ppl will stop the HHH bashing. The guy is still selfish IMO. Rumours have it that he is gonna be in the main event @ WM24 and possibly for the title. He is already 11 time world champion. Seriously how many title reigns does the guy need. He shouldnt win the world title to at least 2009 IMO.

Thumbs up for HHH for putting Jeff over, however it still doesnt change my opinion on the buryier of all buryiers.

Why wouldn't you have the top draw of Raw in the main event of WM, that just makes sense from a business perspective, and just cause he's in a title match doesn't mean he's gonna win the title, remember the past three times he's been in a title match in the ME at WM, at WM 20 he put Benoit over by tapping out to the crossface and losing his title, then at WM21 he put Batista over after losing to him, and then going on to lose to him three more times after that, with two of those loses being on PPV, and one of those PPVs being a HIAC match, a match Triple H has never lost one-on-one, then at WM22 he put Cena over by allowing Cena to retain, so just cause he's in the ME doesn't mean he's gonna win the belt, though I hope he wins the belt this year, he'd make a better champion then Orton is right now IMO, and draws better
 
I am a big fan of Triple H and I respect his in-ring capabilities a lot. I know that he has lost to Cena, and Hardy but he shouldn't be in the title picture anyways because he just came back and he needs to work a little bit more. Hardy has been improving and has given his best in all the matches. Also it feels as if Triple H gets special treatment because of his realtionship with Stephanie McMahon. I would love to see Hardy face Orton becaus they are both awesome young competetiors and that would be a truly good main event. Later in the future I would love to see Triple H hold a title, but not anytime soon.
 
I think it was a very smart move. It contributes to the cause of people trying to convince people that Triple H doesn't live his life around burying people in big-time matches! GREAT MOVE FOR BOTH WWE AND TRIPLE H!!!! I always figured he didn't want to bury anyone on purpose, so my opinion hasn't changed. I have always been a fan of Triple H, ever since he started. Heel or babyface, Triple H is an awesome competitor. Great decision to have Hardy be put over.
 
Why wouldn't you have the top draw of Raw in the main event of WM, that just makes sense from a business perspective, and just cause he's in a title match doesn't mean he's gonna win the title, remember the past three times he's been in a title match in the ME at WM, at WM 20 he put Benoit over by tapping out to the crossface and losing his title, then at WM21 he put Batista over after losing to him, and then going on to lose to him three more times after that, with two of those loses being on PPV, and one of those PPVs being a HIAC match, a match Triple H has never lost one-on-one, then at WM22 he put Cena over by allowing Cena to retain, so just cause he's in the ME doesn't mean he's gonna win the belt, though I hope he wins the belt this year, he'd make a better champion then Orton is right now IMO, and draws better

Dude it seems like almost every year the guy in the the Wrestlemania Main Event win or lose. The only reason he wasnt in it this year was because he was injured. I know the guy has draw power but Raw is filled with guys that can step up to main event WM24. HBK, Lashley, Kennedy, Orton, Jericho and many others can main event WM.

OK so he has put talent over in the past, but so he should. He cant win all the time. And why do you want to see him win yet ANOTHER world title?? He doesnt need to belt to be over with the crowd. While he may draw better than Orton, Orton is still very young and can improve in his career. This is his only his second run as the champion because im not counting when he had it for 30 mins at No Mercy. His match with Jericho was pretty gd IMO. His match with HBK @ Survivor Series was good. They might not be 5 star classics but he has many years to improve remember.
 
My opinion definitley has not changed on HHH. Look at No Mercy for example. We all had to experience HHH's ego as he won the WWE Championship liek 15 mins after it was awarded to Randy Orton. That makes orton look like a chump and he is now constantly booked as a chump. I honestly have not see a poorer booked heel champion in forever. orton has none of the spotlight on raw. Who does? Lets see ummm .... HHH of course. There is nothing wrong with HHH getting wins but his wins rarely help put over the person he is fighting. Look at his short rivalry with Carlito. It made Carlito look like a chump, rather than making both men look strong. It is good that hardy is getting this shot but we all know where the title will be in the end.
 
I think the only way to work Hardy out as a viable main event draw for the next few PPVs is have Orton attack Hardy for the next couple of Raws.

One of those Raws should be an IC title match against somebody like Kennedy or Umaga but more preferably Kennedy. Have Orton interfere and the title changes hands.

Then, have Orton retain the belt at Royal Rumble in a dirty finish while having an SD! star win the rumble itself. That would setup the Elimination Chamber for six Raw stars for a WWE title shot at Wrestlemania. Have HHH and Hardy be the last two participants left and let him win the chamber.

Theb have Hardy beat Orton on the grandest stage of them all.

I believe a Hardy push is due and if it's gonna happen in such a larger scale it should be like this.
 
I think that this is a win, win situation for WWE. I believe Hardy will not be taking the belt from Orton anytime soon and I see HHH being in the main event at Mania but it shows that Hardy is willing and able to step up to main event superstardom.

I read that the only reason WWE did a Hardy win was to swerve the online wrestling community who had been predicting a HHH win for weeks! A smart move if you ask me because the main issue with WWE is the fact that they are not building new stars, something the brand split was suppossed to do!

Now, Hardy is not a "new" star but he is someone who has paid his dues in the business and that is why i Believe HHH respects him so much, especially allowing him to go over clean and get a title shot at one of the biggest PPV's or the year- The Royal Rumble.

No matter how they play it I can see Jeff Hardy getting the title sometime next year, maybe in time for a TLC match at Mania for the WWE title, something that has never been done before on PPV or in Mania history.

No matter how you slice it you have to push new superstars NOW because HBK is hurting, HHH is not getting any younger, Cena is hurt, Jericho has flopped, and guys like Carlito and Masters (before his release) have not stepped up.

WWe has to stop trying to re-create the attitude era and just let these guys be themselves before it is too late.
 
HHH buries more people than he helps. I believe the list was already given earlier so I'm not going to repeat it.

If you are truly good at what you do, you can put others over with while BOTH winning and losing.

Take a look at the Undertaker. While he did win the feuds against Randy Orton, John Cena, Ken Kennedy (just to name a few in recent years), what happened? It propelled every superstar further.

Wheras HHH hasn't done that period. Umaga gets a win over HHH and it stuns people. Suddenly, he spends the next month becoming HHH's personal punching bag thus destroying basically everything he ever accomplished.

What about Carlito? HHH could have helped in restoring the faith in Carlito much earlier had he decided to go up against him and at the very least make him look good while the match too place. Did Carlito and Umaga and everyone else HHH has buried HAVE to win the feud to be pushed? No... all they had to do was be given the time to shine well enough to be allowed to put over. And not pretty much just sledgehammered into submission like HHH likes to do.

Hardy was deserving of at least getting his first run at the title. Will he beat Randy? I highly doubt it, but you never know.
 
I was for HHH the whole time being that I hate Jeff Hardy with a passion, its noting personal i guess. I just despise his character and move set. However, I really dont like how the Game was burying talent or being buried by the talent in recent fueds and angles but if i had to pick its deff HHH over that high flying loser jeff
 
This is NOT a thread about HHH burying talent, or his influences with Vince, but is it me, or has HHH been really boring IN THE RING ever since his return, and i hear people talking about Cena having alimited moveset, what has HHH got? lets see,

Harley Race High Knee
Ric Flair Knee
Pedigree
Double Legged Spine Buster
Facebuster
Sledgehammer

Correct if im wrong, but arent they all the moves he has,
Now im not saying hes always been like this, ive seen him in matches with Austin, Rock (1 Hour Iron man match), Foley, HBK etc, but they were much more entertaining, im not insulting his legacy because seriously, you cant with a man that has won the world title 11 times, but im just finding him boring IN THE RING, Comments plz.
 
Hmmm yeah i suppose he has been quite repetitive. But the man knows how and when to draw a crowd reaction, what with a taunt or a big spinebuster. So he's got at that point of the game (pun XD).

But i do find him really boring to watch getting beat up. I suppose it depends on the guy he's facing when when regal was taking it to him on Raw i just couldn't care really. He didn't do a good job convincing me he was going to lose, i just assumed he would make a come back some time later.

He's great in main event matches, like Last Man Standing with Orton and Career v/s Rumble with Flair.

He needs a new move. Kind of like Jeff Hardy introduced that turnbuckle dropkick thing when he came back.

I see where your coming from :D
 
i would have to agree that HHH does use alot of the same moves, but the reason he has been boring in ring is the fact that WWE isnt using him up to his potential, losing to jeff hardy is not something the old HHH would do and not letting him participate in the royal rumble is definitely a low blow, the storyline they are working on hopefully is a good one b/c this is making him look like a fool in the ring. he knows how to entertain the fans and thats all that rele matters =P

but i can see what you are saying and i guess i agree slightly :)
 
Just like the John Cena thread, Triple H. has gained more than enough mini-threads about him, that they're all being merged together here. From now on, any opinions you have on The Game, bring them here. Do you like him? Explain why. Do you hate him? Explain why.
 
neutral.

i say "neutral" because my opinion is probably the last one that will ever lead to change in the way he conducts himself, and the business he's involved in. i love his character, but hate his reality... so i guess they cancel each other out
 
Anyone who knows me, will know that Triple H is my 'favourite' wrestler, as such. Not because of all this back stage rubbish that everyone loves to judge him on, but because if you look back at the last well 8 or 9 years, he has had some of the best storylines, and even before then he was pretty important to the wrestling business, with DX.
Now how anyone can completely judge him on the backstage stuff is just beyond me, because we watch wrestling as entertainment, because of what we see, and if we like what we see, it keeps us watching. For example you don't watch a film and think "i hate that actor, yeah he can act well, but he is a bastard off camera, therefore he is a shit actor". It just really annoys me how everyone gets on Triple H's back because he has political pull backstage, much like other top wrestlers of the present and past, who never got this much stick.

Well now I have that out of my system, I enjoy Triple H as most of his 'characters'. When he is a heel, he is a bloody good heel, far better than much of what we see today, he is truly hated and plays it up well to the audience. When he is being a face he gets so over, and no one can deny the pop he gets. He is good at what he does, and sure his wrestling ability isn't what it use to be, but what do you expect? he has wrestled for a decent amount of time and hasn't got the best knees or legs in the business, and if i remember correctly, you don't get fitter with age. He is still damn good at what he does (no pun intended).
 
Triple H is my FAVORITE wrestler. No Triple H, no World Wrestling Entertainment, point blank. He may have a limited move set like Cena, Billy. But in all, Triple H has overall talent on Cena and I reckon that as fact. He is limited to his full potential because of his quadricep injuries, you people should know that by now and know he is the one and only diamond in the business regardless. People should'nt hold hostility for him because he's stingy in putting over younger talent. Must of them just can't get properly over anyway so might as well feed him them.
 
Triple H is my FAVORITE wrestler. No Triple H, no World Wrestling Entertainment, point blank.

No Hulk Hogan, no WWE. No Stone Cold Steve Austin, no WWE. But no Triple H, no WWE? The Undertaker, The Rock, these are just some of the names that have done more for WWE than Triple H, and the WWE could have probably still survived without them.

He may have a limited move set like Cena, Billy. But in all, Triple H has overall talent on Cena and I reckon that as fact. He is limited to his full potential because of his quadricep injuries, you people should know that by now and know he is the one and only diamond in the business regardless.

I don't think much of Triple H as a wrestler. He's good, nothing spectacular. Saying, "Oh, it's because of quadriceps injuries" means nothing. It doesn't change facts, does it? And I'm not even disputing his in ring ability.

People shouldn't hold hostility for him because he's stingy in putting over younger talent.

Why not?

Must of them just can't get properly over anyway so might as well feed him them.

Most of them, we'll never know if they'd gotten over anyway, because they were fed to them. Instead of thinking, "they're not getting over, we've got a couple of snacks for Triple H" (i.e. the tag team division) maybe they should show some more perseverance and not be so quick to bury talent.
 
tripple H is an ok wrestler not the greatest but would have to be up there i do not think that if there was no tripple H there would be no WWE but if there was no tripple H there would be no Stone Cold Steve Austin becouse he officially made it big when he won the king of the ring the same king of the ring trips was supposed to win if it wasnt for the curtain call insident. (or there would of been he just wouldnt of made it as big). tripple H will remain one of my favourite wrestlers as long as he doesnt have a fued with shawn michaels again and if he turns heel again becouse he just plain sucks as a face imo.
 
Triple H is probably my favorite Wrestler bar none.

The move-set thing is the stupidest point I think I have ever seen, and I am surprised no-one has picked up on this yet. The WWE have a certain style that they want their workers to use and therefore they will work that style. Its no coincidence that both Cena and Triple H work this kind of style, look at Batista, Undertaker even some of the younger guys coming up, their move-sets are very limited, because thats the way management want it no other reason.

I don't go in for this backstage polticker bollocks. Just because some guy on a news site claims that Triple H is holding people down it doesn't make it true. Would people believe that the earth was flat if three or four popular websites kept reporting it? No they wouldn't. I think the one thing that you can judge Triple H on fairly is his performance in the ring and on the mic, because it's the only thing we all see. Personally I haven't liked his face run, I think he has been a tad boring at times and I feel he makes a much better heel, but thats just my opinion.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top