You mean Kane in 2002? How in fact did he elevate him?
No i mean 2001, which is why I stated 2001, you know the time Kane pinned Triple H for the IC title, making Kane more popular than he ever was, only for Kane to fail substaining it.
You mean Kurt Angle who was already a star in 2001? How in fact did he elevate him?
Okay Kurt was already a star in 2001 you got me, Angle went from mid card to a star 2000 after he fueded with Triple H, oh shit, that's how he elvated him. Because this may shock you but you can get someone over with having to job to him, Angle got over as a major heel because of the Triangle with Steph and Triple H in 2000. Kind of how Jericho got over as a major face in 2000 thanks to Triple H as well.
Benoit? You mean a wrestler who carried HHH to his best match since he injured himself in 2001?
Couldn't find an out for this could you? Triple H tapped to him at Wrestlemania 20 in MSG and instead of syaing "Hey you got a point" you posted something that has no bearing on the discussion.
Shelton Benjamin? You mean the guy who won him as a fluke? Similar to waht happened with him and Jeff Hardy. Didn't he squash shelton Benjamin when he returned from his injury in the summer?
Yeah that Shelton Benjamin, the guy that went from getting no reaction to being massively over in one night thanks to Triple H. Then got more over the week later after he beat Triple H again.
As for Hardy, it's kind of funny that you consider that a fluke, why is that? Because it was a roll up pin? I'm only asking because a few posts ago you protraying Triple H's victory over Orton at No Mercy as decisive when that was a roll up finish as well.
Didn't everybody squash Shelton last summer, because it sure as well seemed that way. Why do you only call Triple H on it?Why does Rory from the Highlanders get a free pass?
Batista = Friend. He's also in his 40's. He's not a young wrestler or even a good wrestler. What are the chances of Batista ever becoming more popular than HHH?
And what does he being his friend have to do with anything? Nobody gives Bret Hart shit for putting Austin over in 1997 when they were friends. Oh because again you can't say you have a point, so you bring something that doesn't matter into the discussion.
Orton? In what year? 2004? Where he defeated him after a one month title reigns. Or 2007? Where he defeated himafter a 20 minute title reign?
I'm talking about the time that Orton beat Triple H so bad that he couldn't answer a ten count. Do you remember that? It shouldn't be hard to forget it's the reason Orton is carrying that Gold bling a round. interesting fact, Raw's Royal Rumble main-event, features two wrestlers that Triple H has put over in the five months since his comeback.
I've already explained Cena.
Care to explain it again? Cause Cena was getting no respect from the fans, they didn't think he could wrestle. So Triple H became the fans voice, said to Cena what all the fans wanted to say. Then he beat him and Triple H came out shook his hand and said, "I was wrong about you." Then he beat Triple H again. And since then a lot of smarks have warmed to Cena.
Interesting fact at Backlash that year Triple H was pinned in a triple threat with Cena and Edge. he didn't have to be pinned because Edge could have took the pin, so why didn't that happen? Oh i know the main summer fued that year was going to Cena and Edge, so Triple H was pinned to keep both looking strong, helping the business as a whole.
Booker T should have won the title at WM 19. Why didn't he? Wrestling storyline ligic says he should have won.
I see your point. You sign Goldberg with the plan to make him a babyface World Champion. You have two options in regards to who he would beat for that belt. A) You have a babyface, B) You have one of the biggest heels ever. Option A is obviously the logical one.
And how long did HHH leave it from the time he hit the pedigree until he pinned him?
I know, I couldn't believe it, for years I'd been told that Triple H was the best in the business and one of the tougest bastards as well. Booker T must have took him to the limit if it took him that long to make the cover.
RVD was ready for a title run in 2002. Triple H put a stop to that. Where was he in 2003? Mid card.
Shawn Michaels was ready for the title in 1995, but Kevin Nash put a stop to that, Austin was ready for the title in 1997 but Undertaker put a stop to that. Interesting thing to note about that was that the year later both guys were still viewed as main-eventers and in fact won the title. One major loss didn't wreck their main-event status, so why did it to RVD, who wasn't even beat clean? Maybe it's because RVD wasn't ready for the title.
Oh and since you like to talk about logic answer me this, The WCW Title had lost all meaning because it had changed hands so much during the dying days of WCW, so when you bring that belt back and want to bring legitmacy back to it logic dictates that you do two things, 1) Give it to your biggest star, 2) Don't have the belt change hands in it's first big match.
You can say that RVD embarresed the company. I doubt McMahon was too bothered. It was free publicity.
McMahon probably didn't care much you're right, I mean it's not like he had RVD drop the WWE Title on Monday, the ECW Title on Tuesday, Suspended him on Wednesday and buried him for months after, oh wait...
I'm still waiting on why guys like Austin and Rock get away on not putting anywhere near as many guys over as Triple H.