The Triple H Thread | Page 18 | WrestleZone Forums

The Triple H Thread

What is your opinion of Triple H.?

  • I Hate Him!

  • I'm not a fan of his

  • Neutral: Don't like or hate him

  • He's okay, not the greatest

  • He's The King of Kings!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Perhaps it was just because I'm tired, but I didn't see any good counter-argument in that last post. In fact, I had trouble finding any argument at all. I've said it once and I'll say it again, and this does apply to myself as well - very few people who's a mark for any wrestler can write a well-balanced and neutral argument when the wrestler they're a fan of falls under the looking glass of criticism. I get that. Let me try the best I can to comment on some of your arguments.

As you said, a majority of fans have the "same skewed opinion." What does that tell you? Maybe that Hunter is indeed not giving his all? What does that help your argument but confirm what I just said? Anyways, the marks and Creative Team, as well as Hunter himself are the ones responsible for Hunter getting a push he seems to neither appreciate nor care about - he's the holder of the biggest belt in the biggest wrestling promotion in the world, and it looks like he could care less. Vince doesn't give a crap about the opinions of us "internet fans." We haven't influenced anything here.

In his match with Benjamin, it was clear for ANYONE to see that Triple H refused to give Shelton his best. In fact, it looked almost deliberately like Hunter was trying to make him look bad. One of the weakest Pedigrees I've seen, some really stiff, out-of-there sells and basically, it just felt like HHH was refusing to have Benjamin look better than him. Now I don't know the truth in this, but to me as a viewer, this is what it looks like to me. I've seen Triple H's A-Game many, MANY times, but that was not it. Not even close.

Professional wrestling is basically a team sport. The opponents work together to sell the other guys' moves and make them look as good as possible. That's the foundation of wrestling itself; teamwork! So why does HHH appear to not want to do that at times?

As for your Kennedy comment, I actually sort of agree with you. Kennedy in-ring work has been on a downhill slide for a while now. While he can still tap into that level he displayed in 2005/2006 at times, sometimes he displays the same sort of complacency I can see in Triple H. But that is not for the majority of the time, unlike Hunter. And Kennedy is not a major title-holder. Cheez, he ain't even in the main event and hasn't been for quite some time. So I'll agree with you that Kennedy has regressed in quality performance in recent times, but that he's "overrated" at the same level of Triple H? Not a chance.

I'm not one to change my opinion of something without someone actually trying to do it, and there wasn't really much that I could see of that in your post. I hate to turn this post into a two way monologue, but it's my nature to respond when others question my judgment. But remember, this is a thread on a user's PERSONAL assessment of who's "overrated" and who's not on SmackDown. Not your opinion on someone else's opinion. You want to contest what I say, fine, but make sure you at least have something to disprove my statements.
 
LOL. I meant people on the IWCs skewed opinion. Seems to me, the roaring responses from the crowd, and the uptrend of SD!'s ratings, the majority who matters dont feel how you do about Triple Hs work. As I said, the opinion of him not selling for Shelton is ridiculous. for a few reasons.

He did. Very simply, he did sell it. Shelton almost BEAT him with a kick to the head. Not sure how much better you want him to sell it. It felt like he wasnt selling anything, becuase thats what you WANTED him to be doing And as I pointed out before, did you watch SummerSlam?? He made Kahli look like a million bucks. you CANT sell any better than he did. Also, why would it make much sense for Trips to no sell one of the guys he is facing this weekend in the main event of a world title championship match?? The entire purpose of booking that match was to make Shelton look legit. You dont think trips had some part in the planning of that match?? Would make no sense then to make him look shit.

Ask Kahli is Trips is a good team mate. You can ask Cena and Batista as well.
 
As you said, a majority of fans have the "same skewed opinion." What does that tell you? Maybe that Hunter is indeed not giving his all? What does that help your argument but confirm what I just said? Anyways, the marks and Creative Team, as well as Hunter himself are the ones responsible for Hunter getting a push he seems to neither appreciate nor care about - he's the holder of the biggest belt in the biggest wrestling promotion in the world, and it looks like he could care less. Vince doesn't give a crap about the opinions of us "internet fans." We haven't influenced anything here.
Dude, HHH as champion has trumped CM & mark henry as champions. No champion has to give it their best for every single match. He has still done a lot more then CM Punk in their current Championship runs.

In his match with Benjamin, it was clear for ANYONE to see that Triple H refused to give Shelton his best. In fact, it looked almost deliberately like Hunter was trying to make him look bad.
Any excuse will work. but when it comes down to it SHELTON ALWAYS LOOKS THAT BAD.
One of the weakest Pedigrees I've seen, some really stiff, out-of-there sells
your a bit confused here mate. Shelton sold the pedigree badly. it looked crap becouse of shelton. thats why his pedigrees differ all the time. its the person recieving the pedigree that makes it look good.
and basically, it just felt like HHH was refusing to have Benjamin look better than him.
Bull shit. Shelton could never look better then HHH.
Now I don't know the truth in this, but to me as a viewer, this is what it looks like to me.
IWell im,a veiwer as well but you dont see me saying that.
've seen Triple H's A-Game many, MANY times, but that was not it. Not even close.
Wait till tommorow morning. we will see it dont you worry.

Professional wrestling is basically a team sport. The opponents work together to sell the other guys' moves and make them look as good as possible. That's the foundation of wrestling itself; teamwork! So why does HHH appear to not want to do that at times?
He does. he sells other peoples moves way better then most. its people selling HIS moves that makes him look shit.
 
Yeah, well, at least now you're trying to counter what I say. I like that.

Something I failed to mention is that all the main tier champions in WWE right now don't work for me. Triple H is actually doing the best job of the WWE, ECW and WHW champions right now, but this is a point in time where few or no champions do a good job. Shelton is one of those in the first category.

Also, I tried to stress it before, this was MY personal opinion. You might think differently, well, good for you. But there were a few moments there where anyone who paid proper attention could see that Triple H was trying to hold him back, or at least, that's what it seemed like to me. And I wasn't suggesting that Shelton is on the level of Triple H that he can outshine him, because he isn't, it just did not look like he was taking Shelton as a legitimate threat. The booking did a pretty fine job of that, and he may have booked the results himself, I don't know, but I think it legitimately looked like at least one of the guys were mucking up the match. It could be Shelton, I guess.

Again, I am a fan of HHH's work, but his WWE Championship reign has been lackluster. But that's my personal opinion, but I feel like I see people saying the same thing all the time.
 
HHH is doing better as champion then the others for the fact that he has had the belt for longer! SD has better ratings because the people rarely see him and I must admit it is a nice change to have him there!

The only question is how long will he be liked? Already I am sick and tired of seeing him as champ. It seems that he will only lose the belt when it is convenient for him or the higher ups notice that the time to change hands is close.

I would like him to face this Russian and look like he has trouble with him and that way it may look better!
 
This is very poor. After a period where Smackdown was interesting thanks Triple H staying off the air (crappy Khali feud excepted), while Edge/Taker built up to their awesome conclusion and The Brian Kendrick seriously started making waves, HHH is up to his old tricks. Over the last couple weeks he has gone on a burying campaign, systematically dissing SD's young stars in his promos and retaining his title against them against silly odds. Apparently they're not happy and have gone complaining to Taker, not that I blame them for a minute.

<next paragraph is informed by spoilers>

So where are we now? Edge is god knows where, maybe even going to RAW. Taker and Show are having busy feuding, with Vickie also engaged there. There is backstage heat on MVP and he's getting seriously buried here. Shelton has improved but may also start moving down, judging by the spoilers, Kendrick's push is, quite naturally, running out of steam, and I see him either moving into the top ranks of the tag-team division or dropping down to the midcard scene. Which leaves Hardy, who a) has possibly fucked up again and b) Trips is seemingly determined to make look as bad as possible before dropping the belt to him.

Frankly, this will make the title scene very boring. Not that they're can't be awesome feud which don't involve the belt at all, but a fun title scene helps massively in making SD the fine show it has the potential to be.
 
My beef with Triple H isn't the fact that he is champion or his political position to get and stay there, as who could care less about that as long as we get enjoyable viewing!

What I absolutely hate about him however is how he buries absolutely everyone that he works with. The greats in the business make their opponents look good, like Flair, Michaels etc. Triple H just does not do this. As soon as he entered the championship scramble, within 30 seconds he had made the other 4 look far far below his level.

He also makes them look stupid with the 'comedy' he injects into his promos. I just don't see how we are supposed to suspend our disbelief when watching HHH, because every moment he is on our screens he is dominant and never in danger.
 
I agree with AP. The Great Khali with his 'power' was almost unstoppable and everyone had a hard time with him. Did HHH? Will we see him put someone over that could get the belt? It most likely be awhile until we see that happen. Have him go heel, that will not help anything. If he goes heel he will face whoever and the samething will happen. First the face will win a chance to face him or get awarded the chance then HHH will come out and say something against the face. Second he attacks him from behind on another day, but the face will face him in a no title match and beat him! Then lastly the title match: He wins and the circle starts again. No change in the storyline.
 
Triple H confuses the hell out of me, so I've got a couple of questions regarding this weeks Smackdown.

#1 On WWE.com the Undertaker vs. Big Show match is listed as a No Contest, why is that? Surely The Undertaker won. Big Show didn't go into the ring and attack Triple H, he did after the bell, but his intention was always to go after Taker. Normally this would result in Triple H losing via DQ but that wasn't the case, so the website tells me.

#2 How Come Koslov's headbuts kill other wrestlers but not Triple H? So he has a long, grueling match with Taker. Big Show then comes out and beats him up, Koslov then comes out and delivers his finishing move, but that's enough. I'm deeply confused by this.
 
When it comes down to it, HHH never can be the underdog. Anybody who has a killer move or supposedly unbeatable will never beat HHH. Khali is an example. The only question is when does he lose the belt and will an injury be the reason?
 
Well, I just finished watching this weeks Smackdown, and what do you know! Jeff Hardy is still getting huge frigging pops! Why is that people? I thought he was supposedly being "buried?" I mean, by the logic of many posters, one loss to Triple H should warrant an automatic burying, but lo and behold, the fanboys once agian blow things way out of proportion.

People need to understand that losing to Triple H does not automatically mean they will be forced to step down a card, or suffer any other debilitating travesty. If a superstar can no longer get over after a loss to Triple H, then thats their fault, not Triple H's.

I also don't see why people think that He has to lose the belt so soon. Smackdown has been all around more entertaining than Raw lately, and from what I hear is getting better ratings than it usually does. Triple H is a reliable worker who can consistently draw on a weekly basis, so why should Vince be so eager to take the title off of him?
 
Triple H burying Jeff Hardy isn't going to effect his pop at all. He's still over, and Triple H making him look inferior won't do a thing. Out of all the wrestlers he's done it to, the only one it's really ever had an effect on is Randy Orton (2004). RVD, Jericho, Booker T and others all managed to remain over. Orton just wasn't as over once Triple H had got his hands on him.

If losing to Triple H doesn't mean you have to step down the card, then how come everybody steps down the card once he beats them?

The guy has been ridiculously dominant this year. I have no problem with him beating Orton, he needed to get his reign off to an impressive start. But every match and feud he's had sice then has been about him. You can't say it should be because he's the champion. But what exactly did he do for Edge & Cena, or the other 4 wrestlers in the Scramble match. The only thing he really did was make himself look better. And if he's as good as he thinks he is, then he shouldn't need to.
 
I agree with jake Triple HHH has been ridiculously dominant this year. There is nothing wrong with him being champion since besides him i do not see anyone else qualified to hold the tittle but the man is burying people left and right. Now i know MVP has been on a losing streak for awhile now(those geniuses at creative at it again) but did we honestly need triple h coming out week after week to destroy him on the mic? Also i know hardy is over no matter what but seriously do we need to see triple h pinning him cleaning this many times? In my book hardys credibility when it comes to facing triple h is practically non existent. And yes i do think losing triple h means you have to step down a card because usually the people he is burying is someone he does not like.
 
I wouldn't mind HHH having a good, long run with the title if he was entertaining and actually had good matches.

I mean, seriously... I loved his match with Cena at NOC, but that's it during this run. His matches with Orton were terrible, in my opinion. Those two just don't work well. The Hardy matches were decent at best, but nothing special. HHH vs. Hardy a few years ago on Smackdown when Jeff beat him for the IC Title still remains as their best match against one another. That goes to show how horrible/lazy HHH has become since then.

Also, the guy needs a new gimmick. New music. New entrance. Let's change the shit up. Please. We all know a heel turn isn't too far down the line at this point, but God I hope he changes his character completely when that time comes. It's time for something new for the guy. Or, is he just too insecure to try something new at this point in time? I hope not, because no one here can deny the douche&#8217;s talent; however, he has been very stale since 2002 and it&#8217;s time for something NEW to light a fire under his ass.
 
Well I mine as well give my thoughts on "The Game" before I head in for the night. Let's take a look at all the highlights of Triple H's reign ever since going to SD!

-He deafeated Chavo Guerrero in his SD! Debut
-Takes on Khali in an Indian broken Glass arm wrestling contest
-Squashes Kenny Dykstra
-Beats Shelton Benjamin
-Defeats Khali in a Lumberjack Match
-Defeats MVP
-He and Jeff Hardy beat MVP and Kendrick in a tag team match
-Beats Chris Jericho and Matt Hardy on SD!'s debut on the MyNetwork Channel
-Faces Big Show in a match that resulted in No Contest
-Faces Undertaker to a no contest
-Defeats Jeff Hardy, Edge, The Great Khali, Brian Kendrick,Shelton Benjamin, and MVP in PPV championship matches.

I don't understand how some people will find his reign entertaining the least bit. It has been a complete snooze fest ever since he came on to SD! He needs to lose the damn belt already. IMO the belt should be around Jeff Hardy's waist right now. The last two PPV encounters between the two have been perfect opportunities for Jeff to walk away as champion.

It's the same shit every fued.Getting attacked after every match as an attempt to make it look like he will be in actual "danger" of losing his title. He couldn't even let Shelton Benjamin go over.

Now you have THE Brian Kendrick who was making waves with his new gimmick terribly losing momentum each week, MVP who is just getting buried, and ,Shelton who is just being thrown in random matches, and Jeff Hardy who just can't seem to win the big one no matter how over or how close he gets.
 
I'll summarize my points that I thought of while reading through the most recent postings to this thread. In no particular order:

1. I agree with all the complaints people have posted about HHH and his title reign, but to be honest, nothing about it surprises me. It's how the majority of his title reigns go. Someone mentioned about him needing a heel turn, and of course he will at some point down the road, but it doesn't make sense right now because there are too many heels at the top level compared to faces right now.

2. Why oh why does HHH think that he's funny? He's not. He should stop trying to make jokes entirely.

3. My guess is that if HHH loses the belt in the near future, it will only be due to blatant cheating, and it will be done mainly to set him up for either another royal rumble or failing that, an elimination chamber victory.

4. It also wouldn't surprise me if HHH is politicking to be the one to end the undertaker's wrestlemania winning streak.

5. Why didn't HHH lose the belt in the championship scramble? It would have been a perfect opportunity for someone else to get a title run and it could have been done without HHH being pinned and looking weak. There was really no reason to keep the belt on him outside of wanting to be some unbeatable monster.

6. On 10/31 smackdown, why did they have koslov back down from HHH? True, it usually happens when we have a face vs. heel confrontation, but it seemed completely out of character for koslov. All it served was making HHH look better in a promo, for about the millionth time he's cut one.
 
Triple H burying Jeff Hardy isn't going to effect his pop at all. He's still over, and Triple H making him look inferior won't do a thing. Out of all the wrestlers he's done it to, the only one it's really ever had an effect on is Randy Orton (2004). RVD, Jericho, Booker T and others all managed to remain over. Orton just wasn't as over once Triple H had got his hands on him.

If losing to Triple H doesn't mean you have to step down the card, then how come everybody steps down the card once he beats them?

The guy has been ridiculously dominant this year. I have no problem with him beating Orton, he needed to get his reign off to an impressive start. But every match and feud he's had sice then has been about him. You can't say it should be because he's the champion. But what exactly did he do for Edge & Cena, or the other 4 wrestlers in the Scramble match. The only thing he really did was make himself look better. And if he's as good as he thinks he is, then he shouldn't need to.

Who has stepped down a card after losing to him? Jeff Hardy lost to him at No Way out, and also at Unforgiven and No Mercy, and went on to compete in main event matches. Umaga and Carlito would be on jobber duty regardless of losing to him, so you can't say buried them. Cena and Orton have also lost to him multiple times, and haven't stepped down to the mid-card level.

I also don't understand why people complain about him beating guys like Kendrick and MVP. Seriously, how could you have expected MVP to go over him so soon? Earlier this year he lost to Matt Hardy, and he recently lost to Funaki, so going over Triple H would make no sense. Kendrick can hang with main event guys, but would still look out of place going over Triple H.

Thats what you have to keep in mind. If someone goes over Triple H, it has to be believable. Having mid-card guys like MVP, Shelton, and Kendrick go over him would not be realistic or believable in the least bit.

About him being too dominant, earlier episodes of Smackdown have had Kozlov and Hardy beating down Triple H, so that point is moot. If a superstar can't look dominant when standing up to Triple H, then its their fault. Its not like he hasn't put anybody over since coming back. He lost to Hardy in 07, was eliminated by Cena at the Rumble, and lost to Orton twice.
 
Who has stepped down a card after losing to him?

Other than the wrestlers I've already mentioned? Who's stepped up after beating him? It's a shorter list.

Jeff Hardy lost to him at No Way out, and also at Unforgiven and No Mercy, and went on to compete in main event matches.

Good work by Jeff Hardy then. Look at his match with HHH at Armageddon. That's how you lose to somebody and not put them over. If Jeff Hardy is still in the main event picture it's because of his own popularity.

Umaga and Carlito would be on jobber duty regardless of losing to him, so you can't say buried them.

He made them look like shit in matches with them, so he did bury them. Umaga faced Cena, Lashley, Jeff Hardy and a few others before his Triple H feud. But Triple H is the only one who didn't let him get much offence in.

Watch the Unforgiven match with Carlito and tell me how he didn't bury him.

Triple H also has this knack of burying people without wrestling them.

Cena and Orton have also lost to him multiple times, and haven't stepped down to the mid-card level.

Other than when Cena returned at the Rumble and spent the next six months as a mid card wrestler? Or Orton waiting nearly 3 years for another proper main event run?

I also don't understand why people complain about him beating guys like Kendrick and MVP.

It's the way he beats them.

Seriously, how could you have expected MVP to go over him so soon?

Nobody. Butr people expect MVP to look like he could win.

Earlier this year he lost to Matt Hardy, and he recently lost to Funaki, so going over Triple H would make no sense.

Right, but Triple H could make him look competitive before he beats him, right?

Kendrick can hang with main event guys, but would still look out of place going over Triple H.

As it was proven at Unforgiven in the Scramble match. Nice back and forth action until Triple H comes in. Withing 30 seconds or so he's pinned Kendrick, and he holds the belt for the remainder of the match. The only wrestler out of three Scramble matches to do so.

Thats what you have to keep in mind. If someone goes over Triple H, it has to be believable. Having mid-card guys like MVP, Shelton, and Kendrick go over him would not be realistic or believable in the least bit.

If Triple H beat them but made them his equal in the process then it would be perfectly believable. If those wrestlers don't beat Triple H, then you're only left with 3 on Smackdown who can.

About him being too dominant, earlier episodes of Smackdown have had Kozlov and Hardy beating down Triple H, so that point is moot.

After which he get's up easily, HHH always get's up after a couple of seconds.

If a superstar can't look dominant when standing up to Triple H, then its their fault.

How so?

Its not like he hasn't put anybody over since coming back. He lost to Hardy in 07, was eliminated by Cena at the Rumble, and lost to Orton twice.

He lost to them, he didn't put them over. There's a difference.
 
Jeff Hardy was suppose to step up a card after beating him. He only lost at the Rumble and No Way Out because they planned on elevating his career later. Hardy was most likely the one who was supposed to win MITB, but he screwed up his big chance.

I would say that Ortons's career was somewhat elevated by beating him at No Mercy. I know that they tried to make it look as if Triple H was injured, but he bottom line is that Orton won, and because of this had a long and dominant title reign. After he beat Triple H, he continued to look even more dominant month by month, and built up credibility by going over guys like Jericho and HBK. Triple H set that in motion by losing to him.

You also keep emphasizing how Triple H doesn't let his opponents get enough offence in, which is complete bullcrap. He got completely dominated at No Mercy 07, and also looked rather weak at WM 24. Hell, he didn't even get his entire offense in at WM.

I have also seen his matches against jobbers like Snitsky and JBL, and he gets dominated all the way up until the end of the match, which is how its suppose to go. Besides, why would you want a guy like Triple H to look like a pussy? Other than maybe the Undertaker, he is the most over guy right now, and you want him to look good when he wins.

Orton looked good when facing Triple H, and so did Hardy. Even Shelton looked like he could win. I just think people are getting angry because their favorite wrestlers aren't winning. If you want proof, just look at all the people whining because Jericho lost his title. Its usually has nothing to do with who looks dominant. In the end, people are pissed because the people they want to win arent winning.
 
Jeff Hardy was suppose to step up a card after beating him. He only lost at the Rumble and No Way Out because they planned on elevating his career later. Hardy was most likely the one who was supposed to win MITB, but he screwed up his big chance.

But he still wasn't a main event calibre wrestler. It was good work by him and Orton that made you think that he could be a world champion.

I would say that Ortons's career was somewhat elevated by beating him at No Mercy.

Again, great work by Orton.

Orton given the belt at No Mercy.
Orton loses belt 20 minutes later.
Triple H beats Umaga, suffers storyline rib injury.
Orton beats injured HHH, with the aid of lots of weapons.

Not a great start to a title reign. Really it only picked up once he started feuding with Hardy.


I know that they tried to make it look as if Triple H was injured,

Why did they do that?

but he bottom line is that Orton won, and because of this had a long and dominant title reign.

After his first 30 day title reign, and his 2nd 20 minute title reign, yes.

After he beat Triple H, he continued to look even more dominant month by month, and built up credibility by going over guys like Jericho and HBK. Triple H set that in motion by losing to him.

All of that was down to Orton. His title reign was hampered from the start. Retained title by DQ to HBK at Cyber Sunday. Could only beat HBK could he couldn't use Sweet Chin Music at Survivor Series. Lost to Y2J via DQ at Armageddon. Hardy the best way to start a title reigns. I've decided not to add the DQ outcome of the No Way Out Orton match. Oops.

Go on then, I'll give you Triple H.

Beats Orton, JBL & Cena to win WWE Championship at Backlash.
Beats Orton at Judgment Day.
Beats Orton at One Night Stand.
Beats Cena at Night Of Champions.
Beats Edge at The Great American Bash.
Beats The Great Khali at Summer Slam.
Beats Shelton Benjamin, Jeff Hardy, The Brian Kendrick & MVP at Unforgiven.
Beats Jeff Hardy at No Mercy & Cyber Sunday.

You also keep emphasizing how Triple H doesn't let his opponents get enough offence in, which is complete bullcrap. He got completely dominated at No Mercy 07, and also looked rather weak at WM 24. Hell, he didn't even get his entire offense in at WM.

Two examples? He's been a main event wrestler for 9 plus years now. Which No Mercy match are you on about anyway?

I have also seen his matches against jobbers like Snitsky and JBL, and he gets dominated all the way up until the end of the match, which is how its suppose to go.

You've got to hand it to the guy, he makes remarkable comebacks. Amazing how he get's dominated, a wrestler uses all the moves in his arsenal. Triple H then beats them with a punch, kick Pedigree combo.

Besides, why would you want a guy like Triple H to look like a pussy?

Where did I say that? It's the other wrestlers who shouldn't look like *****es. It's fine for a heel like MVP to back off. But as a monster heel and face, Koslov and Hardy should never back down.

Other than maybe the Undertaker, he is the most over guy right now, and you want him to look good when he wins.

He's not even the second most over guy on Smackdown. And as a champion he should look good, but as a champion he should make challengers look good also.

Orton looked good when facing Triple H, and so did Hardy.

As neither a fan or Orton or Hardy, I came to the conclusion a while ago that they were both very talented.

Even Shelton looked like he could win.

Don't be silly.

I just think people are getting angry because their favorite wrestlers aren't winning.

I don't care who wins. In fact my favourite wrestlers don't have a very good win percentage.

If you want proof, just look at all the people whining because Jericho lost his title. Its usually has nothing to do with who looks dominant. In the end, people are pissed because the people they want to win arent winning.

Find a post of me whining about it and get back to me.
 
POWERSLAM MAGAZINE
Quote:
In World Wrestling Entertainment, detail is crucial: it&#8217;s so important, in fact, that the McMahon family&#8217;s fingerprints can be found on virtually everything emblazoned with a WWE logo. A micromanager, supreme leader Vince McMahon works 80 hours per week, and obsesses over every aspect of WWE&#8217;s output. It is a work ethic he has handed down to his top lieutenant, the Executive Vice President, Creative Wrestling, Talent Relations & Live Events (could her job title be any longer?) Stephanie McMahon-Levesque. In WWE creative team meetings, Vince likes to brag what separates WWE from it&#8217;s competition, past (WCW) and present (TNA), is quality control. We&#8217;re talking McMahon family pride and consistency here: that&#8217;s what they personally bring to WWE&#8217;s product. To Vince and Stephanie, WWE is the commercial embodiment of the McMahon family, and that means WWE has to be just as perfect as what the egotistical father and daughter see in the mirror each day. Whether it&#8217;s RAW announcer Michael Cole&#8217;s tone of voice or the way Vladimir Kozlov sells or the ring entrances which are tailor-made for each star performer, WWE fans can rest assured that they are seeing and hearing exactly what the McMahon&#8217;s want.

Since all the facets of WWE&#8217;s image are meticulously planned and stage-managed from the top, insiders know that everything is done for a reason. Each detail contains valuable clues about the McMahon brain trust&#8217;s plans for WWE&#8217;s future. That&#8217;s why it should come as no surprise that a memo distributed to the media in August by THQ, publishers of WWE&#8217;s forthcoming SmackDown Vs RAW 2009 video game, has been the source of so much buzz and controversy in wrestling circles. As reported in last month&#8217;s issue, THQ laid down the ground rules for screenshots from the new game, the most scandalous of which will haunt Paul Levesque forever: &#8220;Refrain from showing Triple H in a losing/defeated/defenceless position.&#8221; The absurdity of this request bears repeating: WWE was so protective of Triple H that it requested no magazines publish photographs of the animated version of him appearing vulnerable. In a normally shambolic wrestling company like WCW or TNA, this would have been regarded as a fluke P.R. mishap, a quirky bureaucratic miscommunication or an isolated incident of vanity run amuck &#8211; not necessarily a part of some grand plan dictated from the top. Since this was a WWE directive, however, wrestling fans and insiders saw this memo as one more meaningful piece of evidence corroborating the near-decade-long conspiracy to shove Triple H down the throats of the fan base ahead of his co-workers.

The backlash online was predictable: words to the effect of &#8220;HHH is now holding down wrestlers in video games&#8221; were posted on websites and forums. The folks in Stamford, Connecticut certainly asked for it. WWE/THQ did not forbid journals from publishing screenshots of any other WWE performer &#8220;in a losing/defeated/defenceless position&#8221;: magazines can run a dozen images of Batista, Shawn Michaels, John Cena, Randy Orton or The Undertaker getting beaten up, if they wish. The stipulation in the press release was just an extension of the preferential treatment that HHH has received, really since his memorable wedding angle with Stephanie McMahon, whom he had drugged and married against her will at a drive-through wedding chapel in Las Vegas the night before she was supposed to marry Test on the November 29, 1999 RAW (that, more than his first WWF title win on the post-Summerslam 1999 RAW, was the turning point for HHH: once he was linked with Steph and embroiled in a deeply personal feud with Vince McMahon, he had it made) Triple H&#8217;s win over Vince in the main event of Armageddon on December 12, 1999 &#8211; following which, reluctant bridge Stephanie decided that she enjoyed being married to HHH after all &#8211; set the ball rolling for &#8216;The Game&#8217; after a rocky few months in which he had won, lost, regained and dropped the WWF title. On January 3, 2000, he captured the WWF title for a third time from Big Show and then scored back-to-back victories over Mick &#8216;Cactus Jack&#8217; Foley at the very successful Royal Rumble (in a stellar Street Fight) and No Way Out events (where he supposedly ended Foley&#8217;s career in the Hell in a Cell), and bagged an unprecedented heel victory in the Fatal Four Way main event of WrestleMania 2000, then the biggest money-making PPV in wrestling history. HHH, who would deservedly be ranked number one in the 2000 PS 50 after working further blinders with The Rock, Chris Jericho and others had an incredible year commercially as well: the WWF made a massive profit of $68.9 million between April 2000 and April 2001, if the company hadn&#8217;t launched the disastrous XFL in Steve Austin&#8217;s absence (November 1999-September 2000), HHH was one of the top two names in the company (with The Rock) a position which he clearly warranted. But as good and successful as he was, many were growing to resent him . . .

In September 2000, Stephanie McMahon replaced the late Chris Kreski as the WWF&#8217;s head writer, and soon entered into a real-life relationship with her on-screen husband, while he was still going out with Joanie &#8216;Chyna&#8217; Laurer (Levesque and Laurer split when Laurer learned of the Levesque/Steph affair) It is worth noting that even before the Levesque/Stephanie relationship began, HHH had ingratiated himself with the McMahons and obtained booking influence in the company. With head writer Steph as his new girlfriend, that influence inevitably increased. Before long, the gossip that &#8216;The Game&#8217; was harnessing Stephanie&#8217;s creative power to hinder or torpedo his enemies&#8217; careers while promoting himself to the detriment of the company&#8217;s best interests because accepted as common fact throughout the industry. Was it fact or simply a vicious rumour, triggered by jealously of his seven-figure-per-annum main event spot in the promotion? In a business filled with hypocrisy, lies, distrust and fluctuating allegiances, how seriously should fans take the reports about Triple H&#8217;s reign of terror backstage? What exactly has he done to earn this fearsome reputation? Seeking inside opinion, your writer quizzed several WWE employees, past and present about Triple H and his impact on WWE booking. The answers may surprise you. For a laugh, I contacted one WWE writer whom I hoped would be willing to contribute to this article but expected to declined, for reasons I cannot divulge. To my surprise, the subject of Triple H&#8217;s escapades backstage so deeply affected him that he sent me a lengthy reply in which he detailed Levesque&#8217;s standing in the company. Here is a reproduction of one section of his e-mail that I thought would particularly interest Power Slam readers. It is, as I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll agree, a revealing view of the WWE backstage workplace . . .

&#8220;When I first started working as a writer in the WWE, this is the creative format that was used: we all pitched ideas to our respective show&#8217;s head writer and then they would e-mail a draft of the show to the full writing staff, Vince and Stephanie on Friday night. This would allow all of us to read the shows before the marathon Saturday conference calls that would begin at 9am and continue, on some days as late as 5am. But there was one additional person, who would receive the shows: HHH. His position as a member of WWE creative was never established, yet he had to get a copy of the show, lest we incur both his and Stephanie&#8217;s wrath. Curiously enough, HHH would never participate in any of the conference calls. His changes would be passed on to Stephanie. She would declare in a firm voice on the Saturday conference calls, &#8216;Hunter doesn&#8217;t like that idea, and this is what he wants to change it to.&#8217; Then Vince would always say in a nice, soft tone, which was unusual for him: &#8216;Hmmmmm. What do you all think of that?&#8221; Brian Gewirtz, the notorious Stephanie and HHH lackey, would always be the first to reply, without a moment&#8217;s hesitation, &#8216;I think that&#8217;s a brilliant idea, Steph!&#8217; in his Eddie Munster voice. Then every other writer, with the exception of one or two, would chime in saying variants of &#8216;I agree&#8217; and &#8216;good idea&#8217;, etc. Then Vince would say, &#8216;Well, if there&#8217;s no disagreement, make the changes, Brian.&#8217; Same routine, over and over, whenever it involved a change suggested by HHH. It seemed like a work to me: Stephanie firmly declares HHH&#8217;s idea, Vince acts neutral towards it and asks for our opinions, and then Gewirtz quickly kisses Stephanie&#8217;s ass, prompting everyone else to agree.



&#8220;This routine would never change, except those weeks when we had a triple-header work marathon (Sunday PPV, RAW on Monday, Tuesday taping of SmackDown): we would work on the RAW scripts during the day of the Sunday PPV. In those instances we wouldn&#8217;t e-mail the scripts to HHH --- we would hand-deliver them to him. Normally, the head writer of the show would give it to him, but occasionally that job fell to me. I remember being nervous the first time I delivered the script to the McMahon dressing room where HHH would dress (he would never use the locker rooms with the rest of the boys). When HHH answered I told him the RAW script was ready for his review. On the first occasion, he grabbed the script, flipped through it but did not read it, and asked me point-blank: &#8216;Am I f&#8212;king going over?&#8217; This first time that I delivered the script to him, he did indeed win his match, so I said yes. Then he politely gave the script back to me without reading it and said, &#8216;That&#8217;s all I needed to know,&#8217; and walked back into the McMahon locker room. A few months later when Gewirtz had another weekend off, I delivered another RAW script to him on a PPV Sunday. And it was the same routine. He nonchalantly flipped through it and said, &#8216;Am I f&#8212;king going over?&#8217; This time, however, he was to lose his match via disqualification. He would keep his title. I said to him, &#8216;Well, sort of.&#8217; Then HHH froze. He said, &#8216;What do you f&#8212;king mean, sort of?&#8217; I said, &#8216;You lose the match via DQ, so you still keep the title.&#8217;, &#8216;What page?&#8217; he growled. After I told HHH the page number this occurred on, he ripped that page out, threw the rest of the script to the floor in a rage, and slammed the door in my face. Needless to say, the next day during the agents&#8217; meeting, the script had somehow changed and now HHH won his match &#8211; cleanly. This was hardly an isolated incident.

&#8220;Ultimately, it&#8217;s not HHH&#8217;s fault or even Stephanie&#8217;s fault, really. WWE is Vince&#8217;s company: no one challenges him or what he says must happen. I spent a lot of time with both HHH and Vince together --- in some cases, five hours a day, especially when we had to take Vince&#8217;s Challenger Jet from Connecticut to somewhere on the West Coast. And the fact is that Vince has no objectivity when it comes to HHH. When any of us writers come up with an idea, Vince would say things like: &#8216;That&#8217;s great! Why am I even paying these guys?&#8217; and then laugh, while pointing at all of us strikers. In stark contrast, when Shane McMahon would sit in on some agent meetings, his ideas would be shot down by Vince. Vince was at his most human when interacting with Shame, in that he would yell at Shane like any dad yells at his son, but the yelling was always to try and make Shane better. With HHH, though, Vince would never publicly disagree with him. And with Stephanie by his side, he would accept whatever trash HHH spewed. After all, Vince would do anything for his baby girl. She would incessantly whine to him about putting HHH over, so Vince would do that for her . . .&#8221;

As incredible as this writer&#8217;s account of the backstage environment in the company might seem, his story is remarkably similar to others I was told in interviews I conducted with various WWE writers, producers, agents and backstage personalities for this article and for my book, Ring of Hell. That, to no surprise, leads us to the conclusion that the gossip about Triple H&#8217;s domineering influence backstage appears to be fundamentally true. In Ring of Hell, I quoted former WWE writer Dr. Ranjan Chhibber as saying that HHH once summoned him to a one-on-one meeting to personally advise him to abandon his friendly with then-WWE writer Paul Heyman, so he could instead form a new working relationship with HHH&#8217;s buddy Gewirtz (who had a long-running feud with Heyman). A WWE official interviewed for this article told me that HHH&#8217;s power is so indomitable backstage that, &#8220;If HHH tells a joke, everyone has to laugh. If you don&#8217;t laugh, you will be noticed and called out. It happened to me once, and Stephanie said, &#8216;What&#8217;s the matter: don&#8217;t you have a sense of humour?&#8217; &#8220; Let&#8217;s be frank: it hardly takes insider testimony to determine that Triple H has continually benefited from the sympathetic booking. While others are presented as vulnerable and occasionally silly, WWE for nearly nine years has ensured that the HHH character is always strong, dominated and smart, even when he plays heel. There are so many examples, stretching from the month Stephanie was appointed head writer in 2000, that it&#8217;s easy to come up with a list of incidents:

2000: Triple H pins Kurt Angle at Unforgiven to abruptly end the extremely over HHH/Stephanie/Angle love triangle storyline.
2001: Steve Austin, the wrestler who did more to make Vince McMahon a billionaire than any other, is demoted to the position of HHH&#8217;s heel associate in April and May. &#8216;Stone Cold&#8217; and &#8216;The Game&#8217; had never been close: this only drives the wedge deeper. Meanwhile, &#8216;The Game&#8217; squashes rising star Jeff Hardy to remind everyone of his overwhelming superiority.

2002: Undisputed champion Chris Jericho plays the demeaning role of Stephanie&#8217;s poop-scooping butler and Triple H&#8217;s punching bag on road to WrestleMania X8, after &#8216;The Cerebral Assassin&#8217; vetoes the original plan that Jericho and Stephanie are to have an affair behind his back. Jericho predictably loses the Undisputed title to HHH in a &#8216;Mania match which could not hope to follow The Rock Vs Hollywood Hogan, but is placed in the main event spot at Hunter&#8217;s request, so the image of him holding both title belts closes the show. At Unforgiven in September, HHH pins Rob Van Dam, another rising star. Sharp as a tack, RVD already knows what HHH&#8217;s game is.

2003: Triple H denies underdog Booker T a victory at WrestleMania XIX after degrading him with racist innuendo for weeks. In their match, heel HHH hits the Pedigree and waits 23 seconds before making the winning pin on Booker. Add &#8216;The Book&#8217; to the list of people who resent Triple H.

2004: New World Champion Randy Orton is portrayed as a cowardly babyface, who dumps the title to heel Triple H at Unforgiven, just four weeks after winning it.

2005: HHH triumphs in the Elimination Chamber match at New Year&#8217;s Revolution, winning the title from --- yes! --- HHH, who had vacated it in November, so he could regain it and pad his own title record. (This is his fifth World title, by the way.)

2006: HHH and Shawn Michaels smash five careers with their senseless slaughter of The Spirit Squad. Meanwhile, HHH decides that no younger talent, who might potentially benefit from the association, are allowed to join him and Michaels in the reformed DX.

2007: HHH is pinned by Jeff Hardy at Armageddon in a textbook example of how to technically lose a match while burying your opponent . . .

My sources also confirm the widely held belief that Levesque uses his influence to impede or sabotage careers of wrestlers he&#8217;s not even facing. Two WWE writers whom I spoke to for this feature --- who naturally insisted on anonymity before they would talk honestly about Triple --- offered specific examples. The first writer claimed that Tripper&#8217;s venomous attacks contributed to the exit of Mick Foley and Billy Kidman from the WWE roster. He told us HHH disparaged Foley whenever he appeared for the company, and diminished his value in the eyes of the McMahon family. &#8220;Foley is an out-of-shape nobody,&#8221; HHH was reported as saying &#8220;Funaki puts more **** in seats than Foley does. He should pay us for coming on our shows.&#8221; Meanwhile, HHH&#8217;s derogatory appraisal of Billy Kidman at an agents&#8217; meeting resulted in Kidman&#8217;s relegation to former broadcast Velocity and eventual release from his contract in July 2005 (Kidman was later rehired as a trainer in Florida Championship Wrestling.) The second writer sagely noted that fans can learn much about the real HHH from the few televised moments when he has let his guard down. &#8220;Triple H is on tape in the Bret Hart documentary claiming he knew nothing about the Montreal double-cross that was planned against Bret.&#8221; Said this WWE writer. &#8220;He looked right into Bret&#8217;s wife&#8217;s eyes and says he knew nothing about it, yet many times since he has bragged about knowing what was going to happen beforehand. Something of a character flaw, don&#8217;t you think? All you have to do is listen to some of the promos he cuts on other wrestlers he does not like or feels intimidated by, such as the promo he cut on Chris Masters on RAW in October 2006 (in which he mocked the steroid-free Masters&#8217; dramatic muscle mass loss) . . . He also once cut a promo on John Morrison (then Johnny Nitro) by calling him something to the effect of &#8216;Johnny Oversell&#8217; --- not exactly the way to &#8216;put over&#8217; your fellow wrestlers to help build the business!&#8221;

As touched upon earlier, this blatantly disrespectful conduct has raised the ire of many former and current co-workers of Triple H. (Dwayne &#8216;The Rock&#8217; Johnson had a long-running backstage rivalry with HHH, which was alluded to at the Hall of Fame ceremony this year.) In Issue 170 of Power Slam, the ever-candid Randy Orton revealed that Umaga&#8217;s initial response to his trade to Smackdown in the 2008 draft was, &#8220;Man, you know what? At least I haven&#8217;t got to deal with Triple H no more.&#8221; When HHH was also transferred to SmackDown from RAW later in the draft, RAW roster survivor Orton reported his response as: &#8220;Yes! Oh, my God, yes, yes, yes!&#8221; while punching the air. &#8220;I went right up to Umaga,&#8221; Orton continued, &#8220;and I was, like, &#8216;You&#8217;ve got to deal with him now!&#8217; It was my favourite draft pick, to be honest with you.&#8221; That&#8217;s the voice of experience talking. At a June press conference to promote a WWE event in Chile, Carlito said: &#8220;My opinion is that (marrying Stephanie) was a smart move by (HHH). I think that&#8217;s why he&#8217;s the champion now and has been champion in the past; it&#8217;s easier to him. We, the real wrestlers, don&#8217;t depend on people in the business . . . Others are given champions (on) a plate of gold or platinum, (though) I&#8217;m happy for him.&#8221;

(Since Carlito is the son of Carlos Colon, Puerto Rico&#8217;s most famous ever wrestler, and was pushed immediately following his debut in his father&#8217;s WWC promotion on the island in 1999, those comments irked some in the profession. Nevertheless, Carlito does not receive special treatment in WWE.) Naturally, wrestlers who are no longer with WWE and don&#8217;t have to fear HHH&#8217;s reprisals are free to denounce the &#8220;son-in-law&#8221; in far more graphic terms. &#8220;He&#8217;s like Kevin Federline of professional wrestling,&#8221; said Scott Steiner in an interview with the Stranglehold radio show in May. &#8220;Being married to the boss&#8217; daughter brings a lot of protection. These are guys up there right now who want to beat the hell out of him, but you know, they know they&#8217;d lose their jobs, so they don&#8217;t.&#8221; Steiner continued his assault on HHH in two interviews with The Baltimore Sun that same month. In the latter, on May 28, he told one famous story about an attempt by HHH to thwart Kurt Angle&#8217;s progress in the WWF which actually failed. Scott Steiner: &#8220;It&#8217;s no secret what Kurt Angle thought of Triple H . . . Here&#8217;s one story I got from Kurt: Triple H was trying to block Kurt from winning the WWF title, he said in a meeting, &#8216;I think Kurt Angle&#8217;s too small.&#8217; And Gerry Brisco stood up and said, &#8216;Well, what do you think would happen if you guys fought for real?&#8217; and HHH sat down, shut his mouth and they ran with it. Even Triple H&#8217;s former friend Monty &#8216;Billy Gunn/KipJames&#8217; Sopp, for whom HHH engineered several pushes in the WWF/WWE, blasted Levesque in a shoot interview (his comments are unprintable in this magazine). The list of active wrestlers I&#8217;ve spoken with who have knocked HHH, off the record, goes on and on . . .

So, if everything unpleasant that&#8217;s said about Triple H is generally true, the question becomes: why? If the evidence for HHH&#8217;s behaviour is clear, the explanations for it are anything but. Paul Michael Levesque has every conceivable reason to be a shining, self-assured role model for good, selfless action backstage in WWE. Professionally, his position is untouchable: as Stephanie&#8217;s husband (they were married in October 2003) and father of two of Vince&#8217;s grandchildren, Triple H will have the booking committee in his corner for the rest of his career. With his stardom and political dominance so thoroughly established, Levesque should understand that there&#8217;s nothing undercutting another wrestler&#8217;s career can do to benefit his position or losing a feud can do to damage his character. The worst of HHH&#8217;s abuses make even less sense when reviewed in the context of the outstanding work he has done on occasion over the past few years. There could not have been a more selfless or effective way to elevate Batista than the manner in which Triple H repeatedly put &#8216;The Animal&#8217; over in their excellent break-up storyline and later in their matches in the first half of 2005. The next year, Triple H lost to John Cena by submission in the Main Event of Wrestlemania 22. After the promos in the run-up to the match, in which HHH had unnecessarily belittled Cena&#8217;s wrestling ability, few expected that result on the big show.

Even Triple H&#8217;s burial of Jeff Hardy in December 2007 has been redemmed by his giving performance in the Elimination Chamber match at No Way Out 2008 and at No Mercy earlier this month. In these bouts, Triple H manifested some of the professional generosity and maturity that made his idol, Ric Flair, the ultimate &#8220;oversell and selflessly put over the other guy.&#8221; NWA World Champion in the 1980s. Furthermore, as a multi-millionaire and 39-year old father of two, one would have imagined that Levesque would have outgrown that juvenile impulse to flaunt his clout, just because he can. As a future inheritor of the WWE empire, eventually earmarked for his children, Levesque should be less concerned with beating wrestlers than using his own backstage and in-ring muscle to build new acts to safegyard the long-term profitability of what is his own family business. With this in mind, Triple H&#8217;s demolition of many of his most lucrative potential opponents over the years (Rob Van Dam, Booker T, Kurt Angle, Jeff Hardy, etc.) cannot even be called selfish, since it conflicts with his own personal, financial and familial best interests. Such self-destructive, illogical behaviour on Levesque&#8217;s part must ultimately be the result of some inherent character flaw: after all, there is no rational explanation for HHH&#8217;s record of power trips. One popular explanation is that, despite his amazing success in the business, Triple H harbours insecurity &#8211; that is, doubts he fully deserved the push he has received throughout this decade. It is a trait common among beneficiaries of nepotism.

A number of wrestlers, Kurt Angle and Scott Steiner among them, have claimed that HHH underminede their careers because he was secretly jealous they were tougher, stronger and more credible wrestlers than he could ever hope to be. If the true source of Levesque&#8217;s behaviour is dissatisfaction with himself that he redirects outwords, then he should be pitied: any wrestler who remains personally discontent after the prosperity Triple H has enjoyed will always be miserable, self-loathing man. &#8220;I don&#8217;t think HHH&#8217;s problem is so much insecurity as much as that when you get that much power, you use it to protect yourself,&#8221; continued Wrestling Observer Newsletter editor Dave Meltzer. &#8220;I think it&#8217;s what he was taught be (Kevin) Nash and Michaels.&#8221; As longtime fans know, they were both infamous in the 1990s for their backstage machinations when they were on top in the WWF and later, in Nash&#8217;s case, WCW. There is one more explanation for Triple H&#8217;s abuse of power, and it may be the most likely answer: Levesque is simply a disrespectful, power-hungry jerk, who does what he wants, when he wants and doesn&#8217;t care what other people think. Perhaps that&#8217;s why father in law Vince &#8211; a man whose on-screen character is essentially inseparable from his real-life personality &#8211; likes him so much. If that&#8217;s true and Levesque is playing the scheming &#8216;Cerebral Assassin.&#8217; On-screen and off, then Triple H&#8217;s current and future co-workers will have to watch their backs, as Paul and Stephanie take over the family business. WWE&#8217;s future may or may not be bright --- but it will certainly be bloody with Triple H at the helm.

So, for me this report really sums Triple H up. It contains factual reports from creative writers which are backed up and also contains times of when Triple H has buried other wrestlers.

Why would Triple H be involved with the creative side of the WWE for? After all its none of his business. This is yet another nail in the coffin for Triple H so to speak. So it seems everything that is said about Triple H is true, he is a selfish man who wants to control everything. Did anyone hear about the THQ incident? Where the WWE management and Triple H asked for himself not to be shown in a vulnerable position? So why did Triple H ask this? Why did'nt any other wrestler ask not to be shown in a vulnerable position either?

It also seems as if most people throughout wrestling resent him, Kurt Angle is one guy that certainly does. Here is a quote from Scott Steiner on Triple H &#8220;Being married to the boss&#8217; daughter brings a lot of protection. These are guys up there right now who want to beat the hell out of him, but you know, they know they&#8217;d lose their jobs, so they don&#8217;t.&#8221; So it isn't just a minority of wrestlers that dislike Triple H, it seems alot do. inside the article you will hear things come out that may surprise you, like the creative writers agreeing to one of Triple H's "improvements"

So in my opinion this article exposes Triple H for what he is, a selfish and greedy human being. Why would he want to stop the business growing? He's constantly buried and made stupid promos about certain wrestlers, now is this a man that looks intrested in building up talent? To me he is decimating it.

There is just so many examples, times and dates of Triple H acting like a complete ass and not letting guys prosper over him, i'm not saying he has to but i think everyone can see for themselves what damage he has caused and what fractured relationships have been formed due to his selfish being.

I mean whats Triple H doing changing the scripts? Is this what his time in WWE is all about? Altering scripts to his liking which will at the end of the day benefit him? Personally i feel sorry for the writers and the wrestlers Triple H has belittled and made feel like they had to agree. Is this how selfish and egotistical Triple H really is or is this article a great big lie?

Your thoughts?
 
This article, while a good, rich read, does nothing to set the record straight or prove anything that we don't already know, especially considering the author is seemingly the same guy who wrote that bad "Ring of Hell" book. But at least we got another source confirming what we've heard so many times before; Triple H is more or less a member of WWE's creative writing staff, even if it is not official.

I touched upon many of the same points in some of my earlier posts. Triple H is in a position where he is arguably the company's #1 asset and virtually nothing can ruin his standing within the company, especially not letting workers go over him every now and then. He's so well-connected - he's a de facto McMahon at that! - that absolutely nothing should be able to hurt his position. In his situation, he could indeed be a rolemodel for everyone else in the locker room, but for whatever reason he seems reluctant to do so. I can't really relate to being in a situation like that, so I don't know if I would have or not.

Either way, there will always be animosity between workers and Triple H simply for his connection with the very core of WWE even if some of the stuff he reputedly has done is or is not true. I will not say that I 100% believe that there are not a few exaggerations in the column, but if everything is indeed true, I could not have less respect for Triple H. All that pure wrestling talent, all that power and he refuses to use it for the benefit of his colleagues.
 
Biased much? Reading this article was very similar to reading "Sex Lies and Headlocks."


I would maybe believe some of the crap that this writer was dishing out if I didn't think that HHH was holding the belt when he didn't deserve it. The guy is one of the few guys left in the industry from an era where promos were good. As a result, he is one of the only guys in the E who is any good on the stick. He's got the look, etc. etc. etc.
 
The fact of the matter is that while HHH is from another area, he does not deserve any special treatment. He married into the McMahon family and is sticking his nose in where it should not be. He deserves to be disliked and even hated because he thinks he is better then everyone else. If he wants to get into creative development or whatever you call it, retire. Otherwise he should allow others to get top billing and even make him self look flawed. Then he would get more respect.
 
:lmao:


Marks.

are you guys for real??? do you think Triple H is the only person who has this kind of say?? You dont think HBK, Undertaker, and the rest of the guys who are at the very top of the "time on roster/ spot on the card" pyramid arent??? you must be a blind fool to say/think such things. Undertaker and HBK have been calling shots with creative since before Triple H was even called "Triple H" lol. Hulk Hogan used to do it too. EVERY major player does it. Add to the fact that none of them are going to OWN the fucking WWE within the next ten years or so. Er, yea no shit he runs things. He should probably get as much of this experience as possible now, before he has to run the entire company. Such incredible biased opinions are absolutely laughable. If you belive the article above to be 110% true and accurate, you are extremely naive. I guess its easy to be that way though when it supports a notion you wish was true though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top