If you read my entire post you'd realize I explained my reasoning, and no I'm not ignoring the stipulation, in fact I'm acknowledging the fact that realistically, Vince would do anything to avoid having Styles advance to the next round in HIS arena, but nice try.
Oh I see your method of voting now. Choosing the result of one specific match and choosing a winner based on that, huh? So just because Kane jobbed to Shane once he can't beat Owen? Well guess what? Kane's won a world championship, Owen never did. And In the confines of a steel cage how do you see Owen beating Kane? A guy like Owen Hart would hit and run on kane in order to be able to beat him and he can't do that in a cage. Kane is a bruiser and he would eat Owen alive inside of a cage.
Nash doesn't suck, he's accomplished a lot more in his career than Owen did and like Shockmaster said, people are underrating him because they've only seen the things he's done in his later years in WCW and his recent stuff in WWE and TNA. The truth is that he was a monster in his prime and he could beat him.
Read this from wikipedia about Nash's first run in WWE:
"On November 26, 1994, Diesel defeated Bob Backlund for the WWF Championship at Madison Square Garden in New York City, New York in an eight-second squash match. Michaels was irate about his former bodyguard having beaten him to the WWF Championship, and was sufficiently motivated to go on to win the 1995 Royal Rumble, earning himself a title shot at WrestleMania XI. At WrestleMania XI on April 2, 1995, Nash, accompanied to ringside by actress Pamela Anderson, defeated Michaels to retain the title."
Nash wouldn't have squashed Backlund for the title at MSG and he wouldn't have beaten HBK at wrestlemania if he sucked.
And why would he beat him in the said match? 1 - HBK is a bleeder 2 - An ambulance match is not a casket match, you have to be able to beat down your opponent long enough to drag him to an ambulance and throw him in an ambulance and close it, which i don't see HBK being able to do to a much bigger Nash after bleeding profusely during the entire match and going through a No Holds Barred match with him.
Again, do you realize that ignoring the stipulation makes no sense? I didn't ignore it in my vote for Hogan, I explained that. But Professional wrestling isn't only about who could wrestle better, you need to consider all the intangibles. If you want to ignore all of that go watch boxing or amateur wrestling, we won't miss you.
Oh I see your method of voting now. Choosing the result of one specific match and choosing a winner based on that, huh? So just because Kane jobbed to Shane once he can't beat Owen? Well guess what? Kane's won a world championship, Owen never did. And In the confines of a steel cage how do you see Owen beating Kane? A guy like Owen Hart would hit and run on kane in order to be able to beat him and he can't do that in a cage. Kane is a bruiser and he would eat Owen alive inside of a cage.
Nash doesn't suck, he's accomplished a lot more in his career than Owen did and like Shockmaster said, people are underrating him because they've only seen the things he's done in his later years in WCW and his recent stuff in WWE and TNA. The truth is that he was a monster in his prime and he could beat him.
Read this from wikipedia about Nash's first run in WWE:
"On November 26, 1994, Diesel defeated Bob Backlund for the WWF Championship at Madison Square Garden in New York City, New York in an eight-second squash match. Michaels was irate about his former bodyguard having beaten him to the WWF Championship, and was sufficiently motivated to go on to win the 1995 Royal Rumble, earning himself a title shot at WrestleMania XI. At WrestleMania XI on April 2, 1995, Nash, accompanied to ringside by actress Pamela Anderson, defeated Michaels to retain the title."
Nash wouldn't have squashed Backlund for the title at MSG and he wouldn't have beaten HBK at wrestlemania if he sucked.
And why would he beat him in the said match? 1 - HBK is a bleeder 2 - An ambulance match is not a casket match, you have to be able to beat down your opponent long enough to drag him to an ambulance and throw him in an ambulance and close it, which i don't see HBK being able to do to a much bigger Nash after bleeding profusely during the entire match and going through a No Holds Barred match with him.
Again, do you realize that ignoring the stipulation makes no sense? I didn't ignore it in my vote for Hogan, I explained that. But Professional wrestling isn't only about who could wrestle better, you need to consider all the intangibles. If you want to ignore all of that go watch boxing or amateur wrestling, we won't miss you.