michiganj24
Pre-Show Stalwart
I think I may have said it a littel wrong. I was not trying to say Raven was as good as Flair just that he like Flair won matches he shouldnt through the nmbers game and ring psychology. Raven was always hard to classify as his psychial prime was during his WCW and WWF days befor ehe got too addicted but his ring prime in which he really came into his own was in ECW. In a straight up fight he would have lost to most of his opponents he did beat here. It was ECW rule sthat allowed him to beat Andre, it was the blindfold coupled with the flock that allowed him to beat Harley and a man like Kane with a damged life as he has would have been the prefetc kind of person for Raven to mess with. H ewould have been so in his head he would be like Abyss is now. The way I really wanted to compare him to Falir is that he just nows how to steal that victory out of defeat(or at leats he did until he joined TNA). Flair one on one will whip him seven ways to sunday but make it Raven's rules and Flair will have a hard time(although with the Horseman to neutralize the Flock it might be the same thing)
I see where your coming from... and whether you like certain stips or not that's just how it is in pro wrestling. The point of a stipulation is to try and get the upper hand over an opponent you're afraid will beat you in a regular match. Considering the rules of this tournament, if a given participant can choose the stipulation it's only fair that a guy like Big Show can choose a chokeslam challenge. It's in the same category as say Styles drawing a Ladder match over Hogan. A chokeslam challenge is unfair to Big Show's opponent, but so is a ladder match to Hogan. Catch my drift?
As for Raven... you know what you could be right... personally I can't respect someone to that point who's finisher is a drop-toe hold (albeit it into a chair) (and albeit he has the DDT too), but I can see where you're coming from. HOWEVER, you state that Raven was seldom really at the top of his game... and that's the ticket. We'll never know what he was really like at the top of his game for an extended period of time. And that's what made Flair so great. He was durable, and he still is. He's still going strong, and I don't think one person would have a negative thing to say if he even won another world championship!
My point is that considering he never really "made it" (and yes "making it" is being a star in WWE or to a lesser extent WcW, which he never was), I really can't consider him in even the same paragraph as Ric Flair. You could say that he was that good but underrated or underused... but if he was THAT good (and lest not forget you're comparing him to Ric F'N Flair), he would have at least made it to a certain extent... which he didn't. So sorry, I gotta disagree with you there in the end.