Ahh, I can tell you're a first rate idiot.
You said the boos started in the first place because people got tired of Cena having the same character for 7 years. Watch:
See? That's what you said. John Cena first showed up on WWE TV in 2002. The boos started in 2005. Since I'm sure basic math is a no go for you, that's only three years. Thus, you were wrong.
You really shouldn't call people idiots when basic math is beyond your intelligence.
Who gives a fuck, you were talking about when the boos started. How can you not even know your own argument?
His character has undergone tremendous changes from the time he first won the WWE title until now. If you can't see that, it's your understanding of characters which is incredibly flawed, not Cena's progression.
And I'll reiterate just for you that you're an idiot.
Why the fuck would the WWE care if people boo or cheer him, as long as they're paying to see him? Which they obviously are, more than any other wrestler in the company? The main page here reported just a day or two ago, John Cena is the third most Facebook trending (whatever the fuck that means) sports figure in the entire world, behind only Messi and Ronaldo. That means more people care about Cena on Facebook than Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Peyton Manning, David Beckham, etc.
The WWE doesn't give a rat's ass if people boo or cheer Cena. You don't think they knew putting Cena against Rock and Punk would get Cena booed by the 15-25 male audience? Of course they did. They didn't care because it was going to make them money.
What did he point out? That Rock clearly got booed? That was my point, not sharu7's. Who cares WHY he got booed, he did.
You're a dumbass, first rate. The WWE knew the 15-25 male audience would boo Cena. They didn't care. But when you put Cena with someone like Miz or R-Truth, guys who are not smark favorites, Cena gets the majority of cheers. Sure, you still have the few idiots like you who boo him, but he mostly gets cheered in those situations. Seriously, pay attention. You might learn something.
And yes, I believe the WWE thought Punk cutting his promo would lead to significant Internet buzz. If they didn't, why would they let him completely remove the backstage curtain, figuratively speaking? Of course they knew it would generate buzz, you're an idiot if you say otherwise.
The point is that Cena is their most over wrestler, and he's their most over wrestler by a large margin. Which means his character is most certainly working. God, it's like I'm arguing with a child.
Are you really this obtuse? Do you really not understand not a single person in WWE management gives a rat's ass about the boos? Why do you keep talking about the boos? So a bunch of pimply faced testosterone laden males boo Cena while simultaneously cheering the Tooth Fairy who keeps talking about Fruity Pebbles. Who cares? John Cena is making money. People booing him prove nothing. Why? Because they still paid to come boo him.
Wrestling is a show targeted towards children and idiots. You might happen to fit in both categories.
Actually, very few do. Most of the reasons center around the fact they think they are too cool to like the same thing a child might like, as if someone will judge them for having the ability to think for themselves. That's not a valid reason, that's being herded like a pack of dogs.
I imagine you're quite the bitch.
Until people quit paying to watch Cena, I will always be right.
You want the WWE to change their biggest moneymaker because you simply don't like him, and ignore the fact more people CARE about Cena (whether they cheer him or boo him) than anyone else.
As I said, pot meet kettle.
Try and comprehend this. I'm sure it will be difficult for a child of your obviously limited intelligence, but just work with me here.
Cena = Big Money
R-Truth = Little Money
Cena = People like you are not a fan, but still pay money to watch
R-Truth = People like you are okay with him, but don't pay money to watch.
So you want Cena to be more like R-Truth, despite the fact R-Truth isn't making money. The fact is Cena makes the MOST money, which means people aren't tired of him. When people get tired of John Cena, they'll quit paying money for him. Until that happens, you can argue all you want about boos, but Vince McMahon will never hear you, since he's swimming in a pile of cash created by the current John Cena character.
I don't give a rat's ass if he's a good guy or bad guy, but the comment it would "freshen up the WWE" is so short-sighted it's funny. People like you have no ability to see past 2 months and recognize the impact on the business. How would it freshen things up? What new feuds could come from Cena turning heel? He's already feuded with Big Show, Orton, Punk and Triple H. You never put two heels together in a feud, so there wouldn't be any heel feuds to pursue.
So what would change? The only thing that would change would be he might say some edgier things, but then again, he can do that now.
The fact is Cena turning heel won't freshen up anything, UNLESS THERE'S A LEGITIMATE REASON TO TURN HEEL. You people are worse than Vince Russo, whom many of you claim knows nothing about wrestling. You want to turn Cena heel, without actually thinking about how it affects things. Until there is a legitimate reason to turn Cena heel, you shouldn't arbitrarily turn him heel.
Are you convinced yet your knowledge on wrestling is quite inferior to mine? Do I have to keep embarrassing you over and over, or do you think you can handle the basic ideas of Cena turning heel doesn't make sense right now, and boos have no value compared to moneymaking? I sure hope you can understand those, because your intelligence thus far has shown to be quite suspect.