MrGameTime
Pre-Show Stalwart
Why are people comparing today's Wrestlers with different Era's or Generations? This has nothing to do with wether or not a person should be considered a Legend. It's like saying Mike Tyson isn't a Legend in Boxing because he didn't fight Ali.
Also John Cena reached Main Event Status in the Attitude Era anyway. If i recall he Main Evented against Edge, and Triple H. Obviously he couldn't Main Event with Austin as he retired before Cena hit the scene, and The Rock left for Acting.
It all comes down to ones own definition of a legend. The easiest way is to compare against previous years legends. In my eyes a legend is someone that will be forever known, and is historic for being at the top of the game they were in, in a way cena is on top but its just such a different industry now.... so is it then fair that if you considered Cena a legend you are therefore putting him up there with hogan, austin, flair etc, he has no where near there star power.
What has he done to acheive greatness? kissed vinces ass, does 3 moves and got a boatload of kids to like him as he seems to be the only one worth on the weak roster now a days thats worth appealing to, in other words what im trying to say is they have to get behind someone... so Cenas is in the right place and the right time, if he was in the same time as some off the other "legends" he wouldnt be nowhere near them its just that there is no one else.
Simple question is... do you honestly believe Cena deserves to be a 10 time WWE champion? Thats a mockery.