I'm Done

  • Thread starter Thread starter X
  • Start date Start date
So why shouldn't we be mad if the better wrestler or our favorites don't win? Who gives a shit if it's fake and on the internet, we can still care.
 
I'm getting sick of this "it's a fake wrestling tournament why do you care?" shit everyone keeps saying.

Excuse me, but isn't pro wrestling itself nothing but a giant fat FAKE fucking soap opera? And yet we all devote countless hours upon hours of our lives to it.
 
I'm getting sick of this "it's a fake wrestling tournament why do you care?" shit everyone keeps saying.

Excuse me, but isn't pro wrestling itself nothing but a giant fat FAKE fucking soap opera? And yet we all devote countless hours upon hours of our lives to it.
I never said you shouldn't care. All I said was you should not be getting this pissed.

DO you get this pissed when your favorite wrestler loses a match?

I stand by what I said, Deal with it, a week or 2 after this is over no one will even remember or care who won.
 
...Well that's horseshit, most people who were here during the first and then the second tournament remember damn well who won. Infact the fact that Taker won the tourny last year has been used more then once to justify people voting for Edge.

So yeah, people do remember. And we're not getting pissed so much that the better wrestler is loser, but more so that SO MANY OF YOU ARE SO FUCKING INCREDIBLY STUPID. It's not the losing that angers us, it's a shitload of you flaunting your ignorance in our faces as though you knew what the fuck you were talking about.

And that's the last I'll say on that. I don't often bring back the angry xfear, but there you go.
 
meh, will offers a rep for each vote, and if he wins, i can have him rep me whenever i want.

That's enough for me
 
meh, will offers a rep for each vote, and if he wins, i can have him rep me whenever i want.

That's enough for me

You see? YOU FUCKING SEE THIS?

REP. MEANS. NOTHING. You could have 10,000 million ba jillion green, purple, blue and rainbow colored bars, and it means jack fucking shit to anyone here.

Jesus Will really went all out, he's actually gotten to freakin bribing people to vote for Edge. Insane.
 
To me, if you're going to vote for Edge fine, but the reason they are voting is what got me mad.

"I like Edge better", "It would be funnier if Edge won to see people's reactions", "Will asked me"

Alot of people took time in that matchup debating why to vote for Edge or Undertaker and people didn't even give it a look. Why are we wasting our time trying to convince people who don't want to be convinced? The whole point of a tournament has been lost on the posters here. Like I said, if Edge wins, fine, but we'll all know it wasn't for any real reason at all. The only arguments I've heard for Edge are, "you can't count one-on-one matches between the two, so Edge wins" (which BTW is the biggest load of crap I've ever heard on here), "It's not Wrestlemania so Undertaker won't win" and "it's a tournament so Edge will win". Seriously I've heard nothing else.
 
I'll be voting Edge over Hart simply because I can't bring myself to vote for a douche like Hart. All of Edge's e-fans make him really unbearable IMO. But after reading Bret's book I could never vote for him.
 
wwe-edge.jpg

undertaker.jpg


Edge's hair kicks Taker's hair up and down the street.
 
The only arguments I've heard for Edge are, "you can't count one-on-one matches between the two, so Edge wins" (which BTW is the biggest load of crap I've ever heard on here), "It's not Wrestlemania so Undertaker won't win" and "it's a tournament so Edge will win". Seriously I've heard nothing else.

Yeah, and the only reason I heard as to why 'Taker would beat Sting in a 1 hour Iron Man match was because he sits up after taking a move... so what's your point? There are stupid arguments all throughout the tournament, and there doesn't need to be a logical reason why someone votes for someone. That's how the tournament was set up. If Shocky wanted it different, then there would be no poll and people who have to vote for Edge by posting and explaining why.

X, even you know how ******ed the arguments for 'Taker have been. Remember the Terry Funk match? You had some fantastic posts in that thread, and 'Taker still won because he fucking sits up after taking a move. Man... fuck that motherfucker. I'm happy as fuck he's not winning this thing again.
 
Sting v Taker annoyed me to no end.

I'm pretty sure that Sam just ignored me when I slapped his post in the face and said 'no, that's wrong'. Taker wins by a landslide, my arguments went uncontested.

Taker supporters didn't even need to call that one in.
 
Sting v Taker annoyed me to no end.

I'm pretty sure that Sam just ignored me when I slapped his post in the face and said 'no, that's wrong'. Taker wins by a landslide, my arguments went uncontested.

Taker supporters didn't even need to call that one in.

Sting Should be facing SCSA right now. Not joking. But I was too lazy too post.
 
Oh hell yeah JMT I'd go with Terry Funk over the Undertaker all day and all night god damnit, but that could be because I'm such a hardcore Funk mark (his heel work in the 70s/80s is pretty much the gold standard for heel tactics in my book).

Still, Taker > Edge in every way. People criticizing him for not having great matches in the beginning....hello people, do you remember the insane level of awful wrestlers populating the WWF during that time? Edge on the other hand has had the chance to work with technical Gods like Benoit and Angle.
 
Whoa whoa whoa. People want to talk about first matches? Edge's first match: he injures the other guy and puts him on the shelf. GREAT first move there buddy.
 
What's terrible is the dense logic.

'Taker beating Edge head-to-head has no bearing, really? Edge vs Kurt Angle does?

Yeah, I'm pretty disappointed too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,825
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top