USA Presidential Elections 2012 LD | Page 17 | WrestleZone Forums

USA Presidential Elections 2012 LD

I could actually take a cab to Romney's campaign HQ right now if I wanted to see a lot of bummed out Republicans, but that would require too much money, and I'll need all the money I can get now that we have a raging socialist as president!
 
Do conservatives really think they sound smart when they contest this stuff and refuse to acknowledge that they lost?
 
Fan Fucking Tastic. I hope you people enjoy a war with Iran with the same lie that was told about iraq. Another trillion down the drain!

Umm, what? You do realize Obama is expected to win, not Romney, right? Romney is the one suggesting a war with Iran and George W. Bush was Republican.

You're not making sense.
 
It'll be a Democrat getting us involved in a war we can't afford and a republican getting us out.... I'm sure you see the pattern here?

What pattern? A Republican got us into two wars, and a Democrat got us out of one war and likely another during his second term. What makes you think he'd get into Iran?
 
Umm, what? You do realize Obama is expected to win, not Romney, right? Romney is the one suggesting a war with Iran and George W. Bush was Republican.

You're not making sense.


........................................... HOW DOES THAT NOT MAKE SENSE! Does the fact that we're getting the same info like we got when Iraq had those "weapons of mass destruction"? Yea same thing is going on here. You have "intelligence' and I use that term loosely" saying Iran has nukes or will have nukes....... it's a pattern or an excuse to invade.
 
........................................... HOW DOES THAT NOT MAKE SENSE! Does the fact that we're getting the same info like we got when Iraq had those "weapons of mass destruction"? Yea same thing is going on here. You have "intelligence' and I use that term loosely" saying Iran has nukes or will have nukes....... it's a pattern or an excuse to invade.

No, you had Republicans using scare tactics (thinking mostly of Paul Ryan right now) trying to convince people Iran is close to nuclear weapons. Biden, of course, rightly pointed out how ridiculous Ryan was being. The "red line" was from Israel, not Obama or US intelligence.

You clearly have not followed this election season at all.
 
Calm down, guys. I'm pretty sure that Doug is legally ******ed.

I was just arguing with Rehh Dogg of Tosh.o fame on Facebook. My night has been made.
 
Calm down, guys. I'm pretty sure that Doug is legally ******ed.
I'm not sure if he's legally ******ed, though I know he has said before he does struggle with certain things.

Which is why I'm not calling him a stupid fucking simpleton moron, like I would most other people who would post the things he has.
 
........................................... HOW DOES THAT NOT MAKE SENSE! Does the fact that we're getting the same info like we got when Iraq had those "weapons of mass destruction"? Yea same thing is going on here. You have "intelligence' and I use that term loosely" saying Iran has nukes or will have nukes....... it's a pattern or an excuse to invade.

Except the president of Iran has said they have Nukes himself, unlike Saddam who denied having nukes. Not to mention this has nothing to do with Obama's foreign policy, as he has said that he wants to take a democratic approach with Iran. It's Romney who was more willing to get troops on the ground.
 
Except the president of Iran has said they have Nukes himself, unlike Saddam who denied having nukes. Not to mention this has nothing to do with Obama's foreign policy, as he has said that he wants to take a democratic approach with Iran. It's Romney who was more willing to get troops on the ground.

Grasping for straws there? Wouldn't ending the solution BEFORE risking thousands of MORE lives be more efficient than just blindly sending people into Iran to enter another war that the United States honestly isn't strong enough to enter at the moment?
 
Grasping for straws there? Wouldn't ending the solution BEFORE risking thousands of MORE lives be more efficient than just blindly sending people into Iran to enter another war that the United States honestly isn't strong enough to enter at the moment?

That's JGlass's point. Use diplomacy, not American lives.

I feel as if there's a disconnect somewhere. So I'll help explain.

Both candidates agree an eye should be kept on Iran. Romney came much closer to suggesting military involvement in Iran than Obama. Obama has helped levy crippling sanctions on Iran, which has destroyed their currency and thus their economy, slowing their ability to create nuclear weapons.

When it comes to military involvement in Iran, Obama has shown himself to be LESS likely to send in American soldiers than Romney has.


Hopefully that clears things up.
 
Grasping for straws there? Wouldn't ending the solution BEFORE risking thousands of MORE lives be more efficient than just blindly sending people into Iran to enter another war that the United States honestly isn't strong enough to enter at the moment?

Are you doubting the powerful military might of the good ol' U.S. of A.?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top