First of all, ECHELON, I am not complaining about Jillian Hall "again." Quite the opposite. In fact, in an earlier post of mine quite some time ago, I believe I stated that I don't personally follow the indy scene, male or female, so I really cannot comment on Jillian first hand. I in fact deferred to your expertise specifically regarding her skills as a wrestler, assuming she is as good as you guys all claim she is. I don't question her ability in the ring or for that matter on the mic. All I'm saying is that we'll never see evidence of this in a WWE ring so it's irrelevant. All of the moves she has done elsewhere in the past, she won't be allowed to do in WWE anyway, so they do nothing to establish her as a WWE women's champion.
I don't question her ability to draw heat either, but she won't become champion because of it. Things like that should matter, but we all know that in the WWE women's division, they don't. Unfortunately pretty much all that matters is whether or not she's hot, and she's not. End of story.
I think where we disagree is in the theory of the way the women's division should be (your point), versus the way it has degraded itself into (my point). I question very little of your vision regarding the WWE Women's Division. Unfortunately it's not Vince McMahon's vision, so diva searches and eye candy will continue to come to the forefront.
And let's not be totally ridiculous. Kelly Kelly or Maryse don't even wrestle, at all; they don't even try, so of course they won't become champions. At least Candice is trying, even though she is pretty pathetic. Before she showed this effort, she was still hot, but she never got her push.
Let me pose a hypothetical question to you. Let's, for the sake of discussion, assume the WWE adds a component to their Wellness Policy that suddenly bans breast implants from the WWE. Any divas with implants must have them removed immediately, and any new divas are not allowed to have them. Furthermore, clothing becomes more conservative: loose fitting long pants and full coverage tops only. Novelty/gimmick matches are banned from the WWE (pudding matches, etc.,). But the restrictions to what moves are allowed and what ones aren't remains unchanged (so people like Jillian Hall cannot truly shine). Now I know these are a lot of silly hypotheticals, but my question to you is this: How long do you think the WWE Women's Division would survive? If the women's claim to fame was based strictly on wrestling ability, not looks or gimmicks, but actual wrestling, would the division even exist? I say it would cease to exist, and fast. Because that's all the Women's Division is now, which may be unfortunate, but it's the reality of today's WWE. I know, because you post about it frequently, that this annoys the hell out of you, but I don't think I'm wrong.
WWE needs Candice and Melina to be rolling around in chocolate pudding to have this division even exist. Hell, let's bring Maria out for an interview, and throw her in there too. Personally I'd rather see two great female athletes compete for a viable title. A returning Trish Stratus versus an unleashed Jillian Hall, for example. But I'm not holding my breath. It will more likely be a diva search winner versus some other blond bimbo, rolling around in lemon jello, for the forseeable future.
I don't question her ability to draw heat either, but she won't become champion because of it. Things like that should matter, but we all know that in the WWE women's division, they don't. Unfortunately pretty much all that matters is whether or not she's hot, and she's not. End of story.
I think where we disagree is in the theory of the way the women's division should be (your point), versus the way it has degraded itself into (my point). I question very little of your vision regarding the WWE Women's Division. Unfortunately it's not Vince McMahon's vision, so diva searches and eye candy will continue to come to the forefront.
And let's not be totally ridiculous. Kelly Kelly or Maryse don't even wrestle, at all; they don't even try, so of course they won't become champions. At least Candice is trying, even though she is pretty pathetic. Before she showed this effort, she was still hot, but she never got her push.
Let me pose a hypothetical question to you. Let's, for the sake of discussion, assume the WWE adds a component to their Wellness Policy that suddenly bans breast implants from the WWE. Any divas with implants must have them removed immediately, and any new divas are not allowed to have them. Furthermore, clothing becomes more conservative: loose fitting long pants and full coverage tops only. Novelty/gimmick matches are banned from the WWE (pudding matches, etc.,). But the restrictions to what moves are allowed and what ones aren't remains unchanged (so people like Jillian Hall cannot truly shine). Now I know these are a lot of silly hypotheticals, but my question to you is this: How long do you think the WWE Women's Division would survive? If the women's claim to fame was based strictly on wrestling ability, not looks or gimmicks, but actual wrestling, would the division even exist? I say it would cease to exist, and fast. Because that's all the Women's Division is now, which may be unfortunate, but it's the reality of today's WWE. I know, because you post about it frequently, that this annoys the hell out of you, but I don't think I'm wrong.
WWE needs Candice and Melina to be rolling around in chocolate pudding to have this division even exist. Hell, let's bring Maria out for an interview, and throw her in there too. Personally I'd rather see two great female athletes compete for a viable title. A returning Trish Stratus versus an unleashed Jillian Hall, for example. But I'm not holding my breath. It will more likely be a diva search winner versus some other blond bimbo, rolling around in lemon jello, for the forseeable future.