TheOneBigWill
[This Space for Rent]
The only difference between Cena and Triple H is, and it'll get bashed, is Cena is still good to watch in the ring, and not so gimmick match dependent. John Cena is 31 years old, and has only been in the main event scene for 3 years.
Short of injury ending his career, I don't see John Cena losing his Main Event spot anytime soon. But the thing that should be noted is if he did.. and it wasn't from injury, then its because he didn't do enough to revamp his character.
Triple H. has been the same guy more or less from 1999 on.. but hes added little things here and there to revamp himself, without changing. "The Game" then "The Cerebral Assassin" then "The King of Kings."
Hes changed gimmick roughly once every 3+ years to refresh himself a little, yet stay the same. Cena hasn't really done that.. and definately needs a refreshing.. now.
Triple H is pushing 40 and has been in the main event scene for nine years. It's nauseatingly long. Hogans original run in the WWE was at that length, Triple H is already there and simply shows no sign of giving up his spot at the top, that's the problem.
But within that, did this many people complain about Hulk Hogan being in the Main Event? I mean, I likely did.. but I dispise Hulk Hogan. Still, Triple H. is getting unneeded/undeserved heat, all because he (in his personal life) married into the company.
Thats no more his fault, then Stephanie's for falling in love with him. So unless you can blame Stephanie for not picking someone better, then H.H.H. marrying her isn't really some "master plan" that all the bashers think it is.