George Steele's Barber
Advertise Here $9.95/month
The finishes this weekend have been incredible.
Long live replacement refs!
Long live replacement refs!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
In fairness, that last play you can't blame them for. It was such a close play, you can't blame them for not seeing the INT, and once the touchdown was the official call, the replay couldn't overturn, since it's not indisputable.
In fairness, that last play you can't blame them for. It was such a close play, you can't blame them for not seeing the INT, and once the touchdown was the official call, the replay couldn't overturn since it's not indisputable.
It does, according to the MNF's rule expert.I always thought dual possession goes to the O.
Yeah, that was pretty bad PI.Sweet goodness I hadn't seen that interference either from Tate. The guy was shoved down but that doesn't get called? Now they can't even get the extra point figured out?
What a completely bogus call. I bet the locked out ref's are laughing their asses off.
Gruden cannot stand this officiating. And he won't quit talking about it.
All the talk show hosts are thrilled with this outcome.
Even with regular officials this would have been a bad situation but with the replacements this is down right comical.
Not really. When it happened, I thought it was a simultaneous catch. It's not inconceivable the refs on the field thought the same thing.
Remember, the reply said the play stood, not that it was confirmed which means they simply could not find irrefutable evidence to overturn.
I am not watching the game but I have long thought the indisputable evidence rule is stupid.
I think the camera angle is skewing people's views. The one straight on shot showed Tate had possession as well.
I honestly don't think the regular refs would have done any better.
Elaborate.