Did they even score again after I said that?
It is the Browns. Don't shoot the messenger.
I know
First pick here we go. Or, I should say, first picked turned into suite of picks and/or players.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Did they even score again after I said that?
It is the Browns. Don't shoot the messenger.
Do we get to factor in salary?
If they make the playoffs
I guess so, but Tebow's doing a fine job earning that salary being a benchwarmer in NY because he's not even good enough to take Sanchez's job.
This is true, but Tebow is still not that great a QB. I know Tebow is a winner according to some, so if that's the case what do you call Manning? The guy was the only reason the Colts weren't 2-14 every year, and why the Colts were as good as they were and made the playoffs something like 9 years in a row.
A winner.
Tebow made the playoffs. Peyton Manning wouldn't.
I think my answer answered your question. You're not Roddy Piper, are you?
Not really. What I was getting at was that if the Broncos finished with a better record than last year, and missed the playoffs, they'd be a better team under Manning than they were under Tebow.
If Manning doesn't make the playoffs, he'll be a massive bust. You don't make that move for a guy as an old as Payton, & give up what they did in trade & contract unless you're planning to make a run for the SB now.
Tebow hasn't been given a chance to show that he's better than Sanchez yet, so saying he isn't good enough to take the ob away from Sanchez is pretty ridiculous, he can't possibly play any worse that Sanchez has this season.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...sonville-the-night-before-bears-jaguars-game/The Jaguars suck. Also, Bear fans are the scum of the earth.
If Manning doesn't make the playoffs, he'll be a massive bust. You don't make that move for a guy as an old as Payton, & give up what they did in trade & contract unless you're planning to make a run for the SB now.
Tebow hasn't been given a chance to show that he's better than Sanchez yet, so saying he isn't good enough to take the ob away from Sanchez is pretty ridiculous, he can't possibly play any worse that Sanchez has this season.
Not really. What I was getting at was that if the Broncos finished with a better record than last year, and missed the playoffs, they'd be a better team under Manning than they were under Tebow.
He's not getting the starting job in New York because they won't just hand him the job, they would only give it to him if Sanchez plays like total shit or gets injured. Tebows performance last year/this year had/has virtually zero impact on when/if he starts, and it shouldn't.As for the second paragraph, I agree there to. He hasn't been given a chance. I just like to troll every now and then. Fact is neither Tebow nor Sanchez are great. They might not even be good, and if Tebow had proved he was better than Sanchez, say last year, he'd have the starting job in NY now.
So if Manning only leads the team to one or two more reg. season wins I'm suppose to beleive that better than what Tebow did, when he completely turned the team around leading to 8 of their 9 wins last yr. (counting playoffs)? That's fucking absurd, & would really only mean that Manning is as good as Tebow if not worse because he failed to do what Tebow was able to, make & win a game in the playoffs.
This assuming the scenario of Payton leads the Broncos to a 10-6 season & misses the playoffs actually happens of course.
Division is terrible this year.
He's not getting the starting job in New York because they won't just hand him the job, they would only give it to him if Sanchez plays like total shit or gets injured. Tebows performance last year/this year had/has virtually zero impact on when/if he starts, and it shouldn't.
Tebow wasn't brought in to compete for the starting job. He was brought in to be a backup QB and Wildcat snap-taker. That's what he's been, and that's why he got no starting team reps all offseason. As such, you don't go to him as a starting QB unless the situation gets dire.
Oh, and entering Week 4, the Jets were in first place and 2-0 in the division. And the QB position is hardly the worst of their troubles. That's not a dire situation, as such Sanchez is still the QB.
San Diego is about to be 4-1 if this score holds.
I get all that, but my point was that if Tebow was a better QB, he'd be starting somewhere even if it wasn't in NY. Much like Manning is starting now after being out a whole year and changing teams. I realize it's a bit of an extreme example, but there it is.
They went 4-1 last year.