Mighty NorCal
SHALL WE BEGIN?
[YOUTUBE]?v=k9Cmgbe5230[/YOUTUBE]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes. Norcal and I have already agreed upon that. So if you do a trade for a later year pick, just ignore where it says the overall pick number is as that will change once the season is over.
Scratch that, Norcal and I ended up in the same division, so to keep the two commish's separate I moved over to the other division.
I also grouped people in divisions to keep some natural rivalries.
JMT/Holy One
Oh so he shall get used to being in last place much like his draft order![]()
We set it up that way on purpose. All the divisional rivalries
This. Draft. Is. Bonkers.
I love it!
My RB's suck. After Stafford I have crap at QB. I did take Johnny Football though. And Bridgewater. And some other bum.
Good draft everyone. If yall didn't notice I was kinda drafting for next year. Being that it's week 7 I wasn't too focused on this season now.
Also, why can I only have 6 RBs, but I can have 7 WRs? Even if I cut a WR I still wouldn't be allowed to pick up a RB in it's place.
Can we change that so we can have 7 RBs and 6 WRs if we wanted to?
Also how are trades going to work? I think we should be able to vote on trades, or at least have a committee of five or six people to vote on them? It's not that big of a deal if all trades go through automatically, but in some cases it's better to have a committee to prevent new guys from getting trade raped.
I have a feeling Norcal and I can handle the trades. If it's way out of wack then yeah we'll decline it. I don't see it being too big of an issue.
Is there any way we can make it where we can have 7 RBs on the roster and then 6 WRs? Or 7 WRs and 6 RBs if we wanted. I thought that's what the flex positions were for. Why's that last position force me to take a WR?