Mighty NorCal
SHALL WE BEGIN?
[YOUTUBE]?v=k9Cmgbe5230[/YOUTUBE]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes. Norcal and I have already agreed upon that. So if you do a trade for a later year pick, just ignore where it says the overall pick number is as that will change once the season is over.
Scratch that, Norcal and I ended up in the same division, so to keep the two commish's separate I moved over to the other division.
I also grouped people in divisions to keep some natural rivalries.
JMT/Holy One
Oh so he shall get used to being in last place much like his draft order
We set it up that way on purpose. All the divisional rivalries
This. Draft. Is. Bonkers.
I love it!
My RB's suck. After Stafford I have crap at QB. I did take Johnny Football though. And Bridgewater. And some other bum.
Good draft everyone. If yall didn't notice I was kinda drafting for next year. Being that it's week 7 I wasn't too focused on this season now.
Also, why can I only have 6 RBs, but I can have 7 WRs? Even if I cut a WR I still wouldn't be allowed to pick up a RB in it's place.
Can we change that so we can have 7 RBs and 6 WRs if we wanted to?
Also how are trades going to work? I think we should be able to vote on trades, or at least have a committee of five or six people to vote on them? It's not that big of a deal if all trades go through automatically, but in some cases it's better to have a committee to prevent new guys from getting trade raped.
I have a feeling Norcal and I can handle the trades. If it's way out of wack then yeah we'll decline it. I don't see it being too big of an issue.
Is there any way we can make it where we can have 7 RBs on the roster and then 6 WRs? Or 7 WRs and 6 RBs if we wanted. I thought that's what the flex positions were for. Why's that last position force me to take a WR?