You've got to be kidding me. BIG SHOW? The man who had the single most worthless WWF Title reign of the last 10 years (yep, worse than everyone else - Khali included) in which his only successful defense of note was against the Big Bossman?
I think it's kinda biased and one-sided that you'd pick his worst Championship reign, as opposed to some of his better runs. Not to mention, the Big Show (worthless or not) is the
ONLY individual in Wrestling history to hold all three of the major, original Heavyweight Championships.
He became a W.C.W Heavyweight Champion by defeating guys like Sting, Hogan and Luger. He became W.W.F Heavyweight Champion by defeating Triple H and Rock in the same match. He's also defeated Brock Lesnar, ending his streak. And he's defeated Rob Van Dam, winning the E.C.W Championship becoming the only man in Wrestling history to win all three Championships.
Yes - he's had some horrible situations in his career, including meaningless feuds. But Vader and Andre aren't any different. All three men have had bad situations, and losses they'd rather forget.
The man who was knocked out cold by a man 1/4 his size?
The man who knocked him out, was an undefeated World Champion in the boxing world. Easily excusable.. you just failed to explain the full details of the situation.
The man who is consistently the bitch to every decent sized name in the business, being eliminated last in Royal Rumbles by The Rock and Chris Benoit?
How could he of not had a worst disadvantage? The objective of the Royal Rumble is to shove your opponent over the top rope. Over half of Big Show's body stands above the ropes, so shoving him over or toppling him over isn't going to be that hard.
And according to video evidence later shown - he didn't actually lose the 2000 Royal Rumble, The Rock should've. As for Chris Benoit, he was on the way out and merely choked Show and refused to let go.. using Show's weight against him, pulling him over while choking him out at the same time.
Again - excusable reasons for why he lost.
And you're picking him to defeat the greatest Superheavyweight in Wrestling history?
AN opinionated statement. Clearly, as if Vader was the "greatest" Superheavyweight in Wrestling history - why was it that the Big Show has a greater run-down of accomplishments? Including, once again, being the only man in history to win all three of the original "big three" Heavyweight titles?
A man who routinely came off of the top rope, hit moonsaults, and defeated every major star in WCW, Japan, AND Mexico for nearly 10 years?
Against athletes constantly much smaller than him. When Vader has been matched up against similar sized opponents, his power isn't as strong. This is proof when dating back to his match against Mark Henry, in 1998, when both men went toe to toe, power for power.
The man with a winning record against Sting?
I guess that'd be truly helpful - if Sting were involved in this match, huh?
Vader had "a few good years?" More than a decade, which is more than ten more than Big Shoe has had.
And The Rock has had less than a decade total in this business, and yet still has more accomplishments than both. Just because he's spent more time in the business, isn't really helping me to properly understand why that favors one guy over the other - outside of merely learning more.
Yet this is a match-up, that only Big Show has had experience in.
[youtube]fRXbDbbopGs[/youtube]
[youtube]Hk0G6yuqdlo&feature=related[/youtube]
Yes, he lost. And yes, he didn't have much involvement
with the ladder.. but the point is, to my knowledge I haven't seen a Ladder match with Vader at all.. and Ladder's weren't even a thing when Andre was around. Except for very seldom. So if anyone holds an advantage in knowing at least what to expect, it's the Big Show.
Show's true claims to fame was dressing up like other wrestlers after being first man out at Wrestlemania 2000, and being superplexed BY Brock Lesnar, resulting in a collapsed ring.
How about destroying Hulkamania when he debuted in W.C.W? How about being thrown off the top of a roof, only to come back and win the Heavyweight Championship.
(yes, stupid - but hey, it was memorable.)
Show has done a ton in his career, and you merely opt to pick his worse, comic moments - or moments in which his size has made a big splash. (pun intended)
Show doesn't have the balance OR the agility to climb a turnbuckle, let alone a ladder, and sustain himself long enough to grab ANYTHING, and the contrary is laughable.
Actually, he does. Big Show has done things off the top rope. No, not nearly the way Vader can.. but that doesn't mean Show can't in general. It just means he likely can't, as quickly.
Luckily for Show, its not a single's match-up - which means Vader's speed isn't as effective since he'll have to make sure BOTH
other Superheavyweights are knocked out.
Irish, I'm not voting Big Show (just yet) but he's leading in my head. I'm gonna need more of a reason for voting Vader than just watching you pick apart Big Show's worst career moments - while ignoring the fact that Vader hasn't accomplished nearly what Show has - in the mainstream world, and he's also had some forgettable and horrible losses in is own right - against guys that had no business beating him - yet did.
So, I'll await voting this year, unlike before, so you can win my vote a bit better.