All Future Wrestlemania Discussion (Matches, Gimmicks, Angles.... KEEP IT IN HERE!)

[Wald]

Brock only has 3 PPV dates left right? Summerslam, Rumble and WM?

If that's the case I would have Brock defeat Triple H at Summerslam and attack him and injure him again the next night on Raw. Because of those actions Vince puts him back on suspension and tells him he'll never be allowed back.

Royal Rumble I would have the Rock go over Punk for the title and have Lesnar show up during the Rumble match and win it. Sure it wouldn't make sense for Lesnar to be brought back like that but things don't always have to in the WWE.

Lesnar vs the Rock for the WWE Title is your Wrestlemania main event.

I know people will say, no way would they have one without Cena but you could do a dual main event with Cena vs Taker as well. I honestly think there is more money in those two matches at Wrestlemania than any other.

 

[Kennnny]

I'm not going to try to book Brock in anyway but I don't think Dwayne Johnson(The Rock) would want to be anywhere near Brock Lesnar.

Brock Lesnar is the most dangerous man in the WWE and will probably always be. We all know most of the WWE is smoke and mirrors and some moves probably dont hurt but the Kimura lock(key lock) is one of the most dangerous martial arts holds in the world. You hold that move in strong for 8-10 seconds and you do damage to the core muscles in the upper arm.

Dwayne is 4th most rich movie star in the world and is still growing in popularity. In my opinion Dwayne would not want the WWE to put him anywhere near Brock at WM as both would dissapear afterwards, Brock probably to MMA but Dwayne would have possible muscle and nerve damage in his arm that could hinder his movie career in the next few months after WM.

This is just me speculating and everyone has there opinion, so I would welcome your thoughts on my opinion

 

[Wald]

I'm not going to try to book Brock in anyway but I don't think Dwayne Johnson(The Rock) would want to be anywhere near Brock Lesnar.

Brock Lesnar is the most dangerous man in the WWE and will probably always be. We all know most of the WWE is smoke and mirrors and some moves probably dont hurt but the Kimura lock(key lock) is one of the most dangerous martial arts holds in the world. You hold that move in strong for 8-10 seconds and you do damage to the core muscles in the upper arm.

Dwayne is 4th most rich movie star in the world and is still growing in popularity. In my opinion Dwayne would not want the WWE to put him anywhere near Brock at WM as both would dissapear afterwards, Brock probably to MMA but Dwayne would have possible muscle and nerve damage in his arm that could hinder his movie career in the next few months after WM.

This is just me speculating and everyone has there opinion, so I would welcome your thoughts on my opinion

My thoughts are that Brock doesn't actually lock in the hold like he would in MMA as this is wrestling and that the Rock would just see dollar signs in this feud.

Brock is more known to the general public than any wrestler on the roster that isn't the Rock. The two of them facing off over the WWE Title at Wrestlemania would do huge business, much bigger than Cena vs Rock 2 or Cena vs Brock 2.

Hell if ever they wanted to highlight Cena as the modern day Hogan then why not have him end Taker's streak at WM and go on and beat the Rock for the title on Raw the night after Wrestlemania? Any casual fans tuning in get to see Cena put an end to two of the biggest wrestling stars in history within two straight nights.

 

[Bossblood]

After a lot of thinking and basing things on what SCSA and The Rock have divulged I have come up with this scenario.

WMXXX will be headlined by SCSA vs The Rock for the WWE championship and the WWE will start building for it the night after the next WMXXIX. The Rock has already stated he will be champion once again and WWE will definitely cash in on that. SCSA was very vocal for a while about wanting one more match, he stopped talking about that when The Rock said he had inked a deal with the WWE for "Monday Night Rock". The Rock has reportedly signed a three year deal with the WWE which will last through WMXXX. SCSA recently had surgery to help him get "ring ready".

This is already on the fast track to happening and all signs point to SCSA vs The Rock at WMXXX.

What do you all think?

 

[The Hillside]

If Stone Cold starts to wrestle again it will be good news for the wrestling fans. Yes, then we can get all the big dream matches vs. Punk, vs. Cena, vs. Orton and vs. Daniel Bryan.

But if you are talking about Wrestlemania XXX, I think HHH vs. The Rock with Austin as ref. has more chances of happening then Rock vs. Austin.

Anyways if Austin is able to wrestle at WM XXX I would rather book HHH vs. The Rock vs. Steve Austin for the WWE Title in a triple threat, a match that has never happened before and could be the greatest match in the history of wrestling.

More then Austin vs Rock, at this point I would like to see Austin vs. Cena or Austin vs. Punk.

 

[LoudClearVoice]

If I remember correctly, Undertaker has never fought The Rock or Stone Cold Steve Austin at Wrestlemania.

So, IF Stone Cold can step back into the ring one more time, I'd love to see him fight the Undertaker at Wrestlemania. Either that or Rock vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania. I know WWE wants to do John Cena vs. Undertaker before Undertaker retires but what kind of streak is it if he never beat Stone Cold or the Rock (even if they're both way past their primes).

 

[The Hillside]

If I remember correctly, Undertaker has never fought The Rock or Stone Cold Steve Austin at Wrestlemania.

So, IF Stone Cold can step back into the ring one more time, I'd love to see him fight the Undertaker at Wrestlemania. Either that or Rock vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania. I know WWE wants to do John Cena vs. Undertaker before Undertaker retires but what kind of streak is it if he never beat Stone Cold or the Rock (even if they're both way past their primes).

Rock vs Taker at WM 29 or WM 30 is quite possible and I would love to see them go one on one at this stage of their career (both are huge mega stars).

Taker vs Austin have faced each other many times not at Mania though. But I don't want to see this match again. And before that Taker already has Cena, Rock and Lesnar lined up to compete.

The streak has become valuable in the last 4 years when he wrestled legends like HHH and HBK twice. The streak started to get heat when he beat Orton, Edge and Batista.

But 7 big matches in a row with brilliant performances are enough to say streak is deserving and has its legacy cemented.

The streak also includes Flair, Sid and Diesel so the streak is genuine.

Ofcourse he has never faced or beaten Hogan, Cena, Austin and The Rock at Wrestlemania but I see two of them happening.

 

[TheKingofKings20222]

Okay here's the deal. It's WrestleMania 30. The Main Event should be billed as the Biggest WrestleMania Main Event of All Time! Celebrating 30 years of WrestleMania a milestone that is incredible. My question is, what do you think should be the Main Event of this PPV?

IMO The Main Event of WrestleMania 30 should be: The Rock VS Stone Cold

Why? Because this is the feud that undoubtedly made the WWE. The Texas Rattlesnake VS The Brahma Bull. You were either an Austin fan, or a Rock fan. They personified the Attitude Era and are no doubt the biggest WWE stars of all time. Why not bring them back for one last match? Think about it? One last time. These two have amazing chemistry, and no doubt would put on a show to end all shows. I personally cannot think of a better match for the Main Event of WrestleMania 30.

Now, I know some people will argue and say that the WWE Championship match should be the main event, but in all honesty, both Rock and Austin are too big for the title. They don't need it. They have already achieved it. Stars like Austin, Rock, Undertaker, HHH, and Brock Lesnar have all been around long enough to where they don't need titles to prove their legitimacy. WWE recognizes this and that is why the WWE title comes second compared to these stars.

So thats my take on the WM 30 Main Event. What do you think it should be?

 

[smizzy]

IMO The Main Event of WrestleMania 30 should be: The Rock VS Stone Cold

As I understand where you're coming from in wanting to see this, I don't really like it.
- How could you introduce two inactive wrestlers to regular programming for the two, three month Wrestlemania build.
- How could it make sense and fit in with the other storylines, what route would yout take to spark the rivalry, that granted, already exists, back up? Fight it out for the largest legends contract?
- What would be the significance other than nostalgia. It wouldn't be a relevant fight for the time purposes.
- Stone Cold does not have a thirty minute bout left in him, much less a three month build. I'm sorry, but I don't believe he can prove me wrong on this.

What I think it should be is have a superstar on the verge of going over to perennial main event status actually go over on the current WWE Champ ala Cena vs. JBL in 2005. Most likely matchup for this scenario would be Ziggler vs. Cena, Rhodes vs. Cena. Maybe at the time Sandow. Who knows, but the main even will definitely include Cena dropping the title to a younger star turning the page on a new chapter, new era, new main-event status.

 

[Wolf Pac]

And having the same old WM main event for a 4th time between a guy who can barely wrestle anymore & another who only wrestles on rare occasions is that "Biggest WrestleMania Main Event of All Time"? Sorry but no. And Rock vs. Austin did not "make the WWE". If any feud made the Attitude Era, it was Austin vs. McMahon.

If Cena & Taker don't face off at WM29 then WWE should definitely book it at WM 30. Nothing could get any bigger than WWE's current top dog against the WM King on Mania's 30 anniversary even if it is obvious that Taker would end up winning. Cena would be billed as the biggest threat ever to Taker's streak and I mean even more than HBK, HHH and everybody else Taker has faced at past WM's.

But I like the trend WM 10 & 20 left us, giving us a Canadian wrestler winning the big one in the main event, so if another Canadian with potential comes along or maybe if they decide to push Christian to the moon at the time, I wouldn't mind seeing another Canadian take the title in the main event.

 

[CM Steel]

There has been talk for over a year now that WWE hall of famer Stone Cold Steve Austin will be coming out of forced retirement for one night, one match against CM Punk at Wrestlemania 29. Austin says that he has enough to go for just "one more match!" wrestling. But Stone Cold isn't just a wrestler, he's a brawler.

So what if SCSA just didn't wrestle in the future, he just fought?

It's been done in wrestling before. Remember the Bret Hart vs Mr. McMahon match at Wrestlemania 26? It wasn't a wrestling match. It was a "fight". Bret Hart recovering from a stroke 8 years earlier couldn't risk taking any bumps in the ring. Stone Cold dealing with a eternal neck injury has done stints in a WWF/E ring without taking any bumps. Like at No Mercy 2000 in a street fight match against Rikishi upon coming from a rest at home for 11 months. And a no DQ match against Eric Bischoff at No Way Out 2003 upon Stone Cold returning to the WWE after having beef with the company.

Now if the match at WM 29 with CM Punk goes well? Could we see Stone Cold Steve Austin in the ring anytime after or even before that?

 

[The Hillside]

Chris Jericho is also a Canadian, they can do something with him in the WM 30 main-event going by your trend.

But due to Benoit winning the WM 20 main event, there is no chance WWE will go to that route even if such an idea or trend comes to their observation.

And yea I don't think WWE will put Jericho in their 3rd Decade Wrestlemania main event. Jericho vs Taker looks nice, but no way Jericho is going to beat Taker.

 

[Y 2 Jake]

There's been talk every year since 2003 that Austin will have one last match. He won't though, ever.

Bret vs. Vince was a fight. It was also one of the worst matches in WrestleMania history. I'm sure Austin takes pride in his work and having seen that and the limitations of Bret, he would probably reconsider the possiblity of having another match.

Austin isn't like Bret Hart. Hart retured because he was concerned about his legacy. He said he'd never work for WWE in any capacity and was forced to change his mind when he realised WWE would basically ignore all his achievements. Austin doesn't, and never will, have that problem.

 

[rge2010]

I dont see Austin returning for Wrestlemania 29. When/if Austin returns it will be a huge deal. Wrestlemania 29 already looks like it will have The Rock in a WWE Title match and Lesnar 'probably' going against the streak. Where does that leave Austin? Mid card?

Not sure why people are so into Austin vs Punk. Austin himself has gone cold on the idea saying that Punk needs to better himself if they were to fight.

If Austin comes back for that one last fight I would much rather see him go up against Brock Lesnar (and settle those old scores) or against Undertaker to end the streak. One of these would be better for Wrestlemania 30 which will obviously be a huge deal.

 

[NotoriousMEAT]

Austin's made it clear himself that he's healthy enough to wrestle 2 years full time if he NEEDED to. He's just happy where he's at. Don't have the links to back it up, but I read the very article here on Wrestlezone within the last year. Either way, being that healthy.. if it was right for his character and the company, I believe he'd do it in a heartbeat. I agree with the previous poster that WrestleMania 29 doesn't seem like the logical show for his return to action. But WrestleMania 30... I'm diggin that. I'm feeling like Toronto and Dallas are the leading candidates for WM XXX, and if they land Cowboys Stadium in the heart of Texas... you can bet your ass they'll do everything they can to headline that show with ol' Stone Cold to try and take back the indoor attendance record that the Superbowl in 2011 took from WrestleMania III in that very building.

Last year Stone Cold Steve Austin vs CM Punk was the dream match. But now I'd rather see a match with John Cena, Randy Orton, or Brock Lesnar. Or.. if they could main event that show with Stone Cold vs The Undertaker.. I'm sure they could very well outsell WM 28 in all categories. Or what if Austin teamed with The Rock to challenge a team of Cena & Punk. The possibilities are endless.

 

[Fansince1992]

It depends what is going on at the moment between WWE and Steve Austin. I know Austin said he couldn't appear at Raw1000 because he had surgery on his knee, but i think there is more to it than that.
What was stopping Austin having the surgery after Raw1000, and why didn't Austin just tweet that he wasn't going to be there and send his apoligies.

Like many other fans was gutted that Austin no showed Raw1000. Hope this doesn't mean we will never Austin in WWE again. I also know that Austin is very touchy about The Rock. There isn't room for Austin and Rock in the main event and both would probably refuse to appear on the undercard. Can't see Austin vs Punk at WM29 happening if The Rock is going to be there.

The only way i could see Austin at Wrestlmania next year is if he is guest Referee or Enforcer or something along those lines in The Rocks match (The Main Event)

 

[Jomo_mark]

Wait, why isn't there room for both Austin and Rock? If both of them were in the main event, well the more the merrier. If Austin could do it without risk, I would love to see him take on Punk. Especially now since Punk has turned it would be that much more interesting. As for the 'Bret Hart' idea I don't think that would work. Definitely not against Punk, and who else is there for Austin to squash while still promoting interest? Yea bad idea, and as someone mentioned Hart vs Vince was a horrible match.

 

[georgelfc123]

So, the title was on the line and Undertaker had defeated Triple H in that grueling contest, if you was Mr. Money In The Bank, would you head down to the ring and cash in. Doing that, not only do you achieve a dream of winning the biggest championship in the wrestling industry on the grandest stage of them all, you end the Legendary Streak in the process. I know WWE is scripted like, but if Vince gave you the choice, would you do it or would you back out out of respect for The Undertaker, and his legendary career and streak? Not to mention, you'd single-handedly become one of the biggest heel's ever to step foot in the ring.

What would you do?

 

[Jonyboyuk2]

We know Austin could not make Raw 1000 due to his Knee surgery. With that in mind, I'd dare suggest the following COULD occur.

Just before Royal Rumble 2013, it will be the Raw 20th Anniversary show. They made a big issue of Raw 500, Raw tenth anniversary, Raw 15 special and the Raw 1000 shows, so I would dare say that Raw 20th will be a big one too. I would dare say that Austin will come back, and somehow get involved in Royal Rumble with Punk, Rock and Cena - possibly as Guest referee - with Rock walking out with the gold and then Cena surprise winning the Royal Rumble later to take on Rock again at WM29 for the belt (where he will likely go over). I'd then see CM Punk bad mouth Austin for "costing" him the belt at Rumble - leading to a WM 29 match with the 2. (Then perhaps at WM 30, swap those matches - Austin V Cena "two generations collide" and CM Punk VS Rock) - But I'd most like to see Cena turn heel eventually after ending the Undertakers Streak and Career at WM 30. Would be epic way to launch the next decade of WWE. Remember - the kids who loved Hogan grew up and loved Austin. Wait til they tire of Cena (inevitable).

 

[MCMG]

His injuries a very severe and I'm not sure if he is physical shape to compete.

A brawl with Punk would be good but even that good be dangerous. The feud itself would be very good and the mic work will be incredible. The whole beer drinking/strait edge dynamic is a very enticing thought. Another problem other than Austins health is that Punk may be wasted in a brawl. He is the "best in the world" so having him in a brawl may be a bit of a waste but I would like to see it regardless.

 

[Mr.Fortuna]

Well when deciding the possible matches for WM 29 two points need to be made. First off The Rock will headline the show as WWE Champion and Stone Cold Steve Austin would never make his huge comeback to the ring and play second fiddle to the Rock. So Austin vs Punk will main event WM 30 at Texas Stadium.

Now that the Austin situation is out of the way this leads to WM 29. Quite frankly logic states that Rock vs Cena II will take place as the shows headliner for The WWE Championship with Cena going over. Although I`d prefer Punk beating The Rock at the show to win The Championship. He could be the only man in WWE History to successfully defeate The Rock and Stone Cold Steve Austin in back to back Wrestlemanias.

 

[Arashi]

I honestly see HBK vs the Rock happening at WMXXX just seems like one of if not the biggest match to not happen. And HBK is always willing to job unlike rocky. So you'd have a great matchup and big dollar signs.

 

[XXJJ]

Undertaker vs John Cena
Brock Lesnar vs Randy Orton
The Rock vs CM Punk
HHH vs Dolph Ziggler

I would love to see those matches headline next year Wrestlemania. Have the old stars face the new stars.

Austin has an ego and is very careful about not doing something to tarnish his legacy. If he does ever wrestle again it will be WM 30 not 29... Rock and Taker will most likely be gone, and the whole ppv will be built around him. No way he would ever risk playing 2nd fiddle to them.

 

[The Fabulous Rougeau's]

I honestly see HBK vs the Rock happening at WMXXX just seems like one of if not the biggest match to not happen. And HBK is always willing to job unlike rocky. So you'd have a great matchup and big dollar signs.

Are you serious? The Rock has put others over throughout his whole career.

Rock wins his first title at Survivor Series 98 which puts in motion the main event at WM XV between himself and Austin. Does Rock hold the title from Survivor Series to Mania? No. He's too busy going back and forth with Mankind which fully entrenches Foley as a main eventer and world champ.

Going into WM 2000 Rock wins the Rumble. Does he storm into Mania and win the title over the heel champ? No. He's too busy being involved in a program with Show over who really won the rumble. A program that served to get Show in the main event at WM 2000 and help to build him up as a main eventer. Now for the show itself. Rock is the biggest thing in the WWE at the time. Hunter comes in as a heel champ. You would think this would be Rock's Mania moment but....... After 15 minutes and Show's and Foley's eliminations, Rock and Hunter put on an underrated classic for nearly 25 minutes where the end result is...... Hunter winnning and being the first heel to leave WM the world champ.

Fallout from WM 2000, Rock and Hunter continue their fued in which Rock does not outshine Trips. Rather they look to be equals and go over on each other. This along with WM 2000 are what made Trips a top draw main eventer.... with Rocks help.

Kurt Angle. Who did he beat again for his first title? Oh yea Rock. In Rock's only title run that lasted longer then 2 months, Rock puts over Angle and plays a big hand in Angle becoming a top guy in the company.

Now after this Rock starts his Hollywood thing and comes and goes for stetches. In that time he puts over Brock in a huge way, Goldberg to a lesser extent, and comes back a year later for WM XX to help elevate up and comers Orton and Batista.

But sure I guess Rock never jobs. Why is that? Because he beat Cena at WM 28? Rock's 1st big match of a few planned big matches and you want him to lose. Cena, unlike Trips and Angle when Rock put them over was fully established when Rock faced him. Thus no need for Rock to help Cena. It was Cena who needed to help The Rock. Did you also want Trips to beat Shawn at the 02 SummerSlam?

Rock had to win the Cena match to re establish himself. You are aware if we get what most expect and have The Rock win the title at the Rumble to set up the rematch at WM 29 but this time for the title Cena would most likely win that match.

 

[Randyortonforpres]

I’d say so far Mania is looking like this,



Undertaker vs Wade Barrett --- Taker wont lose but this could help wade a lot, Another person I see facing Taker is Lesnar.

Triple H vs Shawn Michales – After Shawn screws over Triple H at Slam and helps Lesnar win, the match will be set.

Main Event:
WWE Championship
The Rock © vs John Cena – Rock will take the title off Punk at the Rumble and Cena will most likely win the Rumble itself.

Of course there’s going to be other matches but so far it’s looking like these matches could very well happen.

Another bout I see taking palce is Sheamus vs Randy Orton.


As for the winners of these matches….


Undertaker vs Wade Barrett --- Taker keeps the streak alive until he is done with wrestling.

Triple H vs Shawn Michales – Shawn wins, There’s not too much Hunter can gain from a win and it would be a big moment for HBK

Main Event:
WWE Championship
The Rock © vs John Cena – Cena wins the rematch


World Heavyweight Championship
Shemus vs Randy Orton – Orton wins


Austin wont take part until next Mania