If this could happen...it's definately my pick of preferred matches! End of an era that will never be matched...ending in the undertaker's last ride...into the after life. Love this idea!
All Future Wrestlemania Discussion (Matches, Gimmicks, Angles.... KEEP IT IN HERE!)
- Thread starter god-soldier
- Start date
If this could happen...it's definately my pick of preferred matches! End of an era that will never be matched...ending in the undertaker's last ride...into the after life. Love this idea!
Ry.the_Stunner
Dark Match Winner
Anything but Undertaker vs. HHH again. Doing this back-to-back WM thing again like they did with Undertaker-Shawn Michaels just shows you how little thought they put into Undertaker's Wrestlemania matchup. If this is going to be his last year, no thanks to HHH.
I still think it should be Mankind. They put on one of the most replayed matches in WWE history, and if the WWE is really trying to break a record for most masks in a single venue, I think it could be a viable option to bring Mankind back.
I still think it should be Mankind. They put on one of the most replayed matches in WWE history, and if the WWE is really trying to break a record for most masks in a single venue, I think it could be a viable option to bring Mankind back.
Nice topic ! , So when looking at the whole HHH or Kane.
HHH wouldn't make sense for this match because no one is going to think he can beat Taker because of last year and the fact that Shawn Michaels already fought him two years in a row. The only way this works is if its Streak vs, Career.
Kane against Taker would only make sense if Kane wins , Taker beating Kane means nothing. The fact that Kane has said over and over he doesn't plan on quitting anytime soon means he will be around longer.
It shouldn't be who could you believe can beat taker because he has never lost at mania. So in my opinion there is NO one in wrestling that I could see beating him.
When you have beat :
VII 1991 Jimmy Snuka
VIII 1992 Jake Roberts
IX 1993 Giant González Won via disqualification
XI 1995 King Kong Bundy
XII 1996 Diesel
13 1997 Sycho Sid For the WWF Championship in a No Disqualification match
XIV 1998 Kane [22]
XV 1999 Big Boss Man Hell in a Cell match
X-Seven 2001 Triple H
X8 2002 Ric Flair No Disqualification match
XIX 2003 Big Show & A-Train Handicap match
XX 2004 Kane
21 2005 Randy Orton
22 2006 Mark Henry Casket match
23 2007 Batista For the World Heavyweight Championship
XXIV 2008 Edge For the World Heavyweight Championship
XXV 2009 Shawn Michaels
XXVI 2010 Shawn Michaels No countout, no disqualification, "Streak vs. Career" match
XXVII 2011 Triple H No Holds Barred match
Every person on this list other then A-Train should or will be a Hall of Famer. So the chances of him facing a new comer is unlikely.
So only time will tell.
HHH wouldn't make sense for this match because no one is going to think he can beat Taker because of last year and the fact that Shawn Michaels already fought him two years in a row. The only way this works is if its Streak vs, Career.
Kane against Taker would only make sense if Kane wins , Taker beating Kane means nothing. The fact that Kane has said over and over he doesn't plan on quitting anytime soon means he will be around longer.
It shouldn't be who could you believe can beat taker because he has never lost at mania. So in my opinion there is NO one in wrestling that I could see beating him.
When you have beat :
VII 1991 Jimmy Snuka
VIII 1992 Jake Roberts
IX 1993 Giant González Won via disqualification
XI 1995 King Kong Bundy
XII 1996 Diesel
13 1997 Sycho Sid For the WWF Championship in a No Disqualification match
XIV 1998 Kane [22]
XV 1999 Big Boss Man Hell in a Cell match
X-Seven 2001 Triple H
X8 2002 Ric Flair No Disqualification match
XIX 2003 Big Show & A-Train Handicap match
XX 2004 Kane
21 2005 Randy Orton
22 2006 Mark Henry Casket match
23 2007 Batista For the World Heavyweight Championship
XXIV 2008 Edge For the World Heavyweight Championship
XXV 2009 Shawn Michaels
XXVI 2010 Shawn Michaels No countout, no disqualification, "Streak vs. Career" match
XXVII 2011 Triple H No Holds Barred match
Every person on this list other then A-Train should or will be a Hall of Famer. So the chances of him facing a new comer is unlikely.
So only time will tell.
How would it be any threat any year, you knew the likely of him losing the streak once they passed 15 was zero. That's not the point it's about what they do in the ring that entertains and still gives the illusion he may have been losing.
Kane already faced Taker with the mask. The first Kane vs Taker was with masked Kane and both matches they had were woefull not to mention the hundreds of matches they've had that weren't at Mania. Taker vs Kane is done to death
Triple H vs Taker shouldn't happen either they've done there run and can't top what they've already done twice.
needs to be a new face being made famous by being involved in the last great storyline.
or just for fun Hogan vs HBK vs Taker vs Austin vs HHH. WrestleMania era's elimination match.
Lastly though i think he's shit in ring, Sting would be something different, make it both there final matches.
If i have to pick one it would be HHH just because I like him more then Kane (Only slightly).
a bit of off topicness
If people don't see someone like HHH or Kane can be a viable challenge to the Streak
then why in the blue hell would you even think of putting him up against someone like Ziggler or Rhodes? It would be like a child vs a man.
Unless they make either of them into a freaking serial killer it would look horrible.
I get the whole promoting a new star, but with all the talks of believe-ability and such, this makes no sense to me
.
a bit of off topicness
If people don't see someone like HHH or Kane can be a viable challenge to the Streak
then why in the blue hell would you even think of putting him up against someone like Ziggler or Rhodes? It would be like a child vs a man.
Unless they make either of them into a freaking serial killer it would look horrible.
I get the whole promoting a new star, but with all the talks of believe-ability and such, this makes no sense to me
.HBKistheHOF
Guest
If you would have asked me this a couple weeks ago I might have said Triple H. There match a mania 28 blew me away! Even better than the 2nd HBK vs Taker!
BUT R U KIDDING ME?!!!!!! Kane just had his best return his his intial run with the company as Kane when he debuted at Bad Blood! WWE granted a long awaited request and gave us badass, from hell and fire and brimstone Old School but re-done Kane!! Now think of this people....this time last year where was Taker and Kane. Kane just lost the World Title after.....Ding Ding Ding You Got It!!!!....FEUDING WITH TAKER!! one of there best feuds ever that involved Paul Bearer and....Ding Ding Ding You Got It Again!!!...NEVER ENDED!!!! w/help from Nexus Kane buried Taker Alive and that was it!!!!! Not to Mention this may be Kane and/or Takers last run, why not togther????? why not end it huge???? bring paul bearer back and everything!!!!! maybe evenmake it either a casket/Hell in a Cell/Buried Alive match!!
So with So much History between Kane and Taker, and HHH and HBK already evenly having 2 matches a piece w/Taker, possible Title or Stipulation match(since theyve never had one at mania, Kane's best run ever possibly in front of him(possibly both there last runs) and an already EXISTING FEUD that is UNRESOLVED....If Tajer doesnt face someone new, id love to see him face KANE!!!!
BUT R U KIDDING ME?!!!!!! Kane just had his best return his his intial run with the company as Kane when he debuted at Bad Blood! WWE granted a long awaited request and gave us badass, from hell and fire and brimstone Old School but re-done Kane!! Now think of this people....this time last year where was Taker and Kane. Kane just lost the World Title after.....Ding Ding Ding You Got It!!!!....FEUDING WITH TAKER!! one of there best feuds ever that involved Paul Bearer and....Ding Ding Ding You Got It Again!!!...NEVER ENDED!!!! w/help from Nexus Kane buried Taker Alive and that was it!!!!! Not to Mention this may be Kane and/or Takers last run, why not togther????? why not end it huge???? bring paul bearer back and everything!!!!! maybe evenmake it either a casket/Hell in a Cell/Buried Alive match!!
So with So much History between Kane and Taker, and HHH and HBK already evenly having 2 matches a piece w/Taker, possible Title or Stipulation match(since theyve never had one at mania, Kane's best run ever possibly in front of him(possibly both there last runs) and an already EXISTING FEUD that is UNRESOLVED....If Tajer doesnt face someone new, id love to see him face KANE!!!!
I would rather see kane vs undertaker. so much history between the two theyre styles are similar but both have been known to fly ..at the very least crash off the top rope and could have some very interesting spots. i think if taker were to lose even tho i dont think he should ever , if he did it should be to kane. bcuz of the whole brother thing hes the only one that really challenged him and would make kane into a hall of famer (not that he isnt one already). and while the taker hhh match was amazing i dont want to see it again. i really dont, i dont like the fact of hhh doing the same thing as shawn. hhh vs miz, now that i like
lakersyr09
Dark Match Winner
I really feel that HHH/Undertaker will the a good match to have at wrestlemania 28, but like many have said that they already did the whole no holds barred match last year, but they can still have like an 2 out of 3 falls match going with like a submission match, pins match, and then like a cage match, or a street fight or something for the last match
ok here is what I would like to see
taker vs HHH only if HBK is the ref
otherwise
taker vs orton
then HHH vs KANE
here is my mania 28 card
open match
air boom vs headbanger
2nd match
nat vd beth for divas champ
3rd match
cody vs goldust IC title
4.
ziggler vs ray mystrio
5.
taker vs Orton
6.
HHH VS KANE
1st main event
punk vs jericho wwe title
2nd main even
cena vs rock for the world heavy title see there building cena vs henry all ready
good card ? what you think
taker vs HHH only if HBK is the ref
otherwise
taker vs orton
then HHH vs KANE
here is my mania 28 card
open match
air boom vs headbanger
2nd match
nat vd beth for divas champ
3rd match
cody vs goldust IC title
4.
ziggler vs ray mystrio
5.
taker vs Orton
6.
HHH VS KANE
1st main event
punk vs jericho wwe title
2nd main even
cena vs rock for the world heavy title see there building cena vs henry all ready
good card ? what you think
Wow talk about the rock and the hard place.... HHH has faced him already twice at Mania recently last year...Kane at least has had a few years between....So I guess I favor him
But quite frankly I wish it was Taker and Kane working together to face one night only DX
But quite frankly I wish it was Taker and Kane working together to face one night only DX
J.D Lethal
IWGP Junior Heavyweight Champion
other than the John Cena part i agree full heartily Taker should really take this year off Last year was awesome but i do want to see taker go out like he did last year...Give him this year off the only man that can give justice to ending taker is CM Punk and it kills 2 birds with 1 stone you have a fitting piece to kill the streak that's believable and you the moniker of Best In the World truly would mean Best in the world
But to answer the question would i want Kane or HHH i would want HHH the only piece on board that worth any value is taker and its on the grandest stage of them all
Ry.the_Stunner
Dark Match Winner
So who does Daniel Bryan lose his briefcase to?
TheTruNoLimit
Getting Noticed By Management
Personally, I'd like to go in a completely different direction for the Undertaker... I've been thinking about Undertaker and Miz because with Rock and Cena in the Main Event and rumors of Punk and Jericho, this keeps Miz in a main-event level feud and WWE is obviously pretty high on the Miz.
Now, if I had to choose between HHH and Kane, I'll take Kane hands down. If there's a match that NEEDS to happen for a third time, it's really the Undertaker and Kane. With Kane undergoing a different persona likely now with the mask and the Undertaker coming back, it's really the better of the two options. At Wrestlemania 14, their match was amongst the best big man matches in the history of the business, I don't think that's even up for a debate as just about everybody considers it a classic Wrestlemania confrontation. At Wrestlemania 20 it was a quick and decisive victory for Undertaker in his big return and even though Kane went something along the lines of 9 months without being pinned after unmasking the previous year, he looked like a pushover. This would be a little different and much more even. Additionally, Undertaker tends to give it that little bit of extra at Wrestlemania and he wasn't healthy for their series of matches in 2010, I believe he had the shoulder that was bothering him which eventually knocked him out of action.
HHH and the Undertaker was the lone bright spot in my opinion at last years show, but if we're talking about a match that is more fitting of a round 3, this isn't the one. Plus, the back to backs was just done with Shawn Michaels and I don't like the idea of HHH being a back to back opponent for the Undertaker.
That being said, again I go back to my first point and say give it to somebody who the Undertaker hasn't faced with the Miz being a prime candidate, maybe even Wade Barrett. It still creates a strong mid-card match even though it won't be nearly the draw that the streak has been the last few years.
Now, if I had to choose between HHH and Kane, I'll take Kane hands down. If there's a match that NEEDS to happen for a third time, it's really the Undertaker and Kane. With Kane undergoing a different persona likely now with the mask and the Undertaker coming back, it's really the better of the two options. At Wrestlemania 14, their match was amongst the best big man matches in the history of the business, I don't think that's even up for a debate as just about everybody considers it a classic Wrestlemania confrontation. At Wrestlemania 20 it was a quick and decisive victory for Undertaker in his big return and even though Kane went something along the lines of 9 months without being pinned after unmasking the previous year, he looked like a pushover. This would be a little different and much more even. Additionally, Undertaker tends to give it that little bit of extra at Wrestlemania and he wasn't healthy for their series of matches in 2010, I believe he had the shoulder that was bothering him which eventually knocked him out of action.
HHH and the Undertaker was the lone bright spot in my opinion at last years show, but if we're talking about a match that is more fitting of a round 3, this isn't the one. Plus, the back to backs was just done with Shawn Michaels and I don't like the idea of HHH being a back to back opponent for the Undertaker.
That being said, again I go back to my first point and say give it to somebody who the Undertaker hasn't faced with the Miz being a prime candidate, maybe even Wade Barrett. It still creates a strong mid-card match even though it won't be nearly the draw that the streak has been the last few years.
The only opponents that can make the match new and are high profile enough to face Undertaker are Sting and John Cena which unfortunately both aren't available.
Kane vs Undertaker and HHH vs Undertaker are both done and have no intrigue to them anymore.
What I would do is to hold him off at Wrestlemania 28 since Rock vs Cena alone can sell the PPV, continue reference how Undertaker was stretchered out and he's done, wait till Wrestlemania 29 when Cena is available and hopefully turned heel and make the match Cena vs Undertaker.
If I had to choose between the two however, I'd take Kane vs Undertaker as it will be much fresher than HHH vs Undertaker as we have seen that last year and with Kane's new persona.
Kane vs Undertaker and HHH vs Undertaker are both done and have no intrigue to them anymore.
What I would do is to hold him off at Wrestlemania 28 since Rock vs Cena alone can sell the PPV, continue reference how Undertaker was stretchered out and he's done, wait till Wrestlemania 29 when Cena is available and hopefully turned heel and make the match Cena vs Undertaker.
If I had to choose between the two however, I'd take Kane vs Undertaker as it will be much fresher than HHH vs Undertaker as we have seen that last year and with Kane's new persona.
frogsplash31
Dark Match Jobber
I like the idea of Undertaker vs. Orton. Orton deserves a big time Mania match and is more than a credible opponent.
King of the Words
Getting Noticed By Management
The Undertaker could go 20-0 this year against the Game or Kane, but that doesn't mean he's finished. If they really want someone to kill the streak I don't see it happening until after the 20-0 match has been done. If Mania 29 is in Dallas next year in Taker's home state I could see him being inducted the night before Mania and then having an encore type match at Mania 29 to break the streak by losing to Cena or Punk. I can't see him losing to anyone else. In my opinion, if HBK= Mr.Wrestlemania couldn't end the streak then no one deserves to end the streak.
that one is easy cena heel turn on the rock after he wins the belt and lays the rock out for bryan after the rock says he walking away with the WHC like punk did but this time bryan gets the title setting up possable 3rd match for the rock.
and I am still wondering about the deal with bryan and the suit case I thought he turned it in for a shot in a steal cage after he cashed it in and beat mark henry but long voided it because he said MH was hurt and had a match in a steel cage where he lost.
I too agree that it should be Randy Orton. But that wasn't the topic question.
Of Kane or Triple H, Kane hands down... The overall matchup wouldn't be as good tecnhically, but these too can go... and it would likely be a gimmick match given the amount of history.
The benefit to this fued is that their last fued technically didn't end. Interference ended it. Plus masked Kane is an storyline to create this fued and the last fued Kane gave alot of background into the long term plan to destroy Undertaker even if it meant, teaming with him at times to bring him into a lull of weakness as blood brothers.
Triple H has countless options to wrestle against, Taker vs Trips III doesn't interest me after last year. It was a top match, but way too slow.
Kane vs Undertaker III for me, and Kane doesnt end the streak.
Kane doesn't have 10 world titles to his name, he deserves his legacy to be ending the streak.
Of Kane or Triple H, Kane hands down... The overall matchup wouldn't be as good tecnhically, but these too can go... and it would likely be a gimmick match given the amount of history.
The benefit to this fued is that their last fued technically didn't end. Interference ended it. Plus masked Kane is an storyline to create this fued and the last fued Kane gave alot of background into the long term plan to destroy Undertaker even if it meant, teaming with him at times to bring him into a lull of weakness as blood brothers.
Triple H has countless options to wrestle against, Taker vs Trips III doesn't interest me after last year. It was a top match, but way too slow.
Kane vs Undertaker III for me, and Kane doesnt end the streak.
Kane doesn't have 10 world titles to his name, he deserves his legacy to be ending the streak.
Ry.the_Stunner
Dark Match Winner
No, Bryan won a Fatal Fourway match to earn that title match inside the cage. He did not cash in his briefcase for a chance at that match.
TheDarkforce
Dark Match Jobber
Think this way, taker have wrestlamania, kane have the royal rumble, Kane dominates royalrumble 2012 and he is finnaly going to win it and/or elimating more than 11 men, it seems like gonna do it, we awaits a very late entrance, its the undertaker and somehow taker throws out kane, kane makes a promo on raw, sayin something like "royal rumble is as big or bigger as the wrestlemania is for the undertaker, and now undertaker ripped away hes goal, to make history as the undoubtfull most dominant man to ever step foot in a royal rumble, or in a wrestling ring for that matter.
Undertaker ruined his "wrestlamnia" now that undertaker ripped away Kanes "streak" kane is gonna make sure that undertaker will pay for his sins and now kane gonna rip away undertakers streak
Undertaker ruined his "wrestlamnia" now that undertaker ripped away Kanes "streak" kane is gonna make sure that undertaker will pay for his sins and now kane gonna rip away undertakers streak
Personally, out of the two of them I'd definitely be going with Kane.
There is nothing left for HHH and Taker to do. They put on a hell of a match, a brutal beast of a match where for a time I wouldn't of been surprised if Taker was dead. A match which went to the edge of everything the two characters have been about in their careers.
We all know this is most likely Takers last Wrestlemania and out of the two of them the only logical person to end his career is Kane (Though I know ending it will come through a loss to Taker). Kane is the only one with the story to take Taker out and between HHH and him he is the freshest one to provide a more interesting match. For the last wrestlemania we dont want to see a repeat of the year before (As much as Kane v Taker will probably suck anyway).
I also feel that its possible it would be a way to write both Kane and Taker out together. The characters go hand in hand and as much as Taker is above Kane in terms of reputation and legacy Kane's entire character is tied to Taker.
As much as id like to see him fight another legend hes never fought at Wrestlemania before again like he did with HBK, theres no one left. And as much as I want to see him face the likes of Cena (Which I personally would care more for than Cena v Rock) and Jericho...he has to retire and to answer your question. Kane it is.
There is nothing left for HHH and Taker to do. They put on a hell of a match, a brutal beast of a match where for a time I wouldn't of been surprised if Taker was dead. A match which went to the edge of everything the two characters have been about in their careers.
We all know this is most likely Takers last Wrestlemania and out of the two of them the only logical person to end his career is Kane (Though I know ending it will come through a loss to Taker). Kane is the only one with the story to take Taker out and between HHH and him he is the freshest one to provide a more interesting match. For the last wrestlemania we dont want to see a repeat of the year before (As much as Kane v Taker will probably suck anyway).
I also feel that its possible it would be a way to write both Kane and Taker out together. The characters go hand in hand and as much as Taker is above Kane in terms of reputation and legacy Kane's entire character is tied to Taker.
As much as id like to see him fight another legend hes never fought at Wrestlemania before again like he did with HBK, theres no one left. And as much as I want to see him face the likes of Cena (Which I personally would care more for than Cena v Rock) and Jericho...he has to retire and to answer your question. Kane it is.
lowandmighty
lowandmightyer
I would personally like to see him(The Undertaker) face Kane at wrestlemania and not triple H. my 5 reasons being:
1. The storied history between kane and the Undertaker
2. Both similar dark sided types of characters and I think this gives their feud a solid ora of competition.
3. As far as size goes its more believable that kane could do the impossible wheres triple H realistically could just be more easily squashed by Undertaker
4. Kane was originally a character created specifically to feud with the undertaker and is meant to be hell bent on getting his own revenge on him.
5. They are both older than Triple H and it could be one of the last times either of them could have a great wrestlemania match whereas triple H could probably still win the belt again and be in the main event itself for a couple more years.
I also would like this match (Kane vs Undertaker) to be the main event of Wrestlemania and be for the coveted WWE championship.
Here's the controversial part: For the past few years I've been seeing The Undertakers Wrestlemania streak nearing 20 and I've wanted him to get there but now I've changed my mind. Its a real possibility that nobody will ever get 15 wrestlemania wins let a lone 20 so 19 is enough and It would be so unexpected and shocking to see kane defeat him in some kind of cruel way stealing the 20th straight victory from his brother, its the perfect end to a sibling rivalry and would make that post match turnbuckle explosion thing look all the more powerful.
The world is a harsh and often disappointing place and ending the streak right before 20 would be a good moral message in my eyes because nobody always gets exactly what they want not even The Undertaker.
1. The storied history between kane and the Undertaker
2. Both similar dark sided types of characters and I think this gives their feud a solid ora of competition.
3. As far as size goes its more believable that kane could do the impossible wheres triple H realistically could just be more easily squashed by Undertaker
4. Kane was originally a character created specifically to feud with the undertaker and is meant to be hell bent on getting his own revenge on him.
5. They are both older than Triple H and it could be one of the last times either of them could have a great wrestlemania match whereas triple H could probably still win the belt again and be in the main event itself for a couple more years.
I also would like this match (Kane vs Undertaker) to be the main event of Wrestlemania and be for the coveted WWE championship.
Here's the controversial part: For the past few years I've been seeing The Undertakers Wrestlemania streak nearing 20 and I've wanted him to get there but now I've changed my mind. Its a real possibility that nobody will ever get 15 wrestlemania wins let a lone 20 so 19 is enough and It would be so unexpected and shocking to see kane defeat him in some kind of cruel way stealing the 20th straight victory from his brother, its the perfect end to a sibling rivalry and would make that post match turnbuckle explosion thing look all the more powerful.
The world is a harsh and often disappointing place and ending the streak right before 20 would be a good moral message in my eyes because nobody always gets exactly what they want not even The Undertaker.
tomthebodz
Pre-Show Stalwart
I'd like to see Kane v Taker 3. But they would need to up to ante. Maybe a casket match or something. I'd love to see Hell in a Cell but I can't see that happening because 'Mania is in a stadium and there is no place for the cell to go.
The reason is that as far as I remember 'Taker is yet to finish the rivalry with Kane from late 2010, when he lost a buried alive match. I just felt that there was no closure.
The reason is that as far as I remember 'Taker is yet to finish the rivalry with Kane from late 2010, when he lost a buried alive match. I just felt that there was no closure.
Best in the World 79
2 fingers round. 3 fingers down.
I pray to the wrestling gods that neither happen.
Taker/hhh has been done twice as has the kane match. Problem with the hhh match is it happened last year. If his rematch with hbk wouldn't been the following year it would've went down as a better match than what it did, albeit it is still THE UNDERTAKER VS MR WRESTLEMANIA. so it was still great, but hhh is no hbk and taker is not even taker from 2 or 3 years ago, referring to in the ring.
at this point, taker has to be taken care of in the ring. so hhh would be more logical than kane. but neither are interesting.
so, some say wade barrett? cause i truly would believe at any age that wade barrett is going to do what hbk, hhh, randy orton, ric flair, edge,..etc couldn't
so kill that discussion now.
here's what wwe needs for wrestlemania. seriously. undertaker vs brock lesnar. taker never beat lesnar. lesnar did work on taker in hell in the cell no mercy 02 in little rock. taker put over lesnar hard numerous times. they have intense history. lesnar has been said to take the most care in the ring according to big show. he has the strentgh to put on a fabolous match with taker and perform excellent moves but still watch out for the taker in the ring. tell me brock couldn't possibly end the streak? the all time wwe legend undefeated at mania vs the former wwe champ/former ufc champ?? SHIT- FUCK CENA VS ROCK.
Start a fucking twitter petition, or something.
We want TAKER VS LESNAR AT MANIA. Let our voices be heard fans. Isn't their main purpose to entertain us aside from making the most profit??
Money talks vince. taker-lesnar, rock-cena, punk-jericho, plus orton, ziggler, rhodes, big show, kane, possibly christian on the card...not to mention it being mania??? That would fucking shatter every buy rate for mania by a fucking zillion. that shit would be epic. fuck the stale shit no kane no hhh.
WE WANT LESNAR
Taker/hhh has been done twice as has the kane match. Problem with the hhh match is it happened last year. If his rematch with hbk wouldn't been the following year it would've went down as a better match than what it did, albeit it is still THE UNDERTAKER VS MR WRESTLEMANIA. so it was still great, but hhh is no hbk and taker is not even taker from 2 or 3 years ago, referring to in the ring.
at this point, taker has to be taken care of in the ring. so hhh would be more logical than kane. but neither are interesting.
so, some say wade barrett? cause i truly would believe at any age that wade barrett is going to do what hbk, hhh, randy orton, ric flair, edge,..etc couldn't
so kill that discussion now. here's what wwe needs for wrestlemania. seriously. undertaker vs brock lesnar. taker never beat lesnar. lesnar did work on taker in hell in the cell no mercy 02 in little rock. taker put over lesnar hard numerous times. they have intense history. lesnar has been said to take the most care in the ring according to big show. he has the strentgh to put on a fabolous match with taker and perform excellent moves but still watch out for the taker in the ring. tell me brock couldn't possibly end the streak? the all time wwe legend undefeated at mania vs the former wwe champ/former ufc champ?? SHIT- FUCK CENA VS ROCK.
Start a fucking twitter petition, or something.
We want TAKER VS LESNAR AT MANIA. Let our voices be heard fans. Isn't their main purpose to entertain us aside from making the most profit??
Money talks vince. taker-lesnar, rock-cena, punk-jericho, plus orton, ziggler, rhodes, big show, kane, possibly christian on the card...not to mention it being mania??? That would fucking shatter every buy rate for mania by a fucking zillion. that shit would be epic. fuck the stale shit no kane no hhh.
WE WANT LESNAR
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll