See I think it's the other way round; it should be more scientific. The American male audience seems to love poring over stats and and whatnot anyway. Right now I don't know how the system works, and that makes me not care about it.
It should be complex, it should be multi layered and it should accommodate for storytelling, booking and fan involvement and most importantly it should be transparent.
I want to know why the top guy is the top guy. If I disagree that's fine; heat. But if it just happens for no reason then the system isn't doing anything by being in place.
Now I think that making the system work in TNA is borderline impossible, so it should go.
As for the other matter, there is a difference between being complex and being incomprehensible. I'm fine with TNA's "everyone having some kind of program with everyone else" was of booking things. I like it. I understand it, and if I didn't then I'd be embarrassed to admit it.
What I don't like is when things simply don't make sense. Illogical turns that never get followed up on. Recent history completely forgotten. That sort of thing. It makes it very hard for a compelling program to be build when it's in an environment that the workers themselves don't understand. That's why all TNA's best programs recently are ones that have been kept in isolation from the rest of the show.
