Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Seriously, anyone who thinks that Sting is coming to WWE to face Taker needs their head checking. It isn't happening, end of.
But if this is only the Undertaker, then what is he trying to tell us ? He looks sad (if thats him), he's moping around the house, he doesn't look like he's ready to come kick someones ass like he would look in his usual return promos. Nothing intimidating. Thats why i don't think these promos are for him.
If these promos were about the Undertaker and only him, then these promos were a waste. I doesn't make no sense for it just to be him.
When I first read this post, quite honestly i thought it was a little bit silly. Then I thought about it and actually, I think it makes a lot of sense.
Many times in the past, the Undertaker has left, and has returned a while later. But he always returns with an air of fire and brimstone, with anger, looking for retribution against those who put him on the shelf in the first place. With promos that are clearly him, playing mind games with those who opposed him.
A typical return of the Undertaker would see darkness, cemeteries, druids, dry ice/smoke, eerie music, with no doubt that it is Taker, and aimed directly at Kane, or Nexus, or Wade Barrett, the guys responsible for putting him out in the first place. And I just am not getting this vibe from any of these vignettes. It is more subdued, less focused, and less intense. Plus, I get the whole concept of Taker returning on RAW because it is live versus pre-recorded, but when he returns, doesn't he have to address the people responsible for burying him alive in the first place? These guys are all on Smackdown. Jumping a returning Taker into a career versus streak match with Triple H simply does not make any sense. It leaves both of these guys with unresolved scenarios from prior to their absences.
I am still waiting for someone to tell me one thing, one newsflash, that renders the possibility of a second mystery man in the videos impossible, and specifically that it being Sting is impossible. Because while I concede it is probably unlikely,i t is hardly impossible. Far stranger things have happened.
When I first read this post, quite honestly i thought it was a little bit silly. Then I thought about it and actually, I think it makes a lot of sense.
Many times in the past, the Undertaker has left, and has returned a while later. But he always returns with an air of fire and brimstone, with anger, looking for retribution against those who put him on the shelf in the first place. With promos that are clearly him, playing mind games with those who opposed him.
A typical return of the Undertaker would see darkness, cemeteries, druids, dry ice/smoke, eerie music, with no doubt that it is Taker, and aimed directly at Kane, or Nexus, or Wade Barrett, the guys responsible for putting him out in the first place. And I just am not getting this vibe from any of these vignettes. It is more subdued, less focused, and less intense. Plus, I get the whole concept of Taker returning on RAW because it is live versus pre-recorded, but when he returns, doesn't he have to address the people responsible for burying him alive in the first place? These guys are all on Smackdown. Jumping a returning Taker into a career versus streak match with Triple H simply does not make any sense. It leaves both of these guys with unresolved scenarios from prior to their absences.
I am still waiting for someone to tell me one thing, one newsflash, that renders the possibility of a second mystery man in the videos impossible, and specifically that it being Sting is impossible. Because while I concede it is probably unlikely,i t is hardly impossible. Far stranger things have happened.
Exactly. And Triple H's career ending by Undertaker ..? I don't see that. Triple H has a big ego, and ( what i heard) doesn't like Undertaker.
And if Triple H were to feud with Taker, he should of came out earlier, and not appear the same night as the Undertaker.
And, call me nuts, i don't care, but these promos are FOR Taker, but they are NOT Taker.
HHH...big ego? how so? last i checked the guy has hardly had the title on him the past several years and he put Shemus over. I love when people just throw bullshit out there. And link to him not liking the undertaker? again, just throwing bullshit out there to support your "theory"...
reported on the main page:
"The Wrestling Observer is reporting that WWE went to very great lengths to keep Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson's return to WWE a secret.
It's being said that internally, WWE was telling people that Justin Bieber would be announced as the guest host of WrestleMania, in an effort to swerve everyone. In fact, the title of the script for Raw this past Monday was reportedly "Leave it to Bieber," which was yet another attempt to make sure The Rock's return was not spoiled."
not saying that it is or is not Sting...all im pointing out is that the WWE saying that HHH vs Undertaker at 'Mania is a 100% lock, IMO is a smoke screen and is meant to be a swerve.
WWE is very aware of how quickly sup surprises can be leaked and ruined. If they went to such great lengths to protect The Rock surprise I imagine they would do the same for Sting. for those that are so 100% sure that it is not Sting and there is no 2nd person in the promos I ask how the f*ck are you so sure. Nobody can be 100% sure one way or the other.
The twist will be that no one returns!
People, the 2/21/11 video is for The Undertaker, the guy was in the video!
Unless there's some swerve and it was Shawn Michaels for some odd reason dressed as Undertaker (which is highly unlikey, no matter what the dirtsheet's say) it's The Undertaker.
I know people are against it being the Undertaker becuase they don't want to be wrong, but it is him. I'd knew it was The Undertaker since the song aired on the second video killing all hope, but people still "saw," a bat, scorpian, heard a crow, I'm not gonna name any name's, but you know who you are.
And besides why would Sting face Undertaker, becuase their both kinda dead? They both wear black? Give me a break.
Also, even though it's off topic, Triple H vs. Undertaker "Career vs Streak" is'nt happening either. Why would Triple H return for 6 weeks? And he has unfinished business with Sheamus, just as Undertaker has unfinished business with Barret and Kane. And Shawn Michaels is gonna be involved somehow, yeah ok? People, don't believe the dirtsheet's.
If Sting show's up on RAW, i'll be completely shocked. But, as of today, I have complete faith that the 2/21/11 video is only for Undertaker and people are sadly still crasping at straw's.