Smooth Sexual Chocolate
Grapefruits of Wrath
It was between Elvis and Jackson for me, but I felt I could make a better case for Jackson, and he's also more relevant than Elvis and a bigger draw to a wider variety of people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why was Eminem controversial? He made shock value comments on two albums and toned down immediately after that. NWA meanwhile made statements about the horrid conditions of the LA ghettos that brought attention to the plight there and also brought forth the underlying current of police brutality and racial profiling. Not only on top of this but they also brought forward the gang violence and mentality that was also prevalent of their area.
Out of the four chosen I would say NWA is the best pick of the group. I'm not going into major detail as I"m saving it for a post that actually counts.
Controversial doesn't have to mean offensive. Eminem changed rap; he proved that it wasn't just a medium for African-Americans to voice their discontent with the system or to lament how brutish and short life in the hood is. No other white rapper was significant before Eminem, and I doubt that one as significant will come around for a long, long time.
We're talkin' controversy here, not most influential.
Problem is SSC your argument is about lifestyle and choices, not about the music itself, and I think that's what everyone is going for, controversy in the music itself. Jackson's music was relatively safe. You could play an MJ song anywhere and be fine, try playing an NWA or Eminem song in a public place, it just don't fly.
The question was not about the music itself, it was about choosing a controversial musician, and there in lies the dilemma with everyone's argument that it's about the music, because it's not about the music, it's about the controversy. If you choose your musician because of the controversial music than that's all fine and dandy, but nowhere did it say that this competition was about controversial music.
That's not my problem though, I'm more than within the definition of the question.
As I've said in my thread a few times, if the question was pick an artist who made the most controversial music than it would be a whole different story, but the question was controversial musician, and Michael Jackson is in fact Controversial, and a Musician.
The question was not about the music itself, it was about choosing a controversial musician, and there in lies the dilemma with everyone's argument that it's about the music, because it's not about the music, it's about the controversy. If you choose your musician because of the controversial music than that's all fine and dandy, but nowhere did it say that this competition was about controversial music.
It goes for anyone trying to bring rap innovation into this, sure NWA was innovative, and so was Eminem, but the question here is simply the most controversial, innovation doesn't have a home in this discussion.
Controversial doesn't have to mean offensive. Eminem changed rap; he proved that it wasn't just a medium for African-Americans to voice their discontent with the system or to lament how brutish and short life in the hood is. No other white rapper was significant before Eminem, and I doubt that one as significant will come around for a long, long time.
We're talkin' controversy here, not most influential.
Then what's the point of having it in the music section other than it's classified down to Most controversial person who happened to be a musician? If Hitler played the violin I could say Hitler was a musician and then go off about his war atrocities and tactics being controversial.
At that point it's not about the music, it's about the personal life of a person rather than the music, and it's better off in the Cigar Lounge at that point.
Anyone could be very controversial. Only a few can be influential and innovative. MJ is matched by only a couple of names for his musical talent.
That's a bit of a stretch on both the influence and innovation, but I do see why you are going down that route.
SO anyone want to post in my thread? Or is it so obvious that you can't make a case?
So Eminem being a white rapper was controversial and the first and only significant white rapper? Right let me go tell the Beastie Boys that, I"m sure they'd be shocked to learn they weren't significant in the rap game. 9x platinum on their debut album would suggest otherwise.
Hip hop was a positive music outlet in it's original beginnings followed up by the political and social rap with the likes of Public Enemy, followed by the gangsta rap that was prevalent in the 90's. Eminem didn't necessarily change rap, he changed the perception that a white boy couldn't be a hardcore rapper. I will agree he changed that idea because white rappers in the past were more about partying and having a good time. Eminem was capable of changing that perception around and prove that white boys could indeed be hardcore and tell riveting stories on the mic.