All Future Wrestlemania Discussion (Matches, Gimmicks, Angles.... KEEP IT IN HERE!)

[kidmetal24]

I would like to see Mark Henry again. The Mark Henry now is bigger and badder than he used to be. I think he would make an excellent choice. I believe Undertaker will never be defeated at WM. Mark will be a nice end point.

 

[WcWMondayNitro]

I won't be surprised if we see another Triple H vs Undertaker at Wrestlemania 28 with the same stipulation that Shawn Michaels had: The loser retires for good. As for Sheamus, I read that there are plans for him to be the face of Smackdown and rumours are suggesting that he will win the Royal Rumble next year. Speaking of Y2J, I would rather see him face CM Punk, that of course if Y2J does return to the company. Personally, I would like to see the Undertaker face Alberto Del Rio. No matter who faces Taker, I think the streak will never be broken.

 

[dcarson108]

I could see Undertaker being added to the Rock vs. Cena match at this year’s WrestleMania, making it a Triple Threat Undertaker Streak match. If you think the originally scheduled Main Event was going to get 1 million buys, could adding the Phenom get 2 million?? Hey, it’s better than Undertaker vs. Kane III, or Undertaker vs. Shawn Michaels III, or Undertaker vs. Triple H III, or Undertaker vs. (anyone he has already faced) II. He’s never faced The Rock or Cena at Mania. Why not!?

As for WM XXIX, the only SuperStar the Undertaker should face, if he is going for 21 – 0 would be…the Undertaker. It’s the best way to go out. Bringing back his Doppelganger not only guarantees an Undertaker victory, but could ease up the “work load” of the Legendary Dead Man. As a matter of fact, make it a Fatal Four Way match. The Western Mortician vs. The Lord of Darkness vs. The American Bad @$$ vs. Mark Calaway (Similar to Cactus Jack vs. Mankind vs. Dude Love vs. Mick Foley in my Smackdown vs. Raw 2007 video game, Fatal Four Way for the Hardcore Title.) I’m sure the WWE can find 3 people to impersonate the Undertaker for his Grande Finale on the Grandest Stage Of Them All!!

What about an 8 man tag hell in a cell?! Four Takers Vs. Mankind, Dude Love, Cactus Jack, and Mick Foley. He's never faced Foley at Mania and their Hell in a Cell is one of the best matches the world has ever seen. Why not recreate one last time, only with more guys!

 

[Danny.RKO.Mimna]

Who gave King Patrick rep power ??? what a load of cr*p..
I personally do not like cena and would not want to see that match... but its not that its this year its cena v rock. its undertakers 20th mania.. i dont see him wrestling after this... he will most likely retire at 20-0 !!! but a few suggestions and tell me if i am wrong or ridiculous..
So Undertaker
vs Chris Jericho ??
vs Cm Punk ??
vs Kevin Nash (risky one i know but why not...)
vs Stone Cold (he did say he is in 100% wrestling order)
vs Mick foley (might not be wrestling wise a great match but who doesnt wana see them slug it out again )
Vs..you tell me ??

 

[crippler]

I doubt this would happen but why not Booker T he can still go and he has never faced taker at mania. Booker could make it a good and interesting match could use a storyline ending takers streak his last accomplishment before he retires.

 

[xBANEx]

I'd like to see maybe Jericho vs Taker at 28, but that's because I'm a Jericho mark. While I personally don't like Taker, he's good, if that makes any sense Otherwise I don't really care.

I don't think he'll retire before WM29 though.

 

[King of the Words]

I personally see it being The Game and the Undertaker, again at Mania 28, unless they have a match before that. However I had an Idea for the Undertakers 20-0 match and it goes like this. Have Triple H, Kane and HBK all have a third chance at beating the Undertaker in a fatal 4 way elimination match like the one that main evented Mania 16. This way we get to see all three guys get their third chance and Undertaker gets more of a chance to take breaks in the match to have a strong finish. I see it going down like this. Undertaker pins Kane first, then HBK pins Triple H., and it is down to two. I see HBK doing sweet chin music and just about to win when the game comes back and nails HBK with the sledgehammer, turning heel. Then I see Undertaker pick up Michaels and tombstone him off the second rope, leading to the final pinfall. But soon as the match ends the Undertaker crumbles to the mat and remains motionless. Finally, Paul Bearer returns with the urn, and leads the druids down to the ring. They carry the deadmans body up the ramp and place it in a casket at the top, centre of the ramp. Paul Bearer places the urn on the top of the casket, and he and the druids all leave the stage. Then, after a pause, their is some thunder and lightning, and the lights go out. The undertaker bell then rings 20 times symbolizing his 20 wins at Wrestlemania, as the titan tron or what ever it's called shows each opponent the Undertaker defeated on his quest to 20-0. They could then have the casket and urn sink down into the stage as flames shoot up, and smoke rises up. they could then have on the big screen, Undertaker 1990-2012, R.I.P. I think this would be a fitting way for the the Phenom to end his career.

 

[kokoBawesome]

The WWE always sends the top guys out on their back. Every legend loses their last match, usually in order to pass the torch to the next guy. Austin, HBK, Flair, and Foley all lost their last matches. The Taker should be no exception to the rule.

Wrestlemania 28's opponent should be someone he can beat, 29 should be the person that's gonna put him out. Sheamus at 28, HHH at 29. The Taker said if anyone is gonna take him out, it should be HHH, and I think they're gonna stick to that. HBK put out flair, Taker put out HBK, who else deserves to put out the Taker other than HHH. Hes going out his back.

And Mark Calaway needs to walk down the aisle like a man and give his fans one last thank you. He always comes back after being put in a coffin or buried alive, he needs to walk out to show its real.

 

[mattpep5021]

The WWE always sends the top guys out on their back. Every legend loses their last match, usually in order to pass the torch to the next guy. Austin, HBK, Flair, and Foley all lost their last matches. The Taker should be no exception to the rule.

Wrestlemania 28's opponent should be someone he can beat, 29 should be the person that's gonna put him out. Sheamus at 28, HHH at 29. The Taker said if anyone is gonna take him out, it should be HHH, and I think they're gonna stick to that. HBK put out flair, Taker put out HBK, who else deserves to put out the Taker other than HHH. Hes going out his back.

And Mark Calaway needs to walk down the aisle like a man and give his fans one last thank you. He always comes back after being put in a coffin or buried alive, he needs to walk out to show its real.

Normally I would agree with this but even HHH went on record saying his streak should never be broken.

Personally I can see another HHH vs. Undertaker match with it being a retirement match per WM 26 with Shawn. HHH will lose the match and have to retire. Even though Taker doesn't lose I believe he will retire anyway.

 

[The Ace of Knaves]

With Foley returning I can see Taker vs Foley at WM 28. I think HHH vs Punk at WM 28 will happen because WWE has invested so much into their storyline.

As for WM 29, I think Taker it'll be Taker vs Jericho, although I'm sure Vince will try his best to get Lesnar or Sting (to no avail, as always).

The WWE always sends the top guys out on their back. Every legend loses their last match, usually in order to pass the torch to the next guy. Austin, HBK, Flair, and Foley all lost their last matches. The Taker should be no exception to the rule.

Flair's match at Wrestlemania 24 wasn't his last match, pal. He returned to wrestle in TNA after that. Stop making up history, you're not fooling anyone, okay?

 

[Meatsim009]

I personally see it being The Game and the Undertaker, again at Mania 28, unless they have a match before that. However I had an Idea for the Undertakers 20-0 match and it goes like this. Have Triple H, Kane and HBK all have a third chance at beating the Undertaker in a fatal 4 way elimination match like the one that main evented Mania 16. This way we get to see all three guys get their third chance and Undertaker gets more of a chance to take breaks in the match to have a strong finish. I see it going down like this. Undertaker pins Kane first, then HBK pins Triple H., and it is down to two. I see HBK doing sweet chin music and just about to win when the game comes back and nails HBK with the sledgehammer, turning heel. Then I see Undertaker pick up Michaels and tombstone him off the second rope, leading to the final pinfall. But soon as the match ends the Undertaker crumbles to the mat and remains motionless. Finally, Paul Bearer returns with the urn, and leads the druids down to the ring. They carry the deadmans body up the ramp and place it in a casket at the top, centre of the ramp. Paul Bearer places the urn on the top of the casket, and he and the druids all leave the stage. Then, after a pause, their is some thunder and lightning, and the lights go out. The undertaker bell then rings 20 times symbolizing his 20 wins at Wrestlemania, as the titan tron or what ever it's called shows each opponent the Undertaker defeated on his quest to 20-0. They could then have the casket and urn sink down into the stage as flames shoot up, and smoke rises up. they could then have on the big screen, Undertaker 1990-2012, R.I.P. I think this would be a fitting way for the the Phenom to end his career.

You got some great ideas there. WWE creative take note! but now that it's already been posted, the idea can't be used. :S I like the idea though, it's got legs.......like KEIBLER

HHH v Taker III seems safe money, but the whole "Last Outlaw" promo between them for this year's Mania makes me think 'Taker V Nash' could happen.

IMO, mostly everyone knows / believes Taker will win any match at Mania to keep the streak intact. Therefore, the opponent needs to create 'doubt' amongst the crowd that they could win. Cody Rhodes - with his push right now - I still can't see people believing that he could beat Taker.

Taker still has 'unfinished business' with Kane and the New Nexus. Can anyone see Taker having to 'run the gauntlet?' fight 2-4 opponents in one night (have to be a couple of squashes, but physical enough so that he enters the last match tired / weak, scrapes away with the win(s), carried out on stretcher, etc. Heck, you could get him up to 21/0, 22/0, or 23/0 in one night

gonna be interesting to see what happens. I hope whatever it is helps me suspend belief come Mania, and steals the show!

 

[rge2010]

Ahhhh yes. The weekly Undertaker/streak/Wrestlemania thread!!!!

For WM28 I would like to see Taker vs Mick Foley in a hardcore match or even a HIAC match but thats doubtful. Even though Taker vs Triple H was epic last year, I have no interest seeing it again. I think WWE might use WM28 to push a younger talent in someone like Sheamus. Randy Orton would be an interesting one though, but he has already had a shot at Taker.

As for WM29, I think WWE really needs to have John Cena vs Taker. That is money right there and years since they have faced off. If there was ever a match that created doubt towards the streak, that is it right there.

I would have Taker retire at WM30. He can easily last until then on a part time schedule. No idea for an opponent though, maybe Cena would be better at 'the big one' if Taker is going to appear here. Alot can happen in 2 and a half years though, Sting, Lesnar could be available. Who knows. Hell, maybe even The Rock.

 

[SickJames]

There's only one guy...

STING

It should be him, it could be him, it's not out of the question just because he's in TNA and his contract will end before Mania. Anything can happen to give the fans what they want, but unfortunately it's his decision and if he did come in, we'd undoubtedly get that match.

It seems most fitting as a third Kane bout is overkill unlike Rock/Austin, Nash isnt right for his finale, HHH either, only Rock/Austin was worth that trilogy

And Foley vs Taker in HIAC would be nice, but Sting would really be all around better. He can still put on a good match, it would be something NEW and anticipated for years as a dream match. You couldnt possibly get any bigger than that for Taker's last match. It's a perfect way for both men to retire (Sting's legacy needs a fitting end too and there's no one in TNA who can give him that match, even Flair at this point isnt gonna cut it)


And if it had to be a young star it would be most fitting for Ted with his father in his corner to say "My dad brought you in, I'm taking you out." and go for it, not to win, but to be put over (which can happen without losing)

Rumors and speculation had Sting coming in for WM27 but it's best that went down as it did even though it came out he never was in talks, you cant believe what they say true or not, that doesnt matter, it'd make sense for him to be brought in for the 20-0 match, not a WM match before.


Basically my friends... we need a miracle

 

[rge2010]

There's only one guy...

STING

It should be him, it could be him, it's not out of the question just because he's in TNA and his contract will end before Mania. Anything can happen to give the fans what they want, but unfortunately it's his decision and if he did come in, we'd undoubtedly get that match.

It seems most fitting as a third Kane bout is overkill unlike Rock/Austin, Nash isnt right for his finale, HHH either, only Rock/Austin was worth that trilogy

And Foley vs Taker in HIAC would be nice, but Sting would really be all around better. He can still put on a good match, it would be something NEW and anticipated for years as a dream match. You couldnt possibly get any bigger than that for Taker's last match. It's a perfect way for both men to retire (Sting's legacy needs a fitting end too and there's no one in TNA who can give him that match, even Flair at this point isnt gonna cut it)


And if it had to be a young star it would be most fitting for Ted with his father in his corner to say "My dad brought you in, I'm taking you out." and go for it, not to win, but to be put over (which can happen without losing)

Rumors and speculation had Sting coming in for WM27 but it's best that went down as it did even though it came out he never was in talks, you cant believe what they say true or not, that doesnt matter, it'd make sense for him to be brought in for the 20-0 match, not a WM match before.


Basically my friends... we need a miracle

You say Stings contract is up a few weeks before Wrestlemania. You really think Sting is going to come to WWE and in his first PPV lose to Undertaker? Talk about tarnishing his career!

I would love to see Taker vs Sting go at it. But they either need to tag team with each other or wrestle a year after Sting has joined WWE. Sting wouldn't agree to entering WWE and losing straight off the bat. Thats why he never signed in the first place, he was upset the way WWE handled wrestlers like Booker T and DDP.

 

[shooter_mcgavin]

You say Stings contract is up a few weeks before Wrestlemania. You really think Sting is going to come to WWE and in his first PPV lose to Undertaker? Talk about tarnishing his career!

How can loosing to The Undertaker at WM tarnish his career? If anything having his only WWF/E Match againts Undertaker vs. Sting (even if he loses) will add a significant milestone to his Legacy. Especially if the match is given a lot of time, build up, and if also Taker's final WM Apperance.

It would actually make a good story. Let's say Sting is inducted to the HOF and Sting appears in front of the live crowd and says the only reason why he accepted this was a chance to face The Undertaker at WM to be the one to end his streak.

Like I said before it sure beats embarassing yourself being a clown on national TV.

 

[joel9684]

Nash vs Taker!

Have Nash walk in with his WCW Wolfpack entrance, against American Bad Ass undertaker!
The storyline could have been about Nash looking for revenge for his "fallen" comrades HBK and Triple H. But, unlikely to happen, they are building Triple H vs Nash now...

 

[CanYouDigIt98]

For me undertaker has been a brilliant talent for the years that hes been in wwe . he gathered a record that wont be broken (it seems ) at wrestlemania . hes been out of action for a large amount of time but he is the type of wrestler that could slot back in and go for a main event at mania . for me this is where undertaker should bow out . by winning the title and leaving it the next day on raw like what was ment to happen with Bret Hart before he got screwed . For i would like a hell in a cell fatal four way match between him , kane , HHH and big show OR If UFC let brock lesner return have a hell in a cell match between them with no title included .. And add to the streak and then retire .

My Question To You Is :

Should He Have His Last Match At Mania ?

Who Should He Face And In What Match ?

Should He retire Or Not And Why ?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KEEP CALM AND FISTPUMP ! WOO WOO WOO !

 

[streicher187]

I think he should keep his streak alive, then take a young wrestler under his wing to take his place (can show clips of him training him etc. keeping him off tv but in peoples minds)

at the next mania (2 years away) have him wrestle the person who he is training and just as that person is covering the Undertaker the ref counts to 2 and the lights go out. When they come back on there is no Undertaker to be seen anywhere just an urn sitting in the middle of the ring. The New guy picks it up and you hear the gongs and that is the last we see of the Undertaker. Keeping his streak and never really losing at WM.

 

[SickJames]

The streak will not end and that's that. It isnt a requirement everyone lose to a young guy on the way out and it's not like he's Goldberg or Andre, this streak is different and so is he... he's not human. It looks good and you can put someone over without losing.

If he does lose his last match it'll ONLY happen at a final Survivor Series bout for him in a new match type he cant come back from maybe or a soul banishment contractual agreement.

SS is the only other option in 2012 of course

 

[MMSoldier]

What I want, as a massive Taker mark, is that he wins at this years Mania, does what he normally does now, and take the time off until next years. Next year, I think he should lose, but putting over a young talent that needs it, like Barrett or Bryan, even possibly Sheamus. Will it happen? Probably not, but it would be nice to see that happen.

 

[themusicman]

I have always been a big Taker fan and I honestly hope this next WM is his last. He's been amazing over the years and has put his body on the line for the company on numerous occassions and that is one of the main reasons he now spends so much time off TV. I want him to bow out now, while people still have positive memories of him in the ring. Personally I think the last match of the streak should have more of a nostalgic feel to it, a tribute if you like and so for that reason I have two nominations. Kane or Mick Foley, they are two of Takers biggest and most remembered programmes and I think it would be a great moment to see him finish up his career with one of these guys. Personally I would like to see Mick as Mankind one more time and v Taker at Wrestlemania would be great.

 

[Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D.]

As everyone knows, The Undertaker is rumored to go 20-0 at Wrestlemania 28 and retire. But there's a major concern about his health and his opponent. Some believe that he has to retire by putting over a young star (Rhodes, Barret) and others that he has to retire against a strong opponent in a huge match-up (Cena, Jericho). So here's my questions:

What if The Undertaker waits to return after Wrestlemania 28 (Summerslam 2012 for example), in order to have his final opponent at Wrestlemania being someone like John Cena.

Would this hurt the WWE?

Would you like to see something like that?

My opinion is that with The Rock competing at Wrestlemania, CM Punk gaining a lot of momentum and other superstars rumored to return (Jericho, Foley) this wouldn't hurt the WWE. Also, people's minds for Wrestlemania 28 are on Rock vs Cena. Why not take advantage and leave Cena vs Taker for 29? So yes, I would like to see something like that. (Everyone can dream but don't forget Taker's heatlh )

 

[Barbedwire Ropes]

I actually don't mind this idea at all BUT in no way would I ever want to see SuperCena go over The Undertaker, on any event.

As for Wrestlemania 28, I think the WWE really wants to have an Undertaker match. They sure care alot more about him than CM Punk and will give him the more high profile match no matter the circumstance because, well, he is The Undertaker.

The one and only thing the WWE cares about is money and Im sure their wishful thinking is hoping they'll get 1,500,000 buys with Rock vs Cena and they'll want to build a decent card around that as well which will include The Undertaker is some capacity. Its not like his health is going to be any better in another year....

 

[Poop Master Flex]

I think it all comes down to if Taker can handle another match as he is listed as retired at this moment.

Frankly if WM27 was the last time I saw Taker I would be more than ok with it. His match against HHH was fantastic and I don't think you could go out much better than he did. In the biggest match on the biggest card of the year he won and extended his record to 19-0. I would like to see him go 20-0 just cuz it sounds better but if he doesn't I would be pretty much ok with it.

If he does come back I just hope for 2 things:

1) He is in at least good enough shape to put on a great performance, it would be a shame for Taker's last match to be shit.

2) It is against a worthy opponent and not just a Wrestlemania match for the sake of a Wrestlemania match. I don't care if he wins or loses, I just care if its against a great opponent whether its someone old and established or if its someone new who could use a great rub.

 

[Workrate]

I don't get a whole lot out of guys that have been around forever and ever making little sporadic appearances, so for me at least, I don't really care if he is or isn't on the card. I think his streak is great and all, but if he misses an entire year and comes back for a month or two just to have a reason to show up and continue that streak, should I really be excited? That's like a quarterback being undefeated in Super Bowls sitting out the regular season and coming back when the playoffs start to finish it off.