10 years on Montreal Screwjob | Page 9 | WrestleZone Forums

10 years on Montreal Screwjob

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattitude_03
  • Start date Start date
Again...NOOOO.... He never said "Shawn I give you my word that I'll put you over!". or "Shawn I promise I'll put you over". Bret was trying to be professional, and it blew up in his face, so no, he didn't lie, he changed his mind! Sorry..but merely saying something is not giving your word..I happen to believe that!

Again i emphasize, Bret said "If that's the route Vince wants to go", and again, when Vince said Shawn was getting the belt back, it wasn't specified WHEN or WHERE, because Bret hadn't handed in his notice yet!. At first Bret didn't want to give Shawn the belt back, but later he changed his mind and said, he would, just not that weekend!!! Changing your mind and lying are two different things! Again, I'll say it....Bret had no problem saying those things to Shawn.

I can't believe you're still hell bent on calling Bret a liar, after something like that, he never gave his word, he never promised, he merely changed his mind! And Bret even told Vince that he would have no problem saying all that to Shawn! So, no, he didn't go back on his word, because he never gave it. He never lied, he changed his mind after Shawn's smartass comment! The price he pays for being the bigger man...

Ok..the terms of his "Reasonable Creative Control", were that he could "LEAVE ANYWAY HE WANTS TOO", that was also specified by Bret and something he said. Which means, he could drop it whenever he wants...to WHOEVER he wants! Those were the terms!!.

I watched ever Raw leading up that show, and I happen to think otherwise! IMO, Bret was put down pretty much every week by Shawn & Hunter, and that horrendous angle with "The Nation" and Shawn calling him the Grand Wizard, was not very flattering. I've watched that segment on Youtube again, and you can see Bret mouthing the words "This is Stupid", while Shawn was saying that crap!!
 
The whole thing was just amplified by the fact that Shawn and Bret Hart didnt like each other....if they got on, we would not be talking about the screwjob now. it would not have happened.

Shawn was a real tit back then.....he may have been more professional if it had happened after his extended break from the business.

Not extending any blame, IMO it was just business that went sour. Thats my 2c
 
Again i emphasize, Bret said "If that's the route Vince wants to go", and again, when Vince said Shawn was getting the belt back, it wasn't specified WHEN or WHERE, because Bret hadn't handed in his notice yet!. At first Bret didn't want to give Shawn the belt back, but later he changed his mind and said, he would, just not that weekend!!! Changing your mind and lying are two different things! Again, I'll say it....Bret had no problem saying those things to Shawn.

Sometimes changing your mind is an excuse used for lying though. I don't think Bret was lying when he said he'd put over Shawn..But Bret was stubborn and wanted it to happen his way.. I don't know what was said between the 2 because the only person who claimed Shawn refused to do the favor was Bret.. And as untactfull as it was.. I can see Shawns side of things.. Bret said he would put over Shawn at the end of his title run..and Shawn probably did make clear that he wasn't going to be doing a job for someone who was heading to WCW.. which IMO.. After the decision was made for Bret to go.. Shawn shouldn't have jobbed to Bret..



Ok..the terms of his "Reasonable Creative Control", were that he could "LEAVE ANYWAY HE WANTS TOO", that was also specified by Bret and something he said. Which means, he could drop it whenever he wants...to WHOEVER he wants! Those were the terms!!.

I think that people try to look way to into this "reasonable control" This was given to Bret in his contract as a way to say "we're not going to bury you for weeks and months before you leave" Which is what wrestling did to people on the way out.. When Razor and Diesel left WWF they jobbed to everybody on their way out.. Vince didn't even want to have Bret get beat by multiple people for weeks and weeks.. He simply for the good of HIS company wanted to get his championship belt off of Bret..

And isn't it a little more than convenient that Bret had WCW sign non disclosure aggreements that lasted til 11/10 even though he had no intention of losing the belt til after that. Then when asked to drop the belt before the NDA ran out he refused.. even when they asked him to drop the title before SS97 at a house show in Detroit.. and he refused saying it would be "an anticlimax"..THEN suggested a DQ finish..as the big climax??? I think Bret was crafty enuff to know what he was doing and trying to get that extra bit of attention going into WCW and wanted them to announce that he was coming to there while he was still WWF champ.. I would have gotten HUGE anticipation for his arrival..

I watched ever Raw leading up that show, and I happen to think otherwise! IMO, Bret was put down pretty much every week by Shawn & Hunter, and that horrendous angle with "The Nation" and Shawn calling him the Grand Wizard, was not very flattering. I've watched that segment on Youtube again, and you can see Bret mouthing the words "This is Stupid", while Shawn was saying that crap!!

Of course Bret was put down..it was a great..real feeling fued. But you forget that Bret had been trashing Shawn for a year and a half.. on and off TV.. His column in the sun.. Talking about Shawns parents and that "what kind of people would raise a Shawn Michaels?" and calling him gay... and a phony... an injury faker.. Bret was being pretty harsh too...

And the NOD thing was an angle.. It wasn't just something Shawn brought up in some random promo...

"You are a zero...my hero" best HBK quote from the Bret fued... followed closely by "Bret, before you put a sleeper hold on this audience.."
 
Again...NOOOO.... He never said "Shawn I give you my word that I'll put you over!". or "Shawn I promise I'll put you over". Bret was trying to be professional, and it blew up in his face, so no, he didn't lie, he changed his mind! Sorry..but merely saying something is not giving your word..I happen to believe that!

Again i emphasize, Bret said "If that's the route Vince wants to go", and again, when Vince said Shawn was getting the belt back, it wasn't specified WHEN or WHERE, because Bret hadn't handed in his notice yet!. At first Bret didn't want to give Shawn the belt back, but later he changed his mind and said, he would, just not that weekend!!! Changing your mind and lying are two different things! Again, I'll say it....Bret had no problem saying those things to Shawn.

I can't believe you're still hell bent on calling Bret a liar, after something like that, he never gave his word, he never promised, he merely changed his mind! And Bret even told Vince that he would have no problem saying all that to Shawn! So, no, he didn't go back on his word, because he never gave it. He never lied, he changed his mind after Shawn's smartass comment! The price he pays for being the bigger man...

Ok..the terms of his "Reasonable Creative Control", were that he could "LEAVE ANYWAY HE WANTS TOO", that was also specified by Bret and something he said. Which means, he could drop it whenever he wants...to WHOEVER he wants! Those were the terms!!.

I watched ever Raw leading up that show, and I happen to think otherwise! IMO, Bret was put down pretty much every week by Shawn & Hunter, and that horrendous angle with "The Nation" and Shawn calling him the Grand Wizard, was not very flattering. I've watched that segment on Youtube again, and you can see Bret mouthing the words "This is Stupid", while Shawn was saying that crap!!

Look just because he didn't preface his words like you said doesn't mean it wasn't valid, he gave his word he had no problem putting Shawn over, by saying so. He knew Shawn was an ass, if he didn't he should have so that nulls your argument.

The terms were he had reasonable creative control his last 30 days, not full control his last 30, that means no he doesn't get to control who or when he drops the title. According to Vince all it means is Bret doesn't get unreasonabley buried on the way out. As far as it not being scripted till after he gives his notice, it doesn't matter all that much given that it was the Champ's job to lose to the new top guy in the company on the way out anyway, I don't care that they were in his home country. Which by the way they were a few thousand miles from Calgary so you can hardly say it was home.

Of course he thought it was dumb, half of the people watching thought so too, it's wrestling after all. But he still had a job to do, and that's another example of Bret's unprofessionalism, which doesn't help your case my man. It shows that Bret wasn't a team player those last days and probably would have thrown a fit no matter who was supposed to win the title. If the screwjob hadn't happened do you really think he would have just lost clean later. Of course not he would have gone to WCW and claimed nobody beat him for the title and he was the uncrowned Champion.
 
Look just because he didn't preface his words like you said doesn't mean it wasn't valid, he gave his word he had no problem putting Shawn over, by saying so. He knew Shawn was an ass, if he didn't he should have so that nulls your argument.


Buddy you're REALLY grasping straws now! So it was ok for Shawn to be a dick, because Shawn was a dick, Bret couldn't try to be a bigger man? Bret was trying to do business!! And no i'm sorry, it's STILL a difference, I've asked my whole family of middle age people, who don't even like wrestling, and they say Bret had every right to change his mind! Ok, read very carefully because I don't think my point is getting across!!! Bret....was....willing...to...do something...just because you're willing...doesen't mean you're giving your word.....then he...and read carefully now...changed...his...mind!! Last I checked in life you're allowed to do that, and Bret said once again...he...had...no...problem...telling..Shawn...to...his...face!

The terms were he had reasonable creative control his last 30 days, not full control his last 30, that means no he doesn't get to control who or when he drops the title. According to Vince all it means is Bret doesn't get unreasonabley buried on the way out. As far as it not being scripted till after he gives his notice, it doesn't matter all that much given that it was the Champ's job to lose to the new top guy in the company on the way out anyway, I don't care that they were in his home country. Which by the way they were a few thousand miles from Calgary so you can hardly say it was home.

It was even confirmed, by Dave Meltzer, by Bret, and even by Vince in a few interviews he did up here in Canada, that the terms of the contract were, Bret could leave...and read closely again...any...way...he...wanted!! Reasonable means, within reason, and Vince even told Bret on numerous occasions, that you can leave anyway you want. Something ALSO Vince has confirmed. But then Vince brought up to Bret, but on the condition that it's Shawn he drops it too....then Bret finally conceeded, "Ok fine, but not in Montreal", now WHERE he drops it, is within reason pal! The audience would've been much bigger on Raw, and ratings for that match would've skyrocketed at a time where ratings needed a spike!! And also...Bret said he DIDN'T...repeat DIDN'T have to beat Shawn in Montreal, he just wanted to get through it. Shawn would have his belt...Bret would have his self-respect! Bret had been buried all the way up to Survivor Series, and I think him surviving Shawn was a modest request!

Of course he thought it was dumb, half of the people watching thought so too, it's wrestling after all. But he still had a job to do, and that's another example of Bret's unprofessionalism, which doesn't help your case my man. It shows that Bret wasn't a team player those last days and probably would have thrown a fit no matter who was supposed to win the title. If the screwjob hadn't happened do you really think he would have just lost clean later. Of course not he would have gone to WCW and claimed nobody beat him for the title and he was the uncrowned Champion.

Oh wow...yeah, he's such a jerk and unprofessional for not wanting to be portrayed as a racist!! Oh that's just terrible!! Man are you for real? And guess what? HE STILL DID IT!! He was getting hounded by fans after the show ready to beat him in the parking lot, something Bret mentioned in a TV interview here in Canada shortly after that angle aired. And I guess you're implying that Owen Hart was unprofessional doing a storyline that made it look like he was cheating on his wife?? And BRET'S CONTRACT DIDN'T EXPIRE UNTIL NOV.30th...what part of that do you get...LEGALLY HE COULDN'T GO TO WCW!!! Really man, you're just grasping straws.

Why do you think he wasn't on Nitro the next night...or on Nov.17...or Nov.24..or even Dec.1st? Explain that too me please??? Even after they screwed him, he knew LEGALLY, he couldn't go on there show!

So, I take that as, if the screwjob HADN'T happened..then YES, he would've dropped it!!! And Vince...yes, Vince has also said...and I'll try and find the interview if you want me too and upload it on Youtube...that he did not...repeat DID NOT think Bret would do that!
 
Sometimes changing your mind is an excuse used for lying though. I don't think Bret was lying when he said he'd put over Shawn..But Bret was stubborn and wanted it to happen his way.. I don't know what was said between the 2 because the only person who claimed Shawn refused to do the favor was Bret.. And as untactfull as it was.. I can see Shawns side of things.. Bret said he would put over Shawn at the end of his title run..and Shawn probably did make clear that he wasn't going to be doing a job for someone who was heading to WCW.. which IMO.. After the decision was made for Bret to go.. Shawn shouldn't have jobbed to Bret..

Gee, welcome back Jericho, I missed ya for a while there!

It wasn't stubborness, maybe you see that way. I see it as someone standing up for there self-respect. Again, Bret has said on numerous occasions, he just wanted to survive the weekend, that's all!! At first he thought it wouldn't be a big deal for him to beat Shawn, then he thought it over, and changed his mind saying, ok I don't have to beat him, I just want to survive the weekend, that's all.

You're forgetting, Bret had NOT handed in his notice yet, and it was STILL secret at that point! So, no Bret had not decided he was leaving yet, at the time Shawn said his smartass remark, Bret wanted to stay, and that was still the plan in his mind!

I think that people try to look way to into this "reasonable control" This was given to Bret in his contract as a way to say "we're not going to bury you for weeks and months before you leave" Which is what wrestling did to people on the way out.. When Razor and Diesel left WWF they jobbed to everybody on their way out.. Vince didn't even want to have Bret get beat by multiple people for weeks and weeks.. He simply for the good of HIS company wanted to get his championship belt off of Bret..

And isn't it a little more than convenient that Bret had WCW sign non disclosure aggreements that lasted til 11/10 even though he had no intention of losing the belt til after that. Then when asked to drop the belt before the NDA ran out he refused.. even when they asked him to drop the title before SS97 at a house show in Detroit.. and he refused saying it would be "an anticlimax"..THEN suggested a DQ finish..as the big climax??? I think Bret was crafty enuff to know what he was doing and trying to get that extra bit of attention going into WCW and wanted them to announce that he was coming to there while he was still WWF champ.. I would have gotten HUGE anticipation for his arrival..

You're convienently leavinv out that Bret has ALSO stated, he did that at the request of Vince and the WWF, because word had already leaked out that Bret was leaving, pretty much the day after he signed his notice (I think WWF deliberately did it) all you gotta do is look at the fans in the Detroit house show on Dec.8th....and you can see. Even look at some of the signs in Montreal..or the next night in Ottawa. Actually, Bret has stated his main reason for not dropping it before the show, was because he felt fans would feel jipped if it wasn't a title match. Bret was even willing to drop it that same week in New York or any other house show that week.

Of course Bret was put down..it was a great..real feeling fued. But you forget that Bret had been trashing Shawn for a year and a half.. on and off TV.. His column in the sun.. Talking about Shawns parents and that "what kind of people would raise a Shawn Michaels?" and calling him gay... and a phony... an injury faker.. Bret was being pretty harsh too...

And the NOD thing was an angle.. It wasn't just something Shawn brought up in some random promo...

"You are a zero...my hero" best HBK quote from the Bret fued... followed closely by "Bret, before you put a sleeper hold on this audience.."

Being portrayed as a racist...isn't JUST an angle my friend! You're forgetting that even Vince was having trouble controlling what Shawn said and did at that point! So it looked as if Bret didn't know Shawn what Shawn was gonna say, and he made that clear on Canadian TV

According to Bret he cleared all that up with Shawn, and he was only attacking the CHARACTER! Not the person! Shawn made it personal. Bret still put over Shawn's ability, and his nack for performing, but the gay stuff, and all that crap was about Shawn the character, not Michael Hickenbottom the person!

And I've read pretty much ALL of Bret's colummns dating back to 1995, I never saw where he said that about Shawn's parents. I know Shawn mentions it in his book, but I've never seen it myself!!
 
Buddy you're REALLY grasping straws now! So it was ok for Shawn to be a dick, because Shawn was a dick, Bret couldn't try to be a bigger man? Bret was trying to do business!! And no i'm sorry, it's STILL a difference, I've asked my whole family of middle age people, who don't even like wrestling, and they say Bret had every right to change his mind! Ok, read very carefully because I don't think my point is getting across!!! Bret....was....willing...to...do something...just because you're willing...doesen't mean you're giving your word.....then he...and read carefully now...changed...his...mind!! Last I checked in life you're allowed to do that, and Bret said once again...he...had...no...problem...telling..Shawn...to...his...face!



It was even confirmed, by Dave Meltzer, by Bret, and even by Vince in a few interviews he did up here in Canada, that the terms of the contract were, Bret could leave...and read closely again...any...way...he...wanted!! Reasonable means, within reason, and Vince even told Bret on numerous occasions, that you can leave anyway you want. Something ALSO Vince has confirmed. But then Vince brought up to Bret, but on the condition that it's Shawn he drops it too....then Bret finally conceeded, "Ok fine, but not in Montreal", now WHERE he drops it, is within reason pal! The audience would've been much bigger on Raw, and ratings for that match would've skyrocketed at a time where ratings needed a spike!! And also...Bret said he DIDN'T...repeat DIDN'T have to beat Shawn in Montreal, he just wanted to get through it. Shawn would have his belt...Bret would have his self-respect! Bret had been buried all the way up to Survivor Series, and I think him surviving Shawn was a modest request!



Oh wow...yeah, he's such a jerk and unprofessional for not wanting to be portrayed as a racist!! Oh that's just terrible!! Man are you for real? And guess what? HE STILL DID IT!! He was getting hounded by fans after the show ready to beat him in the parking lot, something Bret mentioned in a TV interview here in Canada shortly after that angle aired. And I guess you're implying that Owen Hart was unprofessional doing a storyline that made it look like he was cheating on his wife?? And BRET'S CONTRACT DIDN'T EXPIRE UNTIL NOV.30th...what part of that do you get...LEGALLY HE COULDN'T GO TO WCW!!! Really man, you're just grasping straws.

Why do you think he wasn't on Nitro the next night...or on Nov.17...or Nov.24..or even Dec.1st? Explain that too me please??? Even after they screwed him, he knew LEGALLY, he couldn't go on there show!

So, I take that as, if the screwjob HADN'T happened..then YES, he would've dropped it!!! And Vince...yes, Vince has also said...and I'll try and find the interview if you want me too and upload it on Youtube...that he did not...repeat DID NOT think Bret would do that!

I think you're missing my point, you have na obligation as a man to followthru with every word you say, or at least to attempt to, no matter what others do. Yes Shawn was an ass, and that was uncalled for, but that has no bearing on weather or not Bret had an obligation to follow up on what he said. That's called being an adult, instead of a petulant whiny child, as both Hitman and HBK were.

If you read Meltzer, which you obviously did, Vince even said not dropping the title as it was planned was unreasonable. That would be planned by the head of the company that Bret was an employee of by the way. Again read carefully, Bret was an actor with a contract that obligated him to do something, he didn't honor his end of the bargain.

And you are right he couldn't have shown up at Nitro, but that didn't stop Eric Bishoff from announcing the next night on TNT that Bret was coming, how much more damage would that announcment been if Hart was still champ. Plus given that he was trying to stretch his contract beyond it's original terms, who's to say he would have all of a sudden turned on a dime and become someone willing to honor thier word? Certainly not you or I, after all the best indicater of future behaviors is past behavior, thank you to Dr. Phil, meaning he's throwing a hissy fit at losing to HBK, then he probably will throw a fit no matter who the opponent. The minute Vince said refusing this one job was unreasonable, Bret should have conceeded and done the job in Montreal. He was losing to the absolute best in the company, not Barry Horowitz.

And he wasn't buried, he was winning matches despite saying this is stupid on TV in the middle of an angle. One objecting to, would have been reasonable mind you, but he aparently didn't refuse. He should have acted within the bounds of the script there if he was willing to do the angle, which he was. Not got on TV and sent that message to the fans. The professional thing to do would be to back out instead of going the route he did.
 
That is untrue, and one of the biggest myths going in wrestling today. Bret had no problem dropping the title, it just wasn't going to be to Shawn Michaels. He wasn't going to put Michaels over again in anyway shape or form, and you can thank Shawn Michaels for it.

Bret is a company man, and would have never done anything to hurt the company. He said himself, he would forfeit the title the next night on Raw, the only thing he wouldn't do is drop the title to Shawn Michaels. Was that so much to ask for, especially with all of the locker room garbage between those two? Was it really so much to let a guy that took exactly 6 months off in twelve years with the company not job to the one guy he despised? Bret even suggested that he should drop the belt to Austin.

Again, it wasn't an issue of Bret dropping the title, it just wasn't going to be to Michaels.


Well it was his job to drop the title to whoever Vince said was going to be the next champion. The WWE wrestlers, as much as we love them, are only doing a job, and whatever they dislike outside of the ring, should be forgotten inside the ring, that's just professional, and you have this in most jobs.

Shawn was going to be the next champion, it had been decided, and Bret Harts personal preferences should have nothing to do with that. If Bret had dropped the title to Austin, who had then dropped it to Shawn, we'd have all just complained it was pointless.

Bret Hart ruined any reputation he had in the ring that night to a lot of fans. It made it look like he was putting his feelings about a fellow wreastler first, instead of the company and the fans.
 
Well it was his job to drop the title to whoever Vince said was going to be the next champion. The WWE wrestlers, as much as we love them, are only doing a job, and whatever they dislike outside of the ring, should be forgotten inside the ring, that's just professional, and you have this in most jobs.

Shawn was going to be the next champion, it had been decided, and Bret Harts personal preferences should have nothing to do with that. If Bret had dropped the title to Austin, who had then dropped it to Shawn, we'd have all just complained it was pointless.

Bret Hart ruined any reputation he had in the ring that night to a lot of fans. It made it look like he was putting his feelings about a fellow wreastler first, instead of the company and the fans.

Agreed, but it didn't just look like it, that's exactly what he was doing, he couldn't seperate real from fantasy. Bret being good at the one aspect of the business he was good at, and he was very good, probably one of the top ten technical wrestlers ever, didn't make him get a free pass on being a man. The fact is he had a job he refused to honor. He didn't do it for the boys in the back, he certainly didn't do it for the fans, he did it for himself. There's nothing wrong with being selfish, but at least have the integrity to admit it.

His claims of being a "Hero" to his fellow countrymen, and that it was about respect for Shawn were more than likely nothing but a ploy to keep the belt until it was legal for Eric Bischoff to go ahead and announce the signing of Hart to WCW, which was coincidently the night after Survivor Series. That being "the weekend he wanted to survive" and nobody defending him seems to pick up on that.
 
I think you're missing my point, you have na obligation as a man to followthru with every word you say, or at least to attempt to, no matter what others do. Yes Shawn was an ass, and that was uncalled for, but that has no bearing on weather or not Bret had an obligation to follow up on what he said. That's called being an adult, instead of a petulant whiny child, as both Hitman and HBK were.

Again, I don't think you should be obligated! There's a difference between an obligation and a willingness!!!

If you read Meltzer, which you obviously did, Vince even said not dropping the title as it was planned was unreasonable. That would be planned by the head of the company that Bret was an employee of by the way. Again read carefully, Bret was an actor with a contract that obligated him to do something, he didn't honor his end of the bargain.

You also forget Vince changed his mind every day that week!!! Vince only said that part AFTER the fact, and after everything happened!! The terms were the terms, it was legally written, Bret could leave "Anyway he wanted", that's WHY Vince wrote it in there. He thought Bret deserved the dignity!!

And you are right he couldn't have shown up at Nitro, but that didn't stop Eric Bishoff from announcing the next night on TNT that Bret was coming, how much more damage would that announcment been if Hart was still champ. Plus given that he was trying to stretch his contract beyond it's original terms, who's to say he would have all of a sudden turned on a dime and become someone willing to honor thier word? Certainly not you or I, after all the best indicater of future behaviors is past behavior, thank you to Dr. Phil, meaning he's throwing a hissy fit at losing to HBK, then he probably will throw a fit no matter who the opponent. The minute Vince said refusing this one job was unreasonable, Bret should have conceeded and done the job in Montreal. He was losing to the absolute best in the company, not Barry Horowitz.

Shawn may have been the best perforner, but the #1 guy was cleary Austin! World had already leaked out, I think I've proven that! There is footage to back it up, which isn't hard to find at all. Again, I repeat, Vince changed his mind every day, flip flopped back and forth, someone had his ear!!! Bret says he would've jobbed to anyone else, and at any other time! But Vince wasn't having it!

And he wasn't buried, he was winning matches despite saying this is stupid on TV in the middle of an angle. One objecting to, would have been reasonable mind you, but he aparently didn't refuse. He should have acted within the bounds of the script there if he was willing to do the angle, which he was. Not got on TV and sent that message to the fans. The professional thing to do would be to back out instead of going the route he did.

Again...I guess that makes him a bad person for not wanting to be portrayed as a racist! Gimmie a break buddy!! Actually, I don't even recall Bret winning one match from Oct.6th to Nov.3rd on Raw....Bret didn't have the creative control yet btw, when that angle took place. Otherwise, I'm damn sure he would've vetoed the whole thing! Bret said in an interview some years back, that pretty much the only reason he did it, was so that maybe it would elevate Rocky Maivia!

Well it was his job to drop the title to whoever Vince said was going to be the next champion. The WWE wrestlers, as much as we love them, are only doing a job, and whatever they dislike outside of the ring, should be forgotten inside the ring, that's just professional, and you have this in most jobs.

Again..he was willing to drop it to Shawn. At first he resisted, and said, at a different date, he would, no problem! Bret has said there's a lot of people he didn't want to job too! And that's the only time he refused!

Shawn was going to be the next champion, it had been decided, and Bret Harts personal preferences should have nothing to do with that. If Bret had dropped the title to Austin, who had then dropped it to Shawn, we'd have all just complained it was pointless.

YET AGAIN...I repeat....despite early resistance, Bret said he WOULD drop it to Shawn, just at a different show! And NEVER requested to beat him!

Bret Hart ruined any reputation he had in the ring that night to a lot of fans. It made it look like he was putting his feelings about a fellow wreastler first, instead of the company and the fans.

Maybe his reputation to a bunch of HBK and perhaps HHH marks, which I doubt he's not losing a lot of sleep over! He was putting his self respect ahead of anything!! Again, Bret didn't like jobbing to certain guys, but still did it! And was willing to do it for Shawn until that smartass remark. And decided he'd STILL do it, under his own terms!! With the exception of some company kiss-asses and of course Shawn & Hunter, most of the superstars in that lockeroom in many shoot interviews or whatever, believe Bret was standing up for the boys, and thought it was about time someone stood up to Shawn, because no one had too! 'Taker said in an interview he did here in Canada on MuchMusic, "Some people say Bret was selfish, but I really believe he wasn't just doing for himself. A lot of us had really had enough at that point".

Agreed, but it didn't just look like it, that's exactly what he was doing, he couldn't seperate real from fantasy. Bret being good at the one aspect of the business he was good at, and he was very good, probably one of the top ten technical wrestlers ever, didn't make him get a free pass on being a man. The fact is he had a job he refused to honor. He didn't do it for the boys in the back, he certainly didn't do it for the fans, he did it for himself. There's nothing wrong with being selfish, but at least have the integrity to admit it.

Well many wrestlers think otherwise my friend!!! I'd take there word over yours! Bret is a mark for himself, I'll be the first to say it! But to say he did it for himself is just you continuously trying to paint him in a negative light anyway you can! When the only WWF employees, who think that, are the "Usual Suspects".

His claims of being a "Hero" to his fellow countrymen, and that it was about respect for Shawn were more than likely nothing but a ploy to keep the belt until it was legal for Eric Bischoff to go ahead and announce the signing of Hart to WCW, which was coincidently the night after Survivor Series. That being "the weekend he wanted to survive" and nobody defending him seems to pick up on that.

This is going around in circles now! He did that agreement with Bischoff, about keeping it hush hush, at Vince's request! At VINCE'S request, so therefore, I believe Vince sabotaged him IMO. So yes, I've picked up on it, and it's still just plain utter B.S.

You paint Bret as if he were a monster. Despite Shawn's well documented history, I wouldn't paint him anymore negatively then he already painted himself! But you my friend...take it to another level!
 
Again, I don't think you should be obligated! There's a difference between an obligation and a willingness!!!



You also forget Vince changed his mind every day that week!!! Vince only said that part AFTER the fact, and after everything happened!! The terms were the terms, it was legally written, Bret could leave "Anyway he wanted", that's WHY Vince wrote it in there. He thought Bret deserved the dignity!!



Shawn may have been the best perforner, but the #1 guy was cleary Austin! World had already leaked out, I think I've proven that! There is footage to back it up, which isn't hard to find at all. Again, I repeat, Vince changed his mind every day, flip flopped back and forth, someone had his ear!!! Bret says he would've jobbed to anyone else, and at any other time! But Vince wasn't having it!



Again...I guess that makes him a bad person for not wanting to be portrayed as a racist! Gimmie a break buddy!! Actually, I don't even recall Bret winning one match from Oct.6th to Nov.3rd on Raw....Bret didn't have the creative control yet btw, when that angle took place. Otherwise, I'm damn sure he would've vetoed the whole thing! Bret said in an interview some years back, that pretty much the only reason he did it, was so that maybe it would elevate Rocky Maivia!



Again..he was willing to drop it to Shawn. At first he resisted, and said, at a different date, he would, no problem! Bret has said there's a lot of people he didn't want to job too! And that's the only time he refused!



YET AGAIN...I repeat....despite early resistance, Bret said he WOULD drop it to Shawn, just at a different show! And NEVER requested to beat him!



Maybe his reputation to a bunch of HBK and perhaps HHH marks, which I doubt he's not losing a lot of sleep over! He was putting his self respect ahead of anything!! Again, Bret didn't like jobbing to certain guys, but still did it! And was willing to do it for Shawn until that smartass remark. And decided he'd STILL do it, under his own terms!! With the exception of some company kiss-asses and of course Shawn & Hunter, most of the superstars in that lockeroom in many shoot interviews or whatever, believe Bret was standing up for the boys, and thought it was about time someone stood up to Shawn, because no one had too! 'Taker said in an interview he did here in Canada on MuchMusic, "Some people say Bret was selfish, but I really believe he wasn't just doing for himself. A lot of us had really had enough at that point".



Well many wrestlers think otherwise my friend!!! I'd take there word over yours! Bret is a mark for himself, I'll be the first to say it! But to say he did it for himself is just you continuously trying to paint him in a negative light anyway you can! When the only WWF employees, who think that, are the "Usual Suspects".



This is going around in circles now! He did that agreement with Bischoff, about keeping it hush hush, at Vince's request! At VINCE'S request, so therefore, I believe Vince sabotaged him IMO. So yes, I've picked up on it, and it's still just plain utter B.S.

You paint Bret as if he were a monster. Despite Shawn's well documented history, I wouldn't paint him anymore negatively then he already painted himself! But you my friend...take it to another level!

Bret should have done the time honored tradition when leaving a FED which is drop the title. A wrestler shouldn't get to pick and choose where and to whom he drops the title. That is not reasonable creative control.

When it comes to Bret I wouldn't believe a word he says. Just ask his ex-wife how good his word is.
 
Again, I don't think you should be obligated! There's a difference between an obligation and a willingness!!!



You also forget Vince changed his mind every day that week!!! Vince only said that part AFTER the fact, and after everything happened!! The terms were the terms, it was legally written, Bret could leave "Anyway he wanted", that's WHY Vince wrote it in there. He thought Bret deserved the dignity!!



Shawn may have been the best perforner, but the #1 guy was cleary Austin! World had already leaked out, I think I've proven that! There is footage to back it up, which isn't hard to find at all. Again, I repeat, Vince changed his mind every day, flip flopped back and forth, someone had his ear!!! Bret says he would've jobbed to anyone else, and at any other time! But Vince wasn't having it!



Again...I guess that makes him a bad person for not wanting to be portrayed as a racist! Gimmie a break buddy!! Actually, I don't even recall Bret winning one match from Oct.6th to Nov.3rd on Raw....Bret didn't have the creative control yet btw, when that angle took place. Otherwise, I'm damn sure he would've vetoed the whole thing! Bret said in an interview some years back, that pretty much the only reason he did it, was so that maybe it would elevate Rocky Maivia!



Again..he was willing to drop it to Shawn. At first he resisted, and said, at a different date, he would, no problem! Bret has said there's a lot of people he didn't want to job too! And that's the only time he refused!



YET AGAIN...I repeat....despite early resistance, Bret said he WOULD drop it to Shawn, just at a different show! And NEVER requested to beat him!



Maybe his reputation to a bunch of HBK and perhaps HHH marks, which I doubt he's not losing a lot of sleep over! He was putting his self respect ahead of anything!! Again, Bret didn't like jobbing to certain guys, but still did it! And was willing to do it for Shawn until that smartass remark. And decided he'd STILL do it, under his own terms!! With the exception of some company kiss-asses and of course Shawn & Hunter, most of the superstars in that lockeroom in many shoot interviews or whatever, believe Bret was standing up for the boys, and thought it was about time someone stood up to Shawn, because no one had too! 'Taker said in an interview he did here in Canada on MuchMusic, "Some people say Bret was selfish, but I really believe he wasn't just doing for himself. A lot of us had really had enough at that point".



Well many wrestlers think otherwise my friend!!! I'd take there word over yours! Bret is a mark for himself, I'll be the first to say it! But to say he did it for himself is just you continuously trying to paint him in a negative light anyway you can! When the only WWF employees, who think that, are the "Usual Suspects".



This is going around in circles now! He did that agreement with Bischoff, about keeping it hush hush, at Vince's request! At VINCE'S request, so therefore, I believe Vince sabotaged him IMO. So yes, I've picked up on it, and it's still just plain utter B.S.

You paint Bret as if he were a monster. Despite Shawn's well documented history, I wouldn't paint him anymore negatively then he already painted himself! But you my friend...take it to another level!

So him cheating on his wife was no big deal because he never said "I give you my word to be faithful" OF COURSE he is obligated to carry himself with dignity and honor his commitments, in this case to WWF.


Neither of us have seen the contract, we can only take as fact what both men who have seen it say, the only part they agree on is that he had "reasonable creative control" not he can leave any way he wants. Bret would have left with dignity if he carried himself with integrity, he didn't have integrity, so he didn't get dignity, it's a simple formula.

Vince is the boss, it's his perogative to change his mind, you do understand the words boss and employer right? He owned the company and had that right whether his decisions were good or bad. Bret doesn't get to pick the champs or who he loses to in a scripted event. That right goes to the higher ups.

I said he should have done the angle professionally or not at all, if he didn't want to be portrayed that way, which he wasn't it was shown he was innocent, he should have abstained from the angle on moral grounds.

But he didn't have the right or authority to refuse at all, I personally think Vince shouldn't let anyone get away with refusing a job without some form of penalty.

You say he didn't do it for himself, then say it was his self respect, you can't have it both ways, either way it was purely for him. Besides he wasn't standing up for anything other than his earning potential, which is fine if he'd have the guts to admit it. After all if he could say he left as Champion that makes him more valuble. You say he was a class act, and had all this integrity, but class and integrity are judged by how you treat people, and he treated Julie Hart rather badly, what makes you think he would have anymore class any where else?

So you don't think it was more than a small coincidence that Bret wanted to be Champ at the time WCW could announce his impending arrival. Give me a break, of course that was what he wanted, otherwise it wouldn't have been a deal to lose a faked fight.

I don't paint Bret any worse than history, he cheated on his wife, his actions paint him as selfish, not I. The difference in our opinions is logic versus affection. I ask you to take a step back and look at the whole situation with objectivity. Both wrestlers were selfish, and Vince had a company to protect. Shawn not willing to job to Bret should be a non issue being Bret was going to the competition, even though he was forced out by Vince breaking his initial contract. So that's not important. You say Bret was standing up for wrestling, so as a traditionalist he should have layed down for the next champ to make him appear strong as is tradition, so he obviously wasn't standing up for wrestling. You say he was standing up for the other wrestlers in the WWF. How, by trying to strike a huge blow to the WWF by holding onto the title until it was legal for WCW to announce on Nitro they signed away the reigning WWF champion? Like it or not, Bret was in business for himself, not that it's a bad thing, but the fact is, he lied about it. He talks about being a stand up guy, and how much integrity he has, but he's a known liar, via his admitted affairs and stating he never did drugs, but contradicts himself in his own book. Lastly what makes you think that if his own wife isn't important to him that anybody else is?

I feel bad that he got screwed, because I'm human. But in all honesty he brought it on himself. He refused to honor tradition, and business protocol and got burned. He didn't deserve all the tragedies that befel him after this happened, I'm talking about Owen, his post concussion syndrome from the kick from Goldberg and the Blockbuster from Buff Bagwell, and the motorcycle or car accident(can't remember which) that caused a stroke. But the screwjob was deserved.

Now I'm gonna defend him for a minute, for those saying he needs to get over it, I don't see any evidence he hasn't, he doesn't bring it up, interviewers do. And as far as putting it in his book, don't you think he had to, I'd be disappointed if when I get my copy it's not there.
 
Bret should have done the time honored tradition when leaving a FED which is drop the title. A wrestler shouldn't get to pick and choose where and to whom he drops the title. That is not reasonable creative control.

When it comes to Bret I wouldn't believe a word he says. Just ask his ex-wife how good his word is.

Maybe not in your opinion!!!

Yeah, lets get into his personal life!! I can go on for hours about even so of the most honourable wrestlers within the business weren't exactly the most faithful to there wives!!! So lets not open up THAT can of worms people!!!

So him cheating on his wife was no big deal because he never said "I give you my word to be faithful" OF COURSE he is obligated to carry himself with dignity and honor his commitments, in this case to WWF.

Umm..show me where I said that??? You make a big deal about this being about "wrestling" and "losing a fake match" so lets stick to that subject ok.

Yes, Bret was an ass for cheating on is wife...there I said it!!

But let's stick to the subject because now you're using his personal life to try to paint him even more negatively! Now you truly are grasping straws!!

Even Bret has said himself..."In my personal life, I've done things that were not so smart, and downright stupid. But in the business, I don't feel I ever have". So there...

Neither of us have seen the contract, we can only take as fact what both men who have seen it say, the only part they agree on is that he had "reasonable creative control" not he can leave any way he wants. Bret would have left with dignity if he carried himself with integrity, he didn't have integrity, so he didn't get dignity, it's a simple formula.

Man...how many times do I have to repeat myself. Both Bret & Vince have said in interviews, that the TERMS of "Reasonable Creative Control" specified that Bret can leave anyway he wants. Vince said that was fine with him, as long as Bret didn't put himself over clean on anyone, or bury his talent! Which Bret has also said he never would've done!

So standing up for himself isn't dignified or a sign of integrity? I'd hate to see how your life is!!! I know if someone disrespects me, they're gonna hear about it, and I aint gonna mix words, and I'll damn sure keep my Dignity & Integrity! I'd expect anybody not just in wrestling, but in life to do the same!!!!

I said he should have done the angle professionally or not at all, if he didn't want to be portrayed that way, which he wasn't it was shown he was innocent, he should have abstained from the angle on moral grounds.

You know that's REALLY easy for YOU to say! Put yourself in Bret's shoes for 2 seconds!!!

According to Bret he did try to wave the angle, and had told Ron Simmons he felt uncomfterable doing it. But Ron said to him, "Don't worry man, it's just a work". But Bret knew, that many fans were passionate, and Ron even said if things get out of hand, he'll have his back. And Bret also wanted to elevate The Rock anyway he could. Vince had said "It's too late now, we've started this thing and now we can't end it". And Bret said it's not so much what the Nation would say, it's what Shawn would say. Bret also stated that he was under the impression from Vince Russo and and other writers was that soon after the angle, it was going to be revealed it was D-X all along. And not to mention of course, Shawn took it too far. Again, I refer to a previous comment I made....Shawn was out of control, and Vince was letting him walk all over him (self admittedly pretty much he said on Shawn's DVD) and he didn't know what he'd say or do on TV. Bret even asked Shawn "Let's not take this too far", and Shawn said "Don't worry". Bret stated all of this in a Canadian TV interview in 1999.

And if you notice, Bret didn't say anything until Shawn's dumbass comment!

But he didn't have the right or authority to refuse at all, I personally think Vince shouldn't let anyone get away with refusing a job without some form of penalty.

Yet he had...and IMO HE STILL does!!! Again, don't have hardcore facts to back that up, it's just an opinion!! And I still maintain Bret had good reason!!

You say he didn't do it for himself, then say it was his self respect, you can't have it both ways, either way it was purely for him. Besides he wasn't standing up for anything other than his earning potential, which is fine if he'd have the guts to admit it. After all if he could say he left as Champion that makes him more valuble. You say he was a class act, and had all this integrity, but class and integrity are judged by how you treat people, and he treated Julie Hart rather badly, what makes you think he would have anymore class any where else?

Actually, It's been stated by Bret in interviews, as well as me, in numerous posts on this topic in the last 8 months or so, that it was for ALL those reasons! So yes, I can have it both ways, if it was for both reasons! nice try, I'll give you an E for effort on that one!

Bret has said the following things in shoot interviews with RF Video as well as other interviews on TV and Radio.

1) Self respect was a key for him, his own dignity was important too him,and he wouldn't let a prick like Shawn do that to him!
2) A lot of the boys in the back ('Taker, Simmons, Rude, Vader among many others, all of which have said so) were fed up and sick of Shawn's crap, and Bret felt by standing his ground against him, he was representing them, and they have applauded him for it!! Bret always felt that maybe if he put Shawn in his place, he wouldn't screw around with the others so much anymore.
3) Bret has been encountered with the "But why did you not stand up to anyone else?". Bret said, "I stood up to Hogan & stood up to Shawn, other than those 2, nobody ever disrespected me the way they did, so I never had too do anything like that besides those two occasions".
4) Earning potential was a key. All wrestlers are independant contractors, and have to look out for themselves a time or two!!! Bret didn't want to be damaged goods going into WCW. A major loss and bad buildup of ones character CAN hurt, even if you're as famous as a Bret Hart. Look what Austin's heel turn did to him, in my opinion he NEVER recovered from that!!

you don't think it was more than a small coincidence that Bret wanted to be Champ at the time WCW could announce his impending arrival. Give me a break, of course that was what he wanted, otherwise it wouldn't have been a deal to lose a faked fight.
]

Ya know what GIVE ME A BREAK buddy!!

My cousins and I used to have our own little wrestling website back when I was still in High School where we'd do columns and such!

In May of 2001, just a while after WCW shutdown. We found out on a wrestling news site, that Eric Bischoff would appear on a Georgia radio station, as it was hyped up as "Former WCW President Eric Bischoff: Two Hours, Uncut, Uncensord and Commercial Free". There was a link to listen to it on the net..so we did.

We wrote a report for it, for our site

And I found out not long ago in a box of old stuff I wrote (I've saved everything I've written since I was a kid), and here's what he said about the Bret Hart situation.

The interviewer asked: "Many people say that the events surrounding Bret Hart, were all mishandled. They say the buildup, the arrival, and the subsuquent events to follow, were botched in many ways".

Eric than began, "Well, I guess I'll start from day one on that one. About 30 seconds after Bret had signed with us, I was already brainstorming ideas of how to bring him in. Bret and I had a deal where he didn't want to leak out his arrival to WCW right away out of respect for Vince & The WWF, and I completely understood that. I told Bret that I wanted to think of something big to hype him up anyway, and I'd start doing something by mid-November, and I wanted it to be a big surprise at the same time. So I came up with this idea, that I wanted to air a vignette that said something along the lines of 'The biggest superstar in our great sport today, has finally arrived in WCW', and I wasn't going to reveal it right away, what I wanted to do, was at the end of it, put the actual date of his arrival. I wanted to air it 3 or 4 times during Nitro, before or after major segments, I was also planning on airing it once or twice during our upcoming pay per view (World War 3), to get people talking. So I was going to meet with the video production team within the next week or so, and all of the sudden I'd gotten word from people that word was already leaking out about Bret's departure. I was actually quite pissed off about that. And to this day, in my opinion, that Vince and the WWF did that intentionally, so they could try to ruin my hype. And in a way, I don't blame them, I'd done much worse things to them, and at that point and time they were desperate. So I was trying to figure out what to do next, do I still air the vignette or not? Do I think of soemthing else? I was going to try to think of something before Nitro. All of the sudden of course, comes the incident in Montreal, but at first I didn't know if this was a work or not. So while getting prepared for Nitro the next day, I found out Bret was not only screwed, but he had also gone home to Calgary, and wasn't going to be at Raw. So I figured right away, I have to jump on this now. I knew I was going to involve Bret & the nWo somehow with one another, so it just popped in my head, to have the nWo come out flanked in Canadian flags, talking about Bret and singing O Canada. In retrospect, it may not have been the best thing to do, but I knew I had to jump on this. I knew this was huge".

Eric said more on the subject of Bret, but it's not neccesary for this subject.

I don't paint Bret any worse than history, he cheated on his wife, his actions paint him as selfish, not I. The difference in our opinions is logic versus affection. I ask you to take a step back and look at the whole situation with objectivity. Both wrestlers were selfish, and Vince had a company to protect. Shawn not willing to job to Bret should be a non issue being Bret was going to the competition, even though he was forced out by Vince breaking his initial contract. So that's not important. You say Bret was standing up for wrestling, so as a traditionalist he should have layed down for the next champ to make him appear strong as is tradition, so he obviously wasn't standing up for wrestling. You say he was standing up for the other wrestlers in the WWF. How, by trying to strike a huge blow to the WWF by holding onto the title until it was legal for WCW to announce on Nitro they signed away the reigning WWF champion? Like it or not, Bret was in business for himself, not that it's a bad thing, but the fact is, he lied about it. He talks about being a stand up guy, and how much integrity he has, but he's a known liar, via his admitted affairs and stating he never did drugs, but contradicts himself in his own book. Lastly what makes you think that if his own wife isn't important to him that anybody else is?

You want me to look at his objectively I will!

Bret cheating on his wife was far beyond scummy!

Shawn was an ass, changed his ways, I applaud him for that, and actually admire him for it as well.

However, when both men had problems in there personal lives, only one let it interfere with the business! And Vince has even said, I think it was in an interview with Bob Costas (I could be wrong), but I know he said "As long as it doesen't interfere with there work, what they do on there own time, is not of my concern as a boss. As a friend to tsome, it is a concern, but as a boss, if they don't bring there home life to work with them, then I have no grounds to dismmiss or fire them".

And again...refer to my previous statment...Bret said always conducted himself well within the business! If you wanan say he didn't...then we'll say he didn't...hell, I'LL say he didn't.

First off..when did Bret ever say he NEVER did drugs??? Bret said he had experemented with them in the 80's, but pretty much althrough the 90's when his big push happened, he never did! So no he didn't lie about that. Again...revisionist history.

Second off...don't recall an interviewer ever asking Bret about affairs until the book came out! And we don't know if Julie ever asked, or if Bret ever told her beforehand. IMO she probably knew. You're entitled to your opinion, but we don't know wether she knew or not!!

The following I'm about to say is NOT a justification!!!

But both Bret and even Julie, have stated that they didn't have the best marriage. To be honest with you, It looks to me (although he never said it) that Bret stopped loving her somewehre along the way. Again, NOT a justification!

There are aspects of life where we have our vices and do certain things that are bad and sometimes downright terrible. But there are also aspects of life where we do all the right things, and try to conduct ourselves in the best way we can!

Now I'm just speaking for myself here. But unless you're perfect I guess you've never had that problem.

Time honoured tradition! Actually that's not even something for Vince to say. Weren't the rules of teh territory a time honoured tradition???? It's coming from Vince, the guy who broke most time honoured tradition's I can think of.

Lets talk more time honoured tradition shall we! Another one is respect in the lockeroom.

Another old school tradition, is standing up for yourself! Lou Thesz, Terry Funk & Harley Race have all applauded Bret for his actions! Now I know you're thinking it was a different time for those guys! But hey, we're talking tradition here, right?

And last I checked besides, most interviews I've heard with people who were there at the time besides Shawn and his buddies, a few company kiss asses, a lot of wrestlers who worked there at the time, said Bret was justified in standing up for himself! That's right they said he was justified for standing up for "HIMSELF!". And other wrestlers have stated that he was also representing them!

I feel bad that he got screwed, because I'm human. But in all honesty he brought it on himself. He refused to honor tradition, and business protocol and got burned. He didn't deserve all the tragedies that befel him after this happened, I'm talking about Owen, his post concussion syndrome from the kick from Goldberg and the Blockbuster from Buff Bagwell, and the motorcycle or car accident(can't remember which) that caused a stroke. But the screwjob was deserved.

Ah yes...Time Honoured Traditon!!! Haha..JOKE!

Now I'm gonna defend him for a minute, for those saying he needs to get over it, I don't see any evidence he hasn't, he doesn't bring it up, interviewers do. And as far as putting it in his book, don't you think he had to, I'd be disappointed if when I get my copy it's not there.

Smartest thing you've said so far!
 
So him cheating on his wife was no big deal because he never said "I give you my word to be faithful" OF COURSE he is obligated to carry himself with dignity and honor his commitments, in this case to WWF.


Neither of us have seen the contract, we can only take as fact what both men who have seen it say, the only part they agree on is that he had "reasonable creative control" not he can leave any way he wants. Bret would have left with dignity if he carried himself with integrity, he didn't have integrity, so he didn't get dignity, it's a simple formula.

Vince is the boss, it's his perogative to change his mind, you do understand the words boss and employer right? He owned the company and had that right whether his decisions were good or bad. Bret doesn't get to pick the champs or who he loses to in a scripted event. That right goes to the higher ups.

I said he should have done the angle professionally or not at all, if he didn't want to be portrayed that way, which he wasn't it was shown he was innocent, he should have abstained from the angle on moral grounds.

But he didn't have the right or authority to refuse at all, I personally think Vince shouldn't let anyone get away with refusing a job without some form of penalty.

You say he didn't do it for himself, then say it was his self respect, you can't have it both ways, either way it was purely for him. Besides he wasn't standing up for anything other than his earning potential, which is fine if he'd have the guts to admit it. After all if he could say he left as Champion that makes him more valuble. You say he was a class act, and had all this integrity, but class and integrity are judged by how you treat people, and he treated Julie Hart rather badly, what makes you think he would have anymore class any where else?

So you don't think it was more than a small coincidence that Bret wanted to be Champ at the time WCW could announce his impending arrival. Give me a break, of course that was what he wanted, otherwise it wouldn't have been a deal to lose a faked fight.

I don't paint Bret any worse than history, he cheated on his wife, his actions paint him as selfish, not I. The difference in our opinions is logic versus affection. I ask you to take a step back and look at the whole situation with objectivity. Both wrestlers were selfish, and Vince had a company to protect. Shawn not willing to job to Bret should be a non issue being Bret was going to the competition, even though he was forced out by Vince breaking his initial contract. So that's not important. You say Bret was standing up for wrestling, so as a traditionalist he should have layed down for the next champ to make him appear strong as is tradition, so he obviously wasn't standing up for wrestling. You say he was standing up for the other wrestlers in the WWF. How, by trying to strike a huge blow to the WWF by holding onto the title until it was legal for WCW to announce on Nitro they signed away the reigning WWF champion? Like it or not, Bret was in business for himself, not that it's a bad thing, but the fact is, he lied about it. He talks about being a stand up guy, and how much integrity he has, but he's a known liar, via his admitted affairs and stating he never did drugs, but contradicts himself in his own book. Lastly what makes you think that if his own wife isn't important to him that anybody else is?

I feel bad that he got screwed, because I'm human. But in all honesty he brought it on himself. He refused to honor tradition, and business protocol and got burned. He didn't deserve all the tragedies that befel him after this happened, I'm talking about Owen, his post concussion syndrome from the kick from Goldberg and the Blockbuster from Buff Bagwell, and the motorcycle or car accident(can't remember which) that caused a stroke. But the screwjob was deserved.

Now I'm gonna defend him for a minute, for those saying he needs to get over it, I don't see any evidence he hasn't, he doesn't bring it up, interviewers do. And as far as putting it in his book, don't you think he had to, I'd be disappointed if when I get my copy it's not there.

i agree with you...Bret has moved on...it's the WWE that keeps drudging it up as a catalyst for storylines(Hogan/HBK,McMahon/HBK)...and it was a bicycle accident that caused the stroke for the record...and as far as his book goes, it's 544 pages and he does address the screwjob but it is a very small portion of the book...while we're on the subject of honoring your committment, i wonder what evryone's take on Austin's stunt in 2002 is...he is still highly regarded in the industry and no one ever seems to mention that he walked out of the company the night he was scheduled in the main event on RAW...why?...because he did not want to job to Brock Lesnar on tv for free...while i agree that the match should have been saved for a ppv, after all, the WWE is a business that is supposed to create revnue, you cannot deny that he did not honor his committment...his boss asked to do something and he flat out refused and got on an airplane and went home, leaving thousands of ticket holders for the event screwed out of seeing him live....in my opinon, that is worse than what Bret did, yet everyone praises Austin and bashes Bret....you'll never hear HHH or HBK say a bad word about Stone Cold...i guess when you sell a million t-shirts a month that makes it ok....and as far as Julie Hart goes, she just did an interview where she clearly stated that she did not want to divorce Bret...HE FILEd FOR DIVORCE...she wanted to stay with him and says you'd have to ask Bret about it to find out why it happened...and as far as cheating goes, i work in the music industry and i know all to well that it can get lonely on the road...it's so easy for people that come home to their family every night to point fingers and judge and say 'how horrible'...human nature is human nature and i don't give a shit who you are, if you are on the road for 34,35,36 days at a time, surrounded by coke addicts and alcoholics and stress, you have two choices: become one of the boys and dabble in that stuff or try to to go it alone, which is easier said than done....meeting an attractive female on the road and sharing dinner and drinks is not a crime, if it leads to sleeping together, that's something that you cannot judge unless you walk a mile in the guy's shoes....the other choice is to quit the business and go home and that's much easier said than done when all you've done for a decade is wrestle....and from all accounts i've seen, Julie Hart was not exactly the easiest most understanding person on the planet either...how would you like to have just main evented MSG and called home afterward to speak to your wife, buzzing from the great feeling of main eventing in front of 18,000 fans, only to have her tell you to go fuck yourself because you're never there when she needs you...i'd probably go down to the hotel bar for a drink or two and if i was approached by an attractive woman, the last thing on my mind would be 'gee i don't want to hurt my wife'...it would be 'screw her...she lives in a nice home because i just wrestled in the main event'...i'm not saying it's right, but human nature is human nature and it's alot easier to make poor decisions when you are not at home and you feel justified....and if she was not happy she could have left at any time...she didn't and now claims he was the one who ended their marriage and now is set to have a reality show and make money of the fact that she was Bret's wife...that's pathetic and tells me that the guy could not have been that bad if she wanted to stay with him and now is willing to exploit his name for the sake of money...someone with integrity would not want to be associated with him in any way if that was the case....
 
Maybe not in your opinion!!!

Yeah, lets get into his personal life!! I can go on for hours about even so of the most honourable wrestlers within the business weren't exactly the most faithful to there wives!!! So lets not open up THAT can of worms people!!!



Umm..show me where I said that??? You make a big deal about this being about "wrestling" and "losing a fake match" so lets stick to that subject ok.

Yes, Bret was an ass for cheating on is wife...there I said it!!

But let's stick to the subject because now you're using his personal life to try to paint him even more negatively! Now you truly are grasping straws!!

Even Bret has said himself..."In my personal life, I've done things that were not so smart, and downright stupid. But in the business, I don't feel I ever have". So there...



Man...how many times do I have to repeat myself. Both Bret & Vince have said in interviews, that the TERMS of "Reasonable Creative Control" specified that Bret can leave anyway he wants. Vince said that was fine with him, as long as Bret didn't put himself over clean on anyone, or bury his talent! Which Bret has also said he never would've done!

So standing up for himself isn't dignified or a sign of integrity? I'd hate to see how your life is!!! I know if someone disrespects me, they're gonna hear about it, and I aint gonna mix words, and I'll damn sure keep my Dignity & Integrity! I'd expect anybody not just in wrestling, but in life to do the same!!!!



You know that's REALLY easy for YOU to say! Put yourself in Bret's shoes for 2 seconds!!!

According to Bret he did try to wave the angle, and had told Ron Simmons he felt uncomfterable doing it. But Ron said to him, "Don't worry man, it's just a work". But Bret knew, that many fans were passionate, and Ron even said if things get out of hand, he'll have his back. And Bret also wanted to elevate The Rock anyway he could. Vince had said "It's too late now, we've started this thing and now we can't end it". And Bret said it's not so much what the Nation would say, it's what Shawn would say. Bret also stated that he was under the impression from Vince Russo and and other writers was that soon after the angle, it was going to be revealed it was D-X all along. And not to mention of course, Shawn took it too far. Again, I refer to a previous comment I made....Shawn was out of control, and Vince was letting him walk all over him (self admittedly pretty much he said on Shawn's DVD) and he didn't know what he'd say or do on TV. Bret even asked Shawn "Let's not take this too far", and Shawn said "Don't worry". Bret stated all of this in a Canadian TV interview in 1999.

And if you notice, Bret didn't say anything until Shawn's dumbass comment!



Yet he had...and IMO HE STILL does!!! Again, don't have hardcore facts to back that up, it's just an opinion!! And I still maintain Bret had good reason!!



Actually, It's been stated by Bret in interviews, as well as me, in numerous posts on this topic in the last 8 months or so, that it was for ALL those reasons! So yes, I can have it both ways, if it was for both reasons! nice try, I'll give you an E for effort on that one!

Bret has said the following things in shoot interviews with RF Video as well as other interviews on TV and Radio.

1) Self respect was a key for him, his own dignity was important too him,and he wouldn't let a prick like Shawn do that to him!
2) A lot of the boys in the back ('Taker, Simmons, Rude, Vader among many others, all of which have said so) were fed up and sick of Shawn's crap, and Bret felt by standing his ground against him, he was representing them, and they have applauded him for it!! Bret always felt that maybe if he put Shawn in his place, he wouldn't screw around with the others so much anymore.
3) Bret has been encountered with the "But why did you not stand up to anyone else?". Bret said, "I stood up to Hogan & stood up to Shawn, other than those 2, nobody ever disrespected me the way they did, so I never had too do anything like that besides those two occasions".
4) Earning potential was a key. All wrestlers are independant contractors, and have to look out for themselves a time or two!!! Bret didn't want to be damaged goods going into WCW. A major loss and bad buildup of ones character CAN hurt, even if you're as famous as a Bret Hart. Look what Austin's heel turn did to him, in my opinion he NEVER recovered from that!!



Ya know what GIVE ME A BREAK buddy!!

My cousins and I used to have our own little wrestling website back when I was still in High School where we'd do columns and such!

In May of 2001, just a while after WCW shutdown. We found out on a wrestling news site, that Eric Bischoff would appear on a Georgia radio station, as it was hyped up as "Former WCW President Eric Bischoff: Two Hours, Uncut, Uncensord and Commercial Free". There was a link to listen to it on the net..so we did.

We wrote a report for it, for our site

And I found out not long ago in a box of old stuff I wrote (I've saved everything I've written since I was a kid), and here's what he said about the Bret Hart situation.

The interviewer asked: "Many people say that the events surrounding Bret Hart, were all mishandled. They say the buildup, the arrival, and the subsuquent events to follow, were botched in many ways".

Eric than began, "Well, I guess I'll start from day one on that one. About 30 seconds after Bret had signed with us, I was already brainstorming ideas of how to bring him in. Bret and I had a deal where he didn't want to leak out his arrival to WCW right away out of respect for Vince & The WWF, and I completely understood that. I told Bret that I wanted to think of something big to hype him up anyway, and I'd start doing something by mid-November, and I wanted it to be a big surprise at the same time. So I came up with this idea, that I wanted to air a vignette that said something along the lines of 'The biggest superstar in our great sport today, has finally arrived in WCW', and I wasn't going to reveal it right away, what I wanted to do, was at the end of it, put the actual date of his arrival. I wanted to air it 3 or 4 times during Nitro, before or after major segments, I was also planning on airing it once or twice during our upcoming pay per view (World War 3), to get people talking. So I was going to meet with the video production team within the next week or so, and all of the sudden I'd gotten word from people that word was already leaking out about Bret's departure. I was actually quite pissed off about that. And to this day, in my opinion, that Vince and the WWF did that intentionally, so they could try to ruin my hype. And in a way, I don't blame them, I'd done much worse things to them, and at that point and time they were desperate. So I was trying to figure out what to do next, do I still air the vignette or not? Do I think of soemthing else? I was going to try to think of something before Nitro. All of the sudden of course, comes the incident in Montreal, but at first I didn't know if this was a work or not. So while getting prepared for Nitro the next day, I found out Bret was not only screwed, but he had also gone home to Calgary, and wasn't going to be at Raw. So I figured right away, I have to jump on this now. I knew I was going to involve Bret & the nWo somehow with one another, so it just popped in my head, to have the nWo come out flanked in Canadian flags, talking about Bret and singing O Canada. In retrospect, it may not have been the best thing to do, but I knew I had to jump on this. I knew this was huge".

Eric said more on the subject of Bret, but it's not neccesary for this subject.



You want me to look at his objectively I will!

Bret cheating on his wife was far beyond scummy!

Shawn was an ass, changed his ways, I applaud him for that, and actually admire him for it as well.

However, when both men had problems in there personal lives, only one let it interfere with the business! And Vince has even said, I think it was in an interview with Bob Costas (I could be wrong), but I know he said "As long as it doesen't interfere with there work, what they do on there own time, is not of my concern as a boss. As a friend to tsome, it is a concern, but as a boss, if they don't bring there home life to work with them, then I have no grounds to dismmiss or fire them".

And again...refer to my previous statment...Bret said always conducted himself well within the business! If you wanan say he didn't...then we'll say he didn't...hell, I'LL say he didn't.

First off..when did Bret ever say he NEVER did drugs??? Bret said he had experemented with them in the 80's, but pretty much althrough the 90's when his big push happened, he never did! So no he didn't lie about that. Again...revisionist history.

Second off...don't recall an interviewer ever asking Bret about affairs until the book came out! And we don't know if Julie ever asked, or if Bret ever told her beforehand. IMO she probably knew. You're entitled to your opinion, but we don't know wether she knew or not!!

The following I'm about to say is NOT a justification!!!

But both Bret and even Julie, have stated that they didn't have the best marriage. To be honest with you, It looks to me (although he never said it) that Bret stopped loving her somewehre along the way. Again, NOT a justification!

There are aspects of life where we have our vices and do certain things that are bad and sometimes downright terrible. But there are also aspects of life where we do all the right things, and try to conduct ourselves in the best way we can!

Now I'm just speaking for myself here. But unless you're perfect I guess you've never had that problem.

Time honoured tradition! Actually that's not even something for Vince to say. Weren't the rules of teh territory a time honoured tradition???? It's coming from Vince, the guy who broke most time honoured tradition's I can think of.

Lets talk more time honoured tradition shall we! Another one is respect in the lockeroom.

Another old school tradition, is standing up for yourself! Lou Thesz, Terry Funk & Harley Race have all applauded Bret for his actions! Now I know you're thinking it was a different time for those guys! But hey, we're talking tradition here, right?

And last I checked besides, most interviews I've heard with people who were there at the time besides Shawn and his buddies, a few company kiss asses, a lot of wrestlers who worked there at the time, said Bret was justified in standing up for himself! That's right they said he was justified for standing up for "HIMSELF!". And other wrestlers have stated that he was also representing them!



Ah yes...Time Honoured Traditon!!! Haha..JOKE!



Smartest thing you've said so far!

I'm not grasping at straws, I'm showing you that you're wrong, you said he had integrity and dignity, him standing before whatever god he believes in and saying he will honor his wife and be the best husband he could, if he couldn't handle the temptations on the road then it's time to quit and get a normal job.

Now show me some backup where Vince said reasonable creative control and full creative control are the same thing, show me where he told Bret Hart that he could leave anyway he wants. An interview or whatever.

As far as standing up for yourself being a sign of integrity, it is, IF YOU DO IT THE RIGHT WAY! Bret wanted to throw the whole company down the toilet because he had a personal grudge, putting a few hundred people if not more out of jobs. Is that a sign of integrity, risking your friends and coworkers jobs because someone hurt your feelings?

As far as the angle goes, it sucked and shouldn't have been done, but either the issue is he didn't want to be a racist or he wanted to elevate the Rock. He made a decision, he could have walked out right then and said not gonna happen, but he CHOSE to go through with the angle in question, at that point when the cameras were rolling all involved had an obligation to be professionals. Neither Shawn nor Bret followed through on that. YOU DON'T TRASH YOUR EMPLOYER ON HIS SHOW ON LIVE TV UNLESS IT'S IN THE SCRIPT.

Ok I'll give you a break. Look at it this way, you are a business owner. Your top employee is leaving with your most valuable asset in his possession, it is legal for his new boss to announce his new job tommorrow which will be huge if he still has your asset. Your last chance to regain your asset will be tonight, don't you bet that asset back before the announcement in order to save your company and the jobs it creates.


Shawn certanily compromised his business with personal matters, but so did Bret. Remember this whole thing started with Bret's personal vendetta against HBK. HBK was an unprofessional prick by all accounts, and tons of people bring up that he supposedly refused to job to Vader and a host of others which given the stories are pretty consistant I'm willing to believe, and he was wrong to do it everytime. Do you agree with that? Now if you do, how is it different for Bret to refuse to job, and don't give me any crap about him never doing it before, it's irrelevant, because he shouldn't ever do it.

The fact is alot of people including you are saying he was standing up for wrestling, and the guys backstage. It's just not true, he did it because of ego, if not he would have respected the wrestling tradition and the workers he claimed to stand up for. It was a huge slap in the face to everyone when he tried to take the title and not lose it properly, which would have helped those workers much more than his refusal to job would have if there had not been a screwjob. Even he said at one point he didn't want to lose to HBK in his home country not his home town his country, that's like Undertaker saying he won't lose in the USA, it's rediculous. If they were in his hometown I could even maybe see suggesting it, and even that's not something he should have power to decide, but they were in another province and a few thousand kilos from Calgary. As far as being a hero, do you want your kids looking up to Bret or any other wrestler for that matter?
 
I'm not grasping at straws, I'm showing you that you're wrong, you said he had integrity and dignity, him standing before whatever god he believes in and saying he will honor his wife and be the best husband he could, if he couldn't handle the temptations on the road then it's time to quit and get a normal job.

Well I guess since you have a monopoly on the truth and are perfect in every way from the way you talk, you're absoloutely right and have never made a mistake in your life.

And sometimes I swear you just choose to ignore things from my previous posts! Bret has always conducted himself well in the business, and boss's and co-workers in ALL occupations should not be interfering with personal lives if it's not affecting there work.

He Isn't perfect, and has made some terrible mistakes, and NEVER tried to justify them. Explain,yes...justify..no! Even Bret said, that what he'd done to his wife was terrible.

Now show me some backup where Vince said reasonable creative control and full creative control are the same thing, show me where he told Bret Hart that he could leave anyway he wants. An interview or whatever.

It was on an interview here in Canada, I don't have it taped, but keep on searching on Youtube for it, as it may pop up. I'll see if I can find a tape for my friends, upload it on youtube, and send you a link. Maybe it'll finally put this B.S to rest.

And I never said, full and reasonable were the same thing, quit putting words in my mouth.

As far as standing up for yourself being a sign of integrity, it is, IF YOU DO IT THE RIGHT WAY! Bret wanted to throw the whole company down the toilet because he had a personal grudge, putting a few hundred people if not more out of jobs. Is that a sign of integrity, risking your friends and coworkers jobs because someone hurt your feelings?

So what's the right way then? Where do you get this theory, I have seen actual footage, some of which I'm sure you'll be able to find where nobody outside the usual suspects did it. Buddy, I don't know here the hell you get some of these things sometimes, but that's just laughable man, not even the most anti-Bret person on this board has gone as far to say somethng that stupid. His grudge was with one man...let's keep it straight! So quit revisionising things.

As far as the angle goes, it sucked and shouldn't have been done, but either the issue is he didn't want to be a racist or he wanted to elevate the Rock. He made a decision, he could have walked out right then and said not gonna happen, but he CHOSE to go through with the angle in question, at that point when the cameras were rolling all involved had an obligation to be professionals. Neither Shawn nor Bret followed through on that. YOU DON'T TRASH YOUR EMPLOYER ON HIS SHOW ON LIVE TV UNLESS IT'S IN THE SCRIPT.

Again...your aint listening to a damn word I'm saying. I'm telling you brother, you're a piece of work!!. Put yourself in the mans shoes for ONE minute!!! Bret TRIED to refuse the angle, and they told him they can't turn back now, and Simmons tried to assure him everything would be alright, and Shawn LIED to him (wow..shocker), and I don't think Bret knew the camera was on him, he wasn't even really looking at it. Lots of wrestlers say and do things on the air that isn't in character or in storyline (without the mic or camera on them)! See, until I mentioned it, you never brought it up, it looks to me in my opinion anyway, that you just figured "oh hey, here's another way I can make Bret look unprofessional, oh this is perfect". Last I checked, Vince Russo wasn't Bret's employer!! He wrote the damn thing!

Ok I'll give you a break. Look at it this way, you are a business owner. Your top employee is leaving with your most valuable asset in his possession, it is legal for his new boss to announce his new job tommorrow which will be huge if he still has your asset. Your last chance to regain your asset will be tonight, don't you bet that asset back before the announcement in order to save your company and the jobs it creates.

See the way you've been talking in this topic on the forum...and not just you...as well as others, feel Bret wasn't an asset anymore. So really I don't see why you're concocting this scenario.

But I'll bite...

IMO, I believe Vince didn't feel he was backed up against the wall, until someone (Shawn, Hunter, Brisco, etc.) got in his ear, otherwise, I don't think he would've changed his mind a million times. My mere guess, is that he believed Bret...then the other....Bret....then the others. I didn't post that WHOLE Bischoff interview because it was too long, but Bischoff said he DID tell Bret about the vignettes he wanted to air, and Bret was all for it. So I'm sure Bret told Vince about it, as Vince was aware of what was going on! Again...i'm just stating theories and opinions here based on small facts, I could be wrong, but I very well could be right.

All I'm saying is...don't convict the man quite yet on this subject.

Shawn certanily compromised his business with personal matters, but so did Bret. Remember this whole thing started with Bret's personal vendetta against HBK. HBK was an unprofessional prick by all accounts, and tons of people bring up that he supposedly refused to job to Vader and a host of others which given the stories are pretty consistant I'm willing to believe, and he was wrong to do it everytime. Do you agree with that? Now if you do, how is it different for Bret to refuse to job, and don't give me any crap about him never doing it before, it's irrelevant, because he shouldn't ever do it.

Ok, I dunno if the Vader thing is true for sure. Although I've heard Vader call him a "goldbricking no jobbing asshole", I couldn't tell you if he was specifically refering to there match, but it sounds more like he was talking about the knee injury. Wouldn't shock me in the least if it was true though.

And no this did not start with a vendetta, it started long before that. Ok, and once again, you so conveniently omit the fact that Bret eventually conceeded to do a job to Shawn, I think WHEN you do a job is reasonable, maybe you don't, but oh well, tough shit.

If the Vader thing was true, why did Shawn refuse to lose to Vader? Because he didn't want too! I mean, the only beefs I've ever heard Shawn have with Vader, was that he was too stiff and messed up that one spot in there match (which was still a pretty kick ass and not too mention underrated match).

Of course it's irrelevant...because you say so!!! Dude, just stop...

But no I didn't plan to bring that up. He refused because of disrespect..PERIOD! Obviously there's more too it than that, but we've been over it and over it, and the answers from both you as well as I, will just remain the same, so I gave you the shortest answere possible.

Bret has done business with people he didn't neccesarily like throughout his career! He tried to be the bigger man and do business with Shawn, but Shawn obviously didn't want it that way!

The fact is alot of people including you are saying he was standing up for wrestling, and the guys backstage. It's just not true, he did it because of ego, if not he would have respected the wrestling tradition and the workers he claimed to stand up for. It was a huge slap in the face to everyone when he tried to take the title and not lose it properly, which would have helped those workers much more than his refusal to job would have if there had not been a screwjob. Even he said at one point he didn't want to lose to HBK in his home country not his home town his country, that's like Undertaker saying he won't lose in the USA, it's rediculous. If they were in his hometown I could even maybe see suggesting it, and even that's not something he should have power to decide, but they were in another province and a few thousand kilos from Calgary. As far as being a hero, do you want your kids looking up to Bret or any other wrestler for that matter?

Why because again...you say so? Buddy, I'm just stating the opinion of my own, because i've been weighing this from both sides for 10 years....and there was even a time in my life some years back, where I doubted Bret, but in the end, I was still on his side.

IMO, ego didn't have much to do with it at all. And again, didn't I go over the whole "tradition" thing...why don't you start crucifying others about it!IMO Bret did what any old school champ would've done, and in some cases, HAVE done! Bret says Stu would've done the same thing, and his father was his hero.

Why are some of the most respected men who worked for the company at the time, some of which who've known Bret & Shawn equally well, understand why Bret did what he did? If they thought it was ego, or if he was really hurting things, I think some of the legit tough boys, and there were quite a few, would've taken Bret into a room and said "We think you're hurting us". Wrestling may be a work, but a lot of them are not gutless, and there are quite a few of them are legit tough guys.

Yeah, how often does the WWF/E perform in Canada? Maybe it sounds like I'm grasping straws myself here, but every show was almost like a homecoming for Bret. So no, it's not the same thing! And Bret has even said, that was only part of it! He lost in Canada at quite a few house shows that year too...again, yes I knowl only house shows, but still, jobbing in Canada wasn't the main issue, and at first he was willing to do it, but with the way things were built up on TV, Bret thought it would be a huge blow.

I wouldnt've mind my kids looking up to The Hitman....I wouldn't mind my kids looking up to Bret Hart the WWF employee...the person...ok, that's a different story!

He's man who's made some utterly terrible mistakes, and doesen't live with them with a smile on his face, Bret has said in interviews, that he'll never be able to make it up too the ones he has hurt, and he has to live with that. He's made his bed, and has to sleep in it. Bret has fessed up to many of the mistakes he's made in his career and life, but he obviously feels that the events surrounding the screwjob weren't a mistake.

Would I want my kid looking up too any of the wrestlers today as heroes? No of cousre not. But it's a differet time now.

And I may not know a damn thing about you...and If I've gotten to personal in this post with you...then I apologize! But the fact of the matter is, it's a very passionate subject with me, and that's what happens! I will not apologize for being passionate about the subject!

I can keep going forever, and obviously you can too...but after all we've already said, I actually shudder to think what the next period over time holds.
 
Well I guess since you have a monopoly on the truth and are perfect in every way from the way you talk, you're absoloutely right and have never made a mistake in your life.

And sometimes I swear you just choose to ignore things from my previous posts! Bret has always conducted himself well in the business, and boss's and co-workers in ALL occupations should not be interfering with personal lives if it's not affecting there work.

He Isn't perfect, and has made some terrible mistakes, and NEVER tried to justify them. Explain,yes...justify..no! Even Bret said, that what he'd done to his wife was terrible..

I never said I had a monopoly on the truth, I meant that if you have integrity it will carry over into all areas of your life, if not that will too. To not do business the right way in this instance and put over the next chosen guy is selfish. Just like to not honor your commitment to your wife is selfish.

And I agree about Vince not interfering with personal lives not affecting the WWE, but this personal grudge on both sides was hurting business, can you at least give me that?



It was on an interview here in Canada, I don't have it taped, but keep on searching on Youtube for it, as it may pop up. I'll see if I can find a tape for my friends, upload it on youtube, and send you a link. Maybe it'll finally put this B.S to rest.

And I never said, full and reasonable were the same thing, quit putting words in my mouth..

Your version of reasonable is that he could leave anyway he wants? Isn't that the same as having full control over the situation?



So what's the right way then? Where do you get this theory, I have seen actual footage, some of which I'm sure you'll be able to find where nobody outside the usual suspects did it. Buddy, I don't know here the hell you get some of these things sometimes, but that's just laughable man, not even the most anti-Bret person on this board has gone as far to say somethng that stupid. His grudge was with one man...let's keep it straight! So quit revisionising things..

His grudge was with one man, but was willing to RISK putting the company many people he called friends work for in the can for it. Vince had no way of knowing Eric's plans for Bret, so logically he would think there is a large chance of WCW announcing Bret's arrival asap to generate interest and get publicity. If Bret was champ at that time, that's a pretty big blow to WWF.



Again...your aint listening to a damn word I'm saying. I'm telling you brother, you're a piece of work!!. Put yourself in the mans shoes for ONE minute!!! Bret TRIED to refuse the angle, and they told him they can't turn back now, and Simmons tried to assure him everything would be alright, and Shawn LIED to him (wow..shocker), and I don't think Bret knew the camera was on him, he wasn't even really looking at it. Lots of wrestlers say and do things on the air that isn't in character or in storyline (without the mic or camera on them)! See, until I mentioned it, you never brought it up, it looks to me in my opinion anyway, that you just figured "oh hey, here's another way I can make Bret look unprofessional, oh this is perfect". Last I checked, Vince Russo wasn't Bret's employer!! He wrote the damn thing!

Then Bret should have stood his ground there and not done the angle at all. But the risk of the camera being on him was present and he should have minded where the camera was pointed, it's unprofessional of him because he disregarded because he didn't take care in what he was doing.


See the way you've been talking in this topic on the forum...and not just you...as well as others, feel Bret wasn't an asset anymore. So really I don't see why you're concocting this scenario.

But I'll bite...

IMO, I believe Vince didn't feel he was backed up against the wall, until someone (Shawn, Hunter, Brisco, etc.) got in his ear, otherwise, I don't think he would've changed his mind a million times. My mere guess, is that he believed Bret...then the other....Bret....then the others. I didn't post that WHOLE Bischoff interview because it was too long, but Bischoff said he DID tell Bret about the vignettes he wanted to air, and Bret was all for it. So I'm sure Bret told Vince about it, as Vince was aware of what was going on! Again...i'm just stating theories and opinions here based on small facts, I could be wrong, but I very well could be right.

All I'm saying is...don't convict the man quite yet on this subject. .

First the title was the asset not Bret, he was the one taking the asset on the way out. But no one is sure if Bret told Vince what WCW's plans were, and if Bret did tell Vince that was rather dumb to sell out his new employers plans. If someone was in Vince's ear, we don't know if thier intentions were malicious or only trying to keep the companies interests in tact, or possibly only self serving, which is where the real bet lies. But your theory makes sense.


Ok, I dunno if the Vader thing is true for sure. Although I've heard Vader call him a "goldbricking no jobbing asshole", I couldn't tell you if he was specifically refering to there match, but it sounds more like he was talking about the knee injury. Wouldn't shock me in the least if it was true though.

And no this did not start with a vendetta, it started long before that. Ok, and once again, you so conveniently omit the fact that Bret eventually conceeded to do a job to Shawn, I think WHEN you do a job is reasonable, maybe you don't, but oh well, tough shit. .

The knee injury wasn't faked, that theory doesn't make the least bit of sense. After all, who is dumb enough to lose a few hundred grand if not more, and go through major surgery to get out of jobbing when you'll get the title back anyway eventually.

When you job is reasonable if he said, let's have Shawn win the RAW before the announcment is fair game and just have a rematch at Survivor Series and do the double DQ then, but to allow WCW to announce that the WWF Champ is coming to NITRO just to placate one's ego is wrong.


If the Vader thing was true, why did Shawn refuse to lose to Vader? Because he didn't want too! I mean, the only beefs I've ever heard Shawn have with Vader, was that he was too stiff and messed up that one spot in there match (which was still a pretty kick ass and not too mention underrated match).

Of course it's irrelevant...because you say so!!! Dude, just stop....

We agree that match was great, and all beefs aside that wouldn't matter. Actually it only becomes relevant if refusing a job is somehow not as bad as refusing a job.

And the screwjob comes down to Bret refused to lose to HBK because...wait for it....he didn't want to. Boil off all the extra crap and that's what you get. He had a grudge because Shawn was an ass and didn't want to lose to him, understandable but not a good enough reason.

But no I didn't plan to bring that up. He refused because of disrespect..PERIOD! Obviously there's more too it than that, but we've been over it and over it, and the answers from both you as well as I, will just remain the same, so I gave you the shortest answere possible.

Bret has done business with people he didn't neccesarily like throughout his career! He tried to be the bigger man and do business with Shawn, but Shawn obviously didn't want it that way! .

Nor did Bret, because if Bret and Shawn had truly laid aside their grudges, Bret would have laid down, and Shawn wouldn't have pulled the midget crap the next night.

Why because again...you say so? Buddy, I'm just stating the opinion of my own, because i've been weighing this from both sides for 10 years....and there was even a time in my life some years back, where I doubted Bret, but in the end, I was still on his side.

IMO, ego didn't have much to do with it at all. And again, didn't I go over the whole "tradition" thing...why don't you start crucifying others about it!IMO Bret did what any old school champ would've done, and in some cases, HAVE done! Bret says Stu would've done the same thing, and his father was his hero.

Bret did what he thought he had to, but all those that did it before, Flair chief among them (I call him out because he actually had the WCW belt on WWF TV) were wrong, they should have lost the title with a little class.

Why are some of the most respected men who worked for the company at the time, some of which who've known Bret & Shawn equally well, understand why Bret did what he did? If they thought it was ego, or if he was really hurting things, I think some of the legit tough boys, and there were quite a few, would've taken Bret into a room and said "We think you're hurting us". Wrestling may be a work, but a lot of them are not gutless, and there are quite a few of them are legit tough guys.

I don't doubt their toughness, and they no doubt did understand, especially when that's colored by HBK not being the greatest coworker, maybe some of the others thought it would be worth it to see Shawn get his come uppance.

Yeah, how often does the WWF/E perform in Canada? Maybe it sounds like I'm grasping straws myself here, but every show was almost like a homecoming for Bret. So no, it's not the same thing! And Bret has even said, that was only part of it! He lost in Canada at quite a few house shows that year too...again, yes I knowl only house shows, but still, jobbing in Canada wasn't the main issue, and at first he was willing to do it, but with the way things were built up on TV, Bret thought it would be a huge blow.

But for that to be an issue at all is ridiculous, especially on a scripted TV show. And the whole buildup to the match sucked in my opinion.

I wouldnt've mind my kids looking up to The Hitman....I wouldn't mind my kids looking up to Bret Hart the WWF employee...the person...ok, that's a different story!

He's man who's made some utterly terrible mistakes, and doesen't live with them with a smile on his face, Bret has said in interviews, that he'll never be able to make it up too the ones he has hurt, and he has to live with that. He's made his bed, and has to sleep in it. Bret has fessed up to many of the mistakes he's made in his career and life, but he obviously feels that the events surrounding the screwjob weren't a mistake.

Would I want my kid looking up too any of the wrestlers today as heroes? No of cousre not. But it's a differet time now.

Here's where we differ a little on this. The Hitman the character as a face was a force for good and held high standards and those ideals are good to look up to.

Bret Hart the employee and Bret the person are the same thing, and the man was a liar and didn't honor his commitments

And I may not know a damn thing about you...and If I've gotten to personal in this post with you...then I apologize! But the fact of the matter is, it's a very passionate subject with me, and that's what happens! I will not apologize for being passionate about the subject!

I can keep going forever, and obviously you can too...but after all we've already said, I actually shudder to think what the next period over time holds.

Hey pal, no harm done, I take very few things personally and an argument over the internet isn't one of them. Hopefully you don't talk things personal either, we're just stating our opinions after all. And life isn't worth living without passion so dont' apologize.

If you want to end it here and let bygones be bygones I'm cool, later bro.
 
I never said I had a monopoly on the truth, I meant that if you have integrity it will carry over into all areas of your life, if not that will too. To not do business the right way in this instance and put over the next chosen guy is selfish. Just like to not honor your commitment to your wife is selfish.

And I agree about Vince not interfering with personal lives not affecting the WWE, but this personal grudge on both sides was hurting business, can you at least give me that?

Bret said it was a selfish thing to do for what happened with him and his wife. While I can say, I myself have tried to carry that in all aspects of my OWN life, sometimes people don't do it! But I don't look at them any differently. I have had friends that have made many horrible mistakes, and I'll tell them if they were wrong, but there are some things in life they do carry themselves well in, and I remember that at the end of the day.

While I appreciate your presentation on the subject, to be honest with you I can't...look at the buyrate Survivor Series drew, it was the highest for them that year.

Your version of reasonable is that he could leave anyway he wants? Isn't that the same as having full control over the situation?

As I've said before, and I'll try to find it from one of my friends. Vince has said that, as long as Bret didn't put himself over anyone, or want to bury any talent on the way out, Vince had no problem allowing him to leave anyway he wanted too, as long as his talent wasn't hurt in the process.

And for most of the scenarios presented, I don't think Shawn would've been hurt.

His grudge was with one man, but was willing to RISK putting the company many people he called friends work for in the can for it. Vince had no way of knowing Eric's plans for Bret, so logically he would think there is a large chance of WCW announcing Bret's arrival asap to generate interest and get publicity. If Bret was champ at that time, that's a pretty big blow to WWF.

I still insist that many fans and not just the smart marks knew, the reaction of some fans in Toronto, most fans in Detroit and some fans in Montreal, it was pretty apparant it was widespread. Michael Landsberg even mentioned it on "off the record", not sure if you're familliar with it, it's a very popular sports panel talk show on TSN here in Canada, and was extremely popular at the time.

From what I've heard from Meltzer, and he could be wrong I suppose, but the main reason, for that deal was to protect the Survivor Series PPV. After that I still believe Bret & Shawn's last match STILL would've draw big numbers if seen on Raw, just to see HOW they would do it. Or even record the match at a houseshow, and air it on Raw, and the fans would wanna see what happens.

I still don't think Bret was out to hurt his friends at all in anyway shape or form. None of his friends or ever some acquaintances at the time seem to think that he was out to hurt them...

I don't doubt their toughness, and they no doubt did understand, especially when that's colored by HBK not being the greatest coworker, maybe some of the others thought it would be worth it to see Shawn get his come uppance.

That may very well be true. But I think they'd rather have there jobs secure than to see Shawn get his. I still believe somebody, at least ONE guy would've said something, if they thought Bret was hurting anyone.

But for that to be an issue at all is ridiculous, especially on a scripted TV show. And the whole buildup to the match sucked in my opinion.

That's what I'm trying to say that the buildup from October to November did...but lets not forget that this thing had been going on since mid 1996, and that stuff was pure gold, but then it became one sided, which doesent seem like a big deal, but could have major affects. It's scripted yes, but fans don't wanna sit there and say "I'm watching a fake show" they wanna get lost in it. They want that element of realism. Which is missing today! Why do you think the Edge/Matt Hardy feud created such a buzz before they (WWE) screwed it up.

Here's where we differ a little on this. The Hitman the character as a face was a force for good and held high standards and those ideals are good to look up to.

Bret Hart the employee and Bret the person are the same thing, and the man was a liar and didn't honor his commitments

I can honestly say people conduct themselves differently at work then they would at home...for a lot of occupations! For example, my Mom works the front office at a Dental Office, and deals with assholes all day long, and she wants to freak out at them all the time. But she refrains...but if someone attacks her personally and disrespect her, she will defend herself.

And while a person may be one in the same, again, in some aspects of life people are different. it may not be neccesarily what I want to be...but taht's just how some people are. Bret Hart the employee in my opinion conducted himself properly. And lets not forget, he was not contractually supposed to lose to Shawn that night.

Then Bret should have stood his ground there and not done the angle at all. But the risk of the camera being on him was present and he should have minded where the camera was pointed, it's unprofessional of him because he disregarded because he didn't take care in what he was doing.

I still think that it's pretty shitty that you think this, when Bret was lied too the whole time leading up to doing this! He DID stand his ground, but at that time Bret had no creative control, reasonable or not, and there wasn't much he could do. He tried, he said, it's going to be done. Bret didn't want to risk being fired, he stated in his book, that he didn't care how big a star he was, he'd seen Vince fire some big stars in the past, because he felt everyone was expendable.

And I don't think Vince would've had trouble firing Bret at that time, because he'd already tried to persuade him to go to WCW.


Bret did what he thought he had to, but all those that did it before, Flair chief among them (I call him out because he actually had the WCW belt on WWF TV) were wrong, they should have lost the title with a little class.
I think Flair was ONLY standing up for himself, IMO. Again, as I've constantly stated, I don't think that was the only reason why Bret did what he did.

First the title was the asset not Bret, he was the one taking the asset on the way out. But no one is sure if Bret told Vince what WCW's plans were, and if Bret did tell Vince that was rather dumb to sell out his new employers plans. If someone was in Vince's ear, we don't know if thier intentions were malicious or only trying to keep the companies interests in tact, or possibly only self serving, which is where the real bet lies. But your theory makes sense.

I just think because Bret was adamant about not losing he would've revealed that WCW wasn't going to name him on TV right away. I know that was a primary concern of Vince's and I'm sure he voiced tha to Bret, and with Bret not wanting to lose, I do truly believe he would've said something.

I know the title was an asset...and while this doesen't mean much for the subject...I kinda gotta sneer at the fact that Vince was putting on a guy who called it a "piece of tin" on TV.

The knee injury wasn't faked, that theory doesn't make the least bit of sense. After all, who is dumb enough to lose a few hundred grand if not more, and go through major surgery to get out of jobbing when you'll get the title back anyway eventually.

When you job is reasonable if he said, let's have Shawn win the RAW before the announcment is fair game and just have a rematch at Survivor Series and do the double DQ then, but to allow WCW to announce that the WWF Champ is coming to NITRO just to placate one's ego is wrong.

Well, I dunno, but Kevin Nash has stated in a recent shoot interview with RF Video that "Shawn always found a way to get time off". And Shawn was only gone for approximately 3 months, and was still on TV week after week. He may have been losing house show money, but he was still playing an on air role, and didn't look to be a bad shape to me.

Meanwhile Shawn's injury in 2004, and most recent one you could see he was in dire pain, I didn't see that in 1997.

Still seems screwey to me and always will....

That's actually a good idea, but Bret didn't appear on Raw that week because of Shawn being a ass the week before. And from what ahs been said in the W.O.N by Meltzer, is that many scenarios were presented, but none of which were approved.

I think Vince didn't want to blow PPV bucks on having there first one on one match in a year and a half on TV.

However...they'd done house shows and Triple Threat Matches, as soon as the day the Sept.22nd Raw went off teh air as it was Shawn/Taker/Bret in a dark match.

With the way things were going back then...I would've done a 4-way dance, Shawn, Bret, 'Taker & Shamrock, and all of them were involved somehow so it makes sense. And yeah, Shawn could get the big win then.

But maybe that was an idea Vince shot down. Guess we'll never know.

Nor did Bret, because if Bret and Shawn had truly laid aside their grudges, Bret would have laid down, and Shawn wouldn't have pulled the midget crap the next night.

Sorry to be nit picky, but The midget crap was actually on Nov.24th. If Shawn did that shit in Canada, he would've been lynched! Shawn even said, he was glad he got out of both Ottawa and Cornwall alive.

Bret did try to be the bigger man IMO that night in San Jose when Shawn refused.

We agree that match was great, and all beefs aside that wouldn't matter. Actually it only becomes relevant if refusing a job is somehow not as bad as refusing a job.

And the screwjob comes down to Bret refused to lose to HBK because...wait for it....he didn't want to. Boil off all the extra crap and that's what you get. He had a grudge because Shawn was an ass and didn't want to lose to him, understandable but not a good enough reason.

I work for a painting company, an independant contractor (much like a wrestler is), and when someone disprespects us we aint gonna do shit, and we'll give them there money back and everything. it's not because we don't want to, we just don't tollearte bullshit.

Hey pal, no harm done, I take very few things personally and an argument over the internet isn't one of them. Hopefully you don't talk things personal either, we're just stating our opinions after all. And life isn't worth living without passion so dont' apologize.

If you want to end it here and let bygones be bygones I'm cool, later bro.

I can keep going if you want...but I warn you, I'll be takin a couple days off come Christmas time and won't be able to post anything.
 
I think the fact that Bret was hypocrit shows the kind of person he really was. Shawn said in 2005 that he does not like Hogan for the same reason he does not liek Bret which is the try to protray standing for something that they do not potray in their private life. HBk was a prick and son of bitch off camera and on camera. After HBK won the belt, Hart bash michaels on every station he could about how he is a degenerate, arrogant primadonna, yet Micahels was faith ful to Sunny for nine months, while BRet was dipping out on his wife.

When you talk about intergrity, Bishoff had just trashed teh women title a year before. The following year, he tried to trash teh ECW title. I understand Vince concern that he would take the WWE title and trash it like Bishoff was doing and ruin WWE. Bret should of Job. His contract was up with WWE, he may not of started WCW til december, but he was no longer employed by WWE after the series. And vince is supposed to wait for Hart to show up a resign as champ. Not when HBK refused ot job, he an asshole yet he did give title up. When Bret does he's a hero. I think all you hart fans are like Hart, Hypocrits. Judge it fairly and down teh middle. Hart did not do what best for the company.
 
I think the fact that Bret was hypocrit shows the kind of person he really was. Shawn said in 2005 that he does not like Hogan for the same reason he does not liek Bret which is the try to protray standing for something that they do not potray in their private life. HBk was a prick and son of bitch off camera and on camera. After HBK won the belt, Hart bash michaels on every station he could about how he is a degenerate, arrogant primadonna, yet Micahels was faith ful to Sunny for nine months, while BRet was dipping out on his wife.

When you talk about intergrity, Bishoff had just trashed teh women title a year before. The following year, he tried to trash teh ECW title. I understand Vince concern that he would take the WWE title and trash it like Bishoff was doing and ruin WWE. Bret should of Job. His contract was up with WWE, he may not of started WCW til december, but he was no longer employed by WWE after the series. And vince is supposed to wait for Hart to show up a resign as champ. Not when HBK refused ot job, he an asshole yet he did give title up. When Bret does he's a hero. I think all you hart fans are like Hart, Hypocrits. Judge it fairly and down teh middle. Hart did not do what best for the company.

Yeah Shawn was faithful to Sunny who was common-law with Chris Candido at the time and Shawn knew it...he worked for the WWF....i'm sure in your world that it's perfectly acceptable to fuck another man's wife/partner knowing full well she's married or living with him, but here on earth that does not make you a stand-up guy...and it's sad when you try to come off as articulate yet cannot spell or use grade four level grammar correctly...
 
Yeah Shawn was faithful to Sunny who was common-law with Chris Candido at the time and Shawn knew it...he worked for the WWF....i'm sure in your world that it's perfectly acceptable to fuck another man's wife/partner knowing full well she's married or living with him, but here on earth that does not make you a stand-up guy...and it's sad when you try to come off as articulate yet cannot spell or use grade four level grammar correctly...

I guess that giant run on you wrote is good english. Homie, first off don't hurl your insult this way. One, I did not realize I was writing on for a newspaper or publication. Had I known, I would not have wrote this at one in the morning and waited. I thought this was a friendly little debate pal. I do write for my local newspaper and to read some of my work I have a few on various websites. BMJ3.blogspot.com is just one and you can check the North Lawndale Newspaper based in Chicago. I have a degree in English Literature, so please son, and talk what you know. I am a Site Manger of a community center in Chicago and only 23 so back off. Now if you want to make this personal, you can try, but you do not know me and I will rock you son. Stay in your position and argue the points.

Next, I not stating HBK was an angel. What I am stating is Bret was no angel and was not too loyal to his word after he cheating on his wife, used steroids and so forth. It is interesting that you absolutely ignored the part of my argument where I said what you saw with HBK is what he was while Bret tried to act like he was a upstanding individual on camera and his private life was not that way. Some may say "Well, wrestling is acting and that was his character". I accept that, but argue that his documentary made point that he is "the good guy".

To your point of the common law marriage, I do not believe in these common law marriages spiritually speaking. Marriage is a religious institution and should be dealt with before God. HBK sleeping with Sunny was a sin, but I doubt many of us are virgins here so why judge. What is worst though breaking your word before God and your wife, or messing with a chick who stays with here boyfriend. Now if they were married legally and exchanged vows like Hart, I still think Sunny is more wrong than HBK. Sunny broke her word not Michaels. But i do not think they were married, based on how Sunny said in an interview about the battle over his funeral(http://www.thewrestlingfan.com/burgandvd9.html) . Nevertheless Michaels never defends his action or makes himself out to be a saint then. Yet When Bret was breaking his word to his wife and before God (something that this common law marriage does not require), probably telling his wife he was faithful (lying), and then still attacking Michaels because of his lifestyle on camera that reflected who he was. HBK even proposed to Sunny. I wonder has Michaels cheated on Rebecca. They were married for a good while before HBK got saved. Hmmm. It seems to me, both were pricks.

Now, let look at the screw job for what is was. First off in early 1997 when Michaels lost his smile, he knee was ruined. Some say he did not want job to Bret at Wrestlemania. Interesting thing is that Bret did not win it at the WM13 but Taker did and Bret and Austin had that classic match. Surely if the title was going to Hart, he would on won the fatal four ways match and beat taker at WM ending the streak then. Maybe Michael’s knee really was screwed up. Hell, it screwed up now. Maybe. Bret refused to Job to Michaels in Canada. As Ted Dibiase said in the Heartbreak and Triumph film, “A lost is seen all over the world” so whether he lost at SS or Raw, Canada will still see their hero lose. Or was Bret going to take that title to WCW and trash it. I know people are going to say Vince did it with Flair, but the belt was not trashed. It was used to make a feud about who is the real champion. WCW had no class. Or was Bret going to say that nobody beat him that other company and he is still there champ devaluing the WWE title. There was just too much at stake. Do I agree with the screw job? … no. I believe that Vince, Hart, HHH, Shane, and even Bishoff are just as guilty as HBK.

Sources and citation. I hope this was up to your standards Mr. Academia
 
I guess that giant run on you wrote is good english. Homie, first off don't hurl your insult this way. One, I did not realize I was writing on for a newspaper or publication. Had I known, I would not have wrote this at one in the morning and waited. I thought this was a friendly little debate pal. I do write for my local newspaper and to read some of my work I have a few on various websites. BMJ3.blogspot.com is just one and you can check the North Lawndale Newspaper based in Chicago. I have a degree in English Literature, so please son, and talk what you know. I am a Site Manger of a community center in Chicago and only 23 so back off. Now if you want to make this personal, you can try, but you do not know me and I will rock you son. Stay in your position and argue the points.

Next, I not stating HBK was an angel. What I am stating is Bret was no angel and was not too loyal to his word after he cheating on his wife, used steroids and so forth. It is interesting that you absolutely ignored the part of my argument where I said what you saw with HBK is what he was while Bret tried to act like he was a upstanding individual on camera and his private life was not that way. Some may say "Well, wrestling is acting and that was his character". I accept that, but argue that his documentary made point that he is "the good guy".

To your point of the common law marriage, I do not believe in these common law marriages spiritually speaking. Marriage is a religious institution and should be dealt with before God. HBK sleeping with Sunny was a sin, but I doubt many of us are virgins here so why judge. What is worst though breaking your word before God and your wife, or messing with a chick who stays with here boyfriend. Now if they were married legally and exchanged vows like Hart, I still think Sunny is more wrong than HBK. Sunny broke her word not Michaels. But i do not think they were married, based on how Sunny said in an interview about the battle over his funeral(http://www.thewrestlingfan.com/burgandvd9.html) . Nevertheless Michaels never defends his action or makes himself out to be a saint then. Yet When Bret was breaking his word to his wife and before God (something that this common law marriage does not require), probably telling his wife he was faithful (lying), and then still attacking Michaels because of his lifestyle on camera that reflected who he was. HBK even proposed to Sunny. I wonder has Michaels cheated on Rebecca. They were married for a good while before HBK got saved. Hmmm. It seems to me, both were pricks.

Now, let look at the screw job for what is was. First off in early 1997 when Michaels lost his smile, he knee was ruined. Some say he did not want job to Bret at Wrestlemania. Interesting thing is that Bret did not win it at the WM13 but Taker did and Bret and Austin had that classic match. Surely if the title was going to Hart, he would on won the fatal four ways match and beat taker at WM ending the streak then. Maybe Michael’s knee really was screwed up. Hell, it screwed up now. Maybe. Bret refused to Job to Michaels in Canada. As Ted Dibiase said in the Heartbreak and Triumph film, “A lost is seen all over the world” so whether he lost at SS or Raw, Canada will still see their hero lose. Or was Bret going to take that title to WCW and trash it. I know people are going to say Vince did it with Flair, but the belt was not trashed. It was used to make a feud about who is the real champion. WCW had no class. Or was Bret going to say that nobody beat him that other company and he is still there champ devaluing the WWE title. There was just too much at stake. Do I agree with the screw job? … no. I believe that Vince, Hart, HHH, Shane, and even Bishoff are just as guilty as HBK.

Sources and citation. I hope this was up to your standards Mr. Academia

I don't know to which giant run-on you are referring to..secondly, i wasn't insulting you, just stating a fact about you poorly written post...and third, keep the references to God out of it....i understand where you're coming from with the marriage reference, but not everyone worships the same god and some people don't believe in god or religion period....comparing what two men did and legislating religious rules into the mix is pointless....you can be married in a civil ceremony and never set foot inside a church...how do you know Bret didn't get married under those circumstances?
 
I don't know to which giant run-on you are referring to..secondly, i wasn't insulting you, just stating a fact about you poorly written post...and third, keep the references to God out of it....i understand where you're coming from with the marriage reference, but not everyone worships the same god and some people don't believe in god or religion period....comparing what two men did and legislating religious rules into the mix is pointless....you can be married in a civil ceremony and never set foot inside a church...how do you know Bret didn't get married under those circumstances?

Your comment was "it's sad when you try to come off as articulate yet cannot spell or use grade four-level grammar correctly". But I can spell and can I can use grade four-level grammar correctly. The thing is that your first post towards me was filled with sarcastic remarks about my world and how things were not right with Shawn sleeping with Sunny, and then you come back sounding offended. Yet for the record, you attacked me first. You left HBK and Hart and the WWE and WCW out and came at me about what I cannot do and attack my intellect. So I responded and in my opinion rocked this topic.

I apologize if I offended anyone, but marriage is a religious institution. Whether Islamic, Buddhist, Christian, Jew, Hebrew, Hindus, Greek, and Zoroastrianism were an institution created by their respective gods. Now if we have moved away from that, hey but that what is was. Not trying to offend but the basis of marriage.


What i find interesting is why you choose certain points and never ask the question presented. In this instance, you ignore why bret did not win at WM13 if Michaels was jobbing to Hart. What about the fact that Sunny and Chris were not married? What this means is that a single guy (HBK) hooked up with a single woman (Sunny) and they became a couple. Bret married a woman and signed a contract of vows and commitments and reneged on them by CHEATING ON HIS WIFE. The contract that he agreed to with his wife meant nothing because he broke them. If he does that to the woman he loves, what he do to the company that is changing wrestling for the worst in his opinion? This is the question we need to ask about this upstanding and excellent Canadian role model that so many try to defend. A man who sits on his high horse about how he was this man that lived by this great moral code, but yet he did no such thing. A man who was on steroids like Michaels was. A man who politic likes Michaels did. He is man that refused to job like Michaels did and everyone holds this man how he was of integrity and honor. Maybe Hart was okay in front of people like he was as the Hit man, but that man was politicking and just as bitter HBK.
 
Your comment was "it's sad when you try to come off as articulate yet cannot spell or use grade four-level grammar correctly". But I can spell and can I can use grade four-level grammar correctly. The thing is that your first post towards me was filled with sarcastic remarks about my world and how things were not right with Shawn sleeping with Sunny, and then you come back sounding offended. Yet for the record, you attacked me first. You left HBK and Hart and the WWE and WCW out and came at me about what I cannot do and attack my intellect. So I responded and in my opinion rocked this topic.

I apologize if I offended anyone, but marriage is a religious institution. Whether Islamic, Buddhist, Christian, Jew, Hebrew, Hindus, Greek, and Zoroastrianism were an institution created by their respective gods. Now if we have moved away from that, hey but that what is was. Not trying to offend but the basis of marriage.


What i find interesting is why you choose certain points and never ask the question presented. In this instance, you ignore why bret did not win at WM13 if Michaels was jobbing to Hart. What about the fact that Sunny and Chris were not married? What this means is that a single guy (HBK) hooked up with a single woman (Sunny) and they became a couple. Bret married a woman and signed a contract of vows and commitments and reneged on them by CHEATING ON HIS WIFE. The contract that he agreed to with his wife meant nothing because he broke them. If he does that to the woman he loves, what he do to the company that is changing wrestling for the worst in his opinion? This is the question we need to ask about this upstanding and excellent Canadian role model that so many try to defend. A man who sits on his high horse about how he was this man that lived by this great moral code, but yet he did no such thing. A man who was on steroids like Michaels was. A man who politic likes Michaels did. He is man that refused to job like Michaels did and everyone holds this man how he was of integrity and honor. Maybe Hart was okay in front of people like he was as the Hit man, but that man was politicking and just as bitter HBK.

Sunny was not single...common law is legally, in the eyes of the laws that govern the country we live in, the same as being married, technically...the same rules apply in a separation between two people who have lived together as a couple for more than a year and a married couple...yes Bret broke his committment to his wife, but shawn was just as much a scumbag for going after an injured wrestler's common law girlfriend who had been with him for nearly ten years at the point, while the man was at home,off the road, recovering from an injury...what's your point?...i never ever defended Bret for cheating on his wife...what does it have to do with wrestling?....the only reason i replied to your post in the first place was because i could not believe that what was written was supposed to be English...if your going to bash someone and post an opinion, at least have the decency to spell and phrase correctly..which, to your credit you've done in your last two posts.
 
Get off the why didn't Bret win at WM 13 argument. When Shawn left the whole plan had to change. HBK vs hart made sense as a rematch, hart vs taker didn't fit into anything going on. Now hart vs Austin made sense but it was to early for Austin to be in a title match at WM so the title went to Sid who would lose to taker who would keep his streak. Very simple reasons when you think about it, sometimes you can't just swap opponents.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top