Who would you rather see as Guest Host-- Bret Hart or The Rock? | WrestleZone Forums

Who would you rather see as Guest Host-- Bret Hart or The Rock?

Who would you rather see as Guest Host and who do you feel has more to offer?

  • Bret Hart

  • The Rock


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ryanhitman316

Pre-Show Stalwart
Now I have been watching wrestling for 19 years and I am probably the biggest Bret Hart fan in Queens, NY lol. As of today we all know the story with Bret Hart and The Rock not being in wrestling today. I attended RAW in MSG and I was hoping that either Bret or The Rock would had been the guest host of RAW seeing that NYC is home of Wrestlemania.

But as of today, TNA is planning to go head to head with RAW on Jan 4, 2010. I was wondering who do you prefer to host RAW if you had to choose between Bret Hart and The Rock? Not only that who do you believe will help and catch people's attention to watch RAW and not TNA on Jan 4?
 
well i like bret i think hollywood got to the rock all dwane jonhson lol after all bret held the belt the longist i think i say let the man host it bill goldberg how about that / thats who should be next and shaemus whatever his name is kiss some ones you no what he sucks/? thats just my opioun .
 
bret the hitman hart. people will tune in to see him and vince on t.v. together. what a way to kick off the year for wwe to get a legend like the hitman who hasent been on raw in over 10yrs
 
Even though I feel The Rock is the better performer and FAR better as an entertainer .... leagues beyond Bret in the overall Entertainment category .... I am going to have to pick Bret in this case, for the simple reason that he hasn't stepped foot in a WWE arena since Survivor Series 1997.

The intrigue factor would be well worth the money. The interaction between he, Vince, and even Shawn Michaels and HBK would be great. That is likely what they have in store for the January 4th Raw, and that will sadly probably kill Impact with Hogan's debut that night. People will be flipping back and forth, but I just have a feeling that the intrigue factor of seeing Bret Hart will bring in more ratings then Hogan ... and that is NOT going to get Impact off to a good fresh start.

So if I had a choice of bringing in The Rock

OR

bringing in Bret Hart, to do something with Hart, Vince, Michaels, and Triple H .... I would have to go with Bret Hart. Because that scenario would probably be one of the best things WWE has done in years. And they will probably tease friction the whole night with Bret and DX, but ultimately I see them making up on TV together. And if Triple H had any class, he would actually take a back seat in this role, and let it be solely between Hart and Michaels.

That would actually be a fantastic way to turn Triple H heel and set up a Michaels vs Triple H match for Mania.

Anyway, don't comment on that. I'm rambling and typing as I am thinking out loud.

Back to the thread topic. Bret Hart or The Rock?
 
I am a much bigger Bret Hart fan, but truth is The Rock would be a better guest host and a bigger draw. We're talking about being a host and that involves charisma and pure entertainment value...that is The Rock...that is 90% of what made The Rock huge in the industry's biggest boom period...again we're talking guest host and not surprise appearance
 
Bret Hart by a mile. Ive been wondering who would be host for next week in Tampa. Im going to that show and I was wondering why they announced Timbaland for the 28th but still didnt announce the host for the 21st. I figured they were having trouble getting someone and it would be a nobody or they were keeping it secret cause it would be someone big. When Vince and Miller teased Bret Hart I almost crapped my pants. I had my hopes up that he would be in Tampa next week. Then they announced Johnny Damon. Now Im from NY and Im a huge Yankees fan but after the Bret Hart tease Im totally let down by Johnny Damon. Im a huge Bret Hart fan (Ive been holding up Bret Hart signs at all the events I go to) and I really hope he will one day come back to WWE for an appearance. Although it wont be in Tampa, I would be stoked to see him host RAW period. I just hope it wasnt a meaningless tease and we never end up seeing him host RAW.
 
I am a much bigger Bret Hart fan, but truth is The Rock would be a better guest host and a bigger draw. We're talking about being a host and that involves charisma and pure entertainment value...that is The Rock...that is 90% of what made The Rock huge in the industry's biggest boom period...again we're talking guest host and not surprise appearance

The Rock has been back numerous times since leaving for Hollywood, some of which more memorable than others. But just thinking about the opportunity to promote the return of Bret Hart to WWE programming (not just a Hall of Fame speech) is a tantalizing opportunity that would be every bit as big and more impactful for longtime fans that another Rock cameo. Who's to say they won't both be hosts? But Bret Hart's return - if promoted heavily - could draw a great rating.
 
Wow.. Two very different questions...

Who would I rather see as guest host?? Bret Hart. For the simple reason of how his career in the WWF ended. I would MARK THE FUCK OUT to see Shawn Michaels and Bret stare each other down in the middle of the ring... get some stuff off their chests and shake hands..FINALLY closure to this story..

Now who has more to offer is another story.. The Rock is basically custom made for this kind of role. He's a mainstream Hollywood actor... Hell.. unlike Bret this guy is a household name and a huge draw.

I think Rock will be a bigger ratings grabber as he will even draw none wrestling fans to watch him as well as old Attitude era fans who haven't checked out WWE in years. Bret Hart would be more about having a classic moment.
 
even though i think this will never happen my pick is bret by FAR! sure the rock is a much bigger draw (cept in canada..maybe anywhere outside the us) but bret coming back into a wwe ring 1st time would be absolutely cant miss & blow tna out of the water. im a HUGE bret hart fan. the rock would undoubtabley be entertaing as hell on the mic as always but the tension w/ bret bein back would have everyone on the edge of their seats all night. but like i said to start with i doubt it will happen & dont know why they teased it. ive heard before bret would never be in the same building as hbk.
 
A difficult question. I think Bret would make a better guest host because i think he knows what decent wrestling is. The rock knows what would be entertaining but if possible make both of them guest host you'd have wrestling and entertainment together
 
I was wondering who do you prefer to host RAW if you had to choose between Bret Hart and The Rock? Not only that who do you believe will help and catch people's attention to watch RAW and not TNA on Jan 4?

I would at some point like to see both of them as guest host. I hate the guest host concept, but when they bring in someone who was at one point actually involved with WWE, then my opinion on this concept shifts a bit towards the positive end.

The Rock is more entertaining, but Hart has not been in a WWE ring in years. After his appearance has been teased on multiple occasions it will be so great for him to actually appear for once. The reaction that would get from the fans could possibly be on par with the reaction that The Rock would get because it has such a low likelihood of even happening. I'd pick Hart over the Rock if I absolutely had to pick one because it has been so long since he has been in the ring.... This would also get more fans' attention than the Rock in my opinion. However, I honestly would like to see them both guest host an episode of Raw each because they would potentially be the best guests.
 
Both would be a great choice but if I had to chose 1 of the 2 it would be The Rock. With Bret's age and health he would be a prop at most. They would probably run some kind of a lame segment involving him and DX. And they might have him and Vince have a face off. Not that it wouldn't be good but at this point in time The Rock has so much more to offer. And if he wanted to he could work some kind of a match as well, or at least get physical, give someone the Rock Bottom. Plus having The Rock and John Cena in the ring at the same time would be pretty epic in itself.
 
Bret Hart in my opinion. I think the possibilities are endless as far as what angles they could come up with. You have all the 'screw job' history to work an angle for the night with Vince and DX, and seeing has HBK challenged Taker at Mania once again, how do you top last year's match? You get Bret Hart as the guest referee which is something that they could plant seeds for if he was guest host at some point over the next two months.
 
I am a HUGE Bret Hart Mark. That said-The Rock. He brings the media glitz and glamor with him. All the flashing cameras, all of the paparazzi, all of the E shows, all news will be on the Rock once again entering the squared circle (even though we KNOW he won't wrestle for free tv).

It takes all of the attention from TNA and the Debuting Hulk Hogan Maybe if this was 1992, Hogan would get all of the paparazzi- but now, only wrestling fans care about him. And that's what this is all about, right? Getting the spot light off of TNA and the Hulkster-though no one is willing to admit it.

I will say this- I think either will be a HUGE draw given the circumstances. I think either will smother TNA. It's not a question as to if, but how bad. And while i respect Bret as the better performer (and the better "storyline", and i use that term loosely), I think the Rock is truly the most electrifying on the mic and in the ring, and can work a crowd like none other.

So i say the Rock.
 
i would pick the rock, simply because he's "the most electrifying man in sports and entertainment". i love the rock, he's my favorite wrestler, he's a better entertainer, more people know the rock, we all know bret isn't going to fight in the ring, he might have a confrontation with vince, which would be exciting, but if they have the rock then they have a chance for him to get in the ring and wrestle a little. i think the rock got a better pop when he said he maybe he should guest host raw, then yesterday when a guy like dennis miller who doesnt have to do with wrestling at all, announces maybe it should be bret hart. i was more excited to here the rock say he might guest host then bret. so overall i'd pick the rock
 
This is a hard choice. I'm a major mark for both men, and would love to see them both host.

As for January 4th...I'd like to see The Rock. I'm going to that RAW, and it would be smart seeing as The Rock is well-known both in Hollywood and in WWE. If they advertised it enough, it could bring in massive ratings.

Then again, Bret would be great, too. I really can't decide, as I love them both too much.

I'll just go with, I want them both to host.
 
Bret Hart most likely he can work with The hart Dynasty so it gives him just a little more power. If the rock hosted we wouldn't see a connection. Bret would be the better candidate.
 
LOL, i dont think i have ever seen Mcmahon shit his pants so badly before, he is worrying like TNA will put them out of buisiness on Jan 4th. I personally wouldnt want either of them to host as all it would do is take the attention of the Monday night war.

But if i had to choose then it will have to be The Rock, it's sad to say but no one cares about Bret since 1997. And why on earth would he want to associate himself for one night only with the man who ruined his life.
 
LOL, i dont think i have ever seen Mcmahon shit his pants so badly before, he is worrying like TNA will put them out of buisiness on Jan 4th. I personally wouldnt want either of them to host as all it would do is take the attention of the Monday night war.

But if i had to choose then it will have to be The Rock, it's sad to say but no one cares about Bret since 1997. And why on earth would he want to associate himself for one night only with the man who ruined his life.

I don't think Vince is worried at all. TNA still has a long way to go to actually be considered real competition for WWE. I think Vince just wants to kill off any momentum TNA could gain as soon as possible. Vince isn't just going to lay down and let TNA have their night. He's hitting them before they can even start running. Its just Vince being a business man.

As for who should host, I much rather see The Rock than Bret Cry Baby Hart. NOBODY is bigger than the business. Not Hogan, Not The Rock and definitely not Bret Hart. Too bad for him that on that one night in Canada, he actually thought he was. Vince put him in his place. Ballsy call by Vinny Mac. I doubt nobody else would have the grapefruits to pull what he did to one of the biggest names in pro wrestling.
 
Even though the Rock is more entertaining individually, I would have to say Bret Hart because the directions that the storyline could go are so tremendous. Check out these factors:

-Interaction with Vince
-Interaction with HBK
-Interaction with Triple H
-Interaction with HBK & Triple as a reformed Degeneration X
-Bret being the general manager and having the opportunity to put DX at risk of losing their newly obtained tag titles
-Bret's possible interaction with the Hart Dynasty
-Possible exchange of words with Chris Jericho, a fellow Hart Dungeon graduate and fellow Canadian

Look at how much DRAMA would happen during that show. It's pretty much endless. With all of those factors at Vince's disposal, veteran fans of the sport would drool at the thought of it all and younger, new fans would be able to learn some more about the Montreal Screwjob first hand instead of just hearing about it from adults or reading about it on the internet.
 
Man, I would LOVE to see either of these guys guest host an episode of Raw, especially for the head to head "war" with TNA on Jan. 04. In a perfect world, I'd like to see both guys (different nights, not on the same episode), but I fear in actuality we are going to see neither.

If I had to choose one of them, especially for the Jan 04 episode, I would pick the Hitman. Let's face it, neither guy is going to get much involved in the action physically (Bret because by all accounts he's not physically able to do so, and the Rock because he likely won't want to and risk an injury which could affect his movie-making status). This would be particularly effective if this could be done and kept quiet, ie, not announced ahead of time as per usual, and not spoiled by the Internet/IWC. Because if the WWE announced a surprise guest host for this night, many of the guys who were planning to watch TNA that night would have to tune in to RAW to see who the guest host is, and if it's Bret, with all of the potential this could hold, they wouldn't be returning to Spike on this night. And when those who plan to channel surf between the two find out it's Hart (hypothetically), it'd be Hulk Who?

I cannot see the Rock doing much more than a one-time shot, so while a guest hosting appearance by Dwayne would be huge, I don't see it going anywhere. He'll not get involved in the action, he'll bring his tremendous charisma to the one show, then he'll return to Hollywood and continue to forsake his WWE past.

But with Bret Hart, there's potential for ongoing action beyond a one night appearance. There's interaction between himself and Vince and HBK, bringing closure to the Screwjob at last. This could contribute to a turn by HHH, or even HBK himself, setting up a feud between HHH/HBK at WM26. He could become GM for the Raw brand. He could mentor/manage the Hart Dynasty. It has been speculated on this site previously that Hart was open to returning to WWE in some capacity; this could eminate from a guest host appearance on Jan 04, something that a Rock appearance probably doesn't bring.

And food for thought, what if Bret's physical status is better than we all think? Before anyone reminds me, I know all about his stroke and all that, but I'm not convinced he could not perform to a very limited degree in the ring. I'm not suggesting a full time return to wrestling in a full time capacity, but I wonder about match interference or even a one-time match with someone. I saw Bret recently and I didn't think he looked too bad. I remember years ago, when HBK was retired and I wondered to my friends if he might ever return, and I was mocked and laughed out of the room, being told his back was so messed up that you'd never see him back. When he did return, the same people told me he'd only go to a limited degree and he wouldn't be effective because he wasn't able to go, that he was one bump away from major trouble. And who was it that just received a Slammy for match of the year in 2009, over a decade later? Food for thought.
 
Bret Hart. Simpy because I am a Bret Fan.

The Rock is okay with his poopy jokes, and catch phrases. However, unless Rock is going to build up an angle with Cena then it would not matter. The Rock is NOT as big in Hollywood as he was back in 2002-2003 because of his choice in movie roles and he would appeal to attitude era marks. Bret on the other hand would appeal to all wrestling fans accross the board because of the "Montreal Screwjob" which is probably the most famous match of all time.
 
I would love to see Hart as a guest host of this show. Can you imagine what would happen between him and Shawn? Obviously, Hart wouldn't be wrestling, but there'd be animosity, whether real, or faked between the 2, with fans being aware of what happened in Montreal. I would love to see the 2 interact once more, I was always a huge fan of their matches.

That being said, especially on January 4th, the WWE needs The Rock here. He is the most electrifying man in Sports Entertainment, and one of the most charismatic men the business has ever seen. He's known widely throughout the world, and has a special place in most fans hearts. He would be hilarious, I usually record Raw and watch it in the morning, being in England, but I would definitely stay up until 4AM to see this man guest host a Raw. Just thinking about the things he could do excites me greatly, this would be quite possibly the best Raw in recent times.
 
The Rock would be a more entertaining guest host, as he is by far one of the most entertaining guys to ever wrestle. But from a fan perspective, I think Hart would be the better host. Bret hasn't stepped foot in a WWE arena since he left. And the only association he has had with the WWE since leaving has been an awesome DVD and being inducted into the HOF. Hart being the host on 1/4 would trump Hogan's debut, no doubt in my mind. I think even if Rock hosted it would trump TNA. Both would be great host, but I think Hitman would have more of an impact.
 
as a fan of both The Rock & Bret Hart, it's really hard 4 me 2 choose, I know 4 a fact that either host will bring something entertaining 2 the show, I can see The Rock roasting The Miz & calling him a jabroni however, I can also see Bret finally resolving his situation with Shawn Michaels, like I said, either way, they both R capableof bringing a value of entertainment 2 Monday Night Raw.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top