Everything on that list people have been defending and that is why no one has yet to prove me wrong. No need to bring up your dumb strawman argument claim because that doesn't mean a thing. What is the definition to someone who claims he is right by by not insulting me or not giving me a real argument? That is how most of the people on here act towards me.
Fair enough. Identify the
specific posters who have been arguing anything on your stupid fucking list. You've said everything, so take it a step further- who's been arguing stuff on that list, and where did they do it? Much like your hemp as a food crop argument, that's a no sell, because no one was arguing anything found on your stupid fucking strawman list. It's a list of stupid questions you've made up because you're a mental cripple incapable of handling any of the questions people have
actually been asking you. Not an insult, that's fact, so don't cry about it.
And
once again, speaking of a crippling inability to answer questions, you answered the "point out where hemp was a staple crop" question by saying "oh, but you can eat hemp!"
NO SHIT. THIS HAS NEVER BEEN IN DEBATE. The question is "when was hemp ever a staple crop." A staple crop- and this has been defined for you at least three times now- isn't just "a crop farmers grow and make money out of", but it's a crop which is grown to produce the majority of calories a civilization survives off of. You understand that's how food works, right? The body takes in calories and then burns them moving around and performing work? It'll be HUGE news to pre-Civil War historians that America was feeding itself off of hemp instead of corn. (Your "America grew hemp as a major food source in the 1800's" statement is just a straight up lie, which is why you didn't include a source with it. I'd love to see what kind of website you could find a statement like that on!
)
Why?
Because hemp as a plant provides less energy (calories) when digested than it does to produce. Which is why no one has ever grown it to feed their society. Because that would be suicide.
This is why we don't want you talking to people about marijuana, because you can't even be trusted to feed yourself. We're worried people might think all marijuana smokers are like you, and that's going to set back the legalization movement for decades. Stay the fuck out of Washington and Colorado,
please. Don't fuck this up for them.
I'm not going to bother quoting your response, because it had absolutely nothing to do with the question that was asked. It was the ramblings of a crazy person. This is why we just insult you instead of trying to talk to you, because you can't answer simple questions directly. Instead, you repeat answers that have very little to do with the original question. It's like asking you what your favorite color is, you responding "three!", and then insisting you had given everyone an answer.