You answered a lot of what I said in a confusing way, so I'll try to dissect it, but I might get something wrong so bear with me.
The funny thing about everything you said is that you have no real explanation for a lot of people. You said Kaitlyn is hot period how the hell is that an argument....so what your trying to say is Naomi is not hot, I wonder why you would think that, why would you think a bubble headed no talent blonde hack like kaitlyn is hotter than a educated just as if not more hotter WAY MORE TALENTED IN THE RING Naomi. And I'll bet your answer is you prefer blondes so does that Dick head Johnny Ace.
I actually don't personally find her that hot. What I meant was that she won because she fit the typical WWE diva stereotype of cute face, big boobs, nice ass, little to no wrestling experience. Naomi being more talented in the ring may have actually worked against her, because WWE is always looking for someone with "limited skill and ability" that they can mold into the next Trish Stratus. But no, that's not a racial thing, that just goes with the WWE's general philosophy of liking to create their own stars out of thin air. Anyway, the fact that you're using the diva season of NXT as a talking point is pretty lame, that season didn't matter and the commentators went out of their way to trash the show every damn week. No one took it seriously and Kaitlyn has done next to nothing since winning the show; hell, I think AJ has had more wins on the main roster than she has.
You keep saying "this person was getting a push then something magically happened" Ummm how the hell do you know if someone was getting a push or not. then you say 'creative ruined his push" BS and even if they did they still could have fixed it, the crowd was behind MVP they didn't give him a title run because they didn't want too.
I know what I see from watching Monday Night Raw on the USA Network every week, and when I see someone getting a push, that means they're getting a push. It's not exactly rocket science to figure out. The crowd also wasn't as behind MVP as WWE wanted them to be, mainly because the way he turned face was stupid and he lost all of his character as soon as he turned. But they've done that with plenty of white guys, too. See: Randy Orton in 2004. Riley might be on that path as well, hopefully not though.
Booker T being in wcw did have something to do with it because like wcw or not Booker T already proved he represent the company so VInce had nothing to be afraid of plus they gave him that stupid (yet funny) King Booker Gimmick in stead of letting him be Booker T. If your telling me John Cena is better in the Ring then Shelton your on Drugs all Cena has is a few spots and 3 moves..........even to this day in the MIB promo's they show Shelton is in all of them. He out Wrestled HHH and some of the "TOP GUYS" and his reward was a I.C. & U.S. title run only to be teamed with Charlie Haas again.
Yeah, your argument definitely loses credibility with the idea that Shelton Benjamin is a better in-ring performer than John Cena. Let's get serious here. Shelton was a spot monkey, he did high spots, that's pretty much all he did. He had little to no ability to actually connect with a crowd or tell a story in the ring, two things that John Cena is a master at. But yeah, if how many moves a guy does is your criteria for being a good in-ring wrester, then I guess he should have about 20 world titles by now. Fortunately, that hasn't happened, because being a wrestler is about far more than just number of moves. And honestly I thought that argument was dead in like 2007, it amazes me that it's still being used now.
About Booker, you're saying that he got the push because he was in WCW, yet he got the push because he proved that he was loyal to WWE. Those are two completely separate and contrasting ideas, yet you have somehow connected them. Excuse me for not understanding "wut da hale" you're talking about there.
And yes being HHH work out partner had a huge deal to do with it (aside from being white) why do think they pushed Shemus over Kofi who was way over with the crowd
Maybe because Sheamus was a heel, and having Kofi take the title off Cena as a face would be stupid? But of course race is a much more logical solution than alignment in the world of wrestling.
Everything you can't explain is "I don't understand it but I don't think its Racist"...LMAO like seriously
Wait, what didn't I explain or understand? Please enlighten me.
Miz, Del Rio and Cena are better all the way around 100% than Kofi and Truth...U R BUGGING
I said Miz and Del Rio are better than Truth and Cena is better than Kofi. And yes, I stand by that. If you want to dispute how they aren't (and don't bother with the "Kofi and Truth have more moves" because I'm not arguing that point twice), go right ahead. But I know a good all-around performer when I see one, and the two white guys and the Mexican fit that bill. Go figure.
....wow really that's the most racist thing I've heard so far and thats the problem. The white guys can just be ok or have half the tools to get the belt, but the Blacks guys have to be the total package and when they are the total package there still look over not because there not right for the job but because there not white for the job
That last line was pretty clever, I'll admit. But yeah, what I said wasn't racist at all. If there's a black guy who's better than a lot of white guys (i.e. Rock, Booker) then sure, push them as much as you want. But a white guy is the best face in the WWE (Cena), and a couple of white guys are the best heels in the WWE (Punk, Miz), so that's why they get the spots. But of course, we can ignore R-Truth getting the main event of Capitol Punishment over all those white guys.