Chris Jericho never held the WWE Championship for a year. So no, Jericho never did what Punk did. Jericho was never THE guy to hold the ball and run with it. Never even in the top two or three. CM Punk and John Cena ran the WWE from 2011 to 2013. This year Daniel Bryan and Randy Orton have been booked in close proximity to those two, so really there are four top guys at the moment. But for close to two years, CM Punk was as big, if not a bigger merch draw than John Cena. The non-Rumble, non-Mania PPVs Cena and Punk main evented had comparable ratings. Punk was hardly the clear #1 with Cena around, and he was never going to be. Much like The Rock was never truly THE ONLY GUY when Austin was around. Go take a look at the buyrate differences from when Austin worked the midcard, to when Austin was in the main event. Astronomical. The Rock shared in Austin's greatness, but wasn't ever the #1 guy until he left. But Punk was the #2, and would be #1 if John were to ever leave. Which is something Chris Jericho has never really done.
BS! YKnow why Jericho was never "the man" because when he was in his prime, he was filled with a talent of greatness, a HOF talent roster not the PG era, cm punk is a star in a very mediocre era to say the least, you don't have any good talents.
You have a good wrestlers no doubt but look at Road Dogg, the perfect example, he was a mid-carder in the AE but he was great at working the crowd, kids today can't do that anymore, they don't have that great personnality that AE wrestlers had, the roster is very very weak, you see a guy like Randy Orton, he's the top star right now, what is the best he can say? "I'm the greatest ever"? "I'm more of a man than anyone in this arena"? Really?
The wrestlers today are so boring, it's like the last 40 years of pro wrestling never happened, they are so lame and generic, all the innovations that the rock n wrestling era brought, the innovations that the AE brought, that's the best they can do?
You compare Cena/Punk to Austin/Rock? I say BS!
Punk isn't even close to Cena, there's no way you could make me believe Punk could take Cena's spot. Also, many people see Orton as #2 and not punk.
Austin was an equal to The Rock. Austin revolutionized wrestling but Rock took it to new heights.
You pretend as if Austin was in the driver seat and Rock was just there for the ride. That's BS.
I can say the same thing about nWo and austin.
Rock is the only person to be in the highest rated segment/match/episode in RAW history, he broke gates record set in 1999 set by Austin in 1998 and previously Hogan in 1987 then precedeed to break his own record in 2000.
Rock also sold out arenas in Japan and other countries in Asia, something SCSA was never able to do.
Rock surpassed Austin after 99, SCSA was supposed to turn heel in 99-00 and put over The Rock at WrestleMania 2000, he talked about it previously in an interview but he decided to go and do his surgery.
If you look from 1998 to 2002, Austin was going down while Rock was going up and that's because Stone Cold was the same gimmick and was stale, while Rock was able to refresh his act.
By 2002, Rock was by far the #1 guy while Austin was behind Hunter, Taker and even Hogan.
Austin was even paired in a tag team with Bradshaw before he left.
WWE wanted Rock vs Brock at SS and Austin was to put Lesnar over for Lesnar to look like a threat going on against the real #1 guy.
Also, Rock beat Austin at Survivor Series 2001 and Rock-Booker T for the WCW title main evented over Austin-Angle at SummerSlam 2001 which was for the WWF title.
Rock brought new viewers just like Austin brought new viewers, if not more.
How did he tarnish the WWE Championship? Give me one solid, even remotely conceivable way CM Punk tarnished the WWE Championship. Was it holding the title as long as the EIGHT reigns before his combined? Was it defending the championship 28 times in a year? Was it giving guys like Dolph Ziggler, Mark Henry and Daniel Bryan a shot? Was it having the humility to LOSE THE TITLE TO THE FUCKING ROCK? Do you want to know who tarnished the prestige of the WWE Championship? It was The Rock. That's right, the guy who works one or two matches a year comes in, ends the longest reign of the modern era - over a guy who works 200+ dates a year - defends the title once in a pretty shitty rematch, and then drops it back to John Cena at WrestleMania. Lets not forget how he got that title match in the first place. He didnt' have to earn it, there was no #1 contenders match, and everyone else in line for a shot be damned. He just showed up, said he's fighting for the title in half a year, and then left. But that's all in the story. You can hardly blame him for that. Except that The Rock held that title for 70 days and defended it...once. And in that legendary 70 day reign, he showed up for television a handful of times to show off a brand new belt nobody ever got to see until it was off him.
I don't hate the Rock, but I hate people who pretend he's still anything more than a cash cow WWE can trot out every year to give them a decent buyrate. If Donald Trump could get in the ring, he'd be The Rock circa 2013.
Your whole logic is wrong, with all due respect.
Rock didn't really win the WWE title, he was just a transitional champion because WWE wanted Cena to win the WWE title from The Rock.
The Rock was the WHOLE and ONLY reason Punk held the title for so long, don't even try to counter that argument, even the markest of cm punk marks will admit that, so let's stop with the whole ROCK ENDED LONGEST REIGN argument.
He tarnished the title because he was a mid-carder during the whole reign, simple as that. Also, TLC 2012 was the first PPV since No Way Out 2007 which didn't feature a WWE title match.
No. He should stay in Hollywood. He should keep getting better at acting, and make better movies. That's what he should do. And if he wants to come back, he can come back and do a promo, or interact with somebody. Make the fans happy. I like the Rock, but putting the title on him was bullshit. And taking it OFF Punk to do so just made me hate WWE having anything to do with Dwayne in the future. The only guy he put over in coming back was himself. John Cena didn't gain anything from beating him. If anything, he just broke even going 1-1. It sends the message that "hey, it doesn't matter how hard you work to be on top, if a celebrity comes back you don't matter to us anymore." And it makes the roster look like shit. How many people did Punk beat in a year, yet he can't go over a movie star that's wrestled two matches since being back on TV? Hell, how many times to Punk beat Cena? It just makes the roster of ACTUAL wrestlers look weak.
I guess I have an old school mentality. I have a lot of respect for the guys that go out there and work 200 dates a year and put their bodies through hell for my entertainment. The Rock entertains me in different ways. I don't expect him to come back full time, nor should he. He's found success outside of the business and I'm beyond happy for him. But when he does come back, I think it's a slap in the face to guys like Punk and Cena when WWE bends over backwards and makes him the center of attention. At least when Batista comes back he'll be working a full time schedule. When Jericho is back, he works the house shows and goes out to meet the fans. These guys are pro wrestlers. Dwayne is a celebrity, and he should be treated as such. You don't put your titles on celebrities.
Again, the only reason punk held the title for so long was coz of the rock and rock only held it coz wwe wanted rock-cena II for the title, wwe calls the shot, rock goes with it, not rock's fault.
Rock is a professional, he has no problem putting people over , wwe wanted him to put over cena, he said yes.
Lesnar is a part timer, doesn't work house shows yet he also beat Punk, your argument is invalid. Taker is a 48 year old man yet he beat punk, Rock is arguably the G.O.A.T. of wrestling.
Nothing wrong with him going over cena and punk