Yes he does have the right do be upset. Fulfillment is essential for humans, particularly goal orrientated people like CM Punk.
If you work in a job, you strive for bonuses, promotions, pay raises or symbols of apprieciation and respect. When these goals are impossible, morale and quality of work decrease.
In a sport team you strive to stay in peak shape, to perform at your highest level to win each night, for the goal of end of season glory. Its no secret that once a team is out of running for the title thier urgency, effort and passion decrease. This would be even more clear if told on the first game of the season, that they would recieve no points per win, and thus could never reach the finals.
Wrestling is a combination of the above.
So it should be clear that you WANT punk to be trying to reach wrestlemania at the end of each 'season final'. You WANT punk to be trying to get a promotion.
Saying Punk doesnt have the right to be upset, is akin to sayin, its ok to have no passion goal or drive. Imagine if all wwe wrestlers merely went through the motions devoid of desire. I dont think anyone enjoys watching anyone wrestle like that.
So i think clearly the answer for anyone who wants wrestler to be passionate and always trying to excel, is YES.
BUT.
Does WWE have the right to put the Rock in the main event at WM, is an entirely different story.
Yes. They do. They are a company that are trying to make money in a capatalist democracy.
The fact that the corporate philosophy, is incompatable with the ethos of the philosophy of the workers is IRRELEVENT. Its not paradoxical its simply the environment that exists.
Life isn't fair and shit isn't perfect.
/nerd mode off
(dont quote above and below together please)
I bet 50 bucks he's pissed at Rock more than WWE. Rock shat all over wrestling in interviews, burying the business that feeds cm punk, the one punk is trying to excel in. Then he walk back into something he doesn't like and gets put above him! Its like ur girlfriend dumping you for her rich good looking ex boyfriend who she knows is going to cheat on her again. And your supposed to wait for that to end and hang around to be there when she's done? man. of course he's pissed and he has a right. Wwe is is making the right move and Rock is a douche for saying that to punk. If HBK hadn't broke his back "The Rock" may have never passed the point where cm punk is now. I remember HBK was champ and the rock was a mid carder who's heat depended on how good the segment was before he's. In a spot I would consider far lower than the one Punk is in now. HBK has last match at WM n leaves, 6 months later, breakdown PPV rock has breakout moment and starts his march. If HBK had still been there to hold rock bad, it COULD have never happened.
You'd think the Rock could have a little more empathy. I'd like to think it was kayfabe and he was dissing him as a heel, but the more you hear about Rock from the guys who are still there... well.
If you work in a job, you strive for bonuses, promotions, pay raises or symbols of apprieciation and respect. When these goals are impossible, morale and quality of work decrease.
In a sport team you strive to stay in peak shape, to perform at your highest level to win each night, for the goal of end of season glory. Its no secret that once a team is out of running for the title thier urgency, effort and passion decrease. This would be even more clear if told on the first game of the season, that they would recieve no points per win, and thus could never reach the finals.
Wrestling is a combination of the above.
So it should be clear that you WANT punk to be trying to reach wrestlemania at the end of each 'season final'. You WANT punk to be trying to get a promotion.
Saying Punk doesnt have the right to be upset, is akin to sayin, its ok to have no passion goal or drive. Imagine if all wwe wrestlers merely went through the motions devoid of desire. I dont think anyone enjoys watching anyone wrestle like that.
So i think clearly the answer for anyone who wants wrestler to be passionate and always trying to excel, is YES.
BUT.
Does WWE have the right to put the Rock in the main event at WM, is an entirely different story.
Yes. They do. They are a company that are trying to make money in a capatalist democracy.
The fact that the corporate philosophy, is incompatable with the ethos of the philosophy of the workers is IRRELEVENT. Its not paradoxical its simply the environment that exists.
Life isn't fair and shit isn't perfect.
/nerd mode off
(dont quote above and below together please)
I bet 50 bucks he's pissed at Rock more than WWE. Rock shat all over wrestling in interviews, burying the business that feeds cm punk, the one punk is trying to excel in. Then he walk back into something he doesn't like and gets put above him! Its like ur girlfriend dumping you for her rich good looking ex boyfriend who she knows is going to cheat on her again. And your supposed to wait for that to end and hang around to be there when she's done? man. of course he's pissed and he has a right. Wwe is is making the right move and Rock is a douche for saying that to punk. If HBK hadn't broke his back "The Rock" may have never passed the point where cm punk is now. I remember HBK was champ and the rock was a mid carder who's heat depended on how good the segment was before he's. In a spot I would consider far lower than the one Punk is in now. HBK has last match at WM n leaves, 6 months later, breakdown PPV rock has breakout moment and starts his march. If HBK had still been there to hold rock bad, it COULD have never happened.
You'd think the Rock could have a little more empathy. I'd like to think it was kayfabe and he was dissing him as a heel, but the more you hear about Rock from the guys who are still there... well.