JoeBudden=BestRapperAlive
Dark Match Jobber
"Potenial equals nothing if no work, life equals worthlessness if no risks, no practice. Fact is we are who we determine to be and what we put into, we will get equal out of." me Jordan Myers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
My tagline pretty much sums up my views on this
It's big men fighting to settle their differences! In what kind of stupid fucked up logic does this in any way lend itself to anything kids should be watching. It's as pointless and ******ed as a PG horror film.
I really don't like the direction the WWE is taking.
I can't stand most of it in fact.
If kids are the demographic you are targeting, then that is of course who you will target.
But of course in doing that you alienate everyone else.
I think rather than 'listening to our audience', which they never really have, McMahon seems to be 'listening to our audience and how much money their parents will spend.'
Of course, this is a business, and like any business the aim is to make profit.
However, if your product is Wrestling (Which the WWE likes to pretend it isn't), then you really should listen to Wrestling fans, and what they want, from every demographic.
You'll never please everyone (Some hated Hogan, some hated Austin, some hate The Undertaker, others hate Cena, some hate RAW, some hate Smackdown) but you can at least get a balance of what the fans want to see, not just what you force feed them.
Despite a minor increase over last week, the news stemming from this week's WWE RAW rating was not all positive.
Monday's telecast posted a 3.4 (via rounding), up slightly from last week's 3.3 household rating. While an increase is always good, especially because this week's show did not benefit post-PPV buzz, there are reasons to keep WWE from getting too excited.
For starters, this week's Monday Night Football game did a significantly lower rating than last week's record-breaking telecast. The minor increase indicates that RAW did not pickup a notable portion of the NFL audience (and thus means WWE cannot fully blame last week's low number on the heavy NFL competition .... which is what they did).
Further, the show lost viewers as it progressed, posting hours of 3.4 and 3.3; such a trend is almost always a sign that viewers were not especially hooked by the broadcast.
And, as focus of a lot of television industry members has shifted to demographic numbers, as opposed to the household rating, there was additional disappointment for WWE. PWTorch notes that the show did a 2.39 rating among males in the 18-49 demographic, which is the lowest demo figure since November of 2008.
http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/wwe/4487.html
"who's the 30th entry?"
"Omg its Hornswoggle!!!"
"is standing up to Cena?"
"wait is he pulling out a magic wand?"
"oh my he just teleported Cena outside the ring!!!! Vintage Hornswoggle..."
"Hornswoggle IS GOING TO ENTERTAINIA!!!"
He realized that his audience now is the children of the old Attitude Era and before guys. It is a genius business idea to make it kid friendly so he sells more John Cena products and such. For those of us who grew up in the Attitude Era though, we kind of got shafted. Yeah its not the best product out right now, but we still tune in and watch, and hope it will get better.
PG era = Fail
No original looking or presented characters (except Miz and Morrison), feuds are drawn out too much before the 2nd PPV, Vince stopped caring about the fans that gave WWE an 8.0 during the Attitude Era. Look at the ratings now!
/thread
Well, it's not ALL about it being PG, it's just a factor playing into everything else. You can have a good PG wrestling show. It just seems like this is TV-Y and every new guy brought up is put through a cookie cutter and now we have the same 10 new "stars" who have no chance of standing out.