All Future Wrestlemania Discussion (Matches, Gimmicks, Angles.... KEEP IT IN HERE!)

[sharu7]

They did the same thing in 2006....Dont you remember he faced him at WM 22...No point in wasting a match against Henry once again.

The exact same scenario...Henry came, that too was in a cage, Batista and Rey were facing MNM...And he came and destroyed Batista...

Now he destroyed Orton, and once again we want to do the thing over again..

 

[origanaljerichoholic]

This is the worst idea ever, because yes like he said its been done before, two no one knows why the hell mark henry is main event status now anyway, and undertaker aint gonna have his last mania be against "sexual choclate"

 

[gwumusic10]

Triple H also faced the Undertaker at Wrestlemania 17 and did it again last year and I didn't hear no one complaining so that argument holds no water

 

[Kliq]

Man, you have to be kidding. Are you seriously saying that because HHH got a WM rematch with the Deadman, that Mark Henry is a big enough draw that he could as well? No offense to Henry, but in these final few WM that Undertaker has left, the WWE and the fans don't want to waste one on Mark Henry.

 

[TheTemp]

Man, you have to be kidding. Are you seriously saying that because HHH got a WM rematch with the Deadman, that Mark Henry is a big enough draw that he could as well? No offense to Henry, but in these final few WM that Undertaker has left, the WWE and the fans don't want to waste one on Mark Henry.

Nor did we want to waste one on Triple H again after there was no chance in hell they were going to top their Mania 17 Match.

Mark Henry doesn't need another Mania match with Taker. If Henry makes it onto the card I'll be pleasantly surprised.

 

[SMKM]

Sorry man, as "good" as Mark Henry is right now (I think hes good, others may not) A) its not the best idea at all and B) it was done before and id I recall it was hailed as a horrible streak match. If anything Taker will return around the Rumble and Henry after eliminating 10 people (one less than Kanes record) will then be eliminated by the returning Taker, face and MAYBE squash Taker at Elimination Chamber and then call out for a WM match but get a returning Kane instead. Thats more possible and probably smarter. But a Taker-Henry rematch at WM? Not likely sorry man.

 

[610kr3w]

Id rather see zack ryder than henry. Taker can barely work a match anymore and henry has little more skills than khali in the ring, on paper it sounds terrible and watching that would be an even bigger waste. I think itll be undertaker beating orton or someone for the title, only for daniel bryan to cash in MITB. The streak can then be argued for eternity and it can finally push bryan which they could finally do at that point.

 

[Okininja]

Triple H also faced the Undertaker at Wrestlemania 17 and did it again last year and I didn't hear no one complaining so that argument holds no water

First of all, you used a double negative. But most importantly, people did have problems with Undertaker facing HHH again. I know I did, I loved the match could not have despised the thought of it any more than I did the month leading up to it. I wasn't the only one either. I also know a decent amount of people who were reluctant for an Undertaker vs HBK part II also.

But more to the point Undertaker vs Mark Henry was a horrible match last time it happened. It has also been stated would have the same build as you brought up the cage match as the starting point.

And as many people have said this is either the last or one of the last WrestleMania matches the Undertaker would have left, it makes zero sense what-so-ever to waste it on Mark Henry.

 

["The Instant Classic"]

Taker's next mania match will be against someone smooth in the ring who can carry the match and make him look good. Look for a Jericho, Punk, Orton, Christian, etc. someone they know will keep Taker safe. Plain and simple.

 

[hollowpoint]

I don't know what match that Punk has ever carried, but ok. I don't think Henry v Taker will happen at WM28, nor should it happen. If that scenario is the case where he runs through the SD! roster, he would face UT before WM, maybe EC or on SD! Henry isn't at the point yet where he is a major draw. He's where he should've been years ago, but it's the first time he's been healthy enough to carry a meaningful program with a top talent. Although I don't know who would be a worthy opponent for the Undertaker at WM, I don't think it will be Mark Henry. Maybe Wade Barrett or even Christian.

 

[MrDemonic]

I Agree,I Love Mark Henry hes best as a heel but Taker at WM 28 Needs a new face in my opinion like Jericho or Punk! I would love Austin vs Punk and Jericho vs Taker at WM but Just give taker someone new

 

[Cenation716]

Kane, Triple H & Shawn Michaels have all had their rematches against Undertaker at WrestleMania & were okay in my eyes because all three of them could draw & could wrestle much better than Mark Henry can at this point in his career. The only menI see being worthy of facing the Undertaker in presumably his last match are Chris Jericho, John Cena, CM Punk, Rey Mysterio, Christian & The Miz. But Mark Henry can't draw for a Undertaker-WM match, but the names I listed above can. And let's face it, all of them would lose to Taker, why have Mark Henry face Taker again at WM just to end up losing? it does nothing for Undertaker or Mark Henry.

 

[Common man]

Henry is not Shawn Michael, he can't put a exciting match for second chance. He barely had decent match with him on first one. Im praying please please please please no Henry-Taker 2 please no.

 

[JeffTheRef]

The Undertaker only has a couple WM's left in him. I really don't want another one to be wasted on Mark Henry. If The Undertaker is going to take off most of the year, his 'Mania matches should continue to be memorable.

I just don't see the upside here. The Undertaker will be in a match with a guy that he's already beaten and won't be capable of really furthering his legacy. Mark Henry will get a decent push, but even you have remarked that he's towards the end of his career. It's a lose-lose situation.

 

[Hunted-RKO]

No disrespect but thats a crap Idea.They did it back in 2006 and like u said he wouldn't gain anything from winning or losing,his near the end of his carear and also think about it,This possibly might be Undertakers last WM so he has to go up against a worthy/legendary Wrestler not Mark Henry who was jobbing to mid-carders last year or so.It wont be believable even though he is on a rampage at the moment,anyway the match wouldn't be good itself so no.

 

[Dagger Dias]

I could definitely see this match happening....Undertaker would win of course but I just feel that Mark Henry would put a serious threat on the Undertaker's streak.

How? The only time Henry is ever a threat to anything is during Royal Rumble season when he transforms into A THREAT TO WIN!!!! He is a joke 11 months per year, and he was a joke when he faced Taker at Wrestlemania in 2006.

I know it would make no sense as Mark Henry is approaching the end of his career so he would have nothing to gain.

Then why book the match at all? Sorry dude, but I completely disagree with the idea of Henry facing Taker at Wrestlemania 28. Henry already got his chance a few years back and the match was nothing to write home about. Michaels, Kane, and Trips got rematches and deserved them. Why should Henry be the next to get one? He has done nothing to warrant one. If any of Taker's previous victims deserve a rematch it would be Orton, who has grown tremendously since his Wrestlemania 21 match with Taker in 2005. I would rather see Taker face someone new this year than do another rematch. We have not seen him face Sheamus, Barrett, or even Jericho. All of which would be much better options than a Henry rematch.

 

[Vendetta123]

I don't know, I really don't want to see it again, I hated it the first time. I would much rather have a person whom he hasn't faced for his final match at Wrestlemania

 

[rockyrocky11]

This is going to sound bad because I'm a huge taker fan, but I think it's honestly best (for his legacy not for WWE's bank account) for Taker to retire 19-0. If he comes out and says he's given everything he has and can't wrestle another nobody would blame him. Here's why. When you look at the names he's gone against, and the intense plotlines and feuds (Michaels, HHH, Orton) there is pretty much nothing to gain for the Undertaker. If there is a match there is in the words of mcmahon "no chance in hell" that the Undertaker loses. So the match will be extremely predictable (Undertaker gets 4 finishers and kicks out of all of them, hits a tombstone and wins the match---WM spoiler alert). I don't think Taker wants his last match to be forgetable, and going out from last years match against HHH will allow him to go out with a match that provided great dramatics, slim predictablility (well at least it was somewhat believable that HHH could win), against a great opponent. There is not one person on the roster especially with up and coming guys that could recreate the drama of the last few years with Takers streak.

The only realistic matchup for me is Taker/Miz, but even so Miz already is near the top and the match would be so predicable. If there is a match I just want it to be against someone where you say they might have a 0.0000001% chance of winning. Nobody on the roster currently does that, that Taker hasn't already faced at mania.

 

[#hamler]

This is going to sound bad because I'm a huge taker fan, but I think it's honestly best (for his legacy not for WWE's bank account) for Taker to retire 19-0. If he comes out and says he's given everything he has and can't wrestle another nobody would blame him. Here's why. When you look at the names he's gone against, and the intense plotlines and feuds (Michaels, HHH, Orton) there is pretty much nothing to gain for the Undertaker. If there is a match there is in the words of mcmahon "no chance in hell" that the Undertaker loses. So the match will be extremely predictable (Undertaker gets 4 finishers and kicks out of all of them, hits a tombstone and wins the match---WM spoiler alert). I don't think Taker wants his last match to be forgetable, and going out from last years match against HHH will allow him to go out with a match that provided great dramatics, slim predictablility (well at least it was somewhat believable that HHH could win), against a great opponent. There is not one person on the roster especially with up and coming guys that could recreate the drama of the last few years with Takers streak.

I agree with everything you said. Which is weird because I never really thought about thta until you posted. Undertaker really doesn't have anything to gain from beating someone else who has no chance of winning. Last year's Wrestlemania was a perfect way for The Undertaker to go out. Last year, Undertaker wasn't the non-human, dead guy we've seen over the last couple of years. I think that might play into this year's 'Mania. However, I can't really add to anything you have said. I think most people want to see a nice round number before he retires. But yeah it's pretty much pointless. Great post.

 

[The Perfect Max]

I believe it will be either Alberto Del Rio or The Miz. Either one of them. I could totally believe either of them being a challenge seen as they have rose to fame so quickly and are actually gifted one way or another. It could be Del Rio's destiny to end the streak on the Undertaker's last match. Or, it could the Miz stating he, being the awesome one, could possibly be the only one to break the streak, as he is awesome, and the rest of the back story.

But, because it will be #20, the most likley one, and probably be the one is Triple H #3, #2? I'm sure I have seen them 3 times at WrestleMania, but the WWE say two. . Shame really. If they had pushed and pushed the younger talent, there would be piles and piles of deserving superstars to challenge the Undertaker. Randy Orton did it 3 years after debuting. Why can't The Miz do it 8 years after debuting? Same standard.

 

[kieransuarez7]

I think the only reasonable opponent for him now is Randy Orton Or Cena! But seeing as Cena is occupied i think it should be Orton, they should build him up as sadistic as ever and a genuine threat to the streak! I think Taker should beat him because Orton is over enough that it wont really do anything for his character! Im sure Orton could put on hell of a show with Taker.

I understand people saying it should be up and coming stars like, Barrett, Sheamus, Miz or new stars like Del Rio Or Punk but i think if you had him face these then there would be no element of surprise when Take wins (and he should win). Maybe Punk could look a threat but i think he should win the Title at Mania just to cap off this huge push.

On the other hand, If they are planning on Taker to lose then they should use someone like Miz or Barrett as a way to build them up! but i dont think that will or should happen.

 

[Terry Gyimah]

I would like to see Miz vs. The Undertaker at WrestleMania 28 and here is why:

Taker is undefeated at WrestleMania, and Miz like The Undertaker is also undefeated, so basically it is Streak vs. Streak, and if Miz were to lose this match, Taker would be making him look good, and this match would be the match that further elevates Miz into becoming even more of a star than he already is, and Taker can go to 20-0 but build up Miz to be a serious threat to the Streak and also get into Taker's head but also for Taker to play mind games on The Miz too

 

[rockyrocky11]

I just had this idea...and it would provide a great realistic storyline..that might make us actually believe taker could lose!!!

I'm not a Punk fan at all, but this angle would be awesome. He beats HHH at NOC and they keep feuding Punk saying he's better and what not. Than when the feud has escalated to it's peak, Punk says he will do something HHH failed twice to do. BEAT UNDERTAKER AT MANIA!!

Just an idea but I think it's an awesome one

 

[macho_boy]

if taker leaves without giving up his streak he is a massive fuck tard.. he has the oportunity to put a younger guy MEGA MEGA over.. which is what is best for the company when he leaves!! there is no benefit to the company or the other wrestlers him leaving with the streak!! im prety sure he is to much of a knob cheese to lose it but i really hope he does

 

[nikvoodoo]

I just had this idea...and it would provide a great realistic storyline..that might make us actually believe taker could lose!!!

I'm not a Punk fan at all, but this angle would be awesome. He beats HHH at NOC and they keep feuding Punk saying he's better and what not. Than when the feud has escalated to it's peak, Punk says he will do something HHH failed twice to do. BEAT UNDERTAKER AT MANIA!!

Just an idea but I think it's an awesome one

I don't agree with your "how" it happens, but I like Punk for Undertaker's opponent at WM this year. Punk needs to be focused to be effective (like he currently is) with the audience and having him try to focus on two plots at once I don't think works so well. In order for Punk to be available for 'Taker, he needs to finish this HHH/Nash/VKM/Johnny Ace stuff first. If it's not done by or at Royal Rumble, it's not going to happen and someone else jumps to the front of the line.

At that point it's probably ABR or Miz though I can't see either one of them looking like they'd be an actual threat to the streak. Or even Mark Henry if he stays on the roll he's going on. He could be a legit opponent depending on how he's booked for the rest of the year and leading in to Mania.