Like you said, he isn't established as Orton or Cena, but that doesn't mean he isn't legit. How can someone who has only been around for three months be as established as someone who has been around for eight years?
Not being as established as the two certainly I could agree wouldn't mean he's not legit. However the fact that he haven't even defeated the lesser main event wrestlers is hardly something to make him any legit either is it not? You have to remember legit means you look able to take down your opponent. Does the bit of establishment and the amount of opponents Wade Barrett (As a singles unit) have the list of beating, make him look ANYWHERE near the level of being legit against any of the guys? No it does not.
This week's RAW signified how little legitimacy and ability to hang with Orton these guys have. Orton whooped Cena, Sheamus, Parts of Nexus (Justin and Wade), Edge and Jericho's ass all alone one by one. Hardly something that makes Nexus, or Wade look strong.
Ok. So, why don't they want to take out the other members? If they are such a solid group, why hasn't someone like Slater or Otunga (whom both are bad) been targeted? Why hasn't someone like took out Gabriel or Traver? The focus has been on Wade for a lot longer than the focus on the group.
Because the general saying always have been to either take out the weakest link (Which at that time wasn't visible, now it's eliminated) or to take off the head, which they have failed to do.
Prolly. But he is still a rookie. It is kinda catch 22. On one hand, this is the first time a long time a rookie has gotten such a main event push in his first few months. But he doesn't have the match record. However, I would much rather the way Wade has been pushed simply because it has WORKED much better than the generic "possibly cut a promo and win a match" every week.
Hardly enough to make him come off as a legitimate guy if he wasn't a rookie. Again, Brock Lesnar was also a rookie but booked properly he looked like a beast. If Wade Barrett debuted and kicked everybody's ass from the left side of the roster, all the way over to the right side of the Smackdown roster, then he would look legit (Okay he probably would look legit a little bit half-way through had he beaten up some main eventers on the way).
But, Wade has not done this, and therefore isn't legit against any of the main event wrestlers.
The fans boo this guy. The fans cheer when someone does something to him. That isn't being established?
Established as a heel, barely established as a legitimate threat.
He doesn't. Trust the Barrett Mark.
haha
I wouldn't play that card. I'm a Wade Barrett mark as well mind you. Sheamus however still gets an equal, or better reaction.
I guess you missed the Edge promo before him and Wade had the match. Or the commentary last week when Cena, Sheamus and Edge kept going on about Wade. Wade is getting established as a singles star because the top guys are saying so.
I saw those. And I saw that John Cena and Edge put Wade over, but he still lost. He has lost in singles competition against anyone of the main event wrestlers he has faced. Still not legit.
I would say he established why he is so much better than the rest of the Nexus guys and WHY he is the leader.
Because of something he accomplished
before The Nexus. Did you even read what you quoted right there? I said that any of the establishment and legitimacy that Wade has, have not been achieved when he was a part of Nexus.
Again, he is a rookie. He wrestles as such (though it could be his skill level). Since Jericho isn't an main eventer to you, look at the Edge and Orton match. Wade proved that he is one tough SOB because outside of the finisher of Edge or Orton, Wade took all their offense in the match. Wade won the Edge match when Edge ran like he was running from the cops. The Orton vs Barrett match was won because The Missing Link showed up.
I looked at those matches. And I also saw how he was on the verge of loosing to Edge when Nexus came and fucked up the match, also how he lost to Randy Orton. Hardly something to come off legitimate.
Also, stop pulling the rookie card. I already addressed that with Brock Lesnar.
Heels have always had flying monkeys.
Wrong again. Edge haven't had a minion for a long time, Triple H have been a heel single on his own, Batista have been a heel on his own. A lot of heels have been heels on their own and thrived.
Wade lead the charge against Cena. And he has managed to keep his heat for over three months. I really don't see how you can discount someone in a feud just because of in ring accomplishments and not actual booking. Cena smooshed The Miz last year because Cena treated him like a joke. Has Wade been booked like some ass-clown? Cena has treated the goons like jokes (as evident in that promo on Raw right after Summerslam), but Cena has never discredited Wade as a threat.
I discount it because Wade would be in deep deep waters if he had to be in a singles match with John Cena without interference or anything. At this point of Wade's career, without pulling any rookie card, but purely because he have defeated pretty much nobody worthwhile, John Cena would fuck Wade up pretty badly.
That's all who really matter to the WWE.
Hardly. WWE cares about ratings, so the hardcore constant viewers matter more. They bring in the ratings constantly, rather than a guy who views casually cause there's nothing else on TV that night.
So, you want Nexus to rip through the roster?
They already did that from a faction perspective. I want Wade to rip through the roster if he is to be believable in a match against Cena, Orton, Sheamus, Edge or Triple H.
Oh. That was a horrible Raw for Nexus. Bad promos, all the guys looked lost in what they did, and all of them looked like jobbers. But I guess that was the point: To emphasize the importance of Wade.
Wade is barely needed to come off as a strong faction who can kick someones ass. They were 4 on 6 at that point, and managed to kick their ass back and forth without Wade.
You're the one slamming Wade for lack of legitmacy. But the point I was trying to make was if someone new has been that damn good, why discredit the work just because he is new?
Legitimacy from a kayfabe perspective. That's why I slam Wade for lack og legitimacy.
I discredit the work because I know he has zero ability from a kayfabe standpoint to beat the bigger guys, because guess what? He's new, and he still haven't proven that he is "that damn good".
Sheamus wasn't doing shit until his title reign (noticeably his second one). Wade carries himself as a big deal. When he speaks he sounds like a big deal. If you didn't know Wade was on NXT and just showed up with a bunch of unknown guys (whom still had the stigma of being unknown to the general crowd like Wade) and did the exact same thing as the Nexus angle give or take a promo line or name, do you think that would make any difference?
Sheamus were actually doing something yeah. He was beating people up single handedly in ECW, as well as he kicked a few mid-carders ass before he defeated 9 others (I believe it was 9? Or was it a 20 man battle royal?) to win his championship contendership. Where he then threw Cena through a few tables every now and then, he certainly looked legit as a single unit.
Not really. The problem with TNA or a lot of people is that they don't understand what goes into putting someone over. Having someone just mow over people every week doesn't have the same effect as giving the guy promo time and a chance for the crowd to see some differences in the booking to the character.
Actually it helps getting over if you kick someones ass all the time and does it well. Brock Lesnar weren't great on the microphone, so he got a mouth piece, and did his ass kicking in the ring by himself, every week. He is the example of getting over without microphone skills, and Brock was believed to be the next big deal of WWE, where he got hugely over through his ass kicking.
You can cut as many promos as you want, eventually people if you're good, will like your promos. However, you still need to kick someones ass properly to be believable. We love CM Punk, but do you believe in his ability to defeat any of the main event wrestlers after having his ass handed to him by Big Show and Rey Mysterio the last half years time? I certainly don't. This is the same example with Wade.
If you look at Wade's progression:
- Wade was the next Raw superstar in week one and no one knew WHY Nexus did the attack.
- Wade was unofficially announced as the leader of Nexus simply because he was the only one to have an official contract.
- Wade proclaimed that there was a higher purpose.
- Wade wasn't there and Nexus just flat out wasn't the same (and it wasn't just because Wade wasn't literally there either)
- Wade was the one who represented Nexus against Cena
- Wade has the first singles match for Nexus against Mark Henry to prove Nexus is just as strong as individuals.
- Wade finished off that job-fest.
- Wade was specifically called out by Edge and had a match.
- Wade lead the attack in various ass kickings.
- Wade's arrogance and inexperience cost Nexus the SSlam match.
- Wade made the decree that the Nexus members either win or they are out and won the first match to prove his leadership.
- Wade cashed in his title shot.
- Wade lost his match because of Darren Young.
Oh yeah, thank you very much Sarcy. You've opened my eyes, I can now truly see that.. No wait, he's still not legitimate.
Why would him winning matches week in and week out would be any more effective? That doesn't work for the mid-carders and it damn as sure doesn't work for the Divas.
Because he's be damn well legitimate and he already gets promo time. We know he's over as a heel and all that shit, but he's absolutely NOT legitimate to the point where it's believable if he kicks John Cena's ass back and forth in no matter what match. He actually has to accomplish that to become legitimate first of all!
When has Wade ever been booked like a jobber? He has only been around for three months and only got pinned and tapped out once.. But Cena and Orton are easily the top guys on Raw.
I stated why winning and loosing matters. A jobber is never gonna be considered legitimate, unless he starts winning. Therefore winning and loosing matters.
Still not getting it. Jericho may not have the best win-lose record, but Jericho is still a pretty damn big deal on Raw. You mention him being upper-mid card, but is there really such a thing on Raw?
Hardly. Chris Jericho might be someone to beat from one perspective. However from the perspective that Jericho has actually a history of beating people consistently, and the fact that he would be regarded as a numerous times world champion with actual long reigns, then he would be a big deal. Triple H, John Cena, Randy Orton, Edge, Sheamus, Undertaker, Rey Mysterio (Because the fucker overcomes odds) and Big Show are legitimate big deals to defeat. Chris is not.
It was Wade's first match on Raw against a guy billed as "The World's Strongest Man". Mark Henry is a big bad mofo and the announcers and his booking really makes him seem like a big deal. The only way he has lost this year has been against main event talent, "management is really behind this guy" talent, and tag matches in which his partner gets the finish. Wade and Henry f'up in the finish of the match, but the WWE put it over as a big deal that Wade in his first official Raw as a Raw superstar.
Also, Mark Henry is the guy that has a longer history of having lost to pretty much anybody on the roster. He is the guy that has only held one championship in his 14 years with WWE. Hardly a big deal no.
Mark is only put over by the announcers as a big deal, and the majority of times someone actually defeats him, unless it's because he's a part of a feud and a part of the less believable team (Jeri-show vs MVP & Mark Henry where Mark bodyslammed Show, and pinned Jericho)