Name me one better, please...
John Cena. Done and done.
You are damn sure it is, if made Dolph Ziggler cut that promo people would be quiet, not booing and cheering, like they do with CM Punk....
Because Dolph Ziggler is not a smark favorite. But if Triple H had cut the same promo, then MORE people would have been into it. Or if HBK had, or if Steve Austin had. Hell, Steve Austin DID.
I know you are the boss here, but man in your standards Evan Bourne was better than CM Punk cutting a promo
No, he's not. I never said or even hinted at that.
But trying to say not being able to distinguish good/bad makes a good promo is silly.
Using personal attacks to justify your argument already proves you lost
No, it just proves you're not very smart. But you did a wise thing in not continuing to argue with me.
Are you really going to tell me that Punk wouldn't have gotten those pops elsewhere?
I'm telling you had that show been in Portland, Oregon, Cena would have popped Punk out of the building.
Your point was the Cena got outdone in Boston, which I said was hardly surprising given the fact Boston is a smark audience, just like New York, Chicago and a couple other locations.
But wait, aren't you always telling people that the ''smarky audience'' is but a small minority of wrestling fans, live crowds or otherwise? Because it sure did seem to me like if they were cheering Punk because they were a ''smarky crowd'' then the entire fucking crowd were smarks. Weird how the smarks are a minority until someone wants them to be a majority. Their numbers sure do fluxuate
It's amazing how people don't see "the big picture".
First of all, I highly doubt "the majority" of the audience chose Punk over Cena. More likely, it was the vocal males who were close to the ring. If you watched, everytime Cena came out and they panned to a wide view, Cena got a great reaction and a very good pop.
But what you're trying to say is that those vocal fans close to the ring within earshot of the mic who chose Punk over Cena prove Punk was better than Cena. And my point is that's just a silly way to look at it, and I gave ONS as the example.
This isn't hard to understand.