Oh man, this thread really paints a bad picture of male mentality and sheer unbelievable naivete. I'm not going to even address the troll, such immense and numerous stupidity isn't worth arguing with. I'm actually just assuming he's here to cause trouble and nothing else.
OK, I'll address this main "theory" about how women who dress provocatively are asking to be raped.
How women dress is irrelevant. A century ago, the same argument and excuse was the accepted opinion of men, the difference being that women were covered up and even something as simple as "flashing a bit of shin" was deemed innappropriate and asking for trouble. It doesn't matter how much women cover up, this BULLSHIT excuse continues to be churned out by men of weak morals. I mean, Christ, this is an excuse that's common in the middle east where women look like this.
How women dress is totally fucking irrelevant because men are going to do whatever the hell they want regardless. Anyone who thinks otherwise is in denial.
I mean, how fucked in the head do you have to be to think that just because a woman is out on the town looking for a hookup, it means all her rights to choose are gone. You don't go into a fucking sweet shop and, just because the sweets are advertised, go ahead and steal them because "Hey, if you didn't want me to take them, you shouldn't put them on view" What kind of ****** thinks like that? Oh yeah
Let's switch sexuality around a little shall we. I'm going to try and get into the minds of any guy who even dares to argue this.
Let's say there's a guy, he's out with his friends, tarted up, looking for a woman, except this time it's a gay guy who decides that he's seen what he wants and won't take no for an answer.
Anyone here thinking the guy is asking for it? I mean he's out looking to get laid, so why should he have a choice in whom by. It's exactly the same fucking situation.