Vote To Legalize Marijuana

Fucking hell. Is this still happening?

Also, the American penal system (as Rayne pointed out), does not exclude foreigners on American soil, breaking federal laws.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whatever you say doesn't make Marc Emery wrong.


Why can all you fuck heads edit your post but I can't?

Well maybe in this case that typo was OK by adding an extra not, since Marc Emery never did anything wrong.
 
If there is one person in the world who wouldn't understand the point of Prison, it'd be Todd. Boy-child, I'd be happy to engage you about Marc Emery on a neutral court, but since you're only interested in playing ball if you also get to be the referee, I'm just going to continue mocking you.

We can edit our posts because we are people who understand how to get along in a society, whereas you are not, and have lost many of your posting privileges on this board.
 
Only a blind programmed machine wouldn't understand that Marc Emery never did anything wrong. I understand prison completely. Prison is for criminals, you know like murders,robbers,child molesters,animal abusers,rapist, not good hearted innocent people like Marc Emery. Why is it that child molesters get less time than a man who only sold seeds.

Your only going to mock me because you know you can't say anything to prove me wrong. You only want to debate me if money is on the line.


Is getting along in society in your mind bashing people who speak the truth. Is getting along in society not caring how innocent people and animals are killed because of marijuana being illegal? People like Chris Williams who were taken away from his family left to die in prison only because he was providing medicine for terminally ill and disabled patients. I guess if I want to get along in society I just have to go along with the flow and say this man belongs in prison like all you blind brainwashed programmed machines say. Why should I loose my privileges because I have a different point of view?

Why should I lose my privileges when everything I said about the cannabis plant is true? At least I can show sources to back me up(AndThatsTheBottomLine I'm still waiting for you to send me those unbiased links that proves every web site I posted). Can any one give me a non bull shit reason to why I lost my privileges? I know one will be able to give me a good reason why is it right that Marc Emery is in prison.
Our government needs to stop locking people up and killing them over a harmless plant.
 
I want to debate you in a format in which you can't simply declare yourself right. Again, the only games you want to play seem to be the ones where you can also be the person who decides who wins and loses. Understanding that you have no hope of winning any contest besides "call yourself a winner", you have scrambled and backpedaled to avoid a confrontation in any situation where you cannot do that.

The money was a gesture that I am willing to put something real behind the weight of my arguments, although I have also offered to debate you for honor. Seeing as you have no honor to wager, you have refused this as well.

Once again, I reiterate my offer to debate you on debate.org, a website which provides a forum for two people to debate an argument before a group of judges unknown to either party, using a set of rules mutual to each party. We can either do it as a matter of honor or money; I shall even let you choose the stakes. I have no interest in further engaging in what you consider 'debate' on these boards, because you insist upon using a separate set of rules for yourself and your adversaries.

As far as the rest, you're finding out the hard way that how you express your opinion is usually more important than the opinion you hold. We just think you're an idiot for the opinions you hold; what makes you an idiotic ass is the way you choose to express them to people.
 
I see you reading this thread. I am eagerly anticipating your next "I would, but I won't" excuse. Tell us all about how you only have the time to keep coming back here to argue!
 
This has nothing to with winning or losing. I don't make up any rules, if any thing the people who run this forum make up stupid rules and excuses to help benefit themselves. I don't need to debate you on no stupid web site. It takes a person with a brain to realize all the wrong that has been caused since marijuana has been illegal. You can't say that more harm would be caused if marijuana were legal. When it comes to all the benefits of marijuana I'm right. The fact that you can show me nothing to prove me wrong. Can you show me all the cancer patients who got cancer because the only smoked marijuana? You can't because there is none. The only people who look stupid is everyone here who tries to put me down for speaking the truth. Your opinion really means nothing to me since more people want to see marijuana legal and no how fucked it is what our government does to people for posseing it. When marijuana is legal you will be the ones who look stupid. Even though you already look stupid right now.

What are you going to say next?
 
I'm going to say that you're very obviously avoiding any kind of debate where you can't call yourself "right" and think that ends it.

Again, you can "prove" me wrong and accept my challenge, but the whole point of my making it was to demonstrate that you're a coward without the confidence that you can defend your beliefs in a neutral environment. (Yes, I know you don't think that. Cowards never do. You don't even have the courage to admit you're a coward, which would be the first step in no longer being a coward.) I never thought you'd actually accept it.

Challenge is still on the table should you ever find your balls, but I have no interest in debating you in any environment where you appoint yourself the judge of facts and logic.
 
Whether a law is morally wrong or not means nothing. He broke the law, and therefore he shall suffer the consequences. True, many of us break the law daily by pirating Movies, Music, and other stuff from the internet without proper consent. But at the same time, I'm sure many of us here would be willing to pay the consequences should such thing occur.

I feel bad for that Marc guy, I do. I've had far more than my fair share of marijuana encounters and can atest that it's not bad for anybody in anyway. If anything it helps more often than it doesn't. That being the case, it still is illegal and people still must abide by laws. So unless he lived in one of the "Weed is legal" states or has a medical prescription, he's breaking the law and that's all there is to it.
 
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/07/10/bc-emery-prison-mrsa.html



This is why marijuana needs to be legal. This is what happens to good hearted innocent people who get put into prison for marijuana. This isn't even an American citizen, so he has no reason to be in an American prison. Lets just hope that Marc will be able to fight this infection. It's sad this is how we treat people for doing nothing wrong.

By this logic Randy Blythe of Lamb Of God shouldn't have been held in a Prague jail where he was accused of manslaughter. He isn't a citizen of the country so he shouldn't have been held in the country that he is accused of committing the crime in.

Do you realize how stupid that sounds?
 
I wonder if Todd knows that the only reason this thread still attracts people is because he's basically a zoo animal, and if you throw peanuts (in the form of things that only the stupidest stoners care about) at him, he'll do a little dance to entertain you.
 
You can't compare manslaughter to selling seeds. He committed that while in Prague, Marc Emery was not even in America during the time, he was extradited. Also you can't compare someone who is in a terrible garbage shitty band to a person like Marc Emery.Both are two completely different things.

By saying the law is the law excuse makes you sound like a puppet. What about how child molesters get less time than Marc Emery it makes no sense at all. These fucked up laws make no sense they do no good but only harm. You know America is really fucked up when Marc Emery is labeled one of the most dangerous men in the world.

Why is alcohol commercialized and their seems to be a liquor store on every block, when it is one of the most deadliest addictions in the world? Why don't we arrest tobacco companies for the death of over 450,000 people every year? What about the corporations and big banks and how they are robbing the country? When people who have a harmless plant like marijuana or people who provide it to sick people get locked up in prison, some of those innocent people we even die while in prison. Instead Marc Emery is the guy they go after. While he war on marijuana continues to be one of the world's biggest failures. People are getting locked up because of a plant that can save the world.
 
Then why don't you do that by debunking everything I said.

Since AndThatsTheBottomLine is not going to do it because he pretends that I called his future wife a ****e, maybe you can post un biased links that prove every web site I posted wrong. If you want to have the last thing to say at least make it stand out
 
You can't compare manslaughter to selling seeds. He committed that while in Prague, Marc Emery was not even in America during the time, he was extradited. Also you can't compare someone who is in a terrible garbage shitty band to a person like Marc Emery.Both are two completely different things.

By saying the law is the law excuse makes you sound like a puppet. What about how child molesters get less time than Marc Emery it makes no sense at all. These fucked up laws make no sense they do no good but only harm. You know America is really fucked up when Marc Emery is labeled one of the most dangerous men in the world.

Why is alcohol commercialized and their seems to be a liquor store on every block, when it is one of the most deadliest addictions in the world? Why don't we arrest tobacco companies for the death of over 450,000 people every year? What about the corporations and big banks and how they are robbing the country? When people who have a harmless plant like marijuana or people who provide it to sick people get locked up in prison, some of those innocent people we even die while in prison. Instead Marc Emery is the guy they go after. While he war on marijuana continues to be one of the world's biggest failures. People are getting locked up because of a plant that can save the world.

I'm comparing breaking the law to breaking the law.
In the case of Randy Blythe they waited two years and until he returned to the country to arrest him. If he hadn't returned to the country he may have never been arrested. How exactly is that fair?
Just because you don't like the band doesn't mean the person is bad or worse than your drug hero who actually submitted a guilty plea. He was extradited because he was "selling seeds" to people in America. Therefore he was breaking American law. He is being punished for that.
 
Then why don't you do that by debunking everything I said.

Since AndThatsTheBottomLine is not going to do it because he pretends that I called his future wife a ****e, maybe you can post un biased links that prove every web site I posted wrong. If you want to have the last thing to say at least make it stand out
I've offered to do it several times, but you keep coming up with new reasons why you can't. Including not having enough time, and, yet, here you are.
 
Police Penis Sucking Goat Fucker said:
Then why don't you do that by debunking everything I said.

Since AndThatsTheBottomLine is not going to do it because he pretends that I called his future wife a ****e, maybe you can post un biased links that prove every web site I posted wrong. If you want to have the last thing to say at least make it stand out

That's got nothing to do with it. You refuse to acknowledge anything that proves you wrong so why should I waste my time?



Posted from Wrestlezone.com App for Android
 
Ooooh, now there's a thought. Goat Fucker vs. Bottom Line, with neutral judges. Todd would probably use the ineffective moral high ground argument in that, but I can see Bottom Line being distracted enough to attack where Todd tries to direct him, and losing the battle for himself by legitimizing his opponent.

What about it, you two? I can make the arrangements on debate.org, but out of fairness will have no part in the judging.

Todd obviously doesn't want me with neutral judges. I don't even really want to debate him with neutral judges, because I am not a murderer, and that is all that would occur. It would be a slaughter against a drastically over-matched opponent who would remain unaware of what game he had been playing until years after the fact. The offer, of course, remains on the table, but the point was never for him to take it.

How about it, Todd? Are you willing to debate someone else with neutral judges? Is there any scenario in which you would entrust the ability to call something a "fact" and "proof" to any other person? One who could actually serve in that capacity, not a hypothetical someone who deliberately can't be found. I'm doing everything I can to provide you a fair opportunity to debate on neutral ground, and you don't like my ideas; perhaps YOU have an idea on which you'd agree to give up control of calling things "facts" and "proof" to a trusted, neutral third party.
 
Rayne, you are a devoted, devoted individual. It's fun to watch Sly pick people apart, but I think even Sly would've given up a long time ago.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,824
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top