Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Just so everyone knows, Older does not necessarily mean better.
M'kay?
Super Mario Galaxy 2 is probably better than Super Mario 64.
No, it just means that it can actually be judged on concepts such as legacy and influence. You know, actual arguments as opposed to "This is awesome, I love this game cos it's really good"
If a contemporary game can be shown to be original, revolutionary or genre transcending then it will get all the credit that is owed to it. I'll be pushing Demon's Souls as hard as anything this tournament. However if it is simply another version of something that was developed a decade ago then it does not deserve consideration over something that has achieved historical significance lasting almost thirty years. Similarly, no contemporary game even warrants consideration if an earlier title surpasses it. One of many reasons that FFX shouldn't be voted for.
We'll just have to see if this is the case, won't we?
As for Gears of War... much as I hate it, the original does deserve some credit for popularizing (not as good as pioneering, but still worth of praise) elements of the third person shooter. That being said, we will not be talking about Gears of War in the same way people talk about Tetris. For one, Gears of War is and has always been a past-time aimed exclusively at lowbrow males with small penises, and come the future I doubt many older people are going to want to admit enjoying it long enough to promote it. Secondly it won't be mentioned in the same breath as Tetris for the very simple reason that that's stupid. Tetris has managed to survive unchanged as a staple of the gaming industry for almost thirty years, Gears of War lost all of it's relevance in just under two years, after-which it had been almost universally cast aside in favor of new entries into the genre. The idea that in 2040 people are going to look back on it as anything more than a footnote on the development of the 3PS is laughable.
To be fair, there are alot more games being released on a more frequent timeline now than there was when Tetris was released.
I really have never even heard of Elite prior to it being brought up here. However, I would vote for it in a heartbeat over the overrated pile of shit that is the Halo series. I won't, however, vote it over Mario 64, Ocarina of Time, Super Mario Bros, Portal/Orange Box, or Tetris (the games I am backing in this).they are not going vote Elite over Halo 3 regardless of how strong the argument is.
I dislike you.... just kidding, I don't have anything against you, I just disagree with your opinion. I love Portal, and it was one of the best games to be released in the past 5 years or so (if you include the entirety of the Orange Box as 1 game, then it ranks even better).I dislike Portal.
Are you saying there were no platformers made ever since 1996? Because I would strongly disagree. It may not be an over-saturated genre like Shooters or something, but there is competition.In fairness, the Mario franchise has pretty much had the entire genre to itself since 64. Every main Mario release has easily surpassed Mario 64, and aside from the Mario games, what else in there?
1. It was a 3-d shooter-puzzle-platform game (which to my knowledge had never been done before). Not just a puzzle game.What was so good about it though? It was just a puzzle game. There were around four challenging levels in the game, and it took a few hours to beat the main game. The ending song was the best part of the entire game.
I wouldn't know. I haven't been able to play it yet. Being poor sucks ass. Haven't played that, Mortal Kombat, or any new games (excluding Super Street Fighter IV 3D which was a birthday present).They got it right with Portal 2. So much better than the first.
I never got time to submit my list. Damn.
In fairness, the Mario franchise has pretty much had the entire genre to itself since 64. Every main Mario release has easily surpassed Mario 64, and aside from the Mario games, what else in there?
Because it's a really, really good game.
We will see, and exactly what we will see is Gelgarin getting increasingly frustrated by his superior arguments being overlooked in favor of people voting for games they've actually played. *****.
I'm not fooling myself into thinking that I will win any of these arguments. If this forum wouldn't vote Lou Thesz over Big Van Vader then they are not going vote Elite over Halo 3 regardless of how strong the argument is.
Now for the record, nobody here has the mindset of "Older = Better", with the possible exception of myself, and even then that's only when my posts are filtered through a veil of incomprehension. My stance is that an inventive and original title that pioneered or redefined a genre is superior to an unoriginal, completely derivative contemporary remake, for much the same reason that Citizen Kane is superior to 2 Fast 2 Furious.
If you stood up in a film debate and started lauding the merits of 2 Fast 2 Furious or The Expendables over titles such as Gone with the Wind or Blade Runner then you would be correctly branded a whole host of impolite names. I fail to see why things should be different in a video games tournament just because it is a less cultured medium. On the whole classics achieve classic status for a reason.
You can present the argument that games have to be judged in the context of their time frame, which is fair enough. Then again, games also have to be judged in the context of their technology, and given that the Xbox360 is approximately 30,000 times more powerful than the ZX Spectrum it serves as a pretty hefty bitch-slap to the more modern titles.
As for Gears of War... much as I hate it, the original does deserve some credit for popularizing (not as good as pioneering, but still worth of praise) elements of the third person shooter. That being said, we will not be talking about Gears of War in the same way people talk about Tetris. For one, Gears of War is and has always been a past-time aimed exclusively at lowbrow males with small penises, and come the future I doubt many older people are going to want to admit enjoying it long enough to promote it. Secondly it won't be mentioned in the same breath as Tetris for the very simple reason that that's stupid. Tetris has managed to survive unchanged as a staple of the gaming industry for almost thirty years, Gears of War lost all of it's relevance in just under two years, after-which it had been almost universally cast aside in favor of new entries into the genre. The idea that in 2040 people are going to look back on it as anything more than a footnote on the development of the 3PS is laughable.