Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Well, Taz does know what it's like to have a messed up neck.
inb4willtazjointhefightagainstimmortalquestions
EDIT: Too late.
I think the whole no wrestling thing is supposed to convey the unprepared nature of the show on account of all the shit that's going down. It actually works pretty effectively (as an idea. TNA's history of limited in ring action hurts the premise somewhat) but I can't say I like it.
Sometimes I forget the audience I'm addressing and don't remember to dumb down what I say for a lowest common denominator. My bad. What I did was respond with the same non-response as you did, attacking a generic stereotype instead of what someone's actually saying. They call that a 'strawman' in big-word land.And no I don't see what you did there. Pushing the big word boat out into waters too deep.
You quoted me how many times in that post, and the one time you don't quote me is for your claim that I said something specific? Riiiiiight.Except where you did.
Is the phrase "if all you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail?" That's the one I'm thinking of. It sure makes things simpler when you're arguing on the internet to attack a generic stereotype instead of having to worry about what someone's actually saying.Something about looking and barking like a dog comes to mind. Can't bring the prescise phrase up right now, but I'm sure you can fill in the blanks.
As a company that still has illusions of growing, I thought they were trying to attract new fans? You don't seem to get that I want to like TNA, but what they are offering me, I don't find compelling. I'm far from the only person who feels that way, but anyone who expresses displeasure with anything TNA does is automatically an "internet drone". Again, it's much easier to argue against some strawman than it is to argue against someone's opinions.The people who actually like TNA seem to be enjoying it. The people I see here week on week are having a very good time. And going to go ahead and push the idea that just maybe we are TNA's target audiance and you are not. That doesn't make TNA "shit wrestling".
And what reports are those? The one pulled from in between Left Cheek and Right Cheek? All reports indicate that TNA is going out of business next week. Someone posted it on the internet on a message board, it *must* be true.Well no, because that's simplistic rubish. But you agree with me on that so I won't push it. WWE is many, many times more successful than TNA and is also good wrestling. Bad wrestling is the crap that people don't want. TNA has a major audiance which is retains week on week. All the reports indicate that it runs at a profit (which given it's status as a tax sink is pretty good going).
You are doing the same exact thing right now, except you liked the segment in question. This is Live Discussion, right? Not the Live Mark-out forum?No, you're confusing me with you. I could give a shit whether and not anyone likes TNA. What I don't like is the peopole who are so full of themselves that they like to pretend that their personal oppinions reprosent some kind of baromiter of inherent quality. It doesn't.
This I will say is wrong. If you tell people that something is good enough times, there's a healthy bottom percentage who will believe it. That's Marketing 101 right there; if you don't believe me, it's election season. The candidate who spends more on advertising wins, more often than not.Enough advertising (which TNA didn''t have in the early days) can get an audiance, but it could never keep it. Quality TV does that.