Tiger Chaos Theory
You ain't drawin' shit!
Just made Pope look like a fucking star.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Sometimes I forget the audience I'm addressing and don't remember to dumb down what I say for a lowest common denominator. My bad. What I did was respond with the same non-response as you did, attacking a generic stereotype instead of what someone's actually saying. They call that a 'strawman' in big-word land.
You quoted me how many times in that post, and the one time you don't quote me is for your claim that I said something specific? Riiiiiight.
Is the phrase "if all you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail?" That's the one I'm thinking of. It sure makes things simpler when you're arguing on the internet to attack a generic stereotype instead of having to worry about what someone's actually saying.
As a company that still has illusions of growing, I thought they were trying to attract new fans? You don't seem to get that I want to like TNA, but what they are offering me, I don't find compelling. I'm far from the only person who feels that way, but anyone who expresses displeasure with anything TNA does is automatically an "internet drone". Again, it's much easier to argue against some strawman than it is to argue against someone's opinions.
And what reports are those? The one pulled from in between Left Cheek and Right Cheek? All reports indicate that TNA is going out of business next week. Someone posted it on the internet on a message board, it *must* be true.
You are doing the same exact thing right now, except you liked the segment in question. This is Live Discussion, right? Not the Live Mark-out forum?
[/QUOTE]This I will say is wrong. If you tell people that something is good enough times, there's a healthy bottom percentage who will believe it. That's Marketing 101 right there; if you don't believe me, it's election season. The candidate who spends more on advertising wins, more often than not.
So why is everyone heel? I feel like there are toooooo many.
To make it seem hopeless, where they always win. Until someone finally has enough and comes back to even the odds (namely Sting, Nash, and Angle)
Like in WCW when Sting came back to finally take down Hogan at Starrcade 1997. How did that turn out? I sure hope this isn't how it goes, but those who do not learn from history................
A common theme I'm noticing here so far:
TNA fans/marks are talking about how everything is symbolic and all these deeper meanings to things and how this builds up drama and all that jazz.
The critics here are saying things that are on the surface: things look bad and there is practically no wrestling.
Sums up TNA in a nutshell: if you're not a huge fan, you're likely not going to like the show. Either all in or nothing at all.
A common theme I'm noticing here so far:
TNA fans/marks are talking about how everything is symbolic and all these deeper meanings to things and how this builds up drama and all that jazz.
The critics here are saying things that are on the surface: things look bad and there is practically no wrestling.
Sums up TNA in a nutshell: if you're not a huge fan, you're likely not going to like the show. Either all in or nothing at all.
A common theme I'm noticing here so far:
TNA fans/marks are talking about how everything is symbolic and all these deeper meanings to things and how this builds up drama and all that jazz.
The critics here are saying things that are on the surface: things look bad and there is practically no wrestling.
Sums up TNA in a nutshell: if you're not a huge fan, you're likely not going to like the show. Either all in or nothing at all.
The thing is though, even if all this is "symbolic", when are we going to get definite answers?
Probably never.
Hasn't this entire show been answers?